「dispatch」の検索結果

Use when hunting CI/CD bot comment command vulnerabilities where issue_comment or pull_request_review_comment triggers invoke privileged workflows without verifying the commenter's identity or authorization. Trigger on: "bot command injection", "issue_comment trigger", "@github-actions", "slash command CI", "CI bot command", "comment triggered workflow", "unauthenticated bot", "github-actions publish", "comment dispatch", no authorization check on workflow_dispatch from comment, chatops CI/CD, supply chain via PR comment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Defeats control-flow-flattening obfuscation by identifying the dispatcher/state- variable structure and reconstructing the original control flow so the logic becomes readable. Activates for requests to defeat control-flow flattening, deobfuscate an OLLVM-flattened function, or recover original control flow from a dispatcher loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Dispatcher — assigning a new job to the best available driver/technician in real time, managing an ETA slip and deciding who to notify, triaging a coverage gap in a service territory, sequencing a driver's remaining stops after a delay, or deciding whether a job needs to be reassigned versus the customer rescheduled.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an airline pilot — checking whether an ETOPS diversion-time rating still holds against a current MEL downgrade, deciding whether to accept or query a dispatch release, applying sterile-cockpit discipline and Pilot Flying/Pilot Monitoring role separation on a two-pilot flight deck, resolving a captain-dispatcher operational-control disagreement, or checking Part 117 flight-duty-period legality against an irregular-operations delay.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dispatch to the right problem-solving technique based on how you're stuck

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run work as an explicit event-driven state machine executed by subagents. The orchestrator is the runtime from the canonical loop — `state, effects = init(machine); execute(effects); while state is active: event = nextEvent(); state, effects = transition(machine, state, event); execute(effects); return state.output`. All routing judgment is authored ONCE, at plan time, into a machine file (states, event alphabet, transition table, budgets, final states); at runtime the orchestrator does pure table lookups and dispatches effects — it never decides, never authors, never ingests artifacts. Subagent/sync protocol is the timeboxed-iterating one: role prompts scaffolded once to disk and dispatched BY PATH, an initialiser preamble every subagent reads first, a self-populating cheatsheet, per-unit files, tiny structured returns, independent measurement gate. Use when the user says "workmachine", "run this as a state machine", "state-machine this", or when a goal has a small number of clearly named phases with explicit outcomes (built / passed / failed / blocked) and you want the routing to be auditable rather than judged on the fly. For clock-driven loops use timeboxed-iterating; for wide graphs with judged edge criteria use workgraph.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a 911 dispatch or emergency response system for operational reliability and compliance. Triggers: building or reviewing CAD systems, PSAP software, dispatch platforms, or emergency operations center tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cycle de coordination ai-01 (coordinateur UNIQUEMENT — jamais sur un worker). Lit memoire + dashboards + inbox + GitHub, merge les PRs pretes, tranche les design-gates, dispatche des grains par lane, reporte. Arguments: [--dispatch] [--focus <topic>]

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Judge board subskill for simmer. Dispatches a panel of judges with different lenses, runs one deliberation round where they challenge each other's scores, then synthesizes consensus scores + single ASI. Drop-in replacement for simmer-judge that produces identical output format. Do not invoke directly — dispatched by the simmer orchestrator when JUDGE_MODE is board.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an org-team workflow — a flat pod of up to four peer Claude Code sessions claims lane-tagged slices of an approved spec over the baseline MCP channel and implements them concurrently, each in its own git worktree. Each peer DECIDES its own in-lane implementation choices in its own main context (Article X); only un-decidable or cross-lane forks escalate peer→lead→human (yield_fork for task-bound forks, ask_lead for free-form queries). Opt-in and OFF by default (velocity.org_mode.enabled). Graduates the retired sprint-dispatch prototype into the constitutionally-sanctioned org-team model (Article X — Multi-session coordinated workflows). Requires git.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a plan phase into a PhaseSpec v1 and dispatches it to a specialist subagent via the Agent tool. Subagent reads files itself, returns a structured result, the result is logged into progress.md. Markdown is the shared state; no in-memory shared store across agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use multiple Claude agents to investigate and fix independent problems concurrently

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when facing 2+ independent tasks — "in parallel", "independent tasks", "multiple unrelated failures", "different test files or subsystems" — that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies. Dispatch one agent per independent slice, each with only the context it needs, even when the user did not ask for subagents explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when acting as the orchestrator agent that drives Syntropic137 - running the dogfood loop, deciding what to dispatch next, landing agent PRs, deploying a beta, triaging failed executions, or keeping the scratchpad, paper cuts and retrospectives current. Trigger phrases include "orchestrator tick", "keep the loop running", "what should we dispatch next", "land these PRs", "why are PRs stacking up", "deploy the next beta", "pit stop", "the run failed, what now", "write the retro", "is the system helping", "scale quality", "learning loop for the orchestrator". Do NOT use for deciding whether one task belongs in a workspace or locally (see `dogfooding`), for turning one incident into an eval case (see `learning-loop`), for designing a workflow A/B experiment (see `workflow-experimentation`), or for release-branch and version-bump mechanics (see `devops`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: 'do work', 'dispatch builder', or team lead triggers automated task implementation. Governs end-to-end flow from dispatch through verification, fail handling, batch mode, and escalation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

大学業務文書 (広報原稿 / 研修教材 / 申請書 / 学生向け案内等) のドラフトを 読み取り、subagent dispatch で「AI 臭度」「業務文書適切性」「読者負荷」の 3 軸評価を返す。「この広報原稿、AI っぽくない？」「研修資料が硬すぎないか 気になる」「職員が書いたふうに仕上げたい」と問われた時に起動する。 mizchi-blog-style の評価ワークフローを大学業務文書向けに翻訳、職員 / 学生 / 学外読者の 3 ロールのいずれかで subagent がドラフトを読み、 冗長敬語 / 空虚強調 / 両論併記等を行番号付きで指摘する。反復改善は 呼び出し側判断、本 skill 自体はシングル実行。

open Issue を triage して「次の仕事候補（N 件 + 推奨 1 件）」を窓口が人間へ提示する。 候補はオペレーターが書いたゴール台帳（registry/goals/）の条項に当たるものだけで、条項順に並ぶ。 tools/work_discovery_scan.py を 1 回実行し、その候補 JSON を 設計書 §5.2 / §12 の人間可読フォーマットでレンダリングするところで停止する（propose-only）。 起動主体は窓口に限定。手動 / イベント起動のみ（常駐 /loop なし）。 「次の仕事候補出して」「triage して」「次なにやる？」や PR マージ後の proactive next-dispatch で窓口が手動起動する。

attention notification watcher（承認待ち / 判断待ち / CI 失敗等を OS 通知 + 音で能動通知）を dispatcher ペインの右側に split で常駐起動する。`.state/attention.json` が未配置なら ja 既定テンプレートを `tools/templates/attention.example.json` から自動コピーする。 起動後のペイン id は `.state/attention_pane.json` に記録し、`/org-attention-stop` から参照する。 「attention 起動」「通知監視を始めて」「watcher を立てて」等で発動。 `/org-start` からの auto-start はしない（明示起動推奨ポリシー）。

Windows アプリ開発 (Win32 / WPF / WinForms 相互運用) の相互運用・近代化リファレンス。 Win32 API, CreateWindowExW, WNDPROC, メッセージループ, COM (IUnknown, CoCreateInstance, ComPtr), CsWin32, windows-rs, C++/WinRT (winrt::com_ptr, IAsyncOperation, IDL, ABI 相互運用), C#/WinRT (cswinrt, ComWrappers, AOT/trimming, WindowNative), XAML Islands (DesktopWindowXamlSource, DesktopChildSiteBridge, WindowsXamlManager), WPF/WinForms 相互運用 (HwndHost, HwndSource, WindowsFormsHost, ElementHost), UWP から Windows App SDK / WinUI 3 への 移行 (namespace mapping, AppWindow, DispatcherQueue, .NET Upgrade Assistant)。

Android アプリ開発 (Kotlin) の画面遷移・Navigation リファレンス。 Jetpack Compose, androidx。Navigation 3 (stable), NavDisplay、 Navigation Compose, NavHost, composable, 型安全ルート、 Fragment ナビゲーション, NavHostFragment, Safe Args、 ディープリンク, App Links, assetlinks.json、 予測型戻る (OnBackPressedDispatcher)。

Rory Sutherland's 'psycho-logic' approach to marketing, product, and business problems — solve the human perception, not just the engineering or economic metric. Use when the obvious 'logical' fix is expensive, slow, or already done by every competitor; when the user asks 'how do we make people want X', 'the product/price/funnel is fine but nobody converts', 'how do we stand out', 'is there a cheaper way to fix this', or mentions behavioral economics, nudges, irrational behavior, perception, or 'it doesn't make sense but it works'. This is the ROUTER skill: it diagnoses the problem in human terms, then dispatches to reframing, costly-signaling, counterintuitive-tests, or experience-design. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's book *Alchemy*. 日本語の相談（「商品はいいのに売れない」「値下げしかない？」「競合と差別化できない」）にも使う。中文咨询（“产品很好却卖不动”“只能降价吗？”“无法差异化”）也适用。For a catalogue of individual biases, use marketing-psychology (separate plugin) instead.

調査（Explore）・設計（Plan）・実装（general-purpose）・レビュー（review-* スキル群）のサブエージェントをオーケストレーションして開発タスクを遂行するスキル。依頼文からゴール（調査のみ / 設計まで / 実装まで / レビュー）を判定し、必要なフェーズだけ実行する。親は自分でコードを読み書きせず、分解・dispatch・検収・機械検証に徹する。Use when starting any non-trivial development task（複数ファイル・複数層にまたがる調査/設計/実装/レビュー）, when user says 'オーケストレート', 'orchestrate', '調べて', '設計して', '実装して', '調べて直して', or 'レビューして'.

ATM Captain 派工治理。觸發詞 派工 / 派工單 / dispatch / 開卡 / 派任務 / 派代理 / Phase 0 / Phase 1 / AAO / task card / condition review / 收口。負責 AI-Atomic-Framework (AAF) + 3KLife 雙 repo 治理：強制 Context Map 4 層、雙代理拆分（防外卡 mirror commit）、AAF 嚴格 2 commit、3KLife target_repo 嚴格 1 commit、7-8 段回報、禁止清單前置強化、Captain condition review。承載 0064 → 0093+ 累積的紀律教訓。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegating work down to subagents: briefs, report statuses, independent review. Use when writing an implementer or verifier brief, dispatching a subagent to build, fix, or verify work you own, or a subagent reports DONE, blocked, or concerns. NOT for campaign-scale doctrine (use campaign-pattern).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。