「eval」の検索結果

Use when packaging ACM CCS artifacts for the artifact-evaluation committee and the ACM badges — Artifacts Available, Artifacts Evaluated Functional, Artifacts Evaluated Reusable, and Results Reproduced — covering what security evaluators inspect, how to make attacks and defenses turnkey, and how to justify withheld artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has evaluation principles or a dataset but needs help choosing the right graders, designing evaluation metrics, creating LLM-as-judge prompts, combining multiple metrics into a composite score, or building an automated evaluation pipeline. Also use when the user mentions grader selection, metric design, judge prompt engineering, rubric design, evaluation pipeline code, or "how to evaluate [X] automatically." Outputs executable OpenJudge pipeline code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build custom LLM evaluation pipelines using the OpenJudge framework. Covers selecting and configuring graders (LLM-based, function-based, agentic), running batch evaluations with GradingRunner, combining scores with aggregators, applying evaluation strategies (voting, average), auto-generating graders from data, and analyzing results (pairwise win rates, statistics, validation metrics). Use when the user wants to evaluate LLM outputs, compare multiple models, design scoring criteria, or build an automated evaluation system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has nothing — no traces, no labels, no eval set — and needs to build a v0 evaluation from scratch. Also use when the user says "I need to start evaluating my app but don't know where to begin," "I want to set up eval for a new product," or has just identified failure modes and needs to turn them into principles. Outputs a v0 grader in 30 minutes using OpenJudge SimpleRubricsGenerator, plus a roadmap to reach calibrated evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RFP creation, distribution, evaluation, and shortlisting for in-house legal teams selecting outside counsel. Draft a new legal services RFP from scratch, evaluate firm responses against weighted criteria, produce a shortlist recommendation with selection rationale for GC sign-off, or design the end-to-end RFP process from scratch. Trigger on: 'draft an RFP', 'run an RFP process', 'evaluate firm responses', 'score the RFP submissions', 'which firms should we shortlist', 'selection recommendation', 'how do we run a panel RFP', 'RFP for legal services', 'pitch process', 'firm selection process', 'compare the proposals', 'we're reviewing our panel', 'panel refresh RFP', 'we need to go to market', 'request for proposal', 'evaluate the pitches', 'which firm won the RFP', 'write a legal RFP', 'RFP evaluation criteria', 'design the RFP process', 'how do we weight the criteria'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and check long-running video material evaluation tasks. Use this skill when the user wants to submit videos for evaluation, check an existing video evaluation task list, or fetch the result of a previously created video evaluation task. This skill is not a general-purpose video upload skill because upload is allowed only as an internal step of task creation. Authentication uses an API key passed as an Authorization bearer token.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decomposed, multi-criteria metric design for LLM pipelines. The metric IS the model — change the metric and the optimizer changes behavior. Decompose by default; bool during compile, float during eval; calibrate against human; mitigate judge bias. Search keywords: LLM-as-judge, llm as judge, eval metric, evaluation score, scoring function, rubric, RAGAS, G-Eval, judge bias, verbosity bias, how to evaluate LLM output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MLflow 3 GenAI agent evaluation. Use when writing mlflow.genai.evaluate() code, creating @scorer functions, using built-in scorers (Guidelines, Correctness, Safety, RetrievalGroundedness), building eval datasets from traces, setting up trace ingestion and production monitoring, aligning judges with MemAlign from domain expert feedback, or running optimize_prompts() with GEPA for automated prompt improvement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Information Retrieval Scientist. Use when a task calls for Information Retrieval Scientist judgment. Reasons from the Probability Ranking Principle, Saracevic's relevance layers, and Cranfield pooling through tuned BM25, SPLADE/ColBERT/dense and LLM reranking, trec_eval/ir_measures with paired topic-level tests, interleaving, and nugget-based RAG evaluation while treating unjudged-as-nonrelevant pools, position-biased clicks, LLM-judge circularity, single-vector embedding limits, and benchmark contamination as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative rubric-based evaluation and self-improvement loop. Builds a scoring rubric interactively, evaluates an artifact with multiple models in parallel (Codex, Gemini, Claude), then autonomously improves the artifact one criterion at a time until a score threshold is met or circuit breaker fires. "/rulph", "rubric evaluate", "rubric score", "multi-model evaluate", "score and improve", "evaluate and iterate", "grade this", "루브릭 루프", "채점 루프", "자율 개선", "개선 루프", "루브릭 평가"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when 王建硕 wants to evaluate whether a change to VoiceDrop's 挖矿 system prompt is actually better than the live version — runs the local eval harness (golden fixtures × champion-vs-candidate, same input), dispatches blind pairwise judge subagents, aggregates a win-rate verdict, and on approval promotes the candidate into agent/src/prompts/mine.js. Triggers — "评估 prompt"、"挖矿 prompt 改好了吗"、"eval prompt"、"比一比两版 prompt"、"/wjs-evaling-voicedrop-prompts".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit existing eval coverage — gaps, metric validity, benchmark leakage, dataset freshness. Use when asked "what eval coverage do we have", "audit our evals", or "check for benchmark leakage".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze LLM eval results — score breakdowns by category, regression detection vs baseline, failure clustering. Use when asked to "analyze our eval results", "did the model regress", or "cluster the eval failures".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An AI analyst for buying B2B software. Investigates what vendors claim, checks the evidence, surfaces contradictions and unanswered questions, and produces a shareable Decision Brief with the questions to ask before you buy. Quick Eval by default; Deep Eval on request. Use when asked to evaluate, compare, vet, or research B2B software vendors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and maintain AgentV YAML evaluation files for testing AI agent performance. Use this skill when creating new eval files, adding eval cases, or configuring custom evaluators (code validators or LLM judges) for agent testing workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when testing, evaluating, or building regression suites for Agentforce agents: conversation testing in Agent Builder, topic (now subagent) coverage and utterance testing, Testing API and AiEvaluationDefinition metadata, Agentforce DX CLI test runs (sf agent generate test-spec, sf agent test create/run/resume/results/list), evaluation metrics (containment rate, escalation rate, CSAT, topic activation accuracy), and post-deploy analytics via Enhanced Event Logs. Triggers: 'how do I test my Agentforce agent', 'agent routes to wrong subagent', 'write utterance tests', 'regression test after topic change', 'measure agent quality', 'agent containment rate', 'run agent tests from the CLI'. NOT for agent creation, topic design, or action contract design — use agentforce/agentforce-agent-creation, agentforce/agent-topic-design, or agentforce/agent-actions respectively.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Avalia LLMs em mais de 60 benchmarks acadêmicos (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use quando benchmarking de qualidade de modelo, comparação de modelos, relatório de resultados acadêmicos ou rastreamento de progresso de treinamento. Padrão da indústria usado por EleutherAI, HuggingFace e laboratórios principais. Suporta HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate recommender system quality for the CSX4207 Vinyl Record Store. Use whenever you must compute or report recommender metrics (Precision@k, Recall@k, HitRate@k, MRR, MAP@k, NDCG@k, coverage, diversity, novelty, serendipity, personalization), design an evaluation protocol/split, run a baseline comparison, or write the evaluation section of a course deliverable. Covers formulas, JavaScript reference implementations, and the reporting checklist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NVIDIA RAG Blueprint evaluation guidance for measuring retrieval and answer quality with stable datasets, baselines, and reproducible scoring workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en évaluation d'agents IA (benchmarking, human eval, latence, coût, précision, safety testing)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for evaluation — inline evaluators, Inspect AI integration, and custom evaluators for measuring training progress. Use when the user asks about evaluation, metrics, benchmarks, or how to measure model quality during training.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after changing prompts, skills, the compiler, or editorial policies — or when the user asks to measure edit quality, run regression evals, check agreement with approved edits, or says '評価して', '一致率を測って', 'eval を回して'. Compares agent output against human-approved golden projects.

Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。