1,389 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when auditing a repository for evidence-backed gaps between code, SPECs, architecture, and documentation — before a release, after a review, or when the user asks what is missing or divergent. Confirmed gaps become Draft SPECs via write-specs, a tracked GitHub Epic via create-issues, and orchestrated execution via orchestrator, with an explicit approval gate before any external action.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesises training survey responses and manager notes into a DRAFT training needs report by role: coded needs with record counts per role (n of N), the evidence type behind each count, anonymised quotes cited to record codes, disagreements between what staff report and what managers observe, gaps where a role is under-represented or a required skill has no evidence, and follow-up questions to settle before any course is designed. Never rates an individual, ranks a team or turns a count into a competence verdict. Use when the user asks to "analyse this training survey", "what training do our teams need", "summarise the manager feedback on skills gaps", "build a training needs analysis by role" or "which roles have the biggest skill gaps". Do not use for turning an agreed need into a course, use course-outline-builder instead; for exit interviews, use exit-interview-synthesis. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns an engineer's notes, a ticket history or a chat thread into a draft step-by-step runbook with preconditions, stop conditions, numbered steps with checks, verification, rollback and escalation, for the team to validate before use. Commands verbatim, placeholders marked, every gap UNKNOWN; never executes a step or fills a gap from general knowledge. Use when the user asks to "write a runbook from these notes", "turn this resolved ticket into a runbook", "document the steps we ran" or "check this runbook for gaps". Do not use for a business process without commands, use sop-drafter instead; for a knowledge article or known-error record, use knowledge-article-drafter; for the post-incident review, use incident-postmortem-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns the text of a regulatory change (new regulation, amendment, rule, guidance or standard revision) into a DRAFT impact note: what changed against the prior text where supplied, who is affected as the text scopes it, an obligations table with dates and owners to confirm, and open interpretation questions for legal. States only what the text says; the rest is UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "brief legal on this new regulation", "list what we must do by when under this amendment", "compare the new standard with the version it replaces", "turn this directive into an obligations table" or "what does this rule mean for us". Do not use for assessing existing controls against a requirement set, use controls-gap-pack instead; for gapping a policy against a standard, use policy-gap-review. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "find content gaps", "竞品写了什么", or "还应该写什么"; builds a competitor-relative coverage map of missing topics, keyword gaps, and editorial-calendar opportunities. Not for raw keyword demand discovery — use keyword-research. 内容缺口/选题规划
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Navigate the gap between what you can see and what you can make. The Ira Glass gap. Use when a designer is frustrated by the distance between their taste and their output, when mentoring someone through a creative plateau, or when someone is considering quitting because their work doesn't match their vision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Focused Signals scout for finding observability gaps in PostHog itself — significant event volumes the team isn't tracking, custom events with no insight or dashboard coverage, insights pointing at events that have stopped firing, dashboards missing related context, critical events with no alerts. Watches the event-stream-vs-saved- inventory delta as the team's product evolves and emits findings recommending new insights, dashboard additions, or alerts when gaps clear the confidence bar. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full SEO audit: Google Search Console data + URL Inspection API + PageSpeed Insights API + technical crawl + keyword research + metadata audit + schema markup audit + search intent analysis + Core Web Vitals monitoring. Feeds real GSC data and PageSpeed metrics into AI to surface quick wins, diagnose traffic drops, find content gaps, identify metadata mismatches, detect schema gaps, monitor page performance, and produce an actionable 30-day plan. Use this skill whenever the user asks about SEO, search rankings, organic traffic, Google Search Console, keyword performance, traffic drops, content gaps, search visibility, technical SEO, meta tags, schema markup, structured data, URL indexing, keyword research, indexing issues, page speed, performance, Core Web Vitals, LCP, INP, CLS, or Lighthouse scores. Also trigger on: "why is my traffic down", "what keywords am I ranking for", "improve my rankings", "check my search console", "SEO audit", "analyze my SEO", "technical SEO", "meta tags", "indexing issues", "crawl errors", "content strategy", "keyword cannibalization", "search intent", "schema markup", "structured data", "URL inspection", "page speed", "performance score", "core web vitals", "lighthouse", or any organic search question. If in doubt, trigger. This skill handles everything from quick GSC checks to deep technical audits with performance monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
テストカバレッジのギャップを体系的に分析し、実際に動くテストコードを提案するスキル。 以下のようなときに使う： - テストカバレッジを改善したい・不足テストを特定したい - 「テストが足りない」「カバレッジを上げたい」「どこをテストすべき」 - 「未テストの関数」「what tests am I missing」「improve test coverage」「coverage gap」 t-wada式TDDの原則に基づき、テストの抜け漏れを特定して優先度付きで補完する。 引数: 分析対象ファイル・ディレクトリ（省略時はプロジェクト全体）
Estimate calcium-normalized Gapon selectivity coefficients from paired exchange and solution chemistry, or initialize depth-explicit EcoSIM Gapon inputs from the closest bundled ecosystem template when paired chemistry is unavailable. Use when deriving or checking EcoSIM GKC4, GKCH, GKCA, GKCM, GKCN, or GKCK values; matching a target ecosystem, climate, vegetation, and management regime to a starting profile; remapping template values to target soil layers; or documenting that template-based values require calibration or tuning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
指定した会話と期間で共有されたOpenClawの変更提案や課題を集め、GitHubで状態と根拠を確認し、影響度と対応準備に応じて優先順位を付けるスキル。
XとLinkedInのつながりから、会いたい相手への紹介経路を評価するスキル。経路の近さや関係の強さを重み付けし、紹介を頼む候補と接点の不足を整理します。
学術・技術文献を検索し、選定基準に沿って比較・統合するスキルです。検索履歴や除外理由を残し、根拠の強さと引用を確認したレビューにまとめます。
Detect missing test coverage and generate test suggestions. Use when the user asks about coverage gaps, untested code, or what tests to write next; also after adding a feature to find what still needs tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compares tracked job postings against the candidate profile to identify skill gaps and generate a prioritized learning plan with study resources. Triggers on: /upskill, upskill, skill gaps, what should I learn, learning plan
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decides what information belongs on a resume or CV, what to leave off and in what order, and audits an existing resume against those norms. Covers every section (contact details, photo, summary, experience, education and GPA, skills, languages, references), candidate situations (new grad, career change, gaps, layoffs, veterans, academic, visa and more) and country and industry norms. Use when the user asks "what should I put on my resume", "what should I leave off", "should I include my photo / GPA / date of birth", "how do I show a gap", "summary or objective?", "how long should my CV be", "CV for a job in Dubai / Germany", "I'm moving to another country, what should I change", "what to put on my resume as a veteran" or "audit / review my resume". Works with pasted text or the Reactive Resume MCP server. For rewriting bullets use resume-bullet-writer; for fitting a resume to one job posting use resume-tailor; for building a new resume as JSON use resume-builder.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ranks any list of impediments and their countermeasures using a value-stream scoring model (ROI, Cost to Implement, Ease of Deployment, Risk Factor) and a fixed prioritization formula. Use when someone asks to prioritize, rank, sequence, or triage impediments, countermeasures, remediation items, risks, findings, gaps, action items, or backlog entries; or mentions value-stream prioritization, A3 / lean countermeasure ranking, ROI vs. effort scoring, or building a remediation / improvement backlog. Works with GHQR findings, audit results, retrospective action items, risk registers, architecture review gaps, or any free-form `{impediment, countermeasure}` list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze job postings, calculate match scores, identify gaps, and create an application strategy. Use when the user shares a job description or asks to evaluate fit, match score, or gaps against a posting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Wins back customers who have quietly stopped buying — finds the ones whose gap has stretched past their own normal rhythm or who are showing churn signals, ranks them by what the relationship was worth, drafts a win-back message per customer in the owner's voice, and sends and logs only what the owner approves. Chains review-reputation, outreach-composer, and crm-autopilot, and keeps the rule that the first touch acknowledges the gap without pitching. Use this whenever the owner is worried about customers drifting away, including phrasings like "who hasn't ordered in a while," "win back my old customers," "which customers have gone quiet," "we lost some regulars," "reach out to the people who stopped calling," or "how do I get them back." Reach for it when the owner names a customer they have not heard from, as readily as for a full win-back campaign.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Forward-looking gap check on one opportunity - exactly what is missing to advance it to the next stage and to close, with who does what by when. Use when the user asks "what's missing to advance [deal]", "what do I need to move [opp] forward", "why is [deal] stuck", or "what's between [account] and a close".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research competitors and generate a positioning and messaging comparison with content gaps, opportunities, and threats. Use when building sales battlecards, when finding positioning gaps and messaging angles competitors haven't claimed, or when a competitor makes a move and you need to assess the impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a comprehensive SEO audit — keyword research, on-page analysis, content gaps, technical checks, and competitor comparison. Use when assessing a site's SEO health, when finding keyword opportunities and content gaps competitors own, or when you need a prioritized action plan split into quick wins and strategic investments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze test coverage gaps. Use when user says "test coverage", "what's not tested", "coverage gaps", "missing tests", "coverage report", or "what needs testing".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。