「modeling」の検索結果

Build comprehensive 3-5 year financial models with revenue projections, cost structures, cash flow analysis, and scenario planning for early-stage startups. Use this skill when creating financial projections, calculating burn rate or runway, modeling fundraising scenarios, or preparing investor-ready financials for a seed or Series A raise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a defensible cybersecurity risk assessment using the NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 methodology: prepare scope and a risk model, identify threat sources and threat events, identify vulnerabilities and predisposing conditions, determine likelihood and impact, compute risk, and communicate results as a prioritized risk register. Use when an organization needs an actual risk *assessment* (not a maturity score), when a control framework (CSF, ISO 27001, RMF, SOC 2, PCI) requires a documented risk analysis as input, when leadership asks "what are our top risks and how bad are they", when assessing risk for a new system or major change, or when building a risk register from scratch. This is the methodology that feeds framework selection, ATO packages, and treatment decisions. Keywords: risk assessment, NIST 800-30, threat modeling, likelihood and impact, risk register, risk analysis, threat sources, vulnerabilities, risk determination, qualitative risk, risk matrix, residual risk, risk treatment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert data scientist for advanced analytics, machine learning, and statistical modeling. Handles complex data analysis, predictive modeling, and business intelligence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for STRIDE threat modeling, DREAD risk scoring, data-flow-diagram threat analysis, or a quick secret scan — or when a security request needs routing to the right specialist skill (pen-testing, incident response, cloud posture, red team, AI security, threat hunting, secure code review). This skill owns threat modeling; everything else routes to a sibling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Defensive threat modeling and risk management for your own estate — map where sensitive data lives across your asset graph, run compromise scenarios (what a hacked asset exposes, its blast radius, how you'd respond), and maintain a persistent risk register with likelihood×impact scoring, owners, mitigations, and review cadence via a deterministic CLI. All real data stays in your private USER tree; this skill is code only. USE WHEN threat model, threat modeling, risk register, risk assessment, what if X got hacked, compromise scenario, blast radius, sensitive data map, where is our sensitive data, data classification, risk review, add a risk, accept a risk, security risk posture. NOT FOR active pentesting or exploitation (use an offensive-security skill), world-scale futures stress-testing of ideas (use WorldThreatModel), or executing incident response (use your incident-response runbooks — this skill plans them).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Use when the user asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats or abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do NOT use for general architecture summaries, code review, security best practices (use security-best-practices), or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Thoroughly verify all code, tables, figures, modeling decisions, and quantitative claims in an academic paper against its source R scripts and output files. Use this skill whenever you need to audit, replicate, or verify an academic research paper - including cross-checking LaTeX tables against R output, validating econometric modeling choices, ensuring sample sizes are consistent, building a verification manifest, and running automated replication tests. Trigger this skill for any mention of: paper verification, replication check, table audit, code-paper consistency, reproducing results, verifying estimates, checking coefficients, or any variant of "does the paper match the code."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects and prevents data leakage in machine learning and mathematical modeling. Use after ML tasks involving data cleaning, feature engineering, data augmentation, algorithm development, normalization, missing value imputation, dimensionality reduction, feature selection, or time series modeling. Checks if features/statistics would be available at prediction time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bayesian modeling with PyMC. Build hierarchical models, MCMC (NUTS), variational inference, LOO/WAIC comparison, posterior checks, for probabilistic programming and inference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LQF Machine Learning Expert Guide - Routed skill for ML/Statistical Modeling with Critical Discussion Mode. Triggers on: machine learning, modeling, prediction, training, classification, regression, clustering, deep learning, neural network, model evaluation, feature engineering, hyperparameter tuning, overfitting, underfitting, baseline, ablation study, critique my approach, review my model, is this a good idea, should I use, what's wrong with, evaluate my solution, challenge my assumptions, discuss my approach Engages in critical discussion with minimum 3 rounds of iterative refinement. Challenges both user proposals and own suggestions with fact-based critique. Demands evidence and baselines before accepting solutions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs the warehouse and semantic layer — source-to-mart structure, dimensional modeling, grain, slowly changing dimensions, and the metric layer analytics reads through. Use this to design or restructure a warehouse, model a new source, decide on grain or table structure, build a semantic or metric layer, or diagnose why queries are slow, wrong, or impossible to write.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户要求数学建模、建模竞赛、建模分析、代码求解、结果可视化或生成数学建模论文时使用。支持完整三阶段流程、单独执行任一角色，以及在关键节点使用独立 Subagent 进行阶段内质检；默认只启用质检 Subagent，用户可明确选择额外协作。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in threat modeling methodologies, security architecture review, and risk assessment. Masters STRIDE, PASTA, attack trees, and security requirement extraction. Use for security architecture reviews, threat identification, and secure-by-design planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert database architect specializing in data layer design from scratch, technology selection, schema modeling, and scalable database architectures. Masters SQL/NoSQL/TimeSeries database selection, normalization strategies, migration planning, and performance-first design. Handles both greenfield architectures and re-architecture of existing systems. Use PROACTIVELY for database architecture, technology selection, or data modeling decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Processes eDNA metabarcoding from raw paired-end reads to species tables, navigating ASV (DADA2, UNOISE3) vs OTU (swarm v2) decision (Callahan 2017 vs Schloss multi-copy-16S critique), marker/primer choice (Leray COI, MiFish 12S, 515F/806R 16S, ITS2) with primer-specific bias, OBITools3 v3 command-name break (obi stats plural; .tar.gz taxonomy), tag-jumping with dual-indexing (Schnell 2015; NovaSeq 10x MiSeq), decontam as screening-not-classifier (Davis 2018), read-counts-not-abundance critique (Lamb 2019), site-occupancy modeling (Ficetola 2015), Naive-Bayes calibration limits (Bokulich 2018), and eDNA decay (Strickler 2015). Use when going from raw eDNA FASTQ to species tables, picking marker + denoising pipeline, deciding whether read counts represent abundance, applying occupancy modeling, configuring OBITools3 v3, or interpreting decontam output. Not for clinical 16S microbiome (see microbiome/amplicon-processing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes time-series and longitudinal RNA-seq for differential expression and trajectory structure. Covers DESeq2 LRT with reduced models, time as factor vs continuous vs natural splines, maSigPro (Nueda 2014 for RNA-seq), ImpulseDE2 with explicit impulse-model failure modes, DREAM for repeated measures via linear mixed models, pseudoreplication avoidance, conditional vs marginal modeling, and trajectory clustering with DPGP, Mfuzz (with Schwämmle 2010 fuzzifier estimation), and splines+k-means. Use when modeling time-course or longitudinal expression, choosing factor vs spline, handling repeated measures from the same subject, avoiding pseudoreplication, clustering temporal trajectories, or selecting between dedicated time-course tools and pairwise+LRT.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct threat modeling using STRIDE methodology. Identify threats, assess risks, and design security controls. Use when designing secure systems or assessing application security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform the final submission-level audit of mathematical-modeling workflow integrity, evidence quality, anti-fabrication, paper coherence, figures, references, and contest readiness after consistency and completeness audits pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Package a G6-approved mathematical-modeling paper and its exact supporting code, data, results, and figures without changing their behavior or the workspace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize modeling experiment evidence, compare the approved main method with a usable baseline, surface fallback triggers, and produce a decision-point or final report without creating routine per-round prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and run minimal reproducible Python modeling code for the human-approved main method and usable baseline, saving compact experiment artifacts and a canonical run summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。