「reflection」の検索結果

Use when lighting or rendering a Godot 4.7 3D scene: pick a renderer (Forward+, Mobile, Compatibility), choose GI (SDFGI, VoxelGI, LightmapGI, reflection probes), bake lightmaps without a mouse, tune WorldEnvironment, tonemapper (AgX, ACES, Filmic), glow, fog, volumetric fog and god rays, shadows and shadow acne, quality presets for PC and phones, Compositor post effects, or when 'my scene looks flat', 'too dark indoors', 'light leaks', 'lightmap is black', 'looks different on mobile'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-reflection on recent activity to identify patterns and improvements

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surface beliefs, assumptions, stories, and values shaping a system. Use when deeper mental models need examining with care and evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure a student's self-determined project with mentoring checkpoints, competency alignment, and reflection. Use when guiding student-led projects within a competency-based framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wrap a learning session in a plan → monitor → reflect cycle. Use at the start of any substantial study session to set goals, mid-session to check strategy, and at session end to consolidate what changed. Builds self-regulated learning as a habit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide graduated assistance from abstract conceptual nudge to concrete procedural step, with reflection required before each escalation. Teaches help-seeking as a skill and prevents direct-answer shortcuts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design multi-informant assessment approaches for dispositional competencies like curiosity or resilience. Use when assessing character strengths or competencies that written tests cannot capture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a single-point rubric with one criterion and open columns for evidence. Use for student self-assessment, peer feedback, teacher formative feedback, or pre-task planning. Works with any learning target, with or without a band system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a service-learning project connecting genuine community need with embedded curriculum learning. Use when planning community projects, civic engagement, or social action units.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safely refactors C#/.NET code without changing behavior. USE FOR any request to refactor, rename, move, extract, inline, merge, consolidate, deduplicate, split, or modernize C# code, including partial/generated declarations, wrappers, public APIs, serialization/reflection/configuration names, friend assemblies, conditional compilation, and multi-targeted projects. Also use when a request calls a feature, bug fix, package/framework upgrade, or public nullability change a refactor and the behavior-changing part must be separated or declined. DO NOT USE FOR ordinary feature or bug fixes not presented as refactoring; standalone upgrades after reclassification (use dotnet-upgrade); adding tests; or formatting-only work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make .NET projects compatible with Native AOT and trimming by systematically resolving IL trim/AOT analyzer warnings. USE FOR: making projects AOT-compatible, fixing trimming warnings, resolving IL warnings (IL2026, IL2070, IL2067, IL2072, IL3050), adding DynamicallyAccessedMembers annotations, enabling IsAotCompatible. DO NOT USE FOR: publishing native AOT binaries, optimizing binary size, replacing reflection-heavy libraries with alternatives. INVOKES: no tools — pure knowledge skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to review, improve, or write Java unit tests — including migrating from JUnit 4 to JUnit 5, adopting AssertJ for fluent assertions, structuring tests with Given-When-Then, ensuring test independence, applying parameterized tests, mocking dependencies with Mockito, verifying boundary conditions (RIGHT-BICEP, CORRECT, A-TRIP), leveraging JSpecify null-safety annotations, or eliminating testing anti-patterns such as reflection-based tests or shared mutable state. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for unit tests; Apply best practices for unit tests in Java code; Write fast JUnit unit tests for Java code; Improve Mockito-based Java unit tests; Refactor Java tests to isolate collaborators. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help authors learn from exemplary ICLR, ICML, and NeurIPS papers through source-linked manuscript comparisons, concrete writing and experiment suggestions, and guided reflection. Use for research storytelling, contribution framing, paper comparison, figure planning, or research retrospectives. Not an acceptance predictor or a routine grammar/citation formatter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to reflect on how the session went

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write spoken daily planning notes into an Obsidian Mandala Grid day-plan Markdown file. Use when the user says 今日的日計畫, 今日的日計劃, 日計畫, 日計劃, 青蛙, frog, 🐸, 九宮, 曼陀羅, Mandala Grid, 時段, time block, 日記, or asks to place spoken tasks/events/reflections into today's Obsidian daily plan sections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze CVE reachability in software repositories by examining how vulnerable dependencies are imported and used. Determines whether vulnerable components, classes, or functions are reachable from project code through call chain analysis, reflection detection, dynamic loading patterns, and configuration-gated behavior. Classifies each CVE as likely reachable, possibly reachable, or likely unreachable with supporting evidence. Use when analyzing security vulnerabilities in dependencies, performing post-disclosure CVE triage, assessing vulnerability impact, or when users ask to analyze CVE reachability, check if vulnerabilities are exploitable, or evaluate dependency security risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Geophysicist. Use when a task calls for Geophysicist judgment. Reasons from wavelength and skin-depth limits through earthquake catalogs (USGS ComCat, ObsPy/FDSN), Bouguer/IGRF gravity-magnetics, MT distortion and dimensionality, and SEG-Y reflection processing (NMO, migration) while treating statics, galvanic distortion, velocity ambiguity, and header mis-mapping as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Electromagnetics Engineer. Use when a task calls for Electromagnetics Engineer judgment. Reasons from Maxwell scaling and S-parameters through HFSS/CST/ADS workflows, SOLT/TRL calibration, mesh ΔS convergence, Smith-chart matching, anechoic OTA, and CISPR/FCC Part 15 / IEC-IEEE 62209-1528 SAR compliance while treating PML reflections, probe de-embedding, and chamber ripple as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, troubleshoot, and hand off provider-independent in-camera VFX and LED volume virtual-production work, with Unreal Engine/nDisplay/Live Link awareness. Use for ICVFX suitability, LED stage geometry, frustums, tracking, lens calibration, sync, render nodes, color, lighting/reflections, artifact mitigation, rehearsal, live-composite fallback, monitoring, records, QA, and handoff. Do not use for ordinary offline post compositing, generic storyboards, or full game production.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-independent VFX compositing direction for generated video, ads, trailers, product films, social clips, explainers, mixed-source edits, and image/video composites. Use when an agent must plan, brief, generate, integrate, repair, or quality-check visual effects composites involving plates, alpha/mattes, keying, roto, tracking, stabilization, matchmove, lighting/color integration, grain/noise/sharpness, shadows/reflections/contact, depth/atmosphere, AI-generated elements, clean plates, editor/colorist handoff, rights/safety, or compositing QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a learner or instructor asks for a report, summary, reflection, progress note, performance recap, activity metrics, instructor-shareable record of a MATLAB AI tutoring session, aggregate report across multiple MATLAB tutoring session reports, or instructor dashboard artifact with metric drilldowns. Supports optional start and end datetime arguments for multi-session report and dashboard ranges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mid-conversation reflection skill that pauses execution and zooms out from detail-mode to honestly reassess direction, assumptions, and bias. Use when the user says 'reflect', 'take a step back', 'step back', 'zoom out', 'are we missing something', 'bigger picture', 'sanity check this', 'are we on track', 'are we overthinking this', 'forest for the trees', or any variation signaling intent to break out of detail-mode and reassess. Also trigger when the conversation has gone deep on implementation details without strategic check-in, or when the user shows signs of being stuck — that's often a signal the framing needs a reset, not more detail work. Intentionally low-intake: runs the 5-dimension analysis immediately when prior context is rich enough; asks one forcing clarifier only when invocation context is too thin to reassess from.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the dialectical reasoning and intellectual humility of Socrates (ancient Greek philosopher, 470-399 BCE). Use this skill whenever the user is grappling with fundamental definitions, moral dilemmas, educational approaches, self-reflection, or making high-stakes ethical decisions. Trigger this skill when encountering topics like virtue, justice, the pursuit of truth, questioning assumptions, coaching, or when the user seems overly confident in unexamined beliefs. It helps dismantle false assumptions through probing questions and redirects focus toward the "care of the soul" and objective truth over external validation or material success.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns and techniques for evaluating and improving AI agent outputs. Use this skill when: - Implementing self-critique and reflection loops - Building evaluator-optimizer pipelines for quality-critical generation - Creating test-driven code refinement workflows - Designing rubric-based or LLM-as-judge evaluation systems - Adding iterative improvement to agent outputs (code, reports, analysis) - Measuring and improving agent response quality

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。