「subagent」の検索結果

Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session or facing 3+ independent issues that can be investigated without shared state or dependencies - dispatches fresh subagent for each task with code review between tasks, enabling fast iteration with quality gates

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for parallel subagent execution using the Agent tool (formerly Task). Use when coordinating multiple independent tasks, spawning dynamic subagents, or implementing features that can be parallelized.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

INVOKE THIS SKILL when using subagents, task planning, or human approval in Deep Agents. Covers SubAgentMiddleware, TodoList for planning, and HITL interrupts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit hook delivery health from Agent Monitor data — balance PreToolUse vs PostToolUse (a gap means tools that started but never reported back), detect missing Stop/SubagentStop terminators (sessions/subagents that never closed), and check for stale ingestion (no recent events). Use when hooks look unreliable or events seem to be dropping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug a specific session by inspecting its full event chain (PreToolUse, PostToolUse, Stop, SubagentStop, Compaction, APIError, TurnDuration, Notification events), agent hierarchy (recursive parent/child tree with subagent_type and depth), token usage with compaction baselines, workflow intelligence data (orchestration DAG, error propagation by depth), and session metadata (thinking_blocks, turn_count, total_turn_duration_ms).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parallelize independent sub-jobs across fresh-context subagents instead of one bloated context. Use when a goal branches into many independent pieces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute implementation plan by dispatching fresh subagent for each task, with code review between tasks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute multi-task implementation plans by dispatching a fresh implementer subagent per task with independent review gates. Use when implementing plans, executing multi-task PRs, or transitioning from planning to implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements GitHub or GitLab issues via parallel subagents with review gates between task batches. Use when resolving multi-step issues end-to-end.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stack Honey onto Superpowers-style subagent workflows: dispatched subagents skip the session hook, so inject the levers into each dispatch prompt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a new Claude Code agent (subagent) from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the agent's design tree decision-by-decision — entity fit, domain focus and vocabulary, role identity, anti-patterns, description, model tier, tools, and self-containment — then reviews the finished agent against the plugin-building guidance and applies every fix it finds. Use when creating, authoring, scaffolding, designing, or drafting a new agent or subagent. Does not build a skill or slash command — use skill-builder. Does not serve, vendor, or refresh the authoring guidance itself — use guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create GRACE 4 worker and reviewer subagent presets that understand .grace artifacts, scopes, assertions, and verification evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Profile and debug Hermes sessions from their JSONL transcripts. Find a session and its subagents, build a queryable event table, summarize the work as a hierarchical table of contents, break down wall time, inference, tools, tokens, and estimated cost per agent, identify errors and improvement opportunities, and export a shareable Perfetto trace. Use when a user wants to inspect what a Hermes session did, debug agent or subagent activity, understand session cost or latency, create a session timeline, generate a trace, or learn how to improve the next agent run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate a MULTI-PHASE, dependent, or resumable run over many provider subagents from a JS script, off the main context (`cc-fleet workflow`). Use for fan-out→barrier→synthesis, per-item pipelines, loop-until-dry, or a run that must survive a kill and `--resume` from its journal. NOT a flat fan-out of independent tasks (that is /cc-fleet:subagent — cheaper, no script); NOT interactive collaboration (that is /cc-fleet:team); NOT trivial single-shot work for the main session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate a MULTI-PHASE, dependent, or resumable run over many cc-fleet PROVIDER subagents from a JS script, off the main context (`cc-fleet workflow`). Use for fan-out→barrier→synthesis, per-item pipelines, loop-until-dry, or a run that must survive a kill and `--resume` from its journal. Trigger ONLY to run a cc-fleet provider workflow. NOT a flat fan-out of independent tasks (that is /cc-fleet:subagent — cheaper, no script); NOT trivial single-shot work; NOT for editing or researching cc-fleet's own workflow code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits and reorganises what an AI coding agent carries in its context window: instruction files, path-scoped rules, skills, subagents, hooks and the running conversation. Use when someone says "the agent ignores our CLAUDE.md", "set this repo up for Claude Code / Codex / Cursor", "my AGENTS.md is too long", "quality drops in long sessions", "it keeps inventing APIs", "what should go in a skill versus the rules file", or asks how to hand work to a subagent. Grounded in the documented loading behaviour of Claude Code, with the equivalents for Codex, Gemini CLI and Cursor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds the cause of a hard bug by running several read-only subagents in parallel, each attacking it from a different angle (change history, code path, data and state, environment, reproduction), then checking their evidence, ranking the hypotheses and naming the one experiment that would confirm the leader. It diagnoses and does not fix. Use when someone says "hunt this bug with multiple agents", "swarm on this regression", "investigate in parallel", "find the root cause", or when a failure is intermittent, crosses components, or has resisted a first look.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skill-aware orchestration with context routing. Decomposes complex tasks into skill-typed subtasks, extracts targeted context subsets, executes subagents in parallel, and synthesizes results. Self-answers trivial lookups inline. No SDK dependency — uses raw HTTP via httpx. Use when tasks require multiple analytical perspectives, when context is large and subtasks only need portions, or when orchestrating-chat-agents spawns too many redundant subagents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate tasks to specialized subagents for parallel or sequential execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate code review to a subagent running a specific model. Use ONLY when user explicitly names a model to review changes ("review with opus", "use sonnet to review", "review with gemini"). The root agent reconstructs changes from conversation history and spawns a subagent with the code-review skill using the specified model. Do NOT use for general code review (use code-review skill instead), for reviewing PRs from git history, or when no model is specified by the user.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user's prompt requires (1) researching a topic across multiple sources, comparing options or alternatives, analyzing trends or history, understanding markets or industries, or reviewing literature or studies and (2) synthesizing that research into a comprehensive, narrative report. If you're planning to search the web or internal knowledge bases, consider using this skill. This skill coordinates research subagents, so use it only when you have a tool for spawning subagents (the Agent or Task tool); otherwise, research the question directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Team-theory primitives for cooperative agents: what each subagent sees, when to communicate, aggregation, Shapley credit, coalition topology. Use when organizing subagents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chooses subagent, team, workflow, or debate and launches it on Claude Code or Codex. Use when delegating, running agent review boards, or installing shared agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。