「subsystem」の検索結果

Expert-level spacecraft design covering mission analysis, subsystem design, power and thermal management, attitude control, communications, and systems engineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn an idea into a Conventional Docs Decision, then a Plan: classify the request, explore options and risks through dialogue, then commit a numbered Decision that review, prototypes, and acceptance move through. Use PROACTIVELY before any creative work — new features, new subsystems, interface or dependency changes, or any open-ended design question ("what are the options", "how should I approach", "should I use X or Y", "help me decide", "write a decision", "ADR").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Process] Use when the developer wants something explained or taught, or wants to know HOW TO REVIEW a change — by default the current working tasks + changes in context, or whatever the prompt names (a plan, a subsystem, a decision, a concept, a bug). AI derives WHAT to explain from the prompt and ALWAYS delivers a teacher-and-coach review guide, high level first then detail: what was done, a VISUAL MAP (system flowchart, domain ERD, sequence diagrams), the user stories and business rules with their REAL test-case IDs, a REVIEW PATH naming which files to open first and in what order with an exit criterion per stage, the technical concepts needed to follow it, how it works, why THIS solution, every alternative option with pros/cons, the trade-offs accepted, the blast radius, HOW TO TEST AND DEMO the change, the developer's decision levers, and written challenge prompts that provoke the reader to pressure-test the work. Works at ANY scope — from one line of code to the whole project: it SIZES the target into a scope tier, DECOMPOSES a large one into understanding groups, BREAKS the work into tasks before the first deep read, and ACCUMULATES the report group by group on disk so a huge explanation stays complete instead of thinning out. Writes the full report to a single combined markdown file (plans/reports/understand-*.md) that opens with a detailed summary section — or delivers it in full in chat when Step 3 finds no git-ignored directory for it — and always summarizes it in chat. Regardless of coding level. Never interrogates, never quizzes, never blocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, scaffold, implement, and integrate a complete new emulated computer or console in the EMULATORS repository. Use when Codex creates a new machine, platform, hardware model, or emulator executable; decides which existing CPUs, chips, memory, I/O, video, sound, ROM, and framework classes to reuse or extend; or coordinates several emulator subsystems into a bootable tested system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an evidence-backed working model of an existing codebase. Use when you must orient in a large or unfamiliar repository; explain architecture or a subsystem; trace a request, runtime, control, or data flow for a concrete question or bug; analyze a branch, commit, diff, or pull request for behavioral impact and blast radius; or assess AI-generated or changed code against requirements, contracts, invariants, tests, and runtime evidence. Default to read-only investigation. Do not trigger only because a coding task touches an existing repository; use when understanding or verification is the requested outcome or a substantial prerequisite.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a codebase or subsystem for architecture simplification - shallow or pass-through modules, scattered concepts, naming drift, sibling workflows that disagree, weak test seams. Use when the user asks what to simplify or restructure. Not for a narrow fix or for implementing an already chosen design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when developing, reviewing, debugging, porting, or engineering Linux kernel device drivers, kernel modules, device tree bindings, bus clients, subsystem drivers, DMA/IRQ/memory paths, userspace interfaces, or hardware bring-up plans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a local codebase and infer the architecture it is actually using, including repo kind, best-fit dominant architecture, directly evidenced coexisting patterns, major subsystem exceptions, confidence, docs-vs-code drift, and repo-fit hints for downstream agents. Use when prompts ask what architecture a repo uses, whether it is really hexagonal or just layered, what subtle patterns shape a repo or slice, how a target slice fits a hybrid monorepo, whether documented architecture matches implementation, or when `/tw-tk` needs a repo-dialect preflight before making a minimal change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from FAA-STD-025f (Preparation of Interface Documentation). Use for IRD/ICD family definitions, common format and content, IRD shall-requirements, ICD design characteristics, verification/VRTM, and CM/revision/approval of FAA Enterprise Subsystem interfaces. Covers rev F preparation rules only; does not replace FAA-STD-005 drawing/spec prep, Order 1800.66 full CM procedures, or non-FAA interface standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA Requirements Engineering Management Handbook (DOT/FAA/AR-08/32). Use for writing requirements for real-time, embedded control systems — the avionics/medical slant — via the Handbook's eleven recommended practices: system overview and boundary (monitored/controlled variables), operational concepts (use cases), environmental assumptions, change-tolerant functional architecture (dependency diagrams), safety-driven architecture revision (FHA/PSSA/fault tree), system modes, detailed behavior and performance requirements (ideal value + tolerance + latency), the four-variable model bridge to software requirements (MON/CON/NAT/REQ, IN'/REQ'/OUT', DO-178B mapping), subsystem allocation, and rationale. Carries the Isolette Thermostat and Flight Control System worked examples. Slanted toward control systems with sensors and actuators; thin on information-system / enterprise / agile requirements, on requirements-management tooling, and on the formal-methods internals of SCR/RSML/SpecTRM (it names them, does not re-teach them). Does not reproduce the IEEE/DO-178B/ARP standards it cites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Leverage concurrent terminal background processes to debug multiple independent failures simultaneously using ACH methodology. Use when you have 2+ failures across different subsystems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when facing 2+ independent tasks — "in parallel", "independent tasks", "multiple unrelated failures", "different test files or subsystems" — that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies. Dispatch one agent per independent slice, each with only the context it needs, even when the user did not ask for subagents explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain a body of work plainly so a person actually understands it. Runs the `how` and `why` skills and weaves what they find into one clear explanation. Use for 'teach me this', 'help me really understand X', 'explain this change or subsystem to me'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain how a subsystem works, trace a runtime flow, or determine where code and ownership belong before making a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-specific AGENTS.md authoring and maintenance workflow. Use when creating, refreshing, or expanding AGENTS.md coverage for a codebase, including deciding whether nested AGENTS.md files are needed for subsystems with distinct rules, workflows, or AI-sensitive constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read and reason about an unfamiliar SS14 ECS subsystem before changing it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Создать подсистему 1С — XML-исходники из JSON-определения. Используй ко…

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Валидация подсистемы 1С. Используй после создания или модификации подси…

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Точечное редактирование подсистемы 1С. Используй когда нужно добавить и…

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Анализ структуры подсистемы 1С из XML-выгрузки — состав, дочерние подси…

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。