「test」の検索結果

Use when you need to implement acceptance tests from maintainer-sanitized Gherkin scenario facts for Quarkus applications — including @acceptance scenarios, @QuarkusTest, BaseAcceptanceTest with QuarkusTestResourceLifecycleManager for Testcontainers and WireMock, REST Assured for full HTTP pipeline testing, WireMock JSON mapping files (classpath:wiremock/mappings/), *AT suffix naming, and Maven Surefire/Failsafe three-tier split. Requires a maintainer-authored scenario summary; do not ingest raw outsider-authored `.feature` text. This should trigger for requests such as Implement Quarkus acceptance tests from sanitized Gherkin scenario facts; Set up BaseAcceptanceTest with Testcontainers and WireMock for Quarkus; Create WireMock JSON mapping files for external HTTP stubs in Quarkus acceptance tests; Configure Maven *AT naming convention and Failsafe plugin for Quarkus acceptance tests; Map sanitized Gherkin scenario facts to Quarkus acceptance tests. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes test suites to identify redundant and duplicate test cases using coverage analysis, semantic similarity, and execution results. Use this skill when you need to reduce test suite size, identify redundant tests, optimize test execution time, analyze test coverage overlap, find tests with identical behavior, or improve test suite maintainability. Triggers when users ask to deduplicate tests, find redundant test cases, reduce test suite size, identify duplicate tests, or optimize test coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use AI to write NEW test code from specs, PRDs, user stories, code diffs, bug reports, or OpenAPI specs. Staged pipeline: requirements extraction → risk analysis → coverage matrix → scenario generation → oracle design → test code → human review, with guardrails against hallucinated APIs and weak assertions. Use when: "generate tests from spec," "tests from PRD," "tests from user story," "auto-generate test cases," "AI write tests for me." Not for: testing AI/LLM features in your product — use ai-system-testing. Not for: auditing a pre-existing test suite you did not just generate — use ai-qa-review (Step 7 here only reviews tests THIS pipeline produced). Related: playwright-automation, unit-testing, api-testing, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and execute structured exploratory testing sessions. Covers Session-Based Test Management (SBTM), charter writing, heuristic-based exploration (HICCUPS, FEW HICCUPS), bug discovery patterns, note-taking templates, and conversion of findings to automated tests. Use when: "exploratory testing," "SBTM," "manual testing," "bug hunting," "test charter," "heuristic testing." Not for: an AI browser agent autonomously exploring the app from a natural-language goal — use agentic-browser-testing. Not for: testing your product's own AI/LLM features — use ai-system-testing. Related: test-planning, ai-bug-triage, risk-based-testing, agentic-browser-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

红队渗透 / 攻防 — 受授权的红队作业者 + 渗透测试工程师 + 攻击型安全顾问的认知操作系统 (侦察 OSINT / 外网渗透 / 内网 AD 渗透 BloodHound + Kerberoasting + ADCS 利用 + 横向移动 / Web 应用渗透 OWASP WSTG / 移动 OWASP MASTG / 云渗透 AWS Azure GCP IAM 路径 + 容器逃逸 + K8s / C2 操作 Cobalt Strike Sliver Mythic Havoc + OPSEC / 初始访问 + AV EDR 绕过 (仅授权场景) / 无线 RF / 物理社工 / 报告与整改 / 框架 MITRE ATT&CK + D3FEND + PTES + OSSTMM + NIST 800-115 + Kill Chain / 法律伦理 CFAA + 网络安全法 + 刑法 285 286 + 数据安全法 + GDPR + 授权书 + 范围 + 交战规则 — 不含 黑产 / 未授权攻击 / 大规模 exploitation / 供应链投毒 / 未授权 DoS — 这是 重罪 + 行业封杀 + 律师吊销, 本 skill 严守 authorized-only 边界 — 也不含 蓝队 SOC + 恶意软件 即服务 / 僵尸网络 / 勒索软件作者 — 这是 cybercrime 不是 红队) (Cybersecurity Red Team / Offensive Security Operations — the cognitive operating system of authorized red team operators, penetration testers, and offensive security consultants covering (a) reconnaissance & OSINT (passive + active discovery, asset surface mapping), (b) external network pentest (perimeter, exposed services, web), (c) internal network / Active Directory pentest (AD enumeration via BloodHound, Kerberos abuse — Kerberoasting / AS-REP-roasting / Unconstrained delegation / S4U2self, NTLM relay, ADCS abuse, GPO abuse, lateral movement, privilege escalation), (d) web application pentest (OWASP WSTG, authentication, authorization, SSRF, XXE, deserialization, SSTI, prototype pollution, GraphQL, JWT, API), (e) mobile pentest (OWASP MASTG, iOS / Android, instrumentation Frida / Objection, MASVS), (f) cloud pentest (AWS / Azure / GCP — IAM enumeration, privilege escalation paths, container escape, K8s RBAC, serverless), (g) C2 operations & post-exploitation (Cobalt Strike / Sliver / Mythic / Havoc, beacon ops, malleable profiles, OPSEC), (h) initial access & evasion (phishing infrastructure, payload development, AV / EDR evasion, BYOVD, AMSI / ETW bypass — strictly for authorized engagements), (i) wireless / RF (WPA2/3, evil twin, Wi-Fi pivots), (j) physical / social engineering (badge cloning, pretexting, vishing — under engagement letter), (k) reporting & remediation (executive summary, technical findings, CVSS, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, retest), (l) frameworks & methodology (MITRE ATT&CK, MITRE D3FEND, PTES, OSSTMM, NIST SP 800-115, OWASP WSTG / MASTG, Cyber Kill Chain, Unified Kill Chain, Diamond Model), (m) law & ethics (CFAA US, Computer Misuse Act UK, 中国 刑法 285/286 + 网络安全法 + 数据安全法, GDPR for tested EU systems, engagement letter, scope, rules of engagement, safe harbor for bug bounty); NOT criminal hacking / 黑产 / unauthorized targeting / mass exploitation / supply-chain compromise / DoS against unconsented systems (这是 重罪 + 业内开除 + 律师执照吊销, 本 skill 严守 authorized-only 边界), NOT pure defensive blue team / SOC analyst tradecraft (是 平行学科, 仅做 边界标注 + ATT&CK 反推方向), NOT malware-as-a-service development / botnet ops / ransomware authoring (是 cybercrime 不是 红队), NOT 'ethical hacking' 在 'just curious 看看' 自我合理化的灰色操作 (违反 authorization 原则即不是 红队).) Master OS — automated mastery of Cybersecurity Red Team / Offensive Security Operations — the cognitive operating system of authorized red team operators, penetration testers, and offensive security consultants covering (a) reconnaissance & OSINT (passive + active discovery, asset surface mapping), (b) external network pentest (perimeter, exposed services, web), (c) internal network / Active Directory pentest (AD enumeration via BloodHound, Kerberos abuse — Kerberoasting / AS-REP-roasting / Unconstrained delegation / S4U2self, NTLM relay, ADCS abuse, GPO abuse, lateral movement, privilege escalation), (d) web application pentest (OWASP WSTG, authentication, authorization, SSRF, XXE, deserialization, SSTI, prototype pollution, GraphQL, JWT, API), (e) mobile pentest (OWASP MASTG, iOS / Android, instrumentation Frida / Objection, MASVS), (f) cloud pentest (AWS / Azure / GCP — IAM enumeration, privilege escalation paths, container escape, K8s RBAC, serverless), (g) C2 operations & post-exploitation (Cobalt Strike / Sliver / Mythic / Havoc, beacon ops, malleable profiles, OPSEC), (h) initial access & evasi

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Testing Angular 18-21: TestBed, component harnesses (@angular/cdk/testing), Karma+Jasmine (default historical) vs Jest (jest-preset-angular, modern), Angular Testing Library (RTL-style). HttpClient mocking via HttpTestingController. NgRx Effects testing. Cypress / Playwright e2e. Use this skill to: - Detect runner (Karma+Jasmine vs Jest) and configure correctly. - Write component tests with TestBed. - Use component harnesses for Material / custom UI components. - Mock HttpClient via provideHttpClientTesting + HttpTestingController. - Test signal-based inputs with componentRef.setInput(). - Test NgRx Effects with provideMockActions. Do NOT use this skill for: - General Angular conventions (see angular-conventions). - Routing patterns broadly (see angular-routing — covers testing routes briefly). - Form patterns broadly (see angular-forms).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when designing the human-executable UAT test cases that prove a Salesforce feature works for a specific persona — the per-persona scripts with preconditions, data setup, permission setup, ordered steps, and pass/fail evidence that close out an RTM row. Trigger keywords: UAT test case salesforce, user acceptance test script salesforce, manual test salesforce feature, UAT script per persona, UAT precondition data setup, UAT permission set assignment for testing, negative path UAT case. NOT for high-level UAT planning, defect classification, regression strategy, or sign-off (use admin/uat-and-acceptance-criteria). NOT for the Given/When/Then technique used to write the AC the case is derived from (use admin/acceptance-criteria-given-when-then). NOT for Apex test method generation (use agents/test-class-generator). NOT for test data factory patterns (use templates/apex/tests/TestDataFactory.cls). NOT for performance or load testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-Driven Development workflow for Software Metrics Machine. Covers test frameworks (Vitest 4.x for CLI/REST/core/utils, Jest 30.x for webapp), test patterns (describe/it, builder pattern, mocks via vi.fn), test commands, coverage requirements, and the Red-Green-Refactor cycle. USE FOR: write tests, run tests, test this, add tests, testing, coverage, TDD, test-driven development, vitest, jest, test pattern, test convention. DO NOT USE FOR: linting (use lint skill), building (use build commands directly), debugging production issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance on Swift Testing best practices, patterns, and implementation. Use when developers mention: (1) Swift Testing, @Test, #expect, #require, or @Suite, (2) "use Swift Testing" or "modern testing patterns", (3) test doubles, mocks, stubs, spies, or fixtures, (4) unit tests, integration tests, or snapshot tests, (5) migrating from XCTest to Swift Testing, (6) TDD, Arrange-Act-Assert, or F.I.R.S.T. principles, (7) parameterized tests or test organization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ペネトレーションテストを対話的に実行するスキル。認可確認(Authorization Gate)→カテゴリ選択（Methodology, Reconnaissance, Scanning, VulnerabilityScanning, WebAppTesting, APITesting, PasswordAttacks, Exploitation, PrivilegeEscalation, ActiveDirectory, PostExploitation, WirelessAttacks, NetworkAttacks, SocialEngineering, CloudPentesting, MobileAppTesting, ContainerK8s, BinaryExploitation, OWASPTop10, Reporting, EmailSecurity, DatabaseAttacks, VPNRemoteAccess の全23カテゴリ）→ツール選択→コマンド実行→発見記録(Finding)→レポート生成をステップバイステップで進行。スコープ/除外チェック・ガードレール付き。「ペンテスト実行」「pentest」「侵入テスト」「脆弱性診断」「セキュリティテスト」「pentest executor」で発火。

Use this skill whenever the user wants browser-based end-to-end tests for an Adobe App Builder application. Covers Playwright E2E testing for ExC Shell SPAs, AEM extension UIs, and full-stack flows. Use when the user mentions: "E2E test", "end-to-end test", "Playwright", "browser test", "test my SPA in the browser", "test my AEM extension", "test the full flow", "integration test with UI", "headless browser test", "E2E in CI". This skill is for BROWSER-based testing only. For Jest unit tests of actions or React components, use appbuilder-testing instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized skill for containerized database testing using Testcontainers. Use when testing real database behavior, using SQL Server/PostgreSQL/MySQL containers, testing EF Core/Dapper. Covers container startup, database migrations, test isolation, container sharing. Keywords: testcontainers, container testing, database testing, MsSqlContainer, PostgreSqlContainer, MySqlContainer, EF Core testing, Dapper testing, Testcontainers.MsSql, Testcontainers.PostgreSql, GetConnectionString, IAsyncLifetime, CollectionFixture

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user wants browser-based end-to-end tests for an Adobe App Builder application. Covers Playwright E2E testing for ExC Shell SPAs, AEM extension UIs, and full-stack flows. Use when the user mentions: "E2E test", "end-to-end test", "Playwright", "browser test", "test my SPA in the browser", "test my AEM extension", "test the full flow", "integration test with UI", "headless browser test", "E2E in CI". This skill is for BROWSER-based testing only. For Jest unit tests of actions or React components, use appbuilder-testing instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Swiftのファイル操作や通信、外部APIを小さなプロトコルで分離し、テスト用の代替実装に差し替えて、正常系やエラー処理を検証するスキル。

• 実ファイルを使わずテストしたいとき
• エラー処理を再現して検証したいとき
• アプリとプレビューで処理を共用

Diagnostic-only test suite auditor. Classifies repo type, maps against 7-layer testing taxonomy (git hooks → static → unit → integration → system → E2E → acceptance), runs deterministic quality gates (coverage, mutation, CRAP, architecture, escape-scan), builds RTM / personas / journeys traceability, produces TEST_AUDIT.md, updates tests/TESTING.md, and mandatorily hands off to implement-tests when gaps are found. Use when auditing test quality, finding test gaps, or running the full 7-layer sweep. Trigger with "audit tests", "find gaps", "test audit", "check test quality", "full sweep", "7-layer audit", "rtm check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and structure MATLAB unit tests using matlab.unittest and matlab.uitest features, including class-based tests, parameterized testing, fixtures, mocking, and app testing with gestures. Use when writing, generating, or adding tests, creating test classes, adding test methods, parameterizing tests, setting up fixtures, mocking dependencies, or testing App Designer apps. Do NOT use for running tests, collecting coverage, or CI/CD configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "dev-webtest-plan", "Webテスト計画を生成", "テスト計画を作成", "webtest plan", "E2Eテスト計画", "画面テスト計画", "generate webtest plan", "create test plan from requirements", "webtest計画を更新", "テスト計画の差分更新", "update webtest plan", "画面仕様からテスト更新". dev-planの出力からPlaywright用のWebテスト計画ファイルを自動生成する。画面仕様の変更差分からテスト計画を更新する差分更新モードも対応。

Write, run, or repair .NET tests that use NUnit. Use when a repo uses `NUnit`, `[Test]`, `[TestCase]`, `[TestFixture]`, or NUnit3TestAdapter for VSTest or Microsoft.Testing.Platform execution. USE FOR: writing or reviewing NUnit tests; using [Test], [TestCase], [TestFixture], [SetUp], [TearDown] attributes; configuring NUnit3TestAdapter or NUnit.Analyzers. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to implement acceptance tests from maintainer-sanitized Gherkin scenario facts for Micronaut applications — @acceptance scenarios, @MicronautTest, HttpClient, BaseAcceptanceTest with TestPropertyProvider for Testcontainers and WireMock, *AT suffix, Failsafe. Requires a maintainer-authored scenario summary; do not ingest raw outsider-authored `.feature` text. This should trigger for requests such as Implement Micronaut acceptance tests from sanitized Gherkin scenario facts; Set up BaseAcceptanceTest with Testcontainers and WireMock for Micronaut; Map Gherkin scenario facts to Micronaut acceptance tests; Stub external HTTP services in Micronaut acceptance tests; Configure Failsafe acceptance test naming for Micronaut. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to review, improve, or write Java unit tests — including migrating from JUnit 4 to JUnit 5, adopting AssertJ for fluent assertions, structuring tests with Given-When-Then, ensuring test independence, applying parameterized tests, mocking dependencies with Mockito, verifying boundary conditions (RIGHT-BICEP, CORRECT, A-TRIP), leveraging JSpecify null-safety annotations, or eliminating testing anti-patterns such as reflection-based tests or shared mutable state. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for unit tests; Apply best practices for unit tests in Java code; Write fast JUnit unit tests for Java code; Improve Mockito-based Java unit tests; Refactor Java tests to isolate collaborators. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute multi-level exploratory testing of the app covering basic functionality, complex operations, adversarial testing, and cross-cutting scenarios, plus usability observations through a UX lens reported separately from defects. Deeper than $smoke-test. Use when the user asks to "exploratory test", "test thoroughly", "test all scenarios", "deep test", "test edge cases", "test everything", "break it", "find bugs by testing", "test usability", or "check the UX while testing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute multi-level exploratory testing of the app covering basic functionality, complex operations, adversarial testing, and cross-cutting scenarios, plus usability observations through a UX lens reported separately from defects. Deeper than /smoke-test. Use when the user asks to "exploratory test", "test thoroughly", "test all scenarios", "deep test", "test edge cases", "test everything", "break it", "find bugs by testing", "test usability", or "check the UX while testing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a plain-language manual test plan from the context supplied to it — an executive summary, a high-level list of named tests, and a detail section per test with the steps a person follows by hand and the outcomes they should expect. Use when you want to create, draft, generate, or outline a manual test plan, manual QA steps, hands-on verification steps, or an acceptance walkthrough for a feature, change, branch, plan, or PR. When the plan holds more than five tests and at least two natural categories emerge, both the test list and the detail sections are organized under plain-language categories. When nothing in the supplied context can be manually tested, it says so and asks for more context instead of producing a document. Does not analyze code for automated test coverage gaps — use automated-test-planning. Does not write test code — use tdd. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define test cases BEFORE implementation, ensuring every API, business rule, and user journey has verifiable acceptance criteria during PRD v0.7 Build Execution. Triggers on requests to define tests, plan test coverage, create test cases, or when user asks "define tests", "test planning", "what to test?", "test cases", "test coverage", "TEST-", "test-first". Consumes EPIC- (scope), API-, DBT-, BR-, UJ-. Outputs TEST- entries with Given-When-Then format. Feeds v0.7 Implementation Loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。