「client-side」の検索結果

HTTP parameter pollution (HPP) checklist: duplicate parameter injection, backend vs frontend parsing differences, WAF bypass via HPP, server-side vs client-side HPP, and practical exploitation patterns. Use when testing web applications for parameter handling flaws.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced API exploitation methodology focused on business logic abuse and sophisticated attack patterns that bypass traditional security controls. Covers business logic bypass through API call chaining and workflow manipulation. Addresses GraphQL-specific attacks including batching for credential brute-force, query depth exploitation, and introspection abuse. Includes pagination exploitation for data exfiltration, webhook hijacking for SSRF and data interception, and resource exhaustion through algorithmic complexity attacks. Covers race conditions in API transactions using parallel request techniques. Provides comprehensive JWT manipulation including algorithm confusion, kid injection, jku/x5u abuse, and claim tampering. Details API key leakage detection across source repositories, client-side code, and error messages. Covers undocumented endpoint discovery through predictable naming, debug routes, and source map analysis. Tooling includes Arjun, ParamSpider, jwt_tool, and GraphQL Voyager. Designed for a...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunting skill for business logic vulnerabilities. Built from 12 public bug bounty reports. Covers coupon-race-stacking (Instacart, Stripe, Reverb), negative-quantity-in-cart price tampering (Upserve, Eternal/Zomato), decimal/fraction price-field overflow (Shipt), client-side checkout amount trust on PayPal redirect (WordPress.org), price-per-unit mass-assignment (Krisp), and archived-price swap / cart-TOCTOU (Stripe). Use when hunting business logic — heavy emphasis on financial-impact-demonstrated cases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Requires OFOX_API_KEY — create one at https://app.ofox.ai. Shared execution layer for the Ofox image API (api.ofox.ai) — validates parameters client-side, sends one synchronous request, base64-decodes the result, saves it to a file, and reports the real usage token counts and the computed dollar cost. Does both text-to-image (generate) and editing an existing image you supply as a local file (edit — change the background, recolour an element, alter a product photo, while leaving the rest of the picture intact). This is a library skill, not a standalone user-facing one — it is meant to be invoked by scenario skills that build model/prompt/size choices for a specific use case and then call into this skill's script rather than re-implementing the API calls — image-edit owns "change this image so that...", product-image owns a set of product images to choose between, and seedance-anime-drama owns character images for a video pipeline. Load this skill directly only when a user explicitly names the Ofox image API, asks to call it with specific low-level parameters, asks to debug a failed Ofox image request, or wants a plain "generate an image of..." from text — which is the one common case no scenario skill covers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。