本文へ移動
cccskills

「codebase」の検索結果

1,462 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Navigate and understand codebase structure using the knowledge graph

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tirth8205/code-review-graph3.2万2026年10月7日 更新

Analyze or explore a codebase (remote or local repository) by packing it with the Repomix CLI, then reading and searching the generated output. Use when the user wants a high-level understanding of an unfamiliar or large repo, not a targeted edit. Trigger for: - Structure/overview: "analyze this repo", "what's the structure", "explain this codebase", "what's in vercel/next.js" - Pattern discovery across many files: "find all auth code", "where are the API endpoints", "show me all React components" - Metrics: "how many files/tokens", "largest files", "TypeScript vs JavaScript ratio" - Remote repos: any github.com URL or "owner/repo" the user wants explored DO NOT trigger for: - Editing, refactoring, or writing code in the current project - Reading or searching a known file/path in the local project (use Read or grep directly) - Single-symbol lookups in the local project answerable with one grep - Git operations, running tests, builds, or installs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

yamadashy/repomix2.9万2026年10月11日 更新

Security guidance and vulnerability review for codebases, APIs, services, CLI tools, libraries, and daemons. Use for security questions, focused reviews, vulnerability research, security audits, or pen tests. Run the complete workflow only for explicit codebase audit or pen-test requests, full/comprehensive/end-to-end reviews, or requested report artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cloudflare/security-audit-skill2.8万2026年9月15日 更新

Analyze a codebase and generate onboarding documentation for engineers, tech leads, and contractors. Fast fact-gathering and repeatable onboarding outputs. Use when onboarding a new engineer, writing architecture-overview docs for a new project, or producing tech-lead briefings for unfamiliar repos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Whole-repo audit for over-engineering. Like ponytail-review, but scans the entire codebase instead of a diff: a ranked list of what to delete, simplify, or replace with stdlib/native equivalents. Use when the user says "audit this codebase", "audit for over-engineering", "what can I delete from this repo", "find bloat", "ponytail-audit", or "/ponytail-audit". One-shot report, does not apply fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月11日 更新

Run large codebase migrations and multi-file refactors. Uses the Composio CLI to coordinate issue tracking, batched PRs, and CI verification while the agent executes the transforms locally across hundreds of files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

composio-community/awesome-codex-skills1.7万2026年7月26日 更新

Analyze a reference codebase to discover and extract reusable architectural patterns. Produces structured pattern descriptions that can be turned into standalone skills. This is a meta-skill that bootstraps the skill evolution chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HKUDS/OpenSpace7,7562026年8月13日 更新

Systematic code maturity assessment using Trail of Bits' 9-category framework. Analyzes codebase for arithmetic safety, auditing practices, access controls, complexity, decentralization, documentation, MEV risks, low-level code, and testing, then produces a scorecard with evidence-based ratings and a priority-ordered roadmap. Use when assessing or scoring the maturity of a smart contract or blockchain codebase, producing a maturity scorecard or evaluation, or judging how mature, well-tested, or well-documented such a project is against a rubric.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

trailofbits/skills7,4902026年10月10日 更新

Prepares codebases for security review using Trail of Bits' checklist. Helps set review goals, runs static analysis tools, increases test coverage, removes dead code, ensures accessibility, and generates documentation (flowcharts, user stories, inline comments). Use when preparing your own codebase to be audited by someone else, getting a repository review-ready before an external security review, deciding what to fix before auditors start, or asking what assessors need from a project. For understanding unfamiliar code you are about to audit, use audit-context-building instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

trailofbits/skills7,4902026年10月10日 更新

Maps business domains and suggests service boundaries in any codebase using DDD Strategic Design. Use when asking "what are the domains in this codebase?", "where should I draw service boundaries?", "identify bounded contexts", "classify subdomains", "DDD analysis", or analyzing domain cohesion. Do NOT use for grouping existing components into domains (use domain-identification-grouping) or dependency analysis (use coupling-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tech-leads-club/agent-skills7,0492026年10月9日 更新

Maps architectural components in a codebase and measures their size to identify what should be extracted first. Use when asking "how big is each module?", "what components do I have?", "which service is too large?", "analyze codebase structure", "size my monolith", or planning where to start decomposing. Do NOT use for runtime performance sizing or infrastructure capacity planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tech-leads-club/agent-skills7,0492026年10月9日 更新

Codebase health audit scoring 7 categories with progression plan

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide6,1462026年10月11日 更新

next-qa-idea

無料日本語概要

Run one unattended IDEATION iteration of the quality-assurance loop — find the highest-value untested behavior in the codebase, judge it against the QA value bar, and file ONE locked `qa` issue specifying the test to write. Never writes code or tests; the next-qa skill builds from the queue this skill fills. Use when the user says "QAアイデア", "next qa idea", or wants the QA backlog refilled without implementation.

breaking-brake/cc-wf-studio5,3952026年10月7日 更新

Survey a whole React codebase as a senior React engineer, using React Doctor's scan as evidence, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the React code", "audit this codebase", "make this app faster / more robust", or wants a roadmap of fixes rather than a review of a single diff. For a regression check or a fix-it-now pass, use the `react-doctor` skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CherryHQ/cherry-studio-app3,9852026年10月10日 更新

explore

無料

Meta-skill for internal codebase exploration at varying depths (quick/deep/architecture)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v33,9422026年1月27日 更新

Audit an area of the codebase and propose the smallest structural moves that improve it - untangle boundaries, kill duplication, fix seams, break cycles. Produces a prioritized plan and decision records, not a rewrite. Use when a codebase feels tangled, hard to change, or is becoming a ball of mud, or when asked to improve or refactor architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rohitg00/pro-workflow2,9122026年9月29日 更新

Guided journey from a working codebase grown slow and tangled to one measurably fast, cleanly bounded, and readable. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, clean-architecture, software-design-philosophy, refactoring-patterns, system-design, ddia-systems, release-it, pragmatic-programmer - every phase carries its method inline so it runs standalone, asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (PERFORMANCE.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, ARCHITECTURE-OPTIMIZATION-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to make an app faster, untangle drifted boundaries, fix slow endpoints and queries, or says 'it works but it is slow and getting worse'. For an untested prototype, improve-code-quality; for an aged codebase you fear to touch, remove-technical-debt; for greenfield structure, design-code-architecture; for marketing-site page speed, improve-website. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wondelai/skills2,3872026年9月11日 更新

Generate a complete, beginner-friendly explanation of an entire code repository as a set of markdown files. Maps the repo structure with `treecap` (installing it if missing), studies the actual source, then writes a `CODE_EXPLANATION/` folder containing an `OVERVIEW.md` plus numbered deep-dive files (01_architecture.md, 02_models.md, ...) that explain how the code is built, what it does, and how the pieces fit together — illustrated with real code excerpts. Use this skill whenever the user wants to understand, document, onboard onto, or get a walkthrough of a codebase: phrases like "explain this repo", "explain the code", "code explanation", "walk me through this codebase", "help me understand how this is built", "document the architecture", or "what does this project do" — even if they don't say the word "skill". Prefer this over ad-hoc summaries whenever the goal is a durable, written explanation of a whole repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Leanmcp/gateway-skills2,1112026年10月8日 更新

Systematic codebase exploration following the Iron Law - understand the problem before exploring code. Four phases with file-finder and web-researcher agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

a5c-ai/babysitter1,8412026年9月17日 更新

Convention discovery and rule generation from codebase analysis. Scans project structure, builds search indexes, identifies patterns, and generates enforceable rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

a5c-ai/babysitter1,8412026年9月17日 更新

Automatic codebase indexing for invisible context injection. Catalogs project structure, file types, entry points, dependencies, and test layout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

a5c-ai/babysitter1,8412026年9月17日 更新

When given a project codebase, this skill observes the important functions in the codebase for future action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

benchflow-ai/skillsbench1,8372026年7月24日 更新

You are a technical debt expert specializing in identifying, quantifying, and prioritizing technical debt in software projects. Analyze the codebase to uncover debt, assess its impact, and create acti

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rmyndharis/antigravity-skills1,7402026年10月1日 更新

Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants to "fix everything", "sweep the codebase", "auto-fix all issues", "clean up the whole project", or asks for a single command that both diagnoses and remediates quality problems. Do NOT trigger for: read-only audits or health reports where the user only wants findings without code changes; single-dimension reviews (use the focused skill instead: brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test); server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hyhmrright/brooks-lint1,5142026年10月5日 更新