191 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
[omh] Messy or AI-generated code to clean up: delete AI-generated slop, dead code, and duplication while observable behavior stays identical. Use when the user says: ai-slop-cleaner, cleanup, deslop, refactor, risky, behavior-preserving refactor, risk analysis, refactor workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fixes web search on an agent whose model backend can't run it: a relay/reseller proxying Claude or Codex returns empty instead of failing. Use when web search returns nothing, a model insists a shipped product doesn't exist, someone wants to give an agent internet access, or the user is on a third-party base URL, relay, or 中转站. Diagnoses which built-in tools are dead, removes them, and installs a working replacement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sweep a whole running web app for what is broken, without writing a script or knowing the codebase. Clicks every reachable control and reports dead buttons, console errors, failed requests, and places where the API and the screen disagree. Use on an unfamiliar codebase, before a release, after a big merge or dependency bump, when the user asks for a smoke test or a health check, or when someone says "just check everything still works".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify UI *workflow* correctness that a task list, code review, and static screenshots miss. Drives end-to-end user flows in the Simulator via XCUITest with per-step screenshots, statically audits the navigation graph for dead-ends and missing edit paths, and emits a human discoverability checklist. Use after building any phase/slice that adds or changes UI, or when a user reports "I could only figure out the flow by running it."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and remove unreachable/unused code safely. Use during cleanup or before a refactor.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits .NET test mock usage by tracing each mock setup through the production code's execution path to find dead, unreachable, redundant, or replaceable mocks. Use when the user asks to audit mock usage, find unused or unnecessary mock setups, check if mocks are needed, reduce mock duplication or over-mocking, simplify test setup, or review whether mock configurations like ILogger/IOptions should use real implementations instead. Supports Moq, NSubstitute, and FakeItEasy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build or review gRPC services and clients in .NET. USE FOR: ASP.NET Core gRPC, protobuf contracts, unary or streaming RPC, gRPC client factory, interceptors, deadlines, cancellation, channel reuse, backend service integration. DO NOT USE FOR: broad browser-facing APIs without gRPC-Web tradeoff review, SignalR realtime hubs, plain REST APIs. INVOKES: dotnet build/test and focused service or client smoke checks when code changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects and safely removes unused code (imports, functions, classes) across multiple languages. Use after refactoring, when removing features, or before production deployment. Includes safety checks and validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
独立开发者与微型 SaaS — 单人或极小团队 (≤3 人) 构建可持续订阅收入的软件产品商业, 有别于自由职业/咨询、企业级 SaaS 和开源维护: (a) 产品发现与验证 (自己的痒 vs 市场优先 Nugent/Walling; 着陆页冒烟测试; 先接 Stripe 再写代码; JTBD 访谈适配独立开发者场景; Reddit/HN/X/社区痛点挖掘; Mom Test 验证框架; 公开构建作为验证机制); (b) 独立开发者技术架构 (无聊技术论 McKinley; 单体优先; serverless vs VPS 在 ≤$100/月预算下的取舍; Rails/Django/Laravel/Next.js 等框架的出货速度选型; 托管服务优先于自建; Supabase/PlanetScale/Neon 数据库即服务; Clerk/Auth0 认证即服务; Stripe/Paddle/LemonSqueezy 支付; Vercel/Fly.io/Railway 部署; AI 辅助编码 Cursor/Copilot 作为力量倍增器); (c) 无营销团队的分发与增长 (SEO 作为微型 SaaS 护城河; Product Hunt 发布; AppSumo 终身授权利弊; 冷邮件; Twitter/X 公开构建; IndieHackers 社区分发; 集成市场 Shopify/WordPress/Zapier/Slack 应用目录; 联盟计划; 一人内容营销); (d) 定价与变现 (SaaS 定价心理学; freemium vs 免费试用 vs 纯付费; 按席位 vs 按用量 vs 固定费率; 年付折扣; 老用户保价; 微型 SaaS 流失率控制; MRR/ARR/LTV/CAC 在微型规模的含义; $10K MRR 里程碑心理学); (e) 独立创始人心智模型与生活设计 (default alive vs default dead Graham; 拉面盈利 Levels; 生活方式生意 vs 增长生意的光谱; 独立开发者倦怠预防; 时间管理与上下文切换成本; 地理套利与远程优先; 一次构建反复销售的资产思维; 社区作为支持网络 IndieHackers/WIP/MicroConf); (f) 法务与运营基础 (公司注册地选择 LLC/Ltd/GmbH 税效; Stripe Atlas vs Firstbase vs 本地律师; 服务条款与隐私政策; GDPR/CCPA 低成本合规; 知识产权基础; 首次雇人的承包商 vs 员工选择; 独立开发者会计 SaaS — Xero/QuickBooks; 多辖区税务义务)。中国独立开发者生态: 出海作为主导策略 (从中国构建面向全球市场的产品以避开国内竞争/监管); 即刻/V2EX/少数派作为社区枢纽; 微信小程序作为替代分发; 小报童/爱发电作为中文市场变现; 人民币定价心理学; 支付宝/微信支付集成; ICP 备案要求; 中国区 App Store 审核差异; 独立开发者周刊。诚实处理: 生存偏差 (每一个 Pieter Levels 背后是数千个从未达到 $1K MRR 的人), AI 对微型 SaaS 生态位的颠覆 (wrapper 产品脆弱), 独自构建的孤独与心理健康成本, 公开构建的表演性质 vs 真正透明, AppSumo 终身授权上瘾毁坏单位经济, 样板代码销售的伦理边界。不含: 企业级 SaaS (不同 GTM/销售/融资模型), 不含: 自由职业/咨询 (用时间换钱非建资产), 不含: 开源维护 (不同可持续性模型), 不含: 风投支持的创业 (不同增长期望), 不含: 无代码/低代码平台构建 (相邻但不同受众), 不含: 内容创作作为主业。 (Independent Developer and Micro-SaaS — the craft of single-person or tiny-team (≤3 people) software product businesses that generate sustainable recurring revenue without venture capital, distinct from freelancing/consulting, enterprise SaaS, and open-source maintainership: (a) product discovery and validation (scratching your own itch vs market-first Nugent/Walling; landing page smoke tests; Stripe checkout before code; Jobs-to-Be-Done interview adapted to solo context; Reddit/HN/X/community pain-point mining; idea validation frameworks Fitzpatrick Mom Test; build-in-public as validation mechanism); (b) technical architecture for solo operators (boring technology thesis Mckinley; monolith-first; serverless vs VPS tradeoffs for ≤$100/mo infra; framework selection for shipping speed — Rails/Django/Laravel/Next.js/Remix/SvelteKit; managed services over self-hosted whenever possible; database-as-a-service Supabase/PlanetScale/Neon/Turso; auth-as-a-service Clerk/Auth0/Supabase Auth; payment integration Stripe/Paddle/LemonSqueezy; deployment Vercel/Fly.io/Railway/Render; monorepo vs polyrepo for solo; AI-assisted coding Cursor/Copilot as force multiplier); (c) distribution and growth without a marketing team (SEO as moat for micro-SaaS Ahrefs-style content marketing on 1-person budget; Product Hunt launches; AppSumo lifetime deals tradeoffs; cold email outreach; Twitter/X building in public; IndieHackers community distribution; integration marketplaces Shopify/WordPress/Zapier/Slack app directories as channels; affiliate programs; content marketing at scale-of-one); (d) pricing and monetization (SaaS pricing psychology Patel/Campbell; freemium vs free trial vs paid-only; per-seat vs usage-based vs flat-rate; annual discount strategies; grandfathering existing customers; churn reduction for micro-SaaS — Baremetrics/ProfitWell/ChartMogul analytics; MRR/ARR/LTV/CAC at micro scale; the $10K MRR milestone psychology); (e) solo founder mental model and lifestyle design (default alive vs default dead Graham; ramen profitability Levels; lifestyle business vs growth business spectrum; burnout prevention for solo operators — no team to delegate to; time management and context-switching costs; geographic arbitrage and remote-first; the 'build once sell twice' asset mindset; community as support network IndieHackers/WIP/MicroConf); (f) legal and operational basics (incorporation LLC/Ltd/Gm
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactoring code: variable naming, function extraction, magic number constants, dead code removal. Does not change behavior. Not for bugs/security (Judge), tests (Radar), or features (Builder).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare your codebase for security review using Trail of Bits' checklist. Helps set review goals, runs static analysis tools, increases test coverage, removes dead code, ensures accessibility, and generates comprehensive documentation (flowcharts, user stories, inline comments). (project, gitignored)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs structured Python cleanup and modernization — static analysis via prek/ruff, smell investigation to root cause, typed-boundary hardening by inventorying Any usage, and modernization within the project's requires-python lane. Use when refactoring Python code, removing dead code, hardening type boundaries, or running a modernization pass on a file or scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a question is about *structure* rather than text - who calls or launches a symbol, where it is defined, what a change would reach, whether something is dead, how a request gets from the API to a kernel. Triggers on "who calls", "who launches this kernel", "where is X defined", "what breaks if I change", "is this still used", "is this dead", "trace the path from X to Y", "blast radius", "what depends on this header". Do NOT use for free-text search (`rg` is better and cheaper) or to open a file whose path you already know.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the open-source free `Roslynator` analyzer packages and optional CLI for .NET. Use when a repo wants broad C# static analysis, auto-fix flows, dead-code detection, optional CLI checks, or extra rules beyond the SDK analyzers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user says deslop, debloat, tidy, simplify, clean a diff, cleanup codebase, or deslop branch diff, or remove dead code or config. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the open-source free `Roslynator` analyzer packages and optional CLI for .NET. Use when a repo wants broad C# static analysis, auto-fix flows, dead-code detection, optional CLI checks, or extra rules beyond the SDK analyzers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dead code cleanup and consolidation specialist. Removes unused code, duplicates, and refactors for maintainability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when restructuring existing frontend code while preserving observable behavior, including responsibility extraction, module movement, conditional simplification, API cleanup, or data organization. Do not use for new feature behavior, behavior-changing bug fixes, dependency or framework migrations, or proven dead-code cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run moflo's Healer (`flo healer`, alias for `flo doctor`) from inside the Claude session. Audit-only by default; pass `--fix` to apply auto-repairs, `-c <component>` for a single check. Use when something feels off (missing moflo.yaml, daemon dead, statusline empty, hooks not firing) or as a periodic health check. Distinct from Claude Code's built-in `/doctor`, which diagnoses Claude Code itself, not moflo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous iterative refactoring workflow. Scans for tactical code quality improvements (DRY, dead code, naming, complexity), implements through SMEs, verifies with QA, commits atomically, and loops until no improvements remain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies safe auto-fixes for low-risk audit findings (unused imports, dead code, commented-out code). Confidence >=90% only. Creates single commit with summary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-build pass reducing complexity without changing behavior. Catches dead code, needless abstractions, over-engineering. NOT for style (mk:clean-code) or diff review (mk:review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-implementation simplification pass. Reduces complexity without changing behavior. Use after Phase 3 (Build GREEN) and before Phase 4 (Review). Catches dead code, unnecessary abstractions, over-engineering, and redundant patterns. Triggers on "simplify", "clean up", "reduce complexity", "too complex". NOT for style/convention enforcement (see mk:clean-code); NOT for reviewing diffs or PRs (see mk:review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit one or all supported agent harnesses (claude, codex, opencode, pi, omp, antigravity, cursor, grok) for config efficiency, hook overhead, permission friction, plugin and MCP cost, skill metadata portability, dead config, and measured session friction. Use when invoked as `$optimize-harness [harness ...] [focus]`, or when the user asks to optimize or compare agent harness configuration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。