285 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Provides AI and machine learning techniques for CTF challenges. Use when attacking ML models, crafting adversarial examples, performing model extraction, prompt injection, membership inference, training data poisoning, fine-tuning manipulation, neural network analysis, LoRA adapter exploitation, LLM jailbreaking, or solving AI-related puzzles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Organization-grade cloud and supply-chain attack-surface discovery: S3/GCS/Azure Blob bucket discovery via observed-name mining (CNAME/cert-SAN/Wayback) and bounded two-class permutation (6 prefixes x 15 suffixes on trusted tokens, bounded target-bound expansion on subdomain stems), existence (HEAD/GET) vs public-listing confirmation, object-key triage into 9 value tiers (database dumps, credentials, IaC state, kubeconfig, VCS dirs, config, archives, PII, logs), dangling-CNAME bucket-takeover detection, and the ownership-gated severity model that stops an unattributable public bucket from becoming a false CRITICAL; the fully offline AWS-account-ID recovery from a leaked AKIA/ASIA/AROA access key (base32 decode, runnable stdlib Python, canonical test vector, AWS-documentation-example-ID screening); dependency-confusion confirmation for npm/PyPI (internal-signal classifier -- private-registry binding vs org-namespace match -- paired with a read-only public-registry 404 check and the npm scope-claimability nuance the public search API misses); and passive cloud-native/container/Kubernetes/CI control-plane fingerprinting (Lambda URLs, API Gateway, Cloud Run, App Service, kubelet/etcd/K8s API/dashboard, Jenkins/GitLab/Argo CD) as an org-attribution and exposure surface. Passive/discovery only -- no exploitation, no credential submission, no active control-plane confirmation (a stage-6 validate_cloud active tier is described but out of scope). Use when enumerating a target's cloud storage footprint, recovering an AWS account ID from a leaked key, confirming a supply-chain dependency-confusion vector, or fingerprinting cloud-native/K8s/CI infrastructure for an authorized external recon engagement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end external OSINT engagement autopilot. Run the FULL osint-methodology pipeline to completion in ONE go for an authorized domain — engagement folder, Stages 1-5 (seed, expansion, enrichment, exposure, convergence), multi-agent per-host content+JS fan-out, headline verification, auto-generated findings, and a consolidated multi-tab .xlsx deliverable. Stops ONLY for Stage 6 (active exploitation) arming and out-of-scope sibling assets. Use whenever asked to "run OSINT / recon / attack-surface" on a target — do NOT deliver a thin passive first pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Linux security mechanism bypass playbook. Use when facing restricted bash/rbash, read-only or noexec filesystems, AppArmor, SELinux, seccomp filters, or audit logging that must be evaded during post-exploitation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Subdomain takeover detection and exploitation playbook. Use when targets have dangling CNAME/NS/MX records pointing to deprovisioned cloud resources, expired third-party services, or unclaimed SaaS tenants that an attacker can register to serve content under the victim's domain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Linux lateral movement playbook. Use after gaining initial access to pivot across Linux hosts via SSH hijacking, credential harvesting, internal pivoting, D-Bus exploitation, sudo token reuse, and shared filesystem abuse.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
macOS process injection playbook. Use when you need to inject code into running or launching macOS processes via dylib hijacking, DYLD environment variables, XPC exploitation, Mach port manipulation, or Electron/Chromium abuse.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Arbitrary write to RCE playbook. Use when you have an arbitrary write primitive (from heap exploitation, format string, or OOB write) and need to convert it into code execution by targeting GOT, hooks, _IO_FILE vtable, exit_funcs, TLS_dtor_list, modprobe_path, .fini_array, or C++ vtables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
iOS pentesting playbook. Use when testing iOS applications for keychain extraction, URL scheme hijacking, Universal Links exploitation, runtime manipulation, binary protection analysis, data storage issues, and transport security bypass during authorized mobile security assessments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Binary protection bypass playbook. Use when identifying and bypassing ASLR, PIE, NX/DEP, stack canary, RELRO, FORTIFY_SOURCE, CET, and MTE protections in ELF binaries to enable exploitation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs novel molecules using REINVENT 4 (de novo, scaffold decoration, linker design, R-group, molecular optimization), MolMIM, Diffusion-based generators (DiGress, DiffSMol), and JT-VAE with explicit handling of multi-parameter optimization (MPO), goal-directed scoring functions, transfer/reinforcement/curriculum learning, synthetic accessibility scoring, and chemical space exploration vs exploitation. Use when designing new chemical matter against a target, decorating a scaffold, linking fragments, or optimizing a hit for multiple ADMET / activity properties simultaneously.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform basic penetration testing and security assessments. Use reconnaissance, vulnerability discovery, and exploitation techniques. Use when validating security controls or assessing system security.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use telnet to interact with IoT device shells for pentesting operations including device enumeration, vulnerability discovery, credential testing, and post-exploitation. Use when the user needs to interact with network-accessible shells, IoT devices, or telnet services.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides reverse engineering techniques. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic. Do not use it when the vulnerability is already understood and the remaining task is exploitation; use pwn instead. Do not use it for pure web workflows, log or disk forensics, or standalone crypto problems unless reversing the implementation is the real blocker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies dependencies at heightened risk of exploitation or takeover. Use when assessing supply chain attack surface, evaluating dependency health, or scoping security engagements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a focused security review of pending git changes to identify high-confidence security vulnerabilities with real exploitation potential. Use this skill when the user asks for a security review, security audit, vulnerability scan, or wants to check pending changes on a branch for security issues before merging. This is NOT a general code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Proof-of-concept development, payload crafting, shellcode analysis, and exploitation technique research for authorized security testing
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when starting any offensive-security engagement or task — establishes how to find and invoke the right skill before any action (including clarifying questions, recon, exploitation, or reporting)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when starting an engagement, before exploitation, or whenever the attack surface changes — build/validate the threat model and detect drift (new unreviewed surface) before advancing
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when gaining initial access to a target — phishing, payload delivery, HTML smuggling, ISO/IMG/MOTW bypass, supply-chain, credential stuffing, exposed-service exploitation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when attacking an AI/ML system or model — prompt injection & jailbreaks (Crescendo, Skeleton Key, Best-of-N), RAG/vector poisoning, agentic/MCP exploitation (CVE-2025-54136), ML supply-chain RCE (pickle CVE-2025-32434), model extraction / membership inference / adversarial suffixes (GCG)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when starting, planning, or running a multi-phase pentest or red-team engagement — to sequence the Cyber Kill Chain phases with quality gates instead of jumping straight to exploitation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building a client-side browser exploit — V8/JSC JIT type confusion to renderer R/W, V8 heap-sandbox escape, renderer-to-browser sandbox escape (Mojo IPC, GPU/Dawn/ANGLE), Electron/webview IPC abuse, 1-click RCE chains
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ICS/SCADA/OT exploitation - Modbus (502), S7comm (102), EtherNet/IP (44818), DNP3, OpenPLC, Node-RED SCADA, PLC/HMI/coil/holding-register attacks. Use when a target exposes industrial protocols or the goal is to drive a plant to a dangerous state (over-pressure/over-speed/disable interlock) and read the flag the HMI/CCTV reveals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。