1,389 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Weekly reusable-session ticket-to-KB loop. Reads recently resolved Plain threads, clusters them into recurring topics, cross-references {{kb_path}} of {{kb_repo}} and a durable ledger to find topics with real volume and no article, drafts the top gaps from the actual resolutions, and opens a PR only — never publishing or merging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Augment a Wren project with business context that DB schema cannot carry — enum value meanings, units (USD vs cents, ms vs sec), NULL semantics, magic sentinels (-1 = unknown), soft-delete default filters, business synonyms, time-grain / TZ conventions, cross-system identifiers, currency rules, canonical-table preferences, AND named aggregation metrics (ARR, churn, DAU, WAU, NRR) proposed as cubes. Runs in one of two modes selected at session start: `grill` (one question at a time, user-driven) or `auto-pilot` (agent infers and applies, escalates only on conflicts and high-blast-radius additions like new cubes / views / relationships). Reads everything under <project>/raw/ (PDFs, glossaries, handbooks, code, data dictionaries) and optionally samples low-cardinality columns from the live DB (grill mode), compares against the current MDL / cubes / knowledge (rules + NL→SQL pairs), then fills gaps via the ten-category gap catalog and the cube proposal flow. Confirmed findings are written back to the right sink. Use when: user says 'enrich context', 'augment my project', 'grill me on this project', 'auto-fill my context', 'agent doesn't understand our docs / enum values / units / null meanings', 'business context is missing', 'what does status=A mean', 'is this amount in USD or cents', 'we keep getting wrong aggregations', 'add cubes for ARR / DAU / churn', 'we have a handbook / glossary / data dictionary the agent should know'; or after generating an MDL and noticing the agent lacks business semantics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rigorous mathematical proof verification and fixing workflow. Reads a LaTeX proof, identifies gaps via fresh-agent Codex GPT-6-Astra ultra review, fixes each gap with full derivations, re-reviews, and generates an audit report. Base review is same-family provisional. Use when user says "检查证明", "verify proof", "proof check", "审证明", "check this proof", or wants rigorous mathematical verification of a theory paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rigorous mathematical proof verification and fixing workflow. Reads a LaTeX proof, identifies gaps via cross-model review (external reviewer backend, ultra reasoning), fixes each gap with full derivations, re-reviews, and generates an audit report. Use when user says "检查证明", "verify proof", "proof check", "审证明", "check this proof", or wants rigorous mathematical verification of a theory paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diff a specific regulatory change against the indexed policy library. Use when a reg has changed and you need to know which policies it touches and what the gap is, when the user says "diff this reg against our policies", "which policy does this affect", or "gap analysis", or when reg-feed-watcher hands off a material item.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill helps users analyze Amazon competitor listings by ASIN and produce structured competitive intelligence plus strategic opportunity points for their own go-to-market. The Agent should proactively apply this skill when users want to analyze a competitor Amazon listing by ASIN, understand what a top-ranked product does right in content keywords or visuals, find market gaps and unmet buyer needs, turn competitor research into opportunity maps for their brand, identify keyword placement patterns on rival listings, extract SEO insights from Amazon product pages, reverse-engineer competitor bullet and title strategies, mine competitor reviews for buyer psychology, compare seller and A plus content patterns, run gap analysis before launching a new SKU, research why a listing wins conversion signals, synthesize whitespace you can own versus the diagnosed listing, or say just look at this ASIN with a competitive or optimization angle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "brainstorm research ideas", "use 5W1H framework", "identify research gaps", "conduct gap analysis", "start research project", "conduct literature review", "define research question", "select research method", "plan research", or mentions research project initiation phase. Provides comprehensive guidance for research startup workflow from idea generation to planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a test file or suite; produce a severity-ranked diagnostic report. ALWAYS USE for tests that verify nothing, missing/tautological assertions, swallowed/broad exceptions, flaky/order-dependent tests, duplication, or magic values. Polyglot. DO NOT USE for direct edits: writing-mstest-tests owns supplied MSTest assertions/attributes/lifecycle; code-testing owns new tests. Exclude running tests, migration, assertion metrics (assertion-quality), raw .NET coverage collection (run-tests), non-.NET coverage collection/analysis (native tooling), project-wide .NET coverage/CRAP (coverage-analysis), named-target .NET CRAP (crap-score), behavioral/pseudo-mutation gaps (test-gap-analysis), test-mix/ happy-vs-error classification and trait distributions (test-tagging), or the testsmells.org catalog (test-smell-detection).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calculates CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) for a named .NET method, class, or file. USE FOR: explicit CRAP calculation or coverage-and-complexity risk within that named target, including which tests to prioritize. DO NOT USE FOR: project-wide coverage/CRAP, plateaus, or project-wide blockers/priorities (coverage-analysis); behavioral/pseudo-mutation gaps (test-gap-analysis); writing tests; test runs without CRAP context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "brainstorm research ideas", "use 5W1H framework", "identify research gaps", "conduct gap analysis", "start research project", "conduct literature review", "define research question", "select research method", "plan research", or mentions research project initiation phase. Provides comprehensive guidance for research startup workflow from idea generation to planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to run a full empirical / causal analysis in Python — by default in the style of an applied economics paper (AER / QJE / JPE / ReStud / AEJ) with DID / RD / IV / SCM / DML / matching, written-out estimating equation + identifying assumption, Table 1 / Table 2 / event-study figure / robustness gauntlet — OR in epidemiology / public health style (target-trial emulation, IPTW + g-formula + TMLE triplet, Mendelian randomization, KM/AFT survival, E-value sensitivity, STROBE/TRIPOD reporting) — OR in ML causal inference style (DML, S/T/X/R/DR meta-learners, causal forest, Dragonnet/TARNet/CEVAE, BCF, CATE distribution, policy learning, conformal causal, fairness audit, causal discovery) — OR in distributional / gap-decomposition style (Oaxaca–Blinder `sp.oaxaca`, Kitagawa `sp.kitagawa_decompose`, DiNardo–Fortin–Lemieux `sp.dfl_decompose`, Gelbach `sp.gelbach`, Fairlie `sp.fairlie`, RIF / FFL `sp.rif_decomposition`, all reachable through the `sp.decompose` dispatcher). Also covers exporting multi-column regression tables to Word / Excel / LaTeX (Stata outreg2 / esttab / R modelsummary equivalent) and bundling an entire replication appendix into one .docx / .xlsx / .tex file. Triggers on keywords "StatsPAI", "statspai", "AER empirical analysis", "applied micro pipeline", "Table 1 balance", "event study", "first-stage F", "Oster bound", "honest_did", "spec_curve", "callaway_santanna", "dragonnet", "text as treatment", "outreg2 in Python", "regression table to Word/Excel", "sp.regtable", "sp.collect", "sp.paper_tables", "sp.feols", "summary_col", "modelsummary", "AER style table", "QJE style table", "epidemiology pipeline", "target trial emulation", "g-formula", "IPTW", "TMLE", "Mendelian randomization", "STROBE", "TRIPOD", "公共健康", "流行病学", "DML", "double machine learning", "causal forest", "meta-learner", "CATE", "conformal causal", "policy learning", "因果机器学习", "ML causal", "decomposition", "Oaxaca-Blinder", "Kitagawa", "DiNardo-Fortin-Lemieux", "DFL", "Gelbach", "RIF decomposition", "wage gap decomposition", "sp.decompose", "sp.oaxaca".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze implementation gap between requirements and existing codebase
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze implementation gap between requirements and existing codebase. Use when planning integration with existing systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create phases to close all gaps identified by milestone audit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
分析竞品账号的内容策略，拆解选题、格式、爆款规律和互动模式，输出差异化机会与行动建议。 当用户说"分析竞品""竞品账号""对标账号""拆解爆款""竞品在做什么""对手内容策略""竞争分析"时使用。 和 skill-content-gap-analysis 的区别：本 SKILL 拆解具体竞品账号的内容策略与爆款规律； content-gap-analysis 从赛道整体供需找"没人做好"的蓝海选题空白。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Screen post-earnings gap-up stocks for PEAD (Post-Earnings Announcement Drift) patterns. Analyzes weekly candle formation to detect red candle pullbacks and breakout signals. Supports two input modes - FMP earnings calendar (Mode A) or earnings-trade-analyzer JSON output (Mode B). Use when user asks about PEAD screening, post-earnings drift, earnings gap follow-through, red candle breakout patterns, or weekly earnings momentum setups.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze recent post-earnings stocks using a 5-factor scoring system (Gap Size, Pre-Earnings Trend, Volume Trend, MA200 Position, MA50 Position). Scores each stock 0-100 and assigns A/B/C/D grades. Use when user asks about earnings trade analysis, post-earnings momentum screening, earnings gap scoring, or finding best recent earnings reactions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Health-check the wiki for contradictions, stale claims, orphan pages, missing cross-references, and knowledge gaps. Use periodically or when the user says 'lint the wiki' or 'check wiki health'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "map what our surfaces say today", "inventory our current messaging", or "find the gap between what we say and what we mean"; produces the narrative baseline — a surface-by-surface inventory of what every owned touchpoint (homepage, pricing, docs, decks, social bios, email footers) claims RIGHT NOW, each line labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated, plus a per-surface gap read vs the intended message and the drift-baseline snapshot the Evaluate phase measures future drift against. Not for authoring the canon — use message-system-architect; not for scoring the surfaces or running the vetoes — use narrative-quality-auditor. 现状叙事盘点/各触点口径/意图差距/漂移基线
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "find keywords", "挖词", or "搜什么词"; prioritizes search volume, keyword difficulty, intent, and topic clusters from provided or connected data. Not for competitor-relative coverage gaps — use content-gap-analysis. 关键词研究/内容选题
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "analyze competitors" or "竞品分析"; benchmarks competitor keywords, content, backlinks, AI citations, and traffic share into strengths, weaknesses, and an action plan. Not for a pairwise topic-coverage gap map — use content-gap-analysis. 竞品分析/竞争对手
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to analyze competitors' App Store strategy, find keyword gaps, or understand competitive positioning. Also use when the user mentions "competitor analysis", "competitive research", "keyword gap", "what are my competitors doing", or "compare my app to". For keyword-specific research, see keyword-research. For metadata writing, see metadata-optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds capability — skills gaps, career frameworks, training that transfers to the job, and internal mobility. Use this to design a career ladder, close a capability gap, decide whether to build or hire a skill, structure onboarding into a role, or work out why training keeps failing to change anything.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects overlooked, underrepresented, weakly resolved, or poorly validated populations and subgroups within a biomedical research area so users can identify more precise and meaningful study populations. Always use this skill when the real question is not just what is under-studied, but which populations, strata, or subgroups are missing, thinly represented, superficially analyzed, pooled without resolution, or insufficiently validated in the current evidence base. Focus on meaningful subgroup gaps rather than generic calls for diversity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。