「iac」の検索結果

Infrastructure engineer — cloud services, IaC, networking, cost optimization. Use when asked to "provision infra", "write Terraform", "cut cloud costs", or "design the network".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build production-grade infrastructure as code for a service or project. Use when asked to "set up infra", "provision infrastructure", "create cloud resources", "IaC for this project", "terraform for this", or "deploy this service".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guide for continuous integration, deployment pipelines, Docker, Kubernetes, and Infrastructure as Code (IaC) / Panduan ahli untuk CI/CD dan infrastruktur.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive L&D framework for upskilling DevOps/IaC/Automation teams to become AI Agent Engineers. Covers LLM literacy, RAG, agent frameworks, multi-agent systems, and LLMOps. Designed to help traditional automation teams compete with OpenAI and Anthropic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS best practices: IAM, secrets, networking, security, compute, IaC, ops. Use when building, reviewing, or modifying AWS resources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GCP best practices: IAM, secrets, networking, security, compute, IaC, ops. Use when building, reviewing, or modifying GCP resources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for infra, CI/CD, releases, repo policy, worktree cleanup and native desktop apps. Triggers: Dockerfile, K8s, IaC, SRE, Tauri, 스택 PR CI, 배포, 인프라, 쿠버네티스, 브랜치 정리, 브랜치 삭제, 워크트리 정리, 저장소 세팅, 브랜치 보호, 에이전트 PR, PR 정책, 데스크톱 앱, 메뉴 막대.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures IAC/LPAC design with composition, authority scope, conflict review protocols, and valuation oversight. Use when designing advisory committees, defining LPAC authority, or structuring conflict resolution processes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user is deciding, reviewing, or second-guessing a software architecture or tech-stack choice — monolith vs microservices vs serverless vs event-driven, backend language, database type, caching, CQRS/event sourcing, polyglot, or a migration like Strangler Fig. Triggers on "should I use microservices", "which database", "tech stack for", "system design", or "architecture review". For how to deploy, operate, and scale that design (CI/CD, cloud, Kubernetes, IaC), use devops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when assessing cloud infrastructure for security misconfigurations, IAM privilege escalation paths, S3 public exposure, open security group rules, or IaC security gaps. Covers AWS, Azure, and GCP posture assessment with MITRE ATT&CK mapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates specific, implementable fixes for every finding in findings.json. Produces code patches (unified diff), configuration changes, dependency updates, and IaC fixes — not generic advice but actual before/after code. Uses the reproduction command from each finding as the verification step: "run this after the fix — it should now fail." Stores remediation data in findings.json so the dashboard shows a Fix button and /gh-export includes the remediation in GitHub issues. Chains from /pentester, /codebase, or any scan skill after findings are produced. Chains into /gh-export for export with remediation included.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

White-box source code security review structured around OWASP ASVS 5.0 (427 verification requirements across 16 chapters). Reads and understands application source code to build a security-aware knowledge base that enriches all downstream skills. Covers: tech stack identification, route/endpoint mapping, authentication and authorization architecture, dangerous function patterns, source-to-sink data flow tracing, IaC review, dependency analysis, ASVS compliance mapping, and LLM integration security (prompt injection, tool abuse, output handling, RAG poisoning, MCP server patterns). When LLM/AI framework usage is detected, automatically reviews OWASP LLM Top 10 patterns from source code and chains into /ai-redteam with white-box context for live endpoint testing. Chains into /pentester, /threat-modeling, /web-exploit, /api-security, /cloud-security, /analyze-cve, /credential-audit, and /ai-redteam — providing white-box context that transforms black-box testing into targeted, informed assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrastructure code review patterns. Use when reviewing CI/CD workflows, Dockerfiles, deployment configs, and IaC. Covers supply-chain pinning, secret exposure, container hygiene, least-privilege permissions, and deployment safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrastructure as Code with HashiCorp Terraform

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SST (Ion) infrastructure-as-code — TypeScript-first serverless on AWS with Pulumi, resource linking, and live Lambda dev

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TypeScript-native Infrastructure as Code with Pulumi

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding multimedia to PyQt/PySide6 apps - audio and video playback with QMediaPlayer, camera capture with QCamera and QMediaCaptureSession, audio/video recording with QMediaRecorder, GStreamer backend setup, or codec and platform compatibility issues

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffolds Pulumi TypeScript infrastructure-as-code projects, writes IaC code with proper resource configuration, manages Pulumi ESC environments for centralized secrets and configuration, configures OIDC authentication for cloud providers, and builds multi-language component resources. Use when the user asks to create Pulumi TypeScript projects, write Pulumi infrastructure code, set up ESC environments, configure OIDC for Pulumi, implement infrastructure automation with Node.js/TypeScript, create reusable Pulumi components, or work with stack references. Also use when the user mentions Pulumi with TypeScript, AWS/Azure/GCP infrastructure in TypeScript, or PulumiPlugin.yaml for multi-language components.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages cloud infrastructure through natural language conversations with Pulumi Neo, an AI agent for platform engineers. Enables infrastructure analysis, resource provisioning, stack deployment, and configuration management via conversational AI. Use when creating Neo tasks, requesting infrastructure analysis, automating cloud deployments, managing infrastructure as code (IaC), provisioning AWS/Azure/GCP resources, managing infrastructure through natural language prompts, reviewing PRs with Neo, handling Neo approval workflows, or checking Neo task status and events. Also use when the user mentions "Pulumi Neo", "Neo task", "Neo agent", or wants AI-assisted infrastructure management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Cardiovascular Technologist — measuring and grading a cardiac or vascular ultrasound finding, tracking contrast/anticoagulation/radiation limits during a live cath lab procedure, choosing between imaging modalities for a clinical question, or writing up a diagnostic study for physician sign-off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Biologist — designing a study and identifying its true experimental unit before data collection starts, running a power analysis to size a sample, judging whether a published or preclinical finding warrants trust without independent replication, sequencing IACUC/IBC/field-permit approvals before biosafety or wildlife work begins, or scoping a grant-funded research plan against realistic funding odds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Biology Professor at a research university — writing or defending an NIH/NSF grant budget, deciding authorship order on a paper, navigating an IACUC or biosafety protocol, mentoring a PhD student through a stalled project, or converting a course when active-learning data doesn't match student pushback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and edit draw.io/diagrams.net diagrams as editable `.drawio` files. Covers architecture, UML/ERD/sequence, BPMN, network, and swimlane views authored from a description or converted from code, IaC, SQL, and API schemas, plus sync, query, test, review, export, and publish of existing diagrams. Use when the user asks for draw.io/diagrams.net or an editable diagram; prefer Mermaid/PlantUML when diagrams-as-code is enough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit deployment readiness across CI/CD, containers, monitoring, IaC, secrets, CDN, and DNS — score each area 0-100, identify critical gaps, and optionally auto-fix by chaining deploy sub-skills

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。