165 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. This skill should be used after implementing features or bug fixes to clean up code, when refactoring for readability, or when reducing unnecessary complexity. It launches the code-simplifier subagent provided by the code-simplifier@claude-plugins-official plugin.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Focuses on recently modified code unless instructed otherwise. This skill should be used when code-quality checks pass but the code would benefit from structural cleanup — deduplication, branching simplification, naming improvements, or dead-code removal. Invoked as a subagent from /code-quality or directly via the Task tool.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when diagnosing structural maintainability problems in existing frontend code before deciding how to refactor it, especially when evidence, false-positive checks, and candidate transformations are needed without editing business code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for general frontend code review, PR review, merge-readiness assessment, architecture maintainability, type-safety, rendering/state risks, style consistency, testability gaps, or a cross-cutting review summary. Delegate deep security, accessibility, E2E, or performance investigations to their specialized skills; Chinese triggers include code review, code review, review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guidance for Swift Testing: test structure, #expect/#require macros, traits and tags, parameterized tests, test plans, parallel execution, async waiting patterns, and XCTest migration. Use when writing new Swift tests, modernizing XCTest suites, debugging flaky tests, or improving test quality and maintainability in Apple-platform or Swift server projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Independent senior-engineering quality auditor — architecture, ownership, domain integrity, abstraction, and maintainability. Use as `--gate` inside the ck:cook pipeline (blocks a phase on BLOCKER/HIGH/current-change MEDIUM findings) or call directly with `--audit`, `--diff`, `--changed` on any repository, directory, or file. Never writes tests and never edits production code — it returns structured findings only; ck:cook or ck:fix apply the fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Independent senior-engineering quality auditor — architecture, ownership, domain integrity, abstraction, and maintainability. Use as `--gate` inside the ck:cook pipeline (blocks a phase on BLOCKER/HIGH/current-change MEDIUM findings) or call directly with `--audit`, `--diff`, `--changed` on any repository, directory, or file. Never writes tests and never edits production code — it returns structured findings only; ck:cook or ck:fix apply the fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert code reviewer focusing on quality, maintainability, performance, and best practices
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clean/hexagonal architecture: dependency rules, ports and adapters, layering, and testable boundaries. Use when structuring applications for maintainability and testability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an explicitly requested, unusually strict dygo maintainability audit that seeks structural simplification, removes accidental complexity, and challenges weak abstractions without changing behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design. Use when architecting complex backend systems or refactoring existing applications for better maintainability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review changed code for correctness, security, maintainability, and verification gaps. Use when code is ready for independent review or before handoff, staging, or merge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish, author, restructure, or audit human-first processor Architecture, Design, Research, Review, and Verification documentation. Use for progressive documentation scaffolding, authority maps, reading paths, document-type content contracts, length-budgeted splitting, or maintainability reviews. Do not use as a substitute for cycle-accurate microarchitecture analysis or RTL implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design. Use when architecting complex backend systems or refactoring existing applications for better maintainability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find overly complex code: files over 300 lines, functions over 50 lines, deeply nested conditions (4+ levels), and magic numbers. Use for code quality reviews, pre-release checks, or when asked to assess code maintainability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a comprehensive code quality audit covering security, performance, and maintainability. Use for quarterly audits, pre-release reviews, or when onboarding to a large codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing or refactoring modern C# with maintainability and performance standards. Keywords: coding standards, C# best practices, refactor C#, records, pattern matching, async best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When scoring a roadmap, PR review, ADR, or ticket for completeness — risk, tests, migration, maintainability. Dispatched by /refine-ticket, /adr-create, /review-changes; never auto-gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when you need to simplify and refine code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack developer-experience review for implemented repositories and workflows, focused on setup friction, command reliability, docs gaps, and maintainability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack health-check method for broad project or repository health review across tests, docs, DX, release readiness, and maintainability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack developer-experience plan review for setup, local commands, docs, test loops, onboarding friction, and maintainability before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Core technical, safety, and maintainability rules for codebase edits. Trigger when: - Writing code, refactoring, modifying files, or creating unit tests. - Proposing commits, reviewing git history, or auditing code quality. - Modifying files in any programming language (e.g. *.go, *.rs, *.py, *.ts, *.js, *.c, *.cpp). - Prompt contains keywords: refactor, build, compile, lint, test, git, commit, rule priority, type safety, error handling, defensive programming.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。