「source」の検索結果

Verify statistics and claims in blog posts by fetching cited source URLs and checking if the claimed data actually appears on the page. Extracts all statistical claims (numbers, percentages, named sources), fetches each cited URL via WebFetch, and scores match confidence (exact match 1.0, paraphrase 0.7-0.9, not found 0.0). Flags uncited claims as UNVERIFIED. Use when user says "fact check", "verify statistics", "check sources", "validate claims", "factcheck", "source verification".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a source evaluation protocol using lateral reading and credibility checks for digital information. Use when students need to evaluate websites, online sources, or social media claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a document set for a document-based lesson — selecting and sequencing sources for analytical tension around a central question. Use when assembling sources for a new lesson or when an existing set produces flat responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break down all competitor ASIN traffic sources under a given keyword -- organic search, SP ads, SB brand ads, SBV video ads, SP recommendations, AC/ER/TR recommendation slots, with support for ASIN filtering, custom date ranges, and new traffic keyword filters. Trigger when the user mentions keyword traffic sources, which competitors are grabbing traffic under this keyword, organic traffic vs paid traffic share, SP ad exposure, brand ad share, SP recommendation slots, recommendation ad/non-ad split, search display analysis, Amazon's Choice or editorial recommendation exposure, keyword competitive landscape, ASIN traffic composition, keyword traffic, traffic structure analysis, search share, ad share, traffic source distribution, Nexscope, traffic analysis, SP recommendation, recommend position breakdown. Even if the user does not explicitly mention "Nexscope", if their need involves analyzing competitor ASIN traffic source distribution under a keyword, this skill should also be triggered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Your competitor just launched. You have no idea how they grew so fast. Should you reverse-engineer their website? Track their social media? Map their growth flywheel? This gives you the complete SOP — from Wayback Machine snapshots to X/Twitter propagation analysis to growth flywheel scoring. Built from 150+ AI startup competitive analyses including the Lovable case study (4.3M views, 229K impressions launch day). By @WeiYipei. Inside: 4-step research framework (website → social → traffic → ad spend) · 3-version Wayback evolution analysis · X/Twitter propagation-chain mapping · growth-flywheel 6-stage scoring · KOL identification · content-effectiveness ranking · ICP + freemium pricing teardown · self-check checklist. New in 1.2: time-machine competitor archaeology — Google date-range search back to pre-fame years, star-history launch-day reconstruction (AppFlowy ~40-channel zero-budget launch teardown), competitor funding news as a launch-timing signal, and the "open source alternative" positioning play. Sourced from first-hand founder interviews (AFFiNE co-founder, 2026-04, self-reported figures marked). 🇨🇳 你的竞品刚刚爆了。你完全不知道他们怎么做到的。该拆官网？盯社媒？画增长飞轮？这份 SOP 给你从 Wayback Machine 快照到 X/Twitter 传播链路还原到飞轮六阶段评分的完整方法论。基于 150+ AI 创业公司竞品分析实战，含 Lovable 完整案例。 🇯🇵 競合が突然バズった。どうやって成長したか全く分からない。このSOPは、Waybackスナップショットからツイッター伝播チェーン分析、フライホイール6段階スコアリングまでの完全な競合調査フレームワークを提供します。150以上のAIスタートアップ分析から構築。 🇰🇷 경쟁사가 갑자기 폭발적으로 성장했습니다. 어떻게 그렇게 빨리 성장했는지 모릅니다. 이 SOP는 Wayback 스냅샷부터 X/Twitter 전파 체인 분석, 플라이휠 6단계 스코어링까지 완전한 경쟁사 조사 프레임워크를 제공합니다. 150개 이상의 AI 스타트업 분석에서 구축. Triggers: "competitor research" | "competitive analysis" | "competitor analysis" | "growth flywheel" | "market research" | "竞品调研" | "竞品分析" | "增长飞轮" | "传播链路" | "競合分析" | "경쟁사 분석" | "social media teardown" | "Twitter propagation" | "content strategy analysis"

🇺🇸 GitHub README Writing System — Craft a README that converts visitors to stars in <3 seconds. Proven structure from AFFiNE's 0→60K star journey: tagline engineering, first-screen law, section-by-section copywriting guide, Claude Code integration section, anti-patterns, and a pre-publish checklist. Use when you need to write or rewrite a specific README file. 🇨🇳 GitHub README 写作系统 — 打造 3 秒内把访客转化为 star 的 README。来自 AFFiNE 0→60K star 实战：tagline 工程、首屏法则、逐节文案指南、Claude Code 集成板块、反模式、发布前自检清单。需要写或改一个具体 README 文件时使用。 🇯🇵 GitHub README 作成システム — 3秒以内にビジターをスターに変えるREADMEを作る。AFFiNE 0→60Kスター実績から: タグライン設計、ファーストスクリーン法則、セクション別ライティングガイド、Claude Codeインテグレーション、アンチパターン、公開前チェックリスト。 🇰🇷 GitHub README 작성 시스템 — 3초 안에 방문자를 스타로 전환하는 README 작성법. AFFiNE 0→60K 스타 실전: 태그라인 설계, 첫 화면 법칙, 섹션별 카피라이팅 가이드, Claude Code 통합 섹션, 안티패턴, 게시 전 체크리스트. Triggers: "write README" | "README template" | "GitHub README" | "project description" | "tagline" | "open source README" | "README structure" | "README review" | "fix README" | "rewrite README" | "README写作" | "写README" | "README模板" | "项目介绍" | "开源项目文案" | "改README" | "README检查" | "README 구조" | "README 작성" | "README 검토" | "READMEの書き方" | "READMEレビュー"

Use when the user wants a last30days-style pre-research pass in Deepline: discover the critical public, private, CRM, workflow, social, and web data sources for a research/enrichment job; compare provider coverage; estimate Deepline credit cost; recommend the source plan before building or running the workflow; or build custom language/messaging from buyer, competitor, community, and CRM evidence. Triggers: pre-research, source discovery, provider strategy, research data sources, ScrapeCreators, X/Twitter data, Reddit comments, public and private datasets, CRM data, workflow data, custom language, messaging language, pain language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks whether each claim in a manuscript is supported by the source it cites, reading the project's per-source Markdown knowledge base. Flags contradicted, unsupported, overclaimed, out-of-scope, and misattributed claims with verbatim source quotes. Runs citation-check first, and stops at a pre-flight gate when the knowledge base is missing, incomplete, or holds unconverted PDFs. Use to verify that a draft's claims match the sources it cites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds renewable energy yield models with resource assessment, capacity factor analysis, and P50/P90 production estimates. Use when modeling wind/solar yields, analyzing resource data, or evaluating production uncertainty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures technical and commercial DD for resource assets with geological review, operational assessment, and regulatory evaluation. Use when conducting resource DD, evaluating technical reports, or assessing operational risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates mineral and hydrocarbon reserves with classification methodology, resource conversion rates, and valuation per unit analysis. Use when analyzing reserve reports, validating resource estimates, or assessing depletion profiles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify the source of an image or video frame — TV show episode, movie scene, geographic location, or original publication. This skill should be used when the user asks to identify where an image is from, trace a screenshot back to its source, geolocate a photo, find what show or movie a frame is from, or do a reverse image search. Chains Google Vision, Picarta geolocation, and Gemini in parallel with graceful degradation. Triggers on: reverse image search, identify source, what show is this, where was this taken, trace image, identify video, what movie, which episode, geolocate photo, image source.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inventory all founder resources across 8 categories for a one-person company. Use when Codex needs to systematically confirm what resources the founder has — experience, network, skills, relationships, channels, assets, time/money constraints, hard limits — by first doing a broad scan of each category, then drilling into specifics (distribution, usable portions, how to use, cost of use), and producing a confirmed detailed resource inventory written to `opc-doc/`. Does NOT analyze directions, preferences, suitability, or risk tolerance — those belong to downstream skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evidence needs grading before anyone reasons from it — the user asks "how reliable is this?", "grade this source", "check this report", "can I trust this article?", "is this corroborated?", or hands over a URL, a pasted report or a Liberty91 event ahead of an ACH or assessment. The Quality of Information Check from the CIA Tradecraft Primer, adapted for vendor and press CTI reporting. Resolves each document to its originating source, splits it into claims, and grades every claim on two written elements, access level (how the source knows) and claim support (what backs the statement), with a stated rationale, using a fixed rubric with hard caps. The grade is not an Admiralty rating. Five outlets citing one vendor report count as one source; anything that cannot be traced to a primary is capped, not guessed. Returns a graded claim table, gaps, a deception screen and JSON. /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments run it first by default.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when rating a source with the NATO Admiralty Scale, the user asks "is this reliable?" / "rate this source", or the tradecraft pipeline calls for source assessment before publishing. Reliability A-F, credibility 1-6.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collect and analyze public X posts from keywords, hashtags, OR queries, domains, or known post URLs, then trace them to primary sources, official docs, GitHub repos, benchmarks, and reusable images. Use for launch-day reactions to a new model or product, event hashtags, keynote coverage, new-technology use cases, popularity research, or turning noisy X posts into a source-backed research note. Triggers: X で調べて, X の反応, ハッシュタグ調査, キーワードで X 検索, X 投稿からネタ探し. Not for posting or account operations on X.

Review owned or authorized code for security using structure-first evidence: AST/structure maps, call graphs, complexity, Source/Sink flow, and defensive findings. Use when asked for security review, vulnerability review, AST structure map review, SAST triage, Source/Sink, taint flow, parser/scanner hardening, CI/CD security, LLM/agent tool boundary review, 脆弱性レビュー, 構造マップ, セキュリティレビュー.

White-box source code security review structured around OWASP ASVS 5.0 (427 verification requirements across 16 chapters). Reads and understands application source code to build a security-aware knowledge base that enriches all downstream skills. Covers: tech stack identification, route/endpoint mapping, authentication and authorization architecture, dangerous function patterns, source-to-sink data flow tracing, IaC review, dependency analysis, ASVS compliance mapping, and LLM integration security (prompt injection, tool abuse, output handling, RAG poisoning, MCP server patterns). When LLM/AI framework usage is detected, automatically reviews OWASP LLM Top 10 patterns from source code and chains into /ai-redteam with white-box context for live endpoint testing. Chains into /pentester, /threat-modeling, /web-exploit, /api-security, /cloud-security, /analyze-cve, /credential-audit, and /ai-redteam — providing white-box context that transforms black-box testing into targeted, informed assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skippable Phase 0 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Use only on declared need for higher-quality Stage-2 evidence: a promotion candidate, or a skill that gaia-meta-sweep flagged as under-evidenced. Given a skill id, source repo/context, and needed evidence types (benchmark-result, arxiv, peer-review, social-signal), it runs Firecrawl searches, scrapes top hits to markdown, and appends discovered sources into Phase 1 inputs. Missing benchmark evidence is recorded as benchmark-source candidates first, not direct scoring rows. Trigger phrases: "discover evidence", "find new evidence", "Phase 0", "run ev-discovery", "search for benchmarks/papers", "under-evidenced", "promotion candidate needs stronger proof". This is the ONLY ev-* skill that searches the web for NEW evidence; other ev-* skills aggregate or verify known sources. Requires Firecrawl to be usable (`firecrawl --status` authenticated OR FIRECRAWL_API_KEY set); skips gracefully when neither holds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clones a VIDEO ad end to end for a different product or offer, on the Novoads API. The deliverable is a finished rendered MP4 — the WHOLE ad, not its opening, and not a template. Reads the source's style, pacing, camera work, dialogue and tone, adapts it into a Seedance 2.0 prompt, prices it, renders it, files the source beside the clones and diffs each clip's transcript against the approved script. Use for "clone this video ad", "recreate this video for my brand", "make this ad but for my product" when the source is a video, "clone my competitors' VIDEO ads", or a video ad handed over with a product photo. **Among cloners the source's medium decides, not the wording**: "clone this ad" plus a video lands here; a still, or nothing attached, is clone-image-ad, and animating a still as-is is image-to-motion. This pack has no hook-only skill: for the opening alone, clone the whole ad and cut. If it does not move, wrong skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bootstraps Flux CD on Kubernetes clusters, creates and manages GitOps sources (Git/Helm/OCI/Bucket), configures kustomizations and Helm releases, reconciles resources, sets up image automation and alerting, and pushes OCI artifacts. Use this skill whenever the user mentions the flux CLI, flux bootstrap, flux create source, flux create kustomization, flux create helmrelease, flux reconcile, flux get, Flux CD, GitOps with Flux, or asks about managing Kubernetes deployments via GitOps. Also trigger when users ask about creating Git/Helm/OCI/Bucket sources, building or diffing kustomizations, pushing OCI artifacts, setting up image automation, creating Flux alerts/receivers, or bootstrapping Flux on GitHub/GitLab/Gitea/Bitbucket. Even if the user just says "flux" in a Kubernetes context, this skill applies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify statistics and claims in blog posts by fetching cited source URLs and checking if the claimed data actually appears on the page. Extracts all load-bearing claims (statistics, product or policy claims, ranking and comparative claims, named sources), validates cited URLs before fetching, and scores match confidence (exact match 1.0, paraphrase 0.7-0.9, not found 0.0). Flags uncited claims as UNVERIFIED. Use when user says "fact check", "verify statistics", "check sources", "validate claims", "factcheck", "source verification".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This file generates or explains Cloud SQL resources. Use this file when the user asks to create a Cloud SQL instance or database for MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server. Cloud SQL manages third-party MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server instances as resources in Cloud SQL. For example, when Cloud SQL creates an open-source MySQL instance, the resulting resource is a Cloud SQL for MySQL instance that Google Cloud manages. Cloud SQL handles backups, high availability, and secure connectivity for relational database workloads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when setting up, configuring, or troubleshooting Marketing Cloud Journey Builder — including entry sources, activities, decision splits, wait activities, goals, exit criteria, journey versions, test mode, or journey analytics. Triggers: 'journey builder setup', 'entry source configuration', 'decision split not routing', 'exit criteria not removing contacts', 'goal not tracking conversion', 'journey version publishing', 'journey re-entry settings', 'wait activity date field'. NOT for coding a custom activity or entry source — use apex/marketing-cloud-custom-activities. NOT for business units and sender profiles — use admin/marketing-cloud-engagement-setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。