「type safety」の検索結果

TanStack Form patterns - useForm, form.Field, validators, arrays, linked fields, createFormHook, type safety

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill provides expert-level guidance for refactoring VS Code extension code. Use when extracting classes or functions, reducing code duplication, improving type safety, reorganizing module structure, applying design patterns, or optimizing performance. Covers systematic refactoring workflows, code smell detection, safe transformation techniques, and VS Code-specific patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews Web Audio API JavaScript/TypeScript code for correctness, thread safety, and deprecated patterns. Use when the user asks to review AudioWorklet code, check an AudioWorkletProcessor, audit Web Audio graph construction, or diagnose crackling/dropouts in a web audio app. Trigger on phrases like "review my Web Audio code", "check my AudioWorklet", "is my AudioWorkletProcessor safe", or "why does my web audio crackle".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for general frontend code review, PR review, merge-readiness assessment, architecture maintainability, type-safety, rendering/state risks, style consistency, testability gaps, or a cross-cutting review summary. Delegate deep security, accessibility, E2E, or performance investigations to their specialized skills; Chinese triggers include code review, code review, review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this when writing or reviewing Haskell code. Covers error handling, type safety, idiomatic patterns, HLint compliance, Aeson usage, and testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score your codebase 0-100 across complexity, coupling, cohesion, test coverage, documentation, churn hotspots, dependency health, and lint/type safety. Triggers: 'how healthy is this codebase', 'check code quality', 'score my project', 'find tech debt hotspots'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Schema design, normalization decisions, indexing strategies, and migration safety for relational databases. Use when designing tables, choosing between normalize vs denormalize, selecting index types, planning zero-downtime migrations, or setting up connection pooling. Activate on "schema design", "normalization", "denormalization", "foreign key", "index strategy", "migration", "connection pooling", "composite key", "surrogate key", "soft delete", "polymorphic association". NOT for PostgreSQL-specific query tuning or EXPLAIN analysis (use postgresql-optimization), NoSQL or document database design, or cloud database provisioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to know what will break if they change something, or needs safety analysis before editing code. Examples: "Is it safe to change X?", "What depends on this?", "What will break?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extraia dados estruturados de respostas de LLM com validação Pydantic, tente novamente automaticamente extrações que falharem, analise JSON complexo com segurança de tipo e transmita resultados parciais com Instructor - biblioteca de saída estruturada testada em batalha

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author an editorial HTML+SVG diagram with the Diagram Design kit - choose the visual type, read its reference, start from an example, and satisfy the safety and accessibility contract that diagram_write({kind:"html"}) enforces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA Risk Management Handbook (NASA/SP-2011-3422). Use for risk-informed decision making, continuous risk management, performance commitments, risk scenario diagrams, risk disposition types, risk burn-down schedules, objectives hierarchies, deliberation and alternative selection, risk driver identification, and RM planning for space and safety-critical programmes. Does not cover domain-specific PRA methods (fault trees, event trees) in procedural depth — see NASA PRA Procedures Guide for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies a change-safety review to any requested file, mail or calendar change: lists every create, modify, move, rename, archive or delete before proposing it, marks destructive items as requiring the user's typed confirmation, proposes versioned file names instead of overwrites, declines to draft bulk destructive operations, and drafts a change journal entry for the user to keep. Use when the user asks to "clean up this folder", "delete the old versions", "reorganise these files", "archive everything older than a year", "rename and move these documents" or "make sure nothing gets overwritten while we work", or when any task is about to create or modify files, emails or calendar items. Do not use for backing up, journalling or restoring a skills folder, use skills-backup-keeper instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "review this influencer content" or "check if this post meets brand guidelines"; runs the typed STAR pre-publish gate, scores Trust and Appeal on the deliverable, folds in the creator Suitability read, computes the profile-weighted SQS, checks the disclosure/claim/brand-safety and fraud/fake-engagement vetoes, and writes constructive revision feedback. Not for drafting the brief — use brief-generator; not for partnership terms — use contract-helper. 达人内容审核/发布前质检

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive the user's host machine directly through Cua, with no sandbox. Maps to Cua's Localhost API. Higher risk - the agent can click, type, and run shell commands on the real desktop. Use only when the user explicitly opts in and read the safety section first. Triggers - "control my computer", "click here", "use my real Chrome", "no sandbox", "내 컴퓨터 자동화".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous AI code generation safety guardrail register: static AST analysis, forbidden import filters, and zero-day vulnerability checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect null/undefined/empty handling gaps where callers or consumers may receive unexpected nullish values.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks anything that touches US Department of Transportation (DOT) or Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) regulation for commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) — including who's regulated, MC vs DOT number differences, operating authority, BOC-3 process agents, MCS-150 biennial updates, intrastate vs interstate distinctions, exemptions, or pointing to the right CFR section. Cite the actual regulation when answering. Don't guess; if you're not sure which Part applies, ask the user to clarify the operation type (for-hire vs private, passenger vs property, intra vs interstate, hazmat, gross weight rating).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks about FMCSA's Crash Preventability Determination Program (CPDP) — how to dispute that a crash was non-preventable, eligible crash types, evidence requirements, how preventability findings affect SMS scoring + safety ratings, the difference between "preventability" and "fault," and the National Crash Preventability Program. Cite FMCSA CPDP guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a diff-scoped, behavior-neutral cleanup of AI-generated slop on the current branch before code review. Use for removing trivial comment, defensive-check, type-laundering, redundant-intermediate, compatibility-shim, or local style drift from the branch diff. Do not use for full correctness or safety review, documentation work handled by technical-documentation or docs-refactor, or repo-wide refactors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract structured data from LLM responses with Pydantic validation, retry failed extractions automatically, parse complex JSON with type safety, and stream partial results with Instructor - battle-tested structured output library

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to write modern Swift well — modeling with value types, Swift 6 data-race safety and approachable concurrency (@concurrent, main-actor-by-default, actors, task groups), protocols and generics (some vs any), API design, performance and ARC, Swift Testing, macros, and the modern language features agents don't know about yet. Use when writing, reviewing, or migrating Swift, or when a concurrency error, a hang, a data race, a retain cycle, or a performance problem needs fixing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Schema design, normalization decisions, indexing strategies, and migration safety for relational databases. Use when designing tables, choosing between normalize vs denormalize, selecting index types, planning zero-downtime migrations, or setting up connection pooling. Activate on "schema design", "normalization", "denormalization", "foreign key", "index strategy", "migration", "connection pooling", "composite key", "surrogate key", "soft delete", "polymorphic association". NOT for PostgreSQL-specific query tuning or EXPLAIN analysis (use postgresql-optimization), NoSQL or document database design, or cloud database provisioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。