1,307 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Analyzes your recent Codex chat history to identify coding patterns, development gaps, and areas for improvement, curates relevant learning resources from HackerNews, and automatically sends a personalized growth report to your Slack DMs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive patterns and techniques for analyzing compiled binaries, understanding assembly code, and reconstructing program logic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate comprehensive C4 architecture documentation for an existing repository/codebase using a bottom-up analysis approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enables ultra-granular, line-by-line code analysis to build deep architectural context before vulnerability or bug finding.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Handles batch effects in bulk RNA-seq via design-matrix inclusion (the correct path for DE), ComBat/ComBat-seq for visualization, SVA for unknown latent factors, RUVSeq for negative-control-gene-anchored unwanted variation, and limma::removeBatchEffect for plotting only. Encodes the Nygaard 2016 cardinal sin against testing on a batch-corrected matrix, the choice between SVA/RUVg/RUVs/RUVr, the confounding non-identifiability problem, the single-cell boundary (Harmony/MNN are NOT for bulk), and the Goh 2017 harmonization critique. Use when designing a DE analysis with batch structure, troubleshooting batch-dominated PCA, choosing ComBat vs ComBat-seq, handling unknown batch via SVA, integrating across studies, or deciding when (rarely) to subtract batch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Call accessible chromatin regions from ATAC-seq BAM files using MACS3, MACS2, Genrich, or HMMRATAC. Use when identifying open chromatin from aligned ATAC-seq, choosing between point-source vs HMM peak callers, applying ENCODE-style pseudoreplicate IDR, removing blacklist regions, or fixing 501bp consensus peaks for downstream differential analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "このファイルを変えたら何が壊れる？", "what depends on this function", "影響範囲を調べて", "show me what imports this module", or wants to understand the blast radius before modifying a shared utility, exported type, or public API. Traces import/require references up to two levels deep and lists affected test files.
Reflection-first problem solving methodology for Convex development. Use before implementing any solution to ensure proper root cause analysis, 98% code confidence, and minimal change scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[52] EXECUTE. Three-stage refactoring workflow: (1) iterative research of refactor/modularization options, (2) plan + risk/edge-case analysis + Scope150 validation, then implement with tests after user confirmation, and (3) apply Scout105 cleanup protocol. Use when asked to refactor, modularize, or restructure code safely.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform 12-Factor App compliance analysis on any codebase. Use when evaluating application architecture, auditing SaaS applications, or reviewing cloud-native applications against the original 12-Factor methodology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive patterns and techniques for analyzing compiled binaries, understanding assembly code, and reconstructing program logic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enables ultra-granular, line-by-line code analysis to build deep architectural context before vulnerability or bug finding.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remove refusal behaviors from open-weight LLMs using OBLITERATUS — mechanistic interpretability techniques (diff-in-means, SVD, whitened SVD, LEACE, SAE decomposition, etc.) to excise guardrails while preserving reasoning. 9 CLI methods, 28 analysis modules, 116 model presets across 5 compute tiers, tournament evaluation, and telemetry-driven recommendations. Use when a user wants to uncensor, abliterate, or remove refusal from an LLM.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate spectrograms and audio feature visualizations (mel, chroma, MFCC, tempogram, etc.) from audio files via CLI. Useful for audio analysis, music production debugging, and visual documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Passive domain reconnaissance using Python stdlib. Subdomain discovery, SSL certificate inspection, WHOIS lookups, DNS records, domain availability checks, and bulk multi-domain analysis. No API keys required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Supply chain investigation, evidence recovery, and forensic analysis for GitHub repositories. Covers deleted commit recovery, force-push detection, IOC extraction, multi-source evidence collection, hypothesis formation/validation, and structured forensic reporting. Inspired by RAPTOR's 1800+ line OSS Forensics system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query Base (Ethereum L2) blockchain data with USD pricing — wallet balances, token info, transaction details, gas analysis, contract inspection, whale detection, and live network stats. Uses Base RPC + CoinGecko. No API key required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a "Journey Into [Project]" narrative report analyzing a project's entire development history from claude-mem's timeline. Use when asked for a timeline report, project history analysis, development journey, or full project report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured decision-making framework for technical proposals and trade-off analysis. When the user faces a choice between multiple approaches (architecture decisions, tool selection, refactoring strategies, migration paths), this skill produces a 1-3-1 format: one clear problem statement, three distinct options with pros/cons, and one concrete recommendation with definition of done and implementation plan. Use when the user asks for a "1-3-1", says "give me options", or needs help choosing between competing approaches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run comprehensive worker system benchmarks and performance analysis
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a PR or branch diff using the knowledge graph for full structural context. Outputs a structured review with blast-radius analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interact with DeerFlow AI agent platform via its HTTP API. Use this skill when the user wants to send messages or questions to DeerFlow for research/analysis, start a DeerFlow conversation thread, check DeerFlow status or health, list available models/skills/agents in DeerFlow, manage DeerFlow memory, upload files to DeerFlow threads, or delegate complex research tasks to DeerFlow. Also use when the user mentions deerflow, deer flow, or wants to run a deep research task that DeerFlow can handle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。