「systematic」の検索結果

Systematic Python debugging workflow for spreadsheet tasks to isolate environment issues from script logic

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic diagnostic workflow for resolving pandoc PDF conversion errors

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic approach to diagnose and recover from pandoc PDF conversion unknown errors

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic tracking and completion of all required deliverables before task termination

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic debugging workflow for pandoc PDF conversion errors

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic fallback workflow for PDF generation through pandoc, reportlab, and fpdf2 with installation verification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic workflow to resolve FileNotFoundError by locating and verifying file paths

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic document generation with unicode sanitization, engine fallback chain, and explicit error diagnosis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "triage a vulnerability report", "assess a CVE", "evaluate a bug bounty submission", "decide if a finding is valid", "review a security finding", "dismiss a vulnerability", "should we fix this CVE", "prioritize a vulnerability report", or needs to determine whether an incoming vulnerability report warrants investigation. Applies 7 brocards (rules of thumb) to systematically accept, dismiss, or request more information on vulnerability reports, or needs to filter raw findings from agentic vulnerability discovery pipelines before human review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically verifies suspected security bugs to eliminate false positives, producing a TRUE POSITIVE or FALSE POSITIVE verdict with documented evidence for each. Use when asked whether a specific finding is real, exploitable, or a false positive, or to verify or validate a suspected vulnerability — not for hunting or discovering new bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic code maturity assessment using Trail of Bits' 9-category framework. Analyzes codebase for arithmetic safety, auditing practices, access controls, complexity, decentralization, documentation, MEV risks, low-level code, and testing, then produces a scorecard with evidence-based ratings and a priority-ordered roadmap. Use when assessing or scoring the maturity of a smart contract or blockchain codebase, producing a maturity scorecard or evaluation, or judging how mature, well-tested, or well-documented such a project is against a rubric.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and byte-at-a-time decryption, hash length extension attacks against SHA1/SHA256/MD5-based MACs using HashPump, RSA vulnerabilities including small public exponent, common modulus, Bleichenbacher PKCS1v1.5 padding oracle, and Coppersmith's method for partial key recovery. Addresses weak PRNG exploitation targeting time-seeded generators and Mersenne Twister MT19937 state recovery from observed outputs, timing side-channel attacks against comparison operations, nonce reuse in AES-GCM leading to authentication key recovery, and key derivation weaknesses including insufficient iteration counts and missing salts. Primary tooling includes padbuster, RsaCtfTool, hashpump, and PyCryptodome for building custom exploit payloads. Maps to CWE-327 (Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm), CWE-328 (Use of Weak Hash), and CWE-330 (Use of Insufficiently Random Values). Emphasizes black-box identification of vulnerable implementations before transitioning to targeted exploitation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an agent running inside OpenRig needs the right skill or context for fleet recovery, seat handover, new-seat orientation, a watchdog wake, cross-host reach to an agent on another machine, rig packaging, an OpenRig upgrade, systematic debugging, queue triage, or implementation planning; also when the agent doesn't know what applies or nothing is projected on cold boot. Installing, starting or updating OpenRig, getting back to a team or bringing a stopped one back from a person's own session is the rigs skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic QA testing of a web application: diff-aware, tiered, with fix-and-verify loop

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic root-cause debugging: find the cause before writing any fix

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runtime-neutral Reddit account warm-up and brand promotion skill for AI agents. Systematically grow newly registered or existing Reddit accounts into credible identities, then organically plant brand content in target subreddits to eventually promote products or tools. Use for: register or take over a Reddit account and start the full warm-up cycle, build a credible Reddit account from scratch, run automated daily tasks on a schedule, camp on a post after publishing to reply, run multiple accounts sequentially. Triggers: reddit warmup / 30-day warmup / start warmup / build reddit karma / reddit brand promotion / reddit automated posting / today's task - reddit warmup <user> / Day N warmup / enter brand phase / refresh subreddit pool / camp <user> / stop camping / pause warmup / resume warmup / delete account / promote on reddit. EXECUTION RULE: before taking any action, load the reference files listed in the Phase Router section of this skill. Do not call browser-act, write any state file, or execute any step until the required reference files have been loaded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Four-phase debugging methodology with root cause analysis. Use when investigating bugs, fixing test failures, or troubleshooting unexpected behavior. Emphasizes NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE FIRST.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract and consolidate reusable components, design tokens, and patterns into your design system. Identifies opportunities for systematic reuse and enriches your component library. Use when the user asks to create components, refactor repeated UI patterns, build a design system, or extract tokens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "review paper quality", "check paper completeness", "validate paper structure", "self-review before submission", "audit claims", "check overclaiming", "verify whether results support claims", or mentions systematic paper quality checking. Provides comprehensive quality assurance checklist for academic papers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "debug this", "fix this error", "investigate this bug", "troubleshoot this issue", "find the problem", "something is broken", "this isn't working", "why is this failing", or reports errors/exceptions/bugs. Provides systematic debugging workflow and common error patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing. Use when the user asks to "write rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "draft review response", or "analyze review comments". Improves paper acceptance rates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make .NET projects compatible with Native AOT and trimming by systematically resolving IL trim/AOT analyzer warnings. USE FOR: making projects AOT-compatible, fixing trimming warnings, resolving IL warnings (IL2026, IL2070, IL2067, IL2072, IL3050), adding DynamicallyAccessedMembers annotations, enabling IsAotCompatible. DO NOT USE FOR: publishing native AOT binaries, optimizing binary size, replacing reflection-heavy libraries with alternatives. INVOKES: no tools — pure knowledge skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。