「continuity」の検索結果

Expert-level topology knowledge. Use when working with topological spaces, continuity, compactness, connectedness, metric spaces, homeomorphisms, fundamental groups, homology, manifolds, or algebraic topology. Also use when the user mentions 'open set', 'closed set', 'compactness', 'connectedness', 'homeomorphism', 'homotopy', 'fundamental group', 'covering space', 'manifold', 'homology', 'Euler characteristic', or 'topological invariant'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level fluid physics knowledge. Use when working with fluid statics, fluid dynamics, Bernoulli equation, viscosity, turbulence, Navier-Stokes equations, boundary layers, vorticity, compressible flow, or surface tension. Also use when the user mentions 'Bernoulli', 'Navier-Stokes', 'Reynolds number', 'turbulence', 'viscosity', 'boundary layer', 'vorticity', 'continuity equation', 'laminar flow', 'pressure', 'buoyancy', or 'surface tension'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Real-time work context tracking for session continuity. Maintains task/step state across sessions, tracks progress, manages logs, integrates with phase enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bootstrap a new or existing project with a small, file-based documentation system so Claude Code keeps context, lessons, and decisions across session restarts instead of starting cold every time. Sets up a handful of markdown files under .claude/ (standing rules, a free-form note to your next session, a phased roadmap, a prioritized backlog, and searchable history/changelog archives) sized and split so the files read every session stay small while the archives grow without ever costing context. Use this whenever someone is starting a new project and asks how to structure it for long-running AI-assisted work, wants Claude to "remember" things between sessions without relying on chat history, asks for a CLAUDE.md + backlog + changelog setup, mentions "session continuity", "persistent context", "project memory system", or is retrofitting an existing codebase that has no such system yet. Also use to explain or extend an already-bootstrapped bottle system (add a rule, start the archival script, add a new backlog section).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "pre-launch check the landing page", "run a Quality-Score preflight", or "verify ad-to-page message match before launch"; produces an ad↔page continuity report — message-match gaps, above-the-fold check, page-speed read, form-friction count, mobile-render flags — as a pass/fix punch list. Not for redesigning or rewriting the page — use landing-optimizer; not for scoring the account or the RQS — use ad-account-auditor. 落地页体验预检/广告落地页一致性检查

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select a current video model and endpoint against duration, references, motion, audio, ratio, quality, cost, and continuity requirements using live schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes the piping content a P&ID adds to an accepted PFD process model: line inventory with off-page continuity and required ancillary lines, line identification elements per the project line numbering procedure, connection items at nozzles matched to a quoted schedule, per quoted standards, specification break questions and observations. Every proposal cites its source and revision; no source, no proposal; never sizes a line or selects a class. Use when the user asks to "run the piping enrichment", "start the discipline enrichment", "list the lines the P&ID adds to this PFD" or "fill the line identifiers from the numbering procedure" after gate G2. Do not use for instruments, loops or instrument tags, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment instead; do not use before gate G2, use process-model-check. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-session progress tracking, pattern extraction, and session resumption. Gives agents memory across sessions using markdown files in `.memory/pipeline/progress/`. Subsumes self-improving-agent — handles both implementation tracking AND experiential learning in one skill. Workflows invoke specific protocols by name.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Serena MCP for project memory and code navigation. Use when managing Serena memories, navigating symbols, performing intelligent refactoring, or maintaining context/continuity across AI agent sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architectures and techniques for neural operators on discontinuous PDE solutions (shocks, contact discontinuities, steep gradients). Covers local-global spectral design (ShockFNO), reflection padding for non-periodic BCs, resolution scaling for shock width, and frequency-band error diagnostics. Use for low-viscosity Burgers, compressible Euler, Riemann problems, or any PDE where standard FNO produces Gibbs oscillations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Three-file state management for session continuity. Maintains STATE.md, DECISIONS.md, and PROGRESS.md as human-readable session context alongside the SQLite ticket database. Use this skill when updating workflow state, logging decisions, tracking session progress, or resuming work after a context break.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenAI Codex CLI wrapper — three modes. Code review: independent diff review via codex review with pass/fail gate. Challenge: adversarial mode that tries to break your code. Consult: ask codex anything with session continuity for follow-ups. The "200 IQ autistic developer" second opinion. Use when asked to "codex review", "codex challenge", "ask codex", "second opinion", or "consult codex". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "code x", "code ex", "get another opinion".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build the smallest, highest-signal context package for an AI coding task — goal, constraints, repo facts, boundaries, and a verification plan. Load when prompts are underspecified, the agent is missing key files or decisions, the user says "use the right context", "here's the repo", or when work is drifting due to missing constraints. Also triggers on "context engineering", "gather context", "what do you need from me", "before you start". Not for cross-session continuity (use memory-startup/memory-recall).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Persistent AI companion with long-term memory, project context awareness, and multi-session continuity across any LLM.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit or design server-side indexes, directories, reputations, or aggregates that are DERIVED from traffic a platform witnesses (chain heads, run verdicts, heartbeats, publish activity) so that consent gates the derivation, not merely the read: no shadow index over non-consenting principals, post-consent-only evidence windows, retention bounds and delete-propagation into derived rows, activity-oracle threat modeling, and audit-logged ranking discretion. Use when building a capability directory / whois from witnessed activity, a reputation ledger from settled outcomes, vitals aggregation across tenants, or any "the yellow pages can't lie because they index signatures" feature. Keywords: shadow index, derived index, consent gates derivation, activity oracle, phone book not a log, delist propagation, ranking weight audit, k-anonymous aggregate, subpoena surface. NOT for the consent-screen UX and scope-ladder mechanics themselves (use local-first-tenancy-boundary), reputation scoring math and Sybil economics (use agent-identity-continuity-reputation), or discovery-layer architecture L1/L2/L3 (use agent-discovery-directories-guilds).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Treat tokens as a coding swarm's cost-of-goods-sold and legibility engine while accounting for finite subscription allowance when per-call price is unknown. Covers provider windows, remaining-usage evidence, burn forecasts, preemptive checkpoint/model switching, per-agent budgets, compaction, shared digests, context degradation, and spend metering. Activate on: "token budget", "context budget", "compaction strategy", "briefing as compression", "context rot", "summarization collapse", "COGS for agents", "subscription usage remaining", "five-hour or weekly limit", "burn forecast", "model switch before limit", or "/context-economics-for-agent-swarms". NOT for: memory architecture (use always-on-agent-architecture), single-prompt wording (use prompt-engineer), mechanism-design proofs (use nisan-et-al-2007-algorithmic-game-theory), physical containment (use sandboxed-adversarial-test-harness), or production rebodiment and fencing (use agent-resurrection-and-body-continuity).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits an Articles of Agreement contract — the daemon-witnessed agreement every official Port Daddy agent signs covering registration, transcript reporting, tool-use gating, file claims, parley conduct, budget limits, and operator control — against the enforcement-beats-hope bar: a clause counts as safe only when it resolves to a concrete, daemon-observable mechanism with a defined denial shape, never a promise the agent might honor. Use when drafting a new agent's Articles, reviewing a compliance-level (C0-C6) claim, deciding whether a clause is genuinely enforced or merely documented, or auditing whether an agent's claimed identity can be trusted. NOT for securing the inbound event-to-spawn path (fleet-event-spawn-trust), designing the relay's transport PKI and signing keys (pd-relay-zero-trust), or tracking an agent's identity and reputation across its whole lifetime after it signs (agent-identity-continuity-reputation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。