「dead code」の検索結果

Writes the character-performance layer of a video prompt as behavior under pressure, not displayed emotion — objective, obstacle, tactics, beats, subtext, listening, body/status/proxemics, and mandatory eye life. Produces a reusable 150–220-word acting master profile per character plus a per-scene rewrite of it, and a locked voice prompt. Use whenever a prompt needs acting, performance, or emotion direction; whenever characters read wooden, dead-eyed, or 'AI'; whenever a character must stay themselves across many shots; or when the user asks for character behavior, mannerisms, tics, a gait, or how someone reacts. Pairs with higgsfield-facs (muscle-level AU codes) and higgsfield-seedance (the prompt the paragraph goes into).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reduction pass — cuts content, structure, visuals, and dead code that doesn't answer a user question or drive an action, respecting CRAFT_LEVEL. Use when the UI feels cluttered, has too many CTAs, walls of text, or decorative noise, or when the user says "simplify this" / "it feels too busy". Invoke when the user asks for distill on their UI, or mentions 'distill' alongside design / UI / frontend work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vulnerability-research loop toward a novel CVE. Target triage -> attack-surface map -> ranked hypotheses -> investigate (RE / fuzz / audit) -> a finding deepens the loop, a dead-end pivots to a new approach. Uses the full wiki + hunt skillset. Scaffolds and persists state under raw/research/<project>/. Triggers - "research", "find a cve", "analyze this binary/library", "audit this code for vulns".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cost discipline for recurring /loop runs. A loop multiplies per-iteration cost by iteration count, so waste compounds. Encodes cache-aware pacing (avoid the 300s dead zone), event-driven-over-polling, a no-change short-circuit, a compact state handle carried between ticks, and a stop condition. Use when a /loop is running or being set up — especially long-lived or frequently-firing ones.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a diff for what Honey would cut — over-engineering (speculative generality, hand-rolled stdlib, single-caller abstractions) and over-verbosity (dead code, narration, redundant comments). Outputs a terse delete-list, one line per finding, with the line count each cut saves. Use when asked to review, trim, or de-bloat a change, or before opening a PR. Quality lever only — it finds waste, not correctness bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review all uncommitted changes before pushing. Checks for dead code, stale comments, AGENTS.md rule violations, unused imports, and inconsistencies introduced during the current session. Invoke with $review-before-commit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review all uncommitted changes before pushing. Checks for dead code, stale comments, CLAUDE.md rule violations, unused imports, and inconsistencies introduced during the current session. Invoke with /review-before-commit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and clean up the repository — remove dead files, fix naming inconsistencies, update .gitignore, and ensure the repo is well-organized for OSS contributors. Does NOT modify source code logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design Health — runs 19 deterministic quality checks on HTML output. Use when the user says /reimagine-it audit, "audit this page", "check design quality", or wants to verify craft-floor compliance before shipping. Catches blank plates, missing focus rings, non-compositor motion, off-palette accents, dead motion, fabricated content. No LLM, no API key. CI-ready with --json and exit codes. Part of the reimagine-it Content-Derived Design suite.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a git repo before new work: review uncommitted changes, fix .gitignore, delete merged branches, end on clean main, or inspect one branch before deciding. Don't use for dead code, commit-and-push, releases, LICENSE files, or git how-tos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede AI CI and branch-protection wiring for any repo and any stack: path-aware jobs, a single aggregator required check that cannot deadlock, lockfile hygiene, runtime pinning from the repo, and the exact branch-protection settings. Use when asked to set up CI, protect main, make CI block a bad merge, fix a required check that hangs pending forever, or repair duplicate or misfiring pipelines. Detects the repo's real apps, package managers, and runtime versions first; emits workflow files and settings, never pushes or flips protection itself. NOT FOR: reviewing or grading the change the gate is failing on (use suede-code); designing the AI eval cases to wire in (use suede-ai-eval); branch and worktree hygiene (a private Suede Labs companion, not in this pack).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a comprehensive milestone progress review including feature completeness, quality metrics, risk assessment, and go/no-go recommendation. Use at milestone checkpoints or when evaluating readiness for a milestone deadline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this over-engineered", "simplify review", or invokes /ponytail-review. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Less common Hyperliquid actions and their rules - dead-man's switch (scheduleCancel), TWAP orders, spot orders, expiresAfter and nonces, API wallet approval from code, sub-account and vault addressing, HIP-3 dexs, and what the desk deliberately does not do (transfers, withdrawals, builder fees, staking). Write actions are Execution Trader only, on an approved ticket. Use when a ticket asks for one of these or when a user asks whether the desk can.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Confirms or rejects findings from review-llm-artifacts before deletes or risky refactors. Loads review-verification-protocol-style checks per finding. Use after a review run, when the user wants to reduce false positives, before fix-llm-artifacts on dead code, or when validating a full-project scan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user says 'analyze my wordpress site', 'what is running on my site', 'site dna', or 'what plugins are on my site'. Detects every page builder, audits active versus dead-weight plugins, maps content structure, finds orphaned shortcodes, and checks performance and security posture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ripgrep-powered dead-code crawler that finds stale, broken, or orphaned JavaScript/CJS/MJS modules in the Agent Studio framework. Walks a target directory, checks each file for external references, and surfaces (or deletes) unreferenced files. Prevents registry bloat and silent tool dropouts from modules no one calls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Timebox and coordinate a live three-lane iOS launch sprint from audience idea to tested SwiftUI app, landing page, ASO copy, screenshots, promo video, and privacy report. Use for a 50-minute talk, demo rehearsal, fallback drill, or any request to finish a tiny local iOS product under a hard deadline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a truthful Japanese App Store metadata pack and app-name shortlist in twelve minutes without a multi-agent research round. Use for a live launch sprint, fallback ASO copy, app naming under a hard deadline, or when local product evidence is available but market research is intentionally deferred.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing a linker, fixing link order or undefined symbol errors, enabling LTO or ThinLTO, or cutting dead code with --gc-sections. Not for inspecting the linked binary: use elf-inspection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user says "simplify this diff" or asks for a compression pass over a change-set. Not for dead-code sweeps: use deslop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Works through the surviving mutants that cargo-mutants reports for packages/engine — classify each one as a real test gap, a mutant not worth killing, or dead code, then fix it and verify with `just mutants-diff`. Use when picking up the weekly "Mutatietesten" issue, when asked to improve engine test coverage, or when a pull request fails the Mutation Testing (diff) gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on behavior/data ownership, statement placement, loops, or dead-code knowledge, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electrician — sizing a service panel upgrade with an NEC load calculation, troubleshooting a tripping breaker or dead circuit systematically, checking wire gauge/ampacity and voltage drop for a circuit run, resolving a code-vs-inspector interpretation dispute, or deciding when a job (aluminum wiring, knob-and-tube, undersized service) exceeds the immediate scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。