1,389 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Inserts stable test ids into production components for each selector gap named by a test plan, following the per-framework insertion policy and never renaming existing ids. Use when a test plan or page object lists selector gaps that block E2E generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research ideation workflow from literature search to research planning. Triggers on "brainstorm research ideas", "identify research gaps", "conduct gap analysis", "start research project", "conduct literature review", "define research question", "select research method", "plan research", "research ideation".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits internal (dev/) and external (docs/) documentation completeness for a feature, subject, or set of existing docs, maps changes indicated by the user, across Infrahub's documentation layers, reports gaps, and optionally applies the fixes. TRIGGER when: the user wants to audit or check documentation coverage, find doc gaps after a feature branch, or verify docs are still current for a subject or specific files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: authoring new documentation from scratch → use the add-docs flow; only linting/formatting Markdown → run `uv run invoke docs.lint`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a test file or suite; produce a severity-ranked diagnostic report. ALWAYS USE for tests that verify nothing, missing/tautological assertions, swallowed/broad exceptions, flaky/order-dependent tests, duplication, or magic values. Polyglot. DO NOT USE for direct edits: writing-mstest-tests owns supplied MSTest assertions/attributes/lifecycle; code-testing owns new tests. Exclude running tests, migration, assertion metrics (assertion-quality), raw .NET coverage collection (run-tests), non-.NET coverage collection/analysis (native tooling), project-wide .NET coverage/CRAP (coverage-analysis), named-target .NET CRAP (crap-score), behavioral/pseudo-mutation gaps (test-gap-analysis), test-mix/ happy-vs-error classification and trait distributions (test-tagging), or the testsmells.org catalog (test-smell-detection).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calculates CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) for a named .NET method, class, or file. USE FOR: explicit CRAP calculation or coverage-and-complexity risk within that named target, including which tests to prioritize. DO NOT USE FOR: project-wide coverage/CRAP, plateaus, or project-wide blockers/priorities (coverage-analysis); behavioral/pseudo-mutation gaps (test-gap-analysis); writing tests; test runs without CRAP context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map your security posture against the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover). Produce a gap analysis, current/target tier assessment, and roadmap in the governance language that boards, auditors, and CISOs actually use. Use when the user mentions 'NIST CSF,' 'CSF 2.0,' 'cybersecurity framework,' 'security posture,' 'governance mapping,' 'CSF gap analysis,' 'CSF tiers,' 'cybersecurity maturity,' 'security roadmap,' 'CISO report,' 'board reporting,' 'security program,' or needs to translate technical findings into governance language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Annotate bacterial and archaeal genomes and plasmids with Bakta's Prodigal/HMM/diamond pipeline. Identifies CDS, ncRNA, tRNA, rRNA, tmRNA, sORFs, CRISPR arrays, oriC/oriV/oriT, and gaps against a curated UniRef-derived database. Produces NCBI-compatible GFF3, GenBank, EMBL, JSON, FASTA, TSV, and a circular genome plot. Use Prokka for legacy pipelines or non-bacterial kingdoms; PGAP for NCBI GenBank submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when looking for research topics a longitudinal cohort database can answer (NHIS, UK Biobank, an institutional EMR or registry). Profiles the cohort, matches PI expertise, scans literature saturation and returns ranked topic proposals with gap evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Show per-asset vuln-class coverage gaps for the active engagement so nothing in scope is skipped. Use when asked "coverage", "what haven't we tested", "test gaps", "are we thorough", or before calling an engagement done.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Preparation guide for ISO 31700 privacy by design for consumer goods certification. Covers the 30 requirements across design, production, and disposal phases. Includes gap assessment methodology, remediation planning, and mapping to GDPR Article 25 data protection by design obligations for consumer-facing products and services.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides systematic mapping of international personal data flows across an organisation. Covers system-by-system inventory methodology, third-party identification, transfer mechanism assignment, gap analysis, and data flow visualisation. Keywords: data flow mapping, international transfers, data inventory, transfer register, cross-border data flows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Splits a body of context into a sequence of vertical-slice build phases where each phase is independently demonstrable to a real user and each builds on the previous. Use when the user wants to plan, sequence, phase, slice, break down, or order the build of a feature, capability, system, or initiative, and produces a plain-language phased build outline. Does not produce implementation detail — use plan-implementation. Does not specify behavior that has not been decided — use plan-a-feature. Does not perform gap analysis between two artifacts — use gap-analysis. Does not break a plan into independently-grabbable work items — use plan-work-items.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and prioritize ethical backlink and digital-PR opportunities using SandBase DataForSEO backlink data. Use when asked to analyze backlink profiles, find referring-domain gaps, compare link competitors, or prepare a link-outreach target list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use production telemetry as INPUT to design new tests. Covers OpenTelemetry integration with tests, trace-based assertions, log-informed test creation, production-error analysis for coverage gaps, and telemetry-driven test prioritization. Use when: "trace-based testing," "design tests from logs," "OpenTelemetry assertions," "production errors point to test gaps," "telemetry-driven testing." Not for: safe rollout techniques (flags, canary) during release — use testing-in-production. Not for: scheduled post-deploy probes — use synthetic-monitoring. Not for: triaging CI failures — use ai-bug-triage. Related: testing-in-production, synthetic-monitoring, qa-metrics, ai-bug-triage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Measure and improve test coverage meaningfully. Covers Istanbul/V8/coverage.py configuration, coverage gap analysis by risk, coverage-as-ratchet in CI (never let it decrease), PR coverage diff checks, mutation testing for assertion quality, and distinguishing meaningful from vanity coverage. Use when: "code coverage," "coverage gap," "Istanbul," "coverage threshold," "coverage report," "branch coverage." Not for: writing the tests that raise coverage — use unit-testing; coverage as a tracked KPI trend over time — use qa-metrics. Related: unit-testing, ci-cd-integration, qa-metrics, ai-qa-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Competitive intelligence and market positioning analysis. Researches competitors, compares features, pricing, and tech stacks, then produces a prioritized gap analysis with actionable roadmap. Trigger on: competitors, competitive analysis, gap analysis, feature comparison, market research, what are we missing, who are our competitors, pricing comparison, market positioning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full SEO toolkit for Claude Code, powered by the DataForSEO API. Replaces the data layer of an SEO agency: keyword research, competitor analysis, rank tracking, backlink audits, technical site crawls, content gap analysis, and client-ready PDF reports — all with real Google search data, not scraping. Use when the user says "seo", "keyword research", "rank check", "backlinks", "competitor analysis", "site audit", "content gap", "compare domains", or passes a domain / URL / keyword for SEO analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Backlink profile analysis: referring domains, anchor text distribution, toxic link detection, competitor gap analysis. Works with free APIs (Moz, Bing Webmaster, Common Crawl) and DataForSEO extension. Use when user says backlinks, link profile, referring domains, anchor text, toxic links, link gap, link building, disavow, or backlink audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede Labs skill that lints a local music or media release folder and scores it for release readiness: missing files, weak or malformed metadata, artwork and stem problems, split gaps, rights blockers, and platform-delivery issues, produced by a bundled offline script as a scored markdown and JSON report. Use when a creator has one or more release folders of tracks, artwork, and stems and wants to know what is missing before distributing, delivering, or handing it off; when metadata quality or a delivery rejection is the question; or when a release-readiness score is asked for. Reports what is present, missing, or unknown; never upgrades unknown to confirmed and never means legal clearance. NOT FOR: organizing the evidence behind a rights or split gap the report surfaces (use suede-rights-audit); building the transfer package (use suede-rights-passport); a sync one-sheet (use suede-sync-packaging).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract learning sequence for a mathematical concept using manipulatives. Use when teaching maths through Singapore method or when students struggle with abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quantify cyber risk using FAIR methodology with Monte Carlo simulation, assess control effectiveness against NIST CSF/CIS/ISO 27001 frameworks, evaluate risk appetite alignment, and analyze cyber insurance coverage adequacy. Covers threat landscape mapping, asset valuation, loss event frequency and magnitude estimation, annualized loss expectancy calculation, control gap analysis with ROI ranking, residual risk assessment, and insurance policy gap modeling at 90th/95th/99th percentile loss scenarios. Use when building risk registers, preparing board-level risk dashboards, evaluating security investment priorities, assessing cyber insurance coverage, or auditing any organization's risk quantification maturity per NIST RMF, ISO 27005, or FAIR standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey existing onboarding docs and developer portal — find gaps and structural issues. Use when asked to "survey our onboarding docs", "find developer portal gaps", or "review our onboarding structure".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit an existing Kubernetes cluster — find misconfigurations, security gaps, and resource issues. Use when asked to "audit our Kubernetes cluster", "find K8s misconfigurations", or "check cluster security gaps".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。