174 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Structured code review discipline: correctness, design, readability, and security checks with actionable feedback. Use when reviewing diffs, PRs, or code snippets before merge or after writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write readable, maintainable code: naming, small functions, clear control flow, and honest abstractions. Use when writing new code, refactoring, or reviewing for readability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code against a standard checklist covering security, correctness, performance, and readability. Use when asked to review code, check a PR, or audit changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a diff needs a readability review — naming, single-responsibility, DRY, dead code, mismatch with codebase conventions — dispatched by /review-changes, /do-and-judge, /judge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research-grounded typography for any text-bearing surface — web, PDF, email, documents. GENERATIVE: apply correct line length, font sizing, contrast, dark mode, mobile, and Japanese rules from the start when building any UI, page, layout, or document. REVIEW: audit existing CSS/HTML/templates for typography violations. Use this skill whenever you are writing CSS that touches font-size, line-height, max-width, color, or font-family. Use it when building any frontend component, page, or layout — even if the user doesn't mention typography. Use it when reviewing any rendered output for readability. Use it when generating PDFs, emails, or any formatted document. If text will be read by a human, this skill applies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
生成した handout 資料が初心者に伝わるか読みやすさレビューを依頼したいとき、独立 context のレビュアーから指摘と根拠つきの verdict を回収したいときに使う。
A six-year-old code reviewer who asks "why?" about everything. Catches over-engineering, confusing names, and unnecessary complexity, then corrects the code according to the language spec, but through kids eyes, maintaining simplicity and readability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit over-engineered codebases by factoring layers into live obligations, quotienting redundant distinctions, ablating unearned surface, and normalizing survivors while preserving required behavior. Use when change latency or agent difficulty comes from frameworks, plugins, DI, codegen, task runners, config indirection, ORMs, GraphQL, monorepo/infra tooling, or web stacks, or when asked to remove layers. Produces an evidence-backed Reduction Certificate, cuts, migration phases, proof signals, and rollback. Not for one local readability cleanup (use tw-complexity-mitigator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mitigate incidental code complexity when control flow is tangled, nesting is deep, names are hard to parse, or reasoning requires cross-file hops. Use when a review stalls on readability, you need an analysis-first refactor plan before edits, or you want essential-vs-incidental verdicts, ranked simplification steps, a small structural sketch, and a TRACE assessment (analysis-only; no edits).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects deeply nested loops with duplicated inline logic and recommends extracting into small, named functions. Enforces DRY principles, single-responsibility helpers, and flat iteration patterns. Triggers on nested loop, duplicated logic, extract function, DRY, refactor loop, code review, deeply nested, inline logic, readability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Use when asked to "simplify code", "clean up code", "refactor for clarity", "improve readability", or review recently modified code for elegance. Focuses on project-specific best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies principles from Robert C. Martin's 'Clean Code'. Use this skill when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to ensure high quality, readability, and maintainability. Covers naming, functio...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
two-stage review (spec compliance first, then code quality), refactoring, and quality improvement. Use when reviewing code, eliminating code smells, reducing technical debt, refactoring methods, running self-critique loops, or improving maintainability and readability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert en revue de code (PR reviews, patterns, anti-patterns, security, performance, readability)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Use when asked to "simplify code", "clean up code", "refactor for clarity", "improve readability", or review recently modified code for elegance. Focuses on project-specific best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user asks to "proofread", "review and correct", "fix grammar", "improve readability while keeping my voice", and to proofread a document file and save an updated version.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check code for standardization, readability, maintenance complexity, and defensive coding practices
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run four parallel read-only subagents that each review the same diff from a different lens — security, performance, correctness, and readability — then merge findings into one report. Use before merging large or risky PRs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Use when asked to "simplify code", "clean up code", "refactor for clarity", "improve readability", or review recently modified code for elegance. Focuses on project-specific best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Design System] Quantitative accessibility audit for UI - contrast ratios, font sizes, tap targets, heading hierarchy. Use when (1) checking WCAG color contrast compliance, (2) auditing text sizes for readability, (3) validating touch/click target sizes, (4) reviewing heading structure and landmarks, (5) user asks to 'check accessibility', 'audit contrast', 'WCAG compliance', or 'a11y check'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve code structure, readability, and maintainability without changing external behavior through systematic refactoring techniques like extracting functions, removing duplication, simplifying conditionals, and applying design patterns. Use when reducing technical debt, extracting functions or classes, removing code duplication, simplifying complex conditionals, renaming for clarity, applying design patterns, improving code organization, reducing coupling, increasing cohesion, or maintaining test coverage during structural improvements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simplify application code for clarity without changing behavior — refactor after tests pass, reduce nesting and duplication, match project conventions. Load when refactoring for readability, cleaning up after a feature ships, or when code review flags complexity. Also triggers on "simplify this code", "code simplification", "make this easier to read", "reduce complexity", "refactor for clarity". Not for compress/split/prune-skill (skill-library files). Pairs with technical-debt-audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Content quality and E-E-A-T analysis with AI citation readiness assessment. Use when user says "content quality", "E-E-A-T", "content analysis", "readability check", "thin content", or "content audit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive Power BI DAX formula optimization prompt for improving performance, readability, and maintainability of DAX calculations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。