本文へ移動
cccskills

「thinking」の検索結果

595 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Investigate a specific Codex CLI session by session ID — correlate the local rollout transcript (`~/.codex/sessions/YYYY/MM/DD/rollout-*-<SESSION_ID>.jsonl`) with the router's production logs to understand what Codex rendered vs. what the upstream served on the /v1/responses path. Use when given a session ID and asked "why did X render?" (missing thinking, missing routing marker, wrong model, tool-call weirdness) for a Codex conversation routed through the router.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

weave-os/router5,5872026年10月12日 更新

Use at the START of any bug bounty hunting session, when switching targets, or when feeling lost about what to do next. Master orchestrator that combines the 5-phase non-linear hunting workflow with the critical thinking framework (developer psychology, anomaly detection, What-If experiments). Routes to all other skills based on current hunting phase. Also use when asking "what should I do next" or "where am I in the process."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

awarexone/Agentic-Bug-Hunter5,3272026年10月10日 更新

Use at the START of any bug bounty hunting session, when switching targets, or when feeling lost about what to do next. Master orchestrator that combines the 5-phase non-linear hunting workflow with the critical thinking framework (developer psychology, anomaly detection, What-If experiments). Routes to all other skills based on current hunting phase. Also use when asking "what should I do next" or "where am I in the process."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter5,0272026年10月11日 更新

Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5912026年10月5日 更新

Production-grade Bayesian causal inference with PyMC, CausalPy, and DoWhy. Enforces DAG-first thinking, mandatory user checkpoints for assumptions, design-specific refutation, and defensible reporting with causal language guardrails. Trigger on: causal inference, causal effect estimation, treatment effects, counterfactuals, difference-in-differences (DiD), synthetic control, regression discontinuity (RDD), interrupted time series (ITS), instrumental variables (IV), propensity scores, DAGs, causal graphs, confounders, backdoor criterion, do-calculus, interventional distributions, pm.do(), pm.observe(), CausalPy, DoWhy, mediation analysis, refutation, sensitivity analysis, parallel trends, placebo tests, or any question of the form "does X cause Y" or "what is the effect of X on Y."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5912026年10月5日 更新

Use this skill when building real-time, bidirectional streaming applications with the Gemini Live API, or migrating legacy Live models (2.0/2.5/3.1) to Gemini 3.8 Live. Covers WebSocket-based audio/video/text streaming, voice activity detection (VAD), background reasoning (extended thinking), asynchronous function calling, session management, ephemeral tokens, live transcription, and live translation. SDKs covered - google-genai (Python), @google/genai (JavaScript/TypeScript).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

google-gemini/gemini-skills4,2672026年10月7日 更新

Interrogate a plan, decision, or design one question at a time until it holds — use to stress-test your own thinking before committing to it

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nyldn/claude-octopus4,2102026年10月11日 更新

Compare the user's notes with an expert's work on a topic. Return relevant exact quotes, source locations, and at least one gap in the user's thinking. Use only when /signal-from-expert is explicitly invoked.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

davidondrej/skills4,1222026年10月12日 更新

Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

spacering-net/codeg3,9212026年10月11日 更新

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

spacering-net/codeg3,9212026年10月11日 更新

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills3,6682026年8月31日 更新

Implements the NOWAIT technique for efficient reasoning in R1-style LLMs. Use when optimizing inference of reasoning models (QwQ, DeepSeek-R1, Phi4-Reasoning, Qwen3, Kimi-VL, QvQ), reducing chain-of-thought token usage by 27-51% while preserving accuracy. Triggers on "optimize reasoning", "reduce thinking tokens", "efficient inference", "suppress reflection tokens", or when working with verbose CoT outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills3,6682026年8月31日 更新

Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills3,6682026年8月31日 更新

Master discrete mathematics, logic, formal proofs, and computational thinking. Build the mathematical foundation for all computer science.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills3,6682026年8月31日 更新

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rpamis/comet3,1802026年10月12日 更新

Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MaxMiksa/Auto-Company3,1272026年10月4日 更新

Build and query Kusto graphs from natural language. Covers transient graphs (make-graph), persistent graph models/snapshots, pattern matching (graph-match), shortest paths, connected components, and graph-to-table export. Generates the edges-first thinking: define edges, define node lookups, union, make-graph. WHEN: make-graph, graph-match, graph-shortest-paths, graph-to-table, graph-mark-components, persistent graph, graph model, graph snapshot, build a graph from data, find paths between nodes, pattern matching in graph, connected components, transient graph, Kusto graph, KQL graph.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

microsoft/skills3,1042026年10月10日 更新

This skill should be used when analyzing recent market-moving news events and their impact on equity markets and commodities. Use this skill when the user requests analysis of major financial news from the past 10 days, wants to understand market reactions to monetary policy decisions (FOMC, ECB, BOJ), needs assessment of geopolitical events' impact on commodities, or requires comprehensive review of earnings announcements from mega-cap stocks. The skill automatically collects news using WebSearch/WebFetch tools and produces impact-ranked analysis reports. All analysis thinking and output are conducted in English.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tradermonty/claude-trading-skills2,9882026年10月12日 更新

Find 10x product opportunities and high-leverage improvements. Use when user wants strategic product thinking, mentions '10x', wants to find high-impact features, or says 'what would make this 10x better', 'product strategy', or 'what should we build next'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

softaworks/agent-toolkit2,5482026年3月6日 更新

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer2,4532026年10月9日 更新

Formulate and audit real strategy using Richard Rumelt's "Good Strategy Bad Strategy": an honest diagnosis, a guiding policy, and coherent action instead of goals, vision, and wishful thinking. Use when the user mentions "good strategy bad strategy", "strategy kernel", "diagnosis guiding policy coherent action", "our strategy is just goals", "strategic planning", "mission vs strategy", "annual plan", or "is this actually a strategy". Also trigger when auditing a strategy doc or pitch deck for fluff, turning a goal list into real strategy, formulating strategy for a product or company, or finding leverage and proximate objectives. Covers the kernel of strategy, bad-strategy detection, and sources of power. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome. For uncontested markets, see blue-ocean-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wondelai/skills2,3882026年9月11日 更新

lean-ux

無料

Apply lean thinking to UX: hypothesis-driven design, collaborative sketching, and rapid experiments instead of heavy deliverables. Use when the user mentions "Lean UX", "design hypothesis", "outcome over output", "design studio method", "assumption mapping", "lightweight research", "too much design documentation", or "get the team designing together". Also trigger when reducing design-documentation overhead, getting cross-functional teams to co-design, or running fast usability experiments. Covers hypothesis statements, MVPs for UX, and cross-functional collaboration. For Build-Measure-Learn, see lean-startup. For usability audits, see ux-heuristics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wondelai/skills2,3882026年9月11日 更新

Answers questions about Deep Code CLI itself — including features, configuration options, slash commands, Skills, MCP integration, permissions, notifications, session persistence, and troubleshooting. Use this when users ask how to configure or use Deep Code, how to set up an MCP server, configure notifications (such as Slack/Feishu), manage permissions, view available skills, understand slash commands, configure thinking mode, etc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lessweb/deepcode-cli2,2572026年10月3日 更新

Creative problem-solving techniques for breaking through stuck points - includes collision-zone thinking, inversion, pattern recognition, and simplification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mrgoonie/claudekit-skills2,2282026年4月3日 更新