本文へ移動
cccskills

「relay」の検索結果

191 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

This skill should be used when the user asks to "attack Active Directory", "exploit AD", "Kerberoasting", "DCSync", "pass-the-hash", "BloodHound enumeration", "Golden Ticket", "Silver Ticket", "AS-REP roasting", "NTLM relay", or needs guidance on Windows domain penetration testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JantonioFC/skillsbank92026年8月4日 更新

Work from a registered surface or transverse route by inspecting nodes, neighbors, edges, contracts, owners, tests, and gaps before editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

clawic/Clawix82026年6月6日 更新

railway

無料

Manage Railway projects, services, deployments, environments, variables, and deployment logs via Railway's public GraphQL API — one endpoint, relay-style pagination, two token flavors (account vs project), typed mutations for deploys and env vars. Use when the user wants to deploy, check service status, manage env vars, or read deployment logs programmatically without the Railway MCP installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mnlt/teleport82026年4月25日 更新

03

無料

Run an autonomous consensus round between agent peers on several machines: they negotiate a decision over a shared channel and execute it without a human relaying messages. Use when multiple machines must agree on a change. Triggers: "/03", "work it out among yourselves", "find consensus". Wakes the human only for irreversible actions or a deadlock.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tonydzi/second-brain-starter-kit82026年10月12日 更新

Combine React's official "You Might Not Need an Effect" guidance with this project's stricter no direct useEffect stance. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React components that might reach for useEffect, derived state, event relays, reset logic, subscriptions, or client fetching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

waynesutton/teleprompter52026年6月28日 更新

Use when: ticket lifecycle, state transitions, ready for QA, changes requested, QA passed, role-based workflow policy, Developer to QA handoff, or relay routing across delivery agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月7日 更新

Use when: remote team, delegate, delegated lane, delegated implementation, delegated QA, or non-sensitive ticket routing to the remote team's implementation lane.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月7日 更新

Use when: Router bridges your team and the remote team across Telegram. Classifies inbound messages from the remote agent, dispatches Builder or Tester as subagents, composes replies, and posts outbound state-change notifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月7日 更新

This skill should be used when the user asks to "perform SMTP penetration testing", "enumerate email users", "test for open mail relays", "grab SMTP banners", "brute force email credentials", or "assess mail server security". It provides comprehensive techniques for testing SMTP server security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AxelMrak/ai52026年2月20日 更新

This skill should be used when the user asks to "attack Active Directory", "exploit AD", "Kerberoasting", "DCSync", "pass-the-hash", "BloodHound enumeration", "Golden Ticket", "Silver Ticket", "AS-REP roasting", "NTLM relay", or needs guidance on Windows domain penetration testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AxelMrak/ai52026年2月20日 更新

ctf-osint

無料

Provides open source intelligence techniques for CTF challenges. Use when gathering information from public sources, social media, geolocation, DNS records, username enumeration, reverse image search, Google dorking, Wayback Machine, Tor relays, FEC filings, or identifying unknow

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MustafaKemal0146/fetih52026年10月11日 更新

Audit agent configuration files for security vulnerabilities and misconfigurations. Covers settings.json, .mcp.json, .codex/config.toml, AGENTS.md, hooks, plugin manifests, and relay config. Classify findings as P0 or P1.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aibot88/sec_skill_store42026年5月27日 更新

Combine React's official "You Might Not Need an Effect" guidance with this project's stricter no direct useEffect stance. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React components that might reach for useEffect, derived state, event relays, reset logic, subscriptions, or client fetching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

waynesutton/finder932026年5月24日 更新

Prepare or update a Fabric pull request by proving the changeset-or-skip decision, validation evidence, DCO sign-off, and public-safe PR metadata. Use before the first push, after later revisions, or when asked to create or update a PR. Do not use to review an unrelated PR or authorize relay.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fabric-Pro/fabric-oss32026年10月9日 更新

Use this skill to explain to customers/sales prospects why FMCSA CSA scores are not available in real-time. Covers the SAFER refresh cycle and what 'real-time' actually means for CSA data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

x3allamerican/skills32026年5月17日 更新

Combine React's official "You Might Not Need an Effect" guidance with this project's stricter no direct useEffect stance. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React components that might reach for useEffect, derived state, event relays, reset logic, subscriptions, or client fetching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

waynesutton/waynesutton-ai22026年9月8日 更新

linkedin

無料

LinkedIn automation via browser relay or cookies for messaging, profile viewing, and network actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aAAaqwq/openclaw-team22026年6月18日 更新

Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) attack methodology — GATT enumeration, characteristic read/write without auth, pairing downgrade (Just Works forced), LE Secure Connections bypass, MITM via active relay, sniffing with Sniffle (TI CC1352) / Ubertooth / Frontline, encryption key extraction (LE Legacy Pairing crackable, LE Secure Connections strong), proximity authentication abuse (cars, locks), and companion-app trust analysis. Use for IoT BLE devices, smart locks, fitness trackers, medical devices, BLE beacons, or any device pairing over BLE.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ajtazer/heckit22026年10月7日 更新

You are helping a penetration tester force remote systems to authenticate

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ajtazer/heckit22026年10月7日 更新

Active Directory attack methodology for internal network red team engagements. Covers reconnaissance (BloodHound, PowerView, ADExplorer), credential abuse (Kerberoasting, ASREProasting, NTLM relay, LLMNR/NBT-NS poisoning), privilege escalation (ACL abuse, GPO abuse, unconstrained/constrained delegation), lateral movement (Pass-the-Hash, Pass-the-Ticket, Overpass-the-Hash, WMI/WinRM/PsExec), persistence (Golden/Silver/Diamond Tickets, DCSync, DCShadow, AdminSDHolder, Skeleton Key), forest trust attacks, ADCS abuse (ESC1-ESC15), and modern MDI/Defender for Identity evasion. Use when assessing on-prem AD, hybrid AD/Entra ID environments, or ADCS deployments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ajtazer/heckit22026年10月7日 更新

You are helping a penetration tester exploit ADCS through template/CA access

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ajtazer/heckit22026年10月7日 更新

This skill should be used when the user asks to "attack Active Directory", "exploit AD", "Kerberoasting", "DCSync", "pass-the-hash", "BloodHound enumeration", "Golden Ticket", "Silver Ticket", "AS-REP roasting", "NTLM relay", or needs guidance on Windows domain penetration testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

danstrem2/clawdbot-skill-master-pack22026年2月1日 更新

Architects the encryption, codec/transport, and premium-feature layer of a group video-calling product, on top of an already-chosen SFU topology. Covers E2EE patterns (Zoom leader-fan-out, Signal pairwise-fan-out, MLS/TreeKEM as in Discord's DAVE, Telegram's ledger consensus), the SFrame (RFC 9605) + WebRTC Insertable Streams mechanism letting an SFU relay encrypted frames it can't read, codec/transport choice (AV1/VP9 SVC vs. simulcast, Opus, congestion control, Media-over-QUIC, WHIP/WHEP), and which "premium" features (virtual backgrounds, live captions, recording, breakout rooms, spatial audio) survive E2EE vs. structurally can't. Use when adding E2EE to an SFU-based call, choosing a 2026 codec/SVC strategy, or deciding which features to disable under E2EE mode. NOT for call topology/platform choice (see webrtc-adhoc-video-chat, which this composes with). NOT for one-way broadcast (see managed-video-streaming-pipeline). NOT for the DM/group-chat text backend (see realtime-messaging-backend-architecture).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新