「analyze」の検索結果

Use when you need to analyze Java profiling data collected during the detection phase — including interpreting flamegraphs, memory allocation patterns, CPU hotspots, threading issues, systematic problem categorization, evidence documentation with profiling-problem-analysis and profiling-solutions markdown files, or prioritizing fixes using Impact/Effort scoring. This should trigger for requests such as Analyze JFR profile; Analyze the profile; Analyze the performance; Analyze the memory; Analyze the threading; Analyze GC logs from profiling; Prioritize Java profiling bottlenecks by impact. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix stale Haskell analyzer binaries silently being used by the orchestrator even after a successful rebuild. Use when: (1) modified `packages/js-analyzer/` or other Haskell analyzer source, ran `scripts/build-native.sh ... cabal install`, but a subsequent `grafema analyze` shows old behavior (missing new edges, no new node types, etc.), (2) `~/.cabal/bin/grafema-analyzer` has fresh timestamp but `grafema analyze` produces output as if the change didn't happen, (3) a test verifying new analyzer output passes locally in unit tests but fails in end-to-end runs that go through the orchestrator. Root cause: the Rust orchestrator's `resolve_binary` checks `~/.grafema/bin/<name>` BEFORE `~/.cabal/bin/<name>`, so any stale copy that was once installed there (possibly months ago) shadows the fresh `cabal install` output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `Meziantou.Analyzer` package for design, usage, security, performance, and style rules in .NET. Use when a repo wants broader analyzer coverage with a single NuGet package. USE FOR: the repo uses or wants Meziantou.Analyzer; the team wants one analyzer pack that covers design, usage, security, performance, and style. DO NOT USE FOR: repos that already enforce an overlapping analyzer baseline and do not want extra diagnostics; formatting-only work. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill helps users extract YouTube video transcripts and perform deep competitive analysis on the content. Agent should proactively apply this skill when users express needs like analyze YouTube video content strategy, perform competitive video content analysis, extract and analyze YouTube subtitles for marketing insights, understand competitor value propositions from their videos, identify target audience from YouTube video content, analyze pain points and needs mentioned in YouTube videos, evaluate competitor CTA strategies in video content, find content gaps in competitor YouTube videos, analyze video narrative structure and hooks, extract key messaging and positioning from YouTube content, benchmark competitor video content quality, research competitor marketing angles through video analysis, identify audience signals and terminology level in videos, analyze emotional tone and persuasion techniques in YouTube content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `StyleCop.Analyzers` package for naming, layout, documentation, and style rules in .NET projects. Use when a repo wants stricter style conventions than the SDK analyzers alone provide. USE FOR: the repo wants StyleCop.Analyzers; naming, layout, or documentation style needs stronger enforcement; the team needs stylecop.json guidance. DO NOT USE FOR: repos that intentionally rely only on SDK analyzers; repos where StyleCop overlaps too heavily with an existing style package and no. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use a repo-root `.editorconfig` to configure free .NET analyzer and style rules. Use when a .NET repo needs rule severity, code-style options, section layout, or analyzer ownership made explicit. USE FOR: the repo needs a root .editorconfig; analyzer severity and style ownership are unclear; the team wants one source of truth for rule configuration. DO NOT USE FOR: choosing analyzers with no config change; formatting-only execution with no config ownership question. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the free built-in .NET SDK analyzers and analysis levels with gradual Roslyn warning promotion. USE FOR: the repo wants first-party .NET analyzers; CI should fail on analyzer warnings; the team needs AnalysisLevel or AnalysisMode guidance. DO NOT USE FOR: third-party analyzer selection by itself; formatting-only work. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze A/B test results — statistical significance, practical significance, and segmentation. Use when asked to "analyze our A/B test", "is this result significant", or "read these experiment results".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze LLM eval results — score breakdowns by category, regression detection vs baseline, failure clustering. Use when asked to "analyze our eval results", "did the model regress", or "cluster the eval failures".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automates batch reverse engineering by generating Ghidra analyzeHeadless commands and post-analysis script skeletons to import, auto-analyze, and export results for many samples without the GUI. Activates for requests to script Ghidra headless analysis, batch-analyze samples with Ghidra, or generate an analyzeHeadless command and post-script.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

融合单元的范围判定与收益前置评估：判定「哪些计算该被融进同一个融合单元、边界画在哪、 融了值不值」。结构侧按融合单元构造规则切边界——函数边界即候选组；FA（含 BSA 等变种）为 禁融锚点；以 norm / rope / FA 为分界分区，全 Vec 区域优先试融；区域内有 Cube 时以 Cube 为 首算子向后包裹 Vec（Σvec 小于 cube 或遇下一 Cube 封口）；一轮之后纯 Vector 单元之间再迭代； MLP / MoE 以矩阵乘族（MatMul / BatchMatMul / GroupedMatmul）为界；若该段计算已由单个 融合算子承载，按规则 6 先确认载体是否已生效（不重复建单元）。 收益侧按计算单元利用率判型（memory_bound、*_vec|mac|mte2|mte3_ratio、cube_utilization）， 叠加带宽下限 / 区域占比 / 天花板法 / 地板先行 / Amdahl 传导校验给出 go/no-go。 当用户问「这几个算子能不能融成一个」「融合边界画在哪」「融多大范围」「融了值不值得」， 或 profiling-analyze 给出融合机会候选需要定范围与收益时使用；即使用户只说「这条链要不要 合成一个 kernel」「这里能不能省一次读写」也应触发。 **已经做完、实测收益却打平或为负时同样触发**——此时的任务不是接受"融合无收益"， 而是按事后复核做**等功忙计数对照**归因，并在缺陷落在融合核自身时**升级 operator-dev**。 边界：只出「融合单元草案 + 收益判定 + 否决理由」。不做采纳与选点（dit-perf-opt 依收益选 top 并派活）、不做采集与瓶颈定位（profiling-collect / profiling-analyze）、不写 kernel、不写 pattern、 不做使能与并行选型、不定义验收标准（引 accuracy-gate / perf-gate）。 由 profiling-analyze（融合机会候选）与 operator-dev（实现前的收益评估）调用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when analyzing harness trace logs to surface recurring failure patterns and suggest harness improvements. Scatter-gather pattern across last N runs with mandatory HITL gate before any change is applied. Triggers on /mk:trace-analyze, "analyze traces", "find patterns in harness runs", or after a model upgrade flagged dead-weight-audit-needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze pi (coding-agent) session JSONL and ego-benchmark-harness run artifacts to explain slow or failed individual tasks, compare execution-path differences between agents or browser tools, and count tool calls and error types. Use this skill whenever users ask to analyze a pi session, explain why a task was slow or failed, compare two runs, investigate an error, locate the session corresponding to tasks.jsonl, inspect an agent execution path, count tool calls, analyze a run ID, or perform any forensic or retrospective analysis of JSONL under ~/.pi/agent/sessions/ or agent-home/.pi/agent/sessions/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a paper draft objectively and strictly. Identifies logic gaps, missing proofs, structural issues, and research weaknesses. Reviewer mode. Use for "analyze this paper", "find weaknesses in draft". 旧名 review-analyze。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent skill for analyze-code-quality - invoke with $agent-analyze-code-quality

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent skill for code-analyzer - invoke with $agent-code-analyzer

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent skill for pagerank-analyzer - invoke with $agent-pagerank-analyzer

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent skill for performance-analyzer - invoke with $agent-performance-analyzer

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Command-line interface for CloudAnalyzer — Agent-friendly harness for CloudAnalyzer, a QA platform for mapping, localization, and perception outputs. Supports 27 commands across 8 groups: point cloud evaluation, trajectory evaluation, ground segmentation QA, config-driven quality gates, baseline evolution, processing, visualization, and interactive REPL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze ML experiment results, compute statistics, generate comparison tables and insights. Use when user says "analyze results", "compare", or needs to interpret experimental data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Token integration and implementation analyzer based on Trail of Bits' token integration checklist. Analyzes token implementations for ERC20/ERC721 conformity, checks for 20+ weird token patterns, assesses contract composition and owner privileges, performs on-chain scarcity analysis, and evaluates how protocols handle non-standard tokens. Use when integrating or accepting arbitrary ERC20/ERC721 tokens, auditing a token implementation for standards conformity, or assessing risk from weird tokens such as fee-on-transfer, rebasing, missing return values, or blocklists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze any TRES Finance report XLSX and produce an automatic findings summary. Trigger this skill whenever a user uploads a .xlsx file that came from TRES Finance and asks to "analyze", "summarize", "review", "check", "audit", "look at", "what does this show", "any issues", "anything interesting", or "walk me through" the report. Also trigger when the user uploads an Excel file and mentions TRES, reconciliation, balances, transactions, cost basis, roll forward, or ERP sync. The skill identifies the report type from the file structure, runs targeted analysis based on report-specific logic, and produces a clear findings summary highlighting anomalies, key metrics, and action items.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deeply analyze any empirical economics PDF using the five-question framework (五问框架): research question, identification strategy, core estimand, robustness logic, and scholarly contribution. Converts the PDF to Markdown, dispatches 5 parallel sub-agents (one per question), then compiles a 2000–3000 Chinese-character report with a transferable methodology checklist. Optimized for empirical economics papers in top journals (AER, QJE, JPE, RFS, RoF, JFE, etc.). Use this skill whenever the user wants to: - systematically analyze an empirical economics paper - apply the 五问框架 (five-question framework) to a paper - extract transferable research design elements from a top-journal paper - understand a paper's identification strategy, estimand, or robustness logic - run /five-questions, /five-q, or /paper-five-q-analysis - "帮我做五问分析", "用五问框架分析这篇论文", "analyze this paper with the five-question framework"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skill that analyzes 18-month scenarios from a news headline. Runs the primary analysis with the scenario-analyst agent and obtains a second opinion with the strategy-reviewer agent. Generates a comprehensive English report covering 1st/2nd/3rd-order impacts, recommended stocks, and a critical review. Example: /scenario-analyzer "Fed raises rates by 50bp" Triggers: news analysis, scenario analysis, 18-month outlook, medium-to-long-term investment strategy

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。