「anti-patterns」の検索結果

Review database schema design and detect anti-patterns. Based on common RDB design knowledge and best practices. Supports Prisma, Drizzle, Rails, Django, Laravel, TypeORM, Sequelize, SQLAlchemy, and raw SQL (DDL). Use when the user says "review DB design", "check schema", "review table design", "review migration", "check for anti-patterns", "DB設計をレビューして", "スキーマを見て", "テーブル設計を確認して", "マイグレーションをレビューして", "アンチパターンがないか調べて", "この設計で問題ないか見て".

Reviews test code to identify and fix common testing anti-patterns including flaky tests, over-mocking, brittle assertions, test interdependency, and hidden test logic. Flags bad patterns, explains the specific defect, and provides corrected implementations. Use when reviewing test code, debugging intermittent or unreliable test failures, or when the user mentions flaky tests, test smells, brittle tests, test isolation issues, mock overuse, slow tests, or test maintenance problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when reviewing Python code for common anti-patterns to avoid. Use as a checklist when reviewing code, before finalizing implementations, or when debugging issues that might stem from known bad practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Canonical patterns for writing custom MSBuild targets. USE FOR: diagnosing and fixing custom target authoring anti-patterns; broken SDK target chains across files (e.g., Directory.Build.targets silently redefining SDK targets); targets that replace CompileDependsOn instead of extending it with $(CompileDependsOn); query targets returning stale results from Outputs vs Returns misuse; missing Inputs/Outputs causing unnecessary rebuilds; missing FileWrites registration. Covers DependsOnTargets vs BeforeTargets vs AfterTargets, the Build→CoreBuild three-level pattern, and the $(XxxDependsOn) chain-extension pattern. DO NOT USE FOR: incremental build tuning (use incremental-build), parallelization (use build-parallelism), general anti-patterns (use msbuild-antipatterns), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects duplicate boilerplate, copy-paste tests, and structural maintainability issues across .NET test suites. Use when the user asks to reduce repetition, consolidate similar test methods, convert copy-paste tests to data-driven parameterized tests, suggest a better test structure, or identify refactoring opportunities. Identifies repeated construction, assertion patterns, copy-paste methods convertible to DataRow/Theory/TestCase, redundant setup/teardown, and shared infrastructure. Produces an analysis report with concrete before/after suggestions. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), reviewing test quality or anti-patterns (use test-anti-patterns), or deep mock auditing (use exp-mock-usage-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and avoid common Claude API anti-patterns and integration mistakes. Use when reviewing code, onboarding developers, or debugging subtle issues with Anthropic integrations. Trigger with phrases like "anthropic pitfalls", "claude anti-patterns", "claude mistakes", "anthropic common issues", "claude gotchas".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Canonical patterns for writing custom MSBuild targets. USE FOR: diagnosing and fixing custom target authoring anti-patterns; broken SDK target chains across files (e.g., Directory.Build.targets silently redefining SDK targets); targets that replace CompileDependsOn instead of extending it with $(CompileDependsOn); query targets returning stale results from Outputs vs Returns misuse; missing Inputs/Outputs causing unnecessary rebuilds; missing FileWrites registration. Covers DependsOnTargets vs BeforeTargets vs AfterTargets, the Build→CoreBuild three-level pattern, and the $(XxxDependsOn) chain-extension pattern. DO NOT USE FOR: incremental build tuning (use incremental-build), parallelization (use build-parallelism), general anti-patterns (use msbuild-antipatterns), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects duplicate boilerplate, copy-paste tests, and structural maintainability issues across .NET test suites. Use when the user asks to reduce repetition, consolidate similar test methods, convert copy-paste tests to data-driven parameterized tests, suggest a better test structure, or identify refactoring opportunities. Identifies repeated construction, assertion patterns, copy-paste methods convertible to DataRow/Theory/TestCase, redundant setup/teardown, and shared infrastructure. Produces an analysis report with concrete before/after suggestions. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), reviewing test quality or anti-patterns (use test-anti-patterns), or deep mock auditing (use exp-mock-usage-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WordPress performance code review and optimization analysis. Use when reviewing WordPress PHP code for performance issues, auditing themes/plugins for scalability, optimizing WP_Query, analyzing caching strategies, checking code before launch, or detecting anti-patterns, or when user mentions "performance review", "optimization audit", "slow WordPress", "slow queries", "high-traffic", "scale WordPress", "code review", "timeout", "500 error", "out of memory", or "site won't load". Detects anti-patterns in database queries, hooks, object caching, AJAX, and template loading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Catalogue of known SDLC anti-patterns that great_cto agents must actively reject when reviewing architecture, plans, code, or post-mortems. Used by architect (pre-impl), pm (planning), senior-dev (impl), l3-support (post-incident).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

🇺🇸 GitHub README Writing System — Craft a README that converts visitors to stars in <3 seconds. Proven structure from AFFiNE's 0→60K star journey: tagline engineering, first-screen law, section-by-section copywriting guide, Claude Code integration section, anti-patterns, and a pre-publish checklist. Use when you need to write or rewrite a specific README file. 🇨🇳 GitHub README 写作系统 — 打造 3 秒内把访客转化为 star 的 README。来自 AFFiNE 0→60K star 实战：tagline 工程、首屏法则、逐节文案指南、Claude Code 集成板块、反模式、发布前自检清单。需要写或改一个具体 README 文件时使用。 🇯🇵 GitHub README 作成システム — 3秒以内にビジターをスターに変えるREADMEを作る。AFFiNE 0→60Kスター実績から: タグライン設計、ファーストスクリーン法則、セクション別ライティングガイド、Claude Codeインテグレーション、アンチパターン、公開前チェックリスト。 🇰🇷 GitHub README 작성 시스템 — 3초 안에 방문자를 스타로 전환하는 README 작성법. AFFiNE 0→60K 스타 실전: 태그라인 설계, 첫 화면 법칙, 섹션별 카피라이팅 가이드, Claude Code 통합 섹션, 안티패턴, 게시 전 체크리스트. Triggers: "write README" | "README template" | "GitHub README" | "project description" | "tagline" | "open source README" | "README structure" | "README review" | "fix README" | "rewrite README" | "README写作" | "写README" | "README模板" | "项目介绍" | "开源项目文案" | "改README" | "README检查" | "README 구조" | "README 작성" | "README 검토" | "READMEの書き方" | "READMEレビュー"

Lint Nix expressions and automatically rewrite common anti-patterns before review or refactor work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or update docs/project-context.md — the single source of truth for project conventions, tech stack, and anti-patterns. Loaded by all agents as a "constitution" to ensure consistent behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en design patterns (GoF, SOLID, enterprise patterns, refactoring, anti-patterns)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design patterns v3 — GoF, SOLID, enterprise patterns, anti-patterns, refactoring, language-specific

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en revue de code (PR reviews, patterns, anti-patterns, security, performance, readability)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MSBuild property definition patterns: conditional defaults, composition/concatenation, path normalization, trailing slash handling, TFM detection helpers, and property evaluation order. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: diagnosing and fixing MSBuild property definition issues in .props or .csproj files, reviewing and fixing shared property configuration anti-patterns, fixing DefineConstants or NoWarn being overwritten instead of appended, fixing unconditional property assignments that prevent project-level overrides, fixing unquoted conditions that fail when properties are empty, fixing hardcoded paths that break cross-platform builds, setting property defaults that can be overridden, understanding property evaluation order and last-write-wins semantics. DO NOT USE FOR: props vs targets placement (use directory-build-organization), item operations (use item-management), target structure (use target-authoring), general anti-patterns (use msbuild-antipatterns), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Canonical patterns for writing custom MSBuild targets. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: diagnosing and fixing custom target authoring anti-patterns, reviewing MSBuild target definitions for correctness, diagnosing broken SDK target chains across files (e.g., Directory.Build.targets silently redefining SDK targets), fixing targets that replace CompileDependsOn instead of extending it with $(CompileDependsOn), fixing query targets that return stale results due to Outputs vs Returns misuse, fixing missing Inputs/Outputs causing unnecessary rebuilds, fixing missing FileWrites registration. Covers DependsOnTargets vs BeforeTargets vs AfterTargets, the Build→CoreBuild three-level pattern, hooking into the build pipeline, the $(XxxDependsOn) chain-extension pattern. DO NOT USE FOR: incremental build tuning (use incremental-build), parallelization (use build-parallelism), general anti-patterns (use msbuild-antipatterns), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for MSBuild extensibility: CustomBefore/CustomAfter hooks, wildcard imports with alphabetic ordering, import gating with control properties, NuGet package build extension layout (build/buildTransitive), and the MicrosoftCommonPropsHasBeenImported guard. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: diagnosing and fixing MSBuild import and hook patterns, reviewing and fixing extension point anti-patterns in Directory.Build files, fixing missing Exists() guards on imports that break fresh clones, fixing NuGet package hooks being silently dropped instead of appended, making build targets extensible for other projects, injecting custom logic into the build pipeline, creating NuGet packages that extend the build, conditionally disabling imports. DO NOT USE FOR: target authoring patterns (use target-authoring), props vs targets placement (use directory-build-organization), general anti-patterns (use msbuild-antipatterns), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for managing MSBuild item groups: Include/Remove/Update semantics, item metadata, batching with %(Metadata), transforms, per-item filtering, and cross-product batching pitfalls. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: diagnosing and fixing item group anti-patterns in .csproj files, reviewing item management for correctness, fixing CS2002 duplicate file warnings from SDK globbing, fixing targets that run more times than expected due to cross-product batching, fixing Include vs Update misuse on SDK-globbed items, fixing FileWrites registration for generated file clean support, moving generated files to IntermediateOutputPath. DO NOT USE FOR: target chain architecture (use target-authoring), property patterns (use property-patterns), incrementality (use incremental-build), general anti-patterns (use msbuild-antipatterns), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and avoid Adobe-specific anti-patterns: using deprecated JWT auth, not caching IMS tokens, ignoring Firefly content policy, missing async job polling, and leaking p8_ secrets. Real code examples with fixes. Trigger with phrases like "adobe mistakes", "adobe anti-patterns", "adobe pitfalls", "adobe what not to do", "adobe code review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies and fixes common Rust anti-patterns. Use during code review, when seeing excessive clones/unwraps/index loops, or when code fights the borrow checker instead of working with it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, I got reviewer comments, revision roadmap, should we push back, conference rebuttal, grant panel response, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, check citations, citation check, check my references, verify references, look over the refs, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 我收到審查意見, 修訂路線圖, 評估回覆, 檢查引用, 引用檢查, 檢查參考文獻, 核對文獻, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견을 받았어, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지, 인용 확인, 인용 형식 검사, enmendar mi artículo, redactar artículo, guía mi artículo, analizar reseñas, auditar mi respuesta, verificar borrador de respuesta, verificar citas, divulgación de IA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。