164 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Apply stable-baselines3 in reproducible local data workflows with version-aware APIs, explicit assumptions, and validation. Use when the user chooses stable-baselines3 or its strengths fit the task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establishes behavioral baselines from historical telemetry (process, network, or logon events) so hunts can flag rare and first-seen activity instead of relying on static signatures. Activates for requests to build a telemetry baseline, find rare or first-seen activity, or compute frequency baselines for anomaly hunting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trains and evaluates single-agent reinforcement learning with Stable Baselines3 (PPO, SAC, DQN, TD3, DDPG, A2C), Gymnasium custom environments, vectorized rollouts, callbacks, and checkpoint normalization. Applies to reproducible RL experiments, continuous control, discrete actions, and SB3-Contrib recurrent or masked policies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures and enforces SwiftLint in Swift projects using build tool plugins, run scripts, and CI. Covers .swiftlint.yml configuration, disabled_rules, opt_in_rules, only_rules, analyzer_rules, baselines, autocorrect, swiftlint:disable suppressions, reporter formats (sarif, json, checkstyle), strict and lenient modes, SwiftLintBuildToolPlugin via SimplyDanny/SwiftLintPlugins, swift package plugin swiftlint, Xcode run script phases, CI integration, multiple configuration files, and rollout strategies for existing codebases. Use when setting up SwiftLint, configuring lint rules, suppressing warnings, creating baselines, choosing between build tool plugin and run script, or integrating SwiftLint into CI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build the deterministic evidence ledger (artifact_manifest.json + claims.json) that every other Anti-Autoresearch auditor reads. One pass inventories artifacts, derives the observability level (L0 PDF-only / L1 +LaTeX / L2 +repo+results) by fixed rule, and extracts span-anchored, hashed, checkable claims (numbers, comparisons, scope, method, baselines, citations, captions, table cells) into claims.json. An OPTIONAL additive cross-model pass ADDS span-anchored semantic claims — method, theorem statements with their assumptions, definitions, proof/derivation steps and equations, scope, baselines, conclusions, the motivation span, and reproducibility-artifact references (the proof, derivation, and structure anchors the family B/D/G auditors need) — it never invents a number, emits a finding, or computes a verdict. Run FIRST, before any audit skill. Triggers: "build the ledger", "extract claims", "prep for integrity audit", "evidence ledger", "建证据账本".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit existing performance testing — find missing benchmarks, stale baselines, and CI gaps. Use when asked "do we have benchmarks", "audit our performance testing", or "are our baselines stale".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish and maintain longitudinal baselines of CLI binary contents across versions. Covers marker selection by category (API / identity / config / telemetry / flag / function), weighted scoring, threshold-based system-presence detection, and per-version baseline records. Use when tracking a feature's lifecycle across releases, when probing for dark-launched or removed capabilities, or when verifying that a scanning tool itself still catches known-good markers on old binaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-37 Revision 2, the Risk Management Framework (RMF) for information systems and organizations. Use for the seven RMF steps (Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor) and their tasks; the three-tier organization-wide risk model; authorization boundaries; the requirements-to-controls relationship; security categorization (FIPS 199/200 high-water mark) and control selection/tailoring (SP 800-53/53B baselines); assessment, the authorization decision and risk acceptance, continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization; the security/privacy distinction; and supply chain risk management. This is the security-and-privacy-risk-governance edge of systems engineering — it governs how much protection and whether to accept residual risk, complementing the disciplines that decide how protection is built. Does NOT reproduce the SP 800-53 control catalog or its baselines, the FIPS impact tables, or the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text; it names and routes to them rather than restating them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Webページの表示や操作、APIの応答、ビルド・テストの所要時間を計測するスキル。変更前後の結果を比較し、Gitで共有する基準値をもとに性能の悪化を確認します。
Run `@metaharness/darwin security bench` (upstream "Darwin Shield" / ADR-155) — evolves a champion security-detection harness against a 10-vuln / 9-decoy corpus and grades it on TPR/FPR/patch-pass/repro/unsafe vs four baselines (B0 static, B1 LLM-single-pass, B2 fixed-agent, B3 Darwin-champion). Closest reference implementation for ruflo's own ADR-155 nightly self-learning security harness (PR
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-baseline counterfactual cost analysis. Compares actual session spend to hypothetical always-haiku / always-sonnet / always-opus routing baselines. Answers "is the routing earning its keep?" Negative savings flag over-escalation; positive savings quantify the router's win.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the corpus benchmark — booster locally, optional Gemini/Sonnet/Opus baselines — and persist a verifiable measured-vs-claimed table
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build the evaluation harness that gates every fine-tuning run — golden sets, per-failure-mode graders, judge calibration, and base-model baselines. Use when starting a fine-tuning effort, when converting traces into an eval set, or when calibrating a judge against human labels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect command injection against Modbus TCP/RTU in ICS/SCADA environments by monitoring unauthorized writes, anomalous function codes, malformed frames, and deviations from communication baselines using ICS-aware IDS and deep packet inspection. Use when deploying IDS for Modbus OT networks, investigating unauthorized PLC register/coil changes, or responding to FrostyGoop-style Modbus attacks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit Azure Storage accounts for public blob containers, missing encryption, overly permissive SAS tokens, disabled logging, and network access violations using Azure CLI, PowerShell, and Microsoft Defender for Storage. Use for storage security audits across subscriptions, responding to Defender for Storage anonymous-access alerts, verifying compliance controls, or setting security baselines when onboarding a subscription.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects insider data exfiltration by analyzing DLP policy violations, file access patterns, upload volume anomalies, and off-hours activity in endpoint and cloud logs. Uses pandas for behavioral analytics and statistical baselines. Use when investigating insider threats or building user behavior analytics for data loss prevention.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) using Elasticsearch/OpenSearch to build behavioral baselines, calculate anomaly scores, perform peer group analysis, and alert on insider threat indicators such as data exfiltration, privilege abuse, and unauthorized access. Use when building or tuning a UEBA pipeline rather than a one-off manual hunt.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects anomalous authentication patterns using UEBA analytics, statistical baselines, and machine learning models to identify impossible travel, credential stuffing, brute force, password spraying, and compromised account behaviors across authentication logs. Activates for requests involving authentication anomaly detection, login behavior analysis, UEBA implementation, or suspicious sign-in investigation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploys anomaly detection for OT/ICS environments using machine learning on OT network baselines, physics-based process models, and Modbus/DNP3/OPC UA traffic analysis to flag deviations, rogue devices, and mismatches against historian data. Use for continuous OT monitoring, baselining deterministic SCADA polling, or investigating alerts from Nozomi Guardian/Dragos needing deeper protocol analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect abnormal access in AWS S3, GCS, and Azure Blob Storage by analyzing CloudTrail Data Events, GCS audit logs, and Azure Storage Analytics for after-hours bulk downloads, new-IP access, and API-call spikes (e.g. GetObject) via statistical baselines and time-series anomaly detection. Use when investigating suspected cloud data exfiltration or building related detection rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parse NetFlow v9 and IPFIX records to detect volumetric anomalies, port scanning, data exfiltration, and C2 beaconing patterns. Uses the Python netflow library to decode flow records, builds traffic baselines, and applies statistical analysis to identify flows with abnormal byte counts, connection durations, and periodic timing patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects AI-generated writing four ways — a heuristic audit against a catalog of known AI patterns, deterministic statistical signals (n-gram entropy, burstiness, repetition, stylometry — features never verdicts), an empirical Pangram score calibrated against known-human baselines, and a keyless scan for watermark and steganography signatures (invisible characters, homoglyphs, bidi, odd whitespace) in the bytes. USE WHEN detect AI writing, is this AI, AI detection, AI detector, did an AI write this, does this sound like AI, AI writing score, pangram, scan for AI tells, flag AI patterns, AI-isms, statistical AI signals, burstiness, text entropy, is this watermarked, detect watermark, steganography, zero-width chars, hidden characters, invisible unicode, compare drafts for AI-ness. NOT FOR rewriting prose to strip AI patterns (use a voice/authoring skill), plagiarism detection, detecting AI-generated images/video/code, or judging whether writing is any good.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SEO drift monitoring: capture baselines of SEO-critical elements, detect changes, and track regressions over time. Git for SEO: baseline, diff, and track changes to your on-page SEO. Use when user says "SEO drift", "baseline", "track changes", "did anything break", "SEO regression", "compare SEO", "before and after", "monitor SEO changes", or "deployment check".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。