「blast-radius」の検索結果

Pre-breach impact analysis: inventories sensitive data (PII, PHI, PCI-DSS, credentials), traces data flows, scores exposure vectors, and produces a regulatory blast radius report with fine ranges sourced verbatim from GDPR Art. 83, CCPA § 1798.155(a), and HIPAA 45 CFR § 160.404. Cost benchmarks from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report (annually updated). All citations in references/SOURCES.md for verification. Use when asked: "assess breach impact", "what data could be exposed", "calculate blast radius", "data exposure analysis", "how bad would a breach be", "quantify data risk", "sensitive data inventory", "data flow security audit", "pre-breach assessment", "worst-case breach scenario", "breach readiness", "data risk report", "/data-breach-blast-radius". For any stack handling user data, health records, or financial information. Output labels law-sourced figures (exact) vs heuristic estimates (planning only). Does not replace legal counsel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the worst-case drill before an agent goes autonomous — the 'if this agent were fully hijacked right now, what's the damage' walk-through, the containment controls (caps, kill-switch, reversibility, isolation), and the recovery plan. Use when asked what's the worst my agent could do, run a blast-radius assessment, prepare for an agent going rogue, or am I ready to let this run unattended. Produces the worst-case walk-through, the containment controls, the reversibility audit, and the incident-recovery runbook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform evidence-backed impact analysis before changing code, data, interfaces, or governance documents, then compare the planned impact with the actual diff after implementation. Covers call paths, data and schema, API contracts, tests, documentation, ADRs, deployment, migration, and rollback. Use for cross-module or high-risk changes, database migrations, authentication, public interfaces, blast-radius questions, pre-change checks, and post-implementation alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reusable investigation patterns for AWS CloudWatch: Logs Insights query templates, alarm-to-deployment correlation, blast-radius narrowing decision tree, and PromQL-style metric query patterns for structured incident triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a PR or branch diff using the knowledge graph for full structural context. Outputs a structured review with blast-radius analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning, running, or learning from chaos engineering experiments. Triggers on "chaos experiment", "fault injection", "gameday", "resilience test", "blast radius", "steady state", "abort criteria", "Chaos Toolkit", "Chaos Mesh", "Litmus", "Gremlin", "AWS FIS", or any deliberate failure-injection question. Ships experiment designer, blast-radius calculator, and postmortem generator (all stdlib Python), 4 references on chaos principles + experiment design + attack taxonomy + tooling landscape, and a /chaos-experiment slash command. Composes with feature-flags-architect (kill switches as abort triggers) and kubernetes-operator (common chaos targets).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarizes data lineage graphs on Google Cloud to help users debug data quality issues and understand data provenance for BigQuery and Cloud Storage. Use when summarizing upstream and downstream data flows, and presenting complex lineage data as an intuitive Markdown report. Don't use for generic BigQuery queries, editing lineage relationships, or downstream deprecation. Don't use for downstream blast-radius impact analysis (use datalineage-bigquery-asset-impact-analysis skill instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Augment a Wren project with business context that DB schema cannot carry — enum value meanings, units (USD vs cents, ms vs sec), NULL semantics, magic sentinels (-1 = unknown), soft-delete default filters, business synonyms, time-grain / TZ conventions, cross-system identifiers, currency rules, canonical-table preferences, AND named aggregation metrics (ARR, churn, DAU, WAU, NRR) proposed as cubes. Runs in one of two modes selected at session start: `grill` (one question at a time, user-driven) or `auto-pilot` (agent infers and applies, escalates only on conflicts and high-blast-radius additions like new cubes / views / relationships). Reads everything under <project>/raw/ (PDFs, glossaries, handbooks, code, data dictionaries) and optionally samples low-cardinality columns from the live DB (grill mode), compares against the current MDL / cubes / knowledge (rules + NL→SQL pairs), then fills gaps via the ten-category gap catalog and the cube proposal flow. Confirmed findings are written back to the right sink. Use when: user says 'enrich context', 'augment my project', 'grill me on this project', 'auto-fill my context', 'agent doesn't understand our docs / enum values / units / null meanings', 'business context is missing', 'what does status=A mean', 'is this amount in USD or cents', 'we keep getting wrong aggregations', 'add cubes for ARR / DAU / churn', 'we have a handbook / glossary / data dictionary the agent should know'; or after generating an MDL and noticing the agent lacks business semantics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs graph-assisted triage of a single security finding, SARIF result, weAudit annotation, suspicious function, or report excerpt using Trailmark reachability, entrypoint paths, taint, privilege-boundary, blast-radius, caller/callee, and neighborhood evidence. Use when deciding whether one candidate issue is reachable, prioritizing a finding before PoC work, preparing evidence for exploit validation, or checking whether a static-analysis result is actionable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a Trailmark structural review gate over a branch, pull request, fix commit, release diff, or git ref range to detect new entrypoints, new tainted paths, removed validation or authorization calls, privilege-boundary drift, blast-radius growth, complexity growth, and newly reachable sensitive sinks. Use when reviewing a PR, branch, remediation commit, or release diff where graph-level security regressions should be checked before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "plan my launch tier", "how big should this launch be", or "build a launch risk register with kill criteria"; produces a tier decision (Tier 1 flagship all-channel / Tier 2 targeted / Tier 3 changelog-level), a launch-type declaration (new-product / feature / relaunch / partnership with co-marketing split), an effort calibration matrix (tier to channel intensity and asset scope), D0/W1/M1 KPI targets (labeled Estimated), a risk register (likelihood x blast-radius, owners, mitigations, kill criteria / rollback thresholds), and a T-8w to T+4w timeline skeleton. Not for picking the launch date or window — use launch-window-planner; not for creator-channel launch campaigns — use campaign-planner. 发布分级/发布类型/风险登记册/kill criteria

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans, builds, runs, and analyzes fault injection experiments with AWS Fault Injection Service (AWS FIS) to validate application resilience through chaos engineering. Covers experiment templates (actions, targets, stop conditions), the FIS actions catalog and action selection, the scenario library (AZ power interruption, cross-Region connectivity, EC2/EKS/EBS stress), experiment lifecycle and monitoring, logging and reports, multi-account experiments, the experiment IAM role, and blast-radius safety. Applies when a user mentions AWS FIS or fault injection, asks what experiment to run for a failure mode (AZ, Region, API errors/throttling, instance/pod/DB/cache failure, latency, packet loss), wants to author an experiment template or CLI/CloudFormation, or needs to safely run chaos experiments in pre-production or production. For the broader resilience program across Resilience Hub and ARC, see aws-resilience-lifecycle; for ARC routing controls and zonal shift, see recovery-controller-setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of writing it up. Use for 'blast radius of X', 'what could this break', reviewing a small diff you don't trust, or a brief that asserts something about existing code ('make X public', 'X already handles Y') before you design against that assertion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before and after changing anything shared — a function's return value, a signature, a schema, a label set, a config default, a constant, a file format — find every consumer and actually run them. Catches the change that looks purely additive but silently breaks a contract in a file you never opened. Use when editing shared code, adding a field/column/return element, renaming, changing units or defaults, or touching a pipeline that produces reported numbers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial senior review of the spec before any code is written. Constructs a skeptical reviewer whose authority comes from the codebase, §R research, and live best-practice — then tries to REFUTE the spec, not rubber-stamp it. Every finding cites evidence (file:line or source); unverifiable ones are flagged. Survivors harden §V; the run ends in an explicit go / no-go gate. Triggers before building anything high-blast-radius, when the user says "review the spec", "red-team this", "is this plan sound", "senior review", or invokes /ck:review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic PR review with blast-radius analysis, security scanning, and breaking-change and test-coverage deltas. Use when reviewing PRs that touch shared libraries, APIs, database schemas, auth, or security-sensitive code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chaos engineering: hypothesis-driven fault injection to surface weakness before users do. Use when designing a chaos experiment, planning a gameday, choosing what to inject, computing blast radius, or building a chaos maturity model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prevent Terraform/OpenTofu hallucinations by diagnosing and fixing failure modes: identity churn, secret exposure, blast-radius mistakes, CI drift, and compliance gate gaps. Use when generating, reviewing, refactoring, or migrating IaC and when building delivery/testing pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enhancement overlay for multi-agent / tool-using coder agents. Encodes the per-agent tool- scoping discipline that role-based frameworks (CrewAI, LangChain) document only as a passing best-practice: which agent gets which tool, and why blanket-sharing every tool to every agent is a correctness and blast-radius risk. Activates when an agent system has tools AND there is more than one agent (or one agent holding many tools). Treat a tool as a capability grant; scope by least-privilege. ENHANCE overlay — read alongside [[crewai]], [[agentsop-http-tool-wrapping]], [[agentsop-llm-tool-idempotency]]. Search keywords: which tools per agent, least-privilege agent, agent tool access, tool permissions, limit agent tools, scope tools to roles.overlay_type: enhancement

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes code change impact with risk scoring and affected-node mapping. Use before merging to understand what a change touches and what lacks test coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds or updates the code knowledge graph via tree-sitter AST and SQLite. Use when setting up the graph before search or blast-radius analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of writing it up. Use for 'blast radius of X', 'what could this break', or reviewing a small diff you don't trust.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-change blast-radius report for a symbol or file. Walks tree-sitting references, augments with a plain-text scan over non-parsed files (configs, plain docs), and clusters affected sites by feature (`_FEATURES.md`) or top-level package. Use when about to refactor, rename, or delete something in a repo you don't own — "what breaks if I change `validateUser`", "who calls this", "is this safe to remove", "where is this used", "blast radius", "impact analysis". This is the CONVERGENT pre-change risk skill — for "what is this repo?" use exploring-codebases; for "where is X?" use searching-codebases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。