「causality」の検索結果

Analyze cross-channel campaign data, quantify uncertainty, and propose evidence-labeled budget tests without overstating causality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query a running Convex app's logs + health in natural language (official MCP): failures, slow/expensive functions, deploy causality — scoped, evidence-backed, with a dashboard deep link.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Econometrics skill for time series analysis. Activates when the user asks about: "time series", "stationarity", "unit root test", "ADF test", "KPSS test", "ARIMA", "ARMA", "autocorrelation", "ACF", "PACF", "VAR model", "VECM", "Granger causality", "cointegration", "impulse response function", "forecast", "seasonal decomposition", "ARCH", "GARCH", "时间序列", "平稳性检验", "单位根", "自回归", "格兰杰因果", "协整", "脉冲响应", "预测", "向量自回归"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create text-driven visuals in Markdown: charts, diagrams, cards, architecture and page layouts. Charts and analytical views (bar, line, pie, heatmap, correlation, regression); reliability and operations (latency, incident, throughput, cycle time, OKR, standup, on-call); product and finance (funnel, retention, revenue, budget); process and workflow (approval, BPMN); software design and behaviour (class, state machine, sequence, C4); dependencies and impact (dependency graph, ER, causality); system architecture as HTML (layer stack, wings, zones, topology, service catalogue, request paths); infrastructure (cloud, Kubernetes, ETL, network, security, IAM, compliance); governance and people (ArchiMate, org chart, hiring); knowledge and planning (mind map, roadmap, Gantt, migration); documents (comparison, SWOT, memo, policy, catalogue, case study). Use when a document needs a diagram, chart or card. Figures render live. Not for slide decks or math notation. Not recommended: mermaid / canvas / drawio / dot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs QTL colocalization studies that connect eQTL, pQTL, sQTL, or related molecular QTL signals with GWAS loci. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to plan, scope, or structure a locus-level study asking whether a GWAS association and a molecular QTL association may reflect the same underlying causal signal. Covers locus definition, QTL/GWAS source architecture, ancestry and LD alignment, single-locus vs multi-locus strategy, candidate-gene prioritization, optional fine-mapping, linked MR/SMR follow-up, and functional annotation. Always output four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, method rationale, evidence hierarchy, figure plan, minimal executable version, and strictly verified literature guidance with no fabricated references. Never equate colocalization with causality proof, mediation proof, or automatic target validation. Always include the mandatory Dataset Disclaimer immediately before any workflow section that mentions datasets, repositories, consortia, or public resources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates CIOMS I-compliant ICSR narratives from adverse event case data for FDA and EMA regulatory submission. Includes temporal analysis, MedDRA coding, causality assessment using WHO-UMC or Naranjo criteria, and multi-format output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts an audited medical research gap into a complete, structured, gap-traceable study design. Always use this skill whenever a user already has one or more candidate research gaps and wants to transform them into an executable biomedical research plan rather than re-run broad topic ideation. Covers six gap-to-design patterns (evidence-completion, mechanism-resolution, cell-state/context-mapping, translation-bridge, causality-upgrade, population/stage-specific) and always outputs one recommended primary protocol, a gap-to-design dependency map, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and verified design-support literature rules. Never fabricate references. Preserve claim-evidence discipline and do not replace a topic-specific gap with a generic workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or review source-backed descriptive, diagnostic, predictive, and prescriptive analysis for consequential decisions. Use when an agent must profile and safely prepare uploaded data, turn a real dataset or research question into a reproducible study, investigate drivers without overstating causality, validate a model, compare feasible actions under dependent uncertainty and tail risk, trace every parameter to evidence and approval, or produce an answer-first analytical report across health, business, finance, policy, engineering, operations, behavioral science, AI, or planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze cross-channel campaign data, quantify uncertainty, and propose evidence-labeled budget tests without overstating causality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning style of Daphne Koller (machine learning pioneer, co-founder of Coursera, founder and CEO of Insitro). Use this skill whenever you encounter problems involving AI and machine learning in biology, drug discovery, interdisciplinary collaboration, data generation vs. data mining, or transitioning from academia to industry. Trigger this skill when advising on career trade-offs, building cross-functional teams (especially bridging engineers and domain experts), designing data pipelines, evaluating causality vs. correlation, or applying AI to physical systems ('where bits meet atoms'). Channel her focus on fit-for-purpose data, pragmatism, and disproportionate leverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Microbiome Scientist. Use when a task calls for Microbiome Scientist judgment. Reasons from compositional and longitudinal stats (MaAsLin2, ANCOM-BC2), STORMS pre-analytics, FMT/LBP and diet trials, and multi-omics integration; treats PPI/antibiotic confounders, kitome contamination, host-DNA swamping, and HMA causality overclaim as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the empiricist, skeptical, and practical reasoning of David Hume, 18th-century Scottish philosopher. Use this skill whenever you encounter questions about epistemology, causality, human nature, moral philosophy, political authority, or the limits of rational knowledge. Trigger this skill when the user is grappling with abstract theories that need grounding, evaluating causal claims, discussing the role of emotion vs. reason in decision-making, or questioning the legitimacy of institutions. Even if the user doesn't name Hume, apply his frameworks (like Hume's Fork or the Impression Test) to cut through metaphysical speculation, ground arguments in observable experience, and recognize that reason is ultimately guided by human sentiment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning style of Daphne Koller (machine learning pioneer, co-founder of Coursera, founder and CEO of Insitro). Use this skill whenever you encounter problems involving AI and machine learning in biology, drug discovery, interdisciplinary collaboration, data generation vs. data mining, or transitioning from academia to industry. Trigger this skill when advising on career trade-offs, building cross-functional teams (especially bridging engineers and domain experts), designing data pipelines, evaluating causality vs. correlation, or applying AI to physical systems ('where bits meet atoms'). Channel her focus on fit-for-purpose data, pragmatism, and disproportionate leverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when debugging software, investigating incidents, diagnosing flaky tests, or analyzing performance regressions — enforces structured observation recording with evidence IDs, causality validation, and verification gates to prevent correlation-causation pollution. Use when an agent might otherwise summarize or speculate instead of reporting observed evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts an Adverse Event Reporting Policy compliant with 21 CFR 312.32 (IND safety reporting), 21 CFR 314.80 (postmarketing), and ICH E2A, with multi-jurisdictional overlays (EMA, PMDA, Health Canada). Covers seriousness/causality frameworks, expedited reporting timelines, roles, documentation standards, training mandates, and QA mechanisms. Use when drafting or updating an adverse event reporting policy, pharmacovigilance policy, AE/SAE reporting SOP, or safety reporting framework for a pharmaceutical company, CRO, biotech, or clinical research institution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query a running Convex app's logs + health in natural language (official MCP): failures, slow/expensive functions, deploy causality — scoped, evidence-backed, with a dashboard deep link.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query a running Convex app's logs + health in natural language (official MCP): failures, slow/expensive functions, deploy causality — scoped, evidence-backed, with a dashboard deep link.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Econometrics skill for time series analysis. Activates when the user asks about: "time series", "stationarity", "unit root test", "ADF test", "KPSS test", "ARIMA", "ARMA", "autocorrelation", "ACF", "PACF", "VAR model", "VECM", "Granger causality", "cointegration", "impulse response function", "forecast", "seasonal decomposition", "ARCH", "GARCH", "时间序列", "平稳性检验", "单位根", "自回归", "格兰杰因果", "协整", "脉冲响应", "预测", "向量自回归"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reproduce, isolate, and diagnose a specific software failure before changing production behaviour, then propose the smallest safe fix with regression protection. Use whenever the user reports a bug, crash, error, stack trace, flaky test, incorrect output, "works on my machine," intermittent failure, regression after a deploy, or any behaviour that diverges from expectation and the cause is not obvious. Prefer this over jumping straight to a fix. Part of the audit suite; inherits the shared constitution, while its own job is proving causality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze cross-channel campaign data, quantify uncertainty, and propose evidence-labeled budget tests without overstating causality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query a running Convex app's logs + health in natural language (official MCP): failures, slow/expensive functions, deploy causality — scoped, evidence-backed, with a dashboard deep link.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and audits deterministic, authority-filtered partitions of trust-typed context for already admitted bodies or abstract continuation slots. Use when causal context, obligations, disclosure boundaries, vector-space identity, capacity, and omission proofs must survive partitioning. NOT for spawning or admitting agents, choosing worker count, retrieving arbitrary knowledge, writing successor prompts, or granting tools, leases, identity, or effect authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。