「compare」の検索結果

Designing side-by-side comparison tools (plan-compare, product-compare, alternative-compare) that help users decide rather than just listing features. Axis selection, default-comparison logic, recommendation discipline. Honest about feature-list-dump (every feature in a row, no decision support), hidden-recommendation (biased comparison pretending to be neutral), and honest-comparison-with-guidance (genuine comparison plus opinionated recommendation) patterns. Triggers on comparison tool, plan compare, product compare, alternative compare, vs page, decision support tool. Also triggers when conversion through comparison stages is poor, when users are abandoning at the comparison step, or when a comparison tool is being scoped for the first time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare several Japanese NLP libraries, models, or datasets for a keyword (a specific tool name, or a function/task like '形態素解析') across a handful of criteria chosen for that comparison, rendered as a ○/△/✕ table. Use when the user wants a side-by-side comparison of multiple Japanese NLP tools/libraries/datasets, not just the single best one. Trigger phrases include 'X と Y と Z を比較して', '形態素解析ライブラリを比較', 'MeCab と Sudachi どっちがいい', 'どのツールを使うべき', 'compare japanese tokenizers', 'mecab vs sudachi vs janome', 'which embedding model should I use', '日本語NERライブラリの比較表', 'pros and cons of japanese OCR tools'. For a single ranked list use search; for alternatives to one specific tool (or contribution candidates) without a multi-axis table, use discover.

Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派, 禅净之争, 性相之辩, 空有之争, or wants multiple masters to answer the same question. Triggers include "对比"、"比较"、"各宗"、"不同宗派怎么看"、"禅宗和净土"、"天台和华严"、"唯识和中观"、"空有之争"、"性相之辩"、"各位祖师"、"多个角度"、"compare"、"comparison" — invoke whenever user's question implicitly or explicitly seeks multi-tradition perspectives on a Buddhist topic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares two Prof datasets (GPU vs NPU / NPU vs NPU) by auto-installing and calling msprof-analyze compare, then parses the result xlsx into HTML report and Chinese xlsx. Invoke when user provides two prof dirs to compare, or has a compare result xlsx to analyze/translate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares the performance of two or more audience segments across key metrics side by side. Use this skill when someone wants to compare audiences, cohorts, or groups — for example, "how do mobile users compare to desktop users on conversion," "compare new vs. returning visitors," "show me the difference between these two segments," "compare these audiences on our KPIs," or "which segment performs better." Also trigger for "segment comparison," "audience comparison," or "cohort comparison."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares the performance of two or more audience segments across key metrics side by side. Use this skill when someone wants to compare audiences or visitor groups — for example, "how do mobile visitors compare to desktop on conversion," "compare new vs. returning visitors," "show me the difference between these two segments," "compare these audiences on our KPIs," or "which segment performs better." Also trigger for "segment comparison" or "audience comparison."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares the performance of two or more audience segments across key metrics side by side. Use this skill when someone wants to compare audiences or visitor groups — for example, "how do mobile visitors compare to desktop on conversion," "compare new vs. returning visitors," "show me the difference between these two segments," "compare these audiences on our KPIs," or "which segment performs better." Also trigger for "segment comparison" or "audience comparison."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares the performance of two or more audience segments across key metrics side by side. Use this skill when someone wants to compare audiences, cohorts, or groups — for example, "how do mobile users compare to desktop users on conversion," "compare new vs. returning visitors," "show me the difference between these two segments," "compare these audiences on our KPIs," or "which segment performs better." Also trigger for "segment comparison," "audience comparison," or "cohort comparison."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare API performance across versions — regression detection and root cause analysis. Use when asked "did performance regress", "compare API latency across versions", or "why is this slower".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare Google Search Console performance between two time periods to identify trends and changes. Supports month-over-month (MoM), year-over-year (YoY), or custom date ranges. Use when user says "GSC compare", "period comparison", "month over month", "year over year", "compare performance", "MoM", or "YoY".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare standardized metrics across multiple ego-benchmark-harness runs by recalculating them from tasks.jsonl and session JSONL, never from HTML reports. Covers overall aggregates (success rate/average score), Odysseys per-rubric pass rates, duration distributions (avg/p50/p90/max), turns/tools/cost, error and exception counts, per-task success matrices, helper distributions, and the share of DOM operations. Use whenever users ask to compare data or metrics across runs, calculate aggregate/Odysseys/duration/turn/error/helper metrics, inspect differences among runs, or compare multiple rwb/real-world-bench runs. Use pi-session-analyzer instead for deep forensic analysis of why an individual task was slow or failed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Itôのバスケットや予測市場のデータを閲覧・整理し、手元の調査メモとの比較、出典付きの市場概要、人が確認するための計画シートを作成します。

• Itôのバスケット一覧を調べたいとき
• 調査メモやウォッチリストとの比較
• 出典付きの予測市場概要の作成

株価や暗号資産の価格を調べ、企業名から銘柄を探せるスキル。Yahoo Financeのデータで過去の値動きや期間の騰落率を確認し、複数銘柄を比較します。

• 株価や暗号資産の価格確認
• 企業名から銘柄コードを探したいとき
• 過去の値動きと騰落率の確認

Command-line interface for CloudCompare — Agent-friendly harness for CloudCompare, the open-source 3D point cloud and mesh processing software. Supports 41 commands across 9 groups: project management, session control, point cloud operations (subsample, filter, segment, analyze), mesh operations, distance computation (C2C, C2M), transformations (ICP, matrix), export (LAS/LAZ/PLY/PCD/OBJ/STL/E57), and interactive REPL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monthly delta tracking and progress reporting for GEO clients. Compares two GEO audits (baseline vs. current), calculates score improvements across all categories, tracks action item completion, and generates a "here's your progress" client report. Use when user says "compare", "delta", "monthly report", "progress", "confronta", "progressi", "report mensile", or when running a monthly client check-in.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Choosing between coding agents on evidence: compare executor or agent choices on reproducible tasks using quality, cost, time, tool, and evidence metrics. Use when the user says: agent-evaluation, agent evaluation, agent eval, agent benchmark, executor evaluation, executor benchmark, compare agents, compare codex claude.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Forecast Azure spend and price planned resources or workloads. WHEN: "forecast Azure spending", "project next month cost", "compare forecast to my planning target", "how much will Azure cost", "estimate VM cost", "compare storage tiers", "compare Azure regions", "retail price", "EA rate card", "negotiated pricesheet". DO NOT USE FOR: configured budget health or alerts, bill analysis, cost spikes, rightsizing, or commitments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit external compatibility between two DSH (DeepSeek Harness) versions and detect reverts, producing an upgrade-report directory; compares git tags with a source checkout, or published npm packages without one. Use whenever the user asks to check/compare/audit two DSH versions or whether upgrading is safe — e.g. "more changes or reverts in dsh-vX -> dsh-vY", "compare the breaking changes" — even with only two version numbers and no source location. Read-only outside the report directory; npm mode installs in isolation with --ignore-scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Forecast Azure spend and price planned resources or workloads. WHEN: "forecast Azure spending", "project next month cost", "compare forecast to my planning target", "how much will Azure cost", "estimate VM cost", "compare storage tiers", "compare Azure regions", "retail price", "EA rate card", "negotiated pricesheet". DO NOT USE FOR: configured budget health or alerts, bill analysis, cost spikes, rightsizing, or commitments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to compare two annual reports, put two companies from the same sector side by side, or check whether two companies' adjusted numbers mean the same thing. Takes two uploaded annual reports from one sector and compares them on five ratios computed with identical definitions from audited figures, flagging every place the companies define a metric differently. Produces a page-referenced comparison table, a definitions-differ section (adjusted vs statutory, inside vs outside the audited statements), and three questions to ask before believing either company's highlights. Educational, not financial advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare UX patterns across multiple reference apps using pattern libraries produced by ux-extract. Reads 2+ pattern-library.md files, walks them category by category, identifies where apps converge (strong signal), where they diverge (genuine design choice), what's unique to one app, and what's absent across the set. Produces an opinionated comparison document with recommendations for a new build. No browser needed — pure markdown analysis. Trigger with 'compare UX patterns', 'how do top apps handle X', 'ux comparison', 'pattern comparison across reference apps'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze website traffic, global rank, engagement metrics, and traffic sources for any domain. Use this skill to evaluate affiliate program websites, compare competitor traffic, assess advertiser strength, or understand where an audience comes from. Triggers on: "analyze traffic for [domain]", "how much traffic does [site] get", "compare traffic between [site A] and [site B]", "is [program] worth promoting based on traffic", "traffic analysis", "website analytics for [domain]", "where does [site] get traffic", "check if [advertiser] is legit", "evaluate [program] website health", "SimilarWeb analysis", "traffic sources for [domain]", "how popular is [site]", "website rank", "domain authority check", "compare affiliate program websites".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Offer 对比决策器。用户同时拿到两份（或多份）offer 纠结怎么选时，扮演 Senior Career Decision Advisor：结构化对比 comp / 成长 / AI 敞口 / 公司强度 / 团队风险 / 晋升速度 / 生活方式，识别 front-loaded vs long-term upside、resume value、switch-out 难度、hidden risks，最后给一条**明确、有立场、不中性**的推荐（并附「你是 X 类人选 A，你是 Y 类人选 B」的分叉判定）。三步：贴两份 offer → 补 priorities & 现状 → 自动生成并打开一份 HTML Offer Decision Report。是 offer-toolkit 里 JD Skill / Resume Skill / BQ Skill 拿到结果之后的下一环。关键词：offer compare, 选 offer, 两个 offer, offer decision, TC compare, 该去哪家, which offer, 4-year TC, RSU, sign-on, front-loaded, long-term upside, career decision。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。