「completion」の検索結果

Use Neo4j GenAI Plugin ai.text.* functions and procedures for in-Cypher embedding generation, text completion, structured output, chat, tokenization, and batch ingestion. Covers ai.text.embed(), ai.text.embedBatch(), ai.text.completion(), ai.text.structuredCompletion(), ai.text.aggregateCompletion(), ai.text.chat(), ai.text.tokenCount(), ai.text.chunkByTokenLimit(), and provider configuration for OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, VertexAI, and Amazon Bedrock. Requires CYPHER 25. Replaces deprecated genai.vector.encode(). Use when writing pure-Cypher GraphRAG, embedding nodes in-graph, generating structured maps from prompts, or calling LLMs inside Cypher queries. Does NOT handle neo4j-graphrag Python library pipelines — use neo4j-graphrag-skill. Does NOT handle vector index creation/search — use neo4j-vector-index-skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates shell completion scripts for CLI tools. Parses command structure from help output, commander/yargs configs, or manual specification. Produces completions for bash, zsh, and fish that follow each shell's conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates shell completion scripts for CLI tools. Parses command structure from help output, commander/yargs configs, or manual specification. Produces completions for bash, zsh, and fish that follow each shell's conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add shell completion support via a 'completion' subcommand for bash, zsh, and fish. Generic pattern for any Commander.js CLI, with static and dynamic completion examples.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is doing hands-on DOCA RDMI (RDMA Initiator) programming — picking doca-rdmi vs doca-rdma for an accelerator-initiated one-sided RDMA flow, standing up a doca_rdmi_connection or doca_rdmi_poster, attaching a doca_dpa_completion or doca_verbs_cq before doca_ctx_start(), retrieving the DPA-side handle for a DPA kernel, auditing whether a doca_rdmi_* symbol is EXPERIMENTAL on this DOCA, or debugging DOCA_ERROR_* returns from RDMI calls. Trigger even when the user does not say "DOCA RDMI" or "initiator" — implicit phrasings include "my DPA kernel needs to post RDMA writes to a remote responder", "DPA kernel sees no completions", "function not found on doca_rdmi_* at link time", "DOCA_ERROR_BAD_STATE from completion attach", or "the DPA posted but the work request never arrived". Refuse and route elsewhere for two-sided or host-CPU RDMA, the DPA programming model, GPU-side RDMA initiation, or general RDMA/IB/RoCE concepts — those belong to other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, implement, or review verification before completion work in an existing codebase with compatibility, security, and verification controls. Use when the user explicitly requests verification before completion work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when work produces a deliverable, factual claim, dataset, code change, decision, publication, deployment, automation, or irreversible action whose failure would matter; when the user asks for a quality gate, acceptance criteria, QA, completeness, validation, audit, evidence, preflight, release readiness, or a definition of done; or before claiming completion on medium- or high-risk work. Automatically decide whether a formal gate is warranted, derive task-specific pass/fail criteria, gather evidence, and block unsupported completion. Make sure to use this skill even when the user does not say "quality gate" if consequential work needs acceptance criteria or completion evidence. Skip formal gating for trivial, reversible, low-impact requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

対話型のコマンド操作が動いているtmuxの画面を確認し、文字やキーを送るスキル。セッションの一覧、出力履歴の取得、入力待ちの監視に使えます。

• 対話型プログラムの出力を確認したいとき
• 実行中のセッションへ文字やキーを送信
• 入力待ちや処理の完了を監視したいとき

作業完了や不具合修正を報告する前に、テストやビルドを実行して結果を確認します。コミットやPR作成の前にも、実際の出力を根拠に状況を伝えるスキルです。

• 完了報告の前に結果を確認したいとき
• 不具合の修正を確かめたいとき
• コミットやPR前の検証

AIエージェントが読むスキルや指示文を、手順・参照情報・完了条件に整理し、必要な資料を読む条件の明確化や重複の削減まで支援する文書作成・編集のスキル。

• スキル文書を作成・編集したいとき
• AGENTS.mdやCLAUDE.mdの整理
• 参照資料を読む条件を明確にしたいとき

One-shot chat completion against DeepSeek's `deepseek-chat` model via the OpenAI-compatible /v1/chat/completions endpoint. Reads DEEPSEEK_API_KEY from the environment; degrades gracefully (exit 0 with a JSON status:degraded envelope) when the key is missing or the API is unreachable. Use for non-reasoning tasks — summarization, extraction, quick classification — where deepseek-reasoner would be overkill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reasoning-mode completion against DeepSeek's `deepseek-reasoner` model (R1) via /v1/chat/completions. Surfaces the model's chain-of-thought (`reasoning_content`) separately from the final answer (`content`), so callers can display or discard the CoT without re-parsing. Reads DEEPSEEK_API_KEY; degrades gracefully (exit 0 with status:degraded envelope) when unset or the API is unreachable. Ignores temperature/top_p per DeepSeek's spec for reasoner models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building CLI tools, implementing argument parsing, or adding interactive prompts. Invoke for parsing flags and subcommands, displaying progress bars and spinners, generating bash/zsh/fish completion scripts, CLI design, shell completions, and cross-platform terminal applications using commander, click, typer, or cobra.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Completion Check: Verify Infrastructure Is Wired

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify completion and success claims with fresh evidence. Use before claiming a task is complete, a fix works, tests pass, or a feature is ready for GO.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Completion-evidence route used before claiming work is complete, fixed, passing, committed, or PR-ready. Requires fresh verification output before success claims. Do not use for root-cause debugging, TDD implementation, test-report packaging, or review-feedback triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is doing hands-on DOCA DPA host-side work on a BlueField — creating the `doca_dpa` Core context, loading a DPACC-compiled DPA app image (`doca_dpa_app`), creating DPA threads, launching kernels via `doca_dpa_kernel_launch_update_*`, draining `doca_dpa_completion`, running `doca_dpa_cap_*` discovery, choosing between the DPA comm component (inter-DPA messaging) and the DPA verbs component (in-kernel RDMA), or debugging `DOCA_ERROR_*` from `doca_dpa_*`. Trigger even without "DOCA DPA" or "Data-Path Accelerator": "run compute on the DPA from my host", "DPA kernel hangs, no completion", "DOCA_ERROR_DRIVER on launch", "DOCA/DPACC version skew", or "does this BlueField expose a DPA". Route elsewhere for DPA-side kernel programming itself, DPACC compiler internals, host↔DPU messaging (doca-comch), host-side RDMA (doca-rdma), and GPU-initiated networking (doca-gpunetio).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user runs doca_dpa_hl_tracer to capture/decode DPA-side traces at the programming-events layer (kernel entry/exit, sync points, comm primitive calls, RDMA WR submission, completion drain) — picking TRACE vs CRIT, tuning the JSON config (file-size limits + file_size_limit_policy, thread priorities/cores), decoding against the matching DPA-side ELF, or diagnosing empty/noisy captures. Trigger even when the user does not explicitly mention "DOCA DPA tracer" or "high-level tracer" — typical implicit phrasings include "DPA kernel returns wrong result but host completions look clean", "kernel-entry to first-comm latency is huge", "RDMA WR to drain gap on the DPA", "trace file truncated mid-run", "TRACE doubled my DPA latency", or "tracer wrote a file but parser shows zero events". Refuse and route elsewhere for writing DPA kernels, DPA-Comms/DPA-Verbs programming, raw per-cycle DPA profiling, host-side doca-dpa debugging, or production DPA telemetry — those belong to other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Completion claim tested by Jev: Jev done check: does the gathered evidence support the completion claim? It can only object. Use when the user says: jev-done-check, jev done check, ask jev if this is done, jev evidence check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure OpenAI SDK for .NET. Client library for Azure OpenAI and OpenAI services. Use for chat completions, embeddings, image generation, audio transcription, and assistants. Triggers: "Azure OpenAI", "AzureOpenAIClient", "ChatClient", "chat completions .NET", "GPT-4", "embeddings", "DALL-E", "Whisper", "OpenAI .NET".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and run usability tests on existing or prototype designs including test design, task scripts, moderation, observation, and findings synthesis. Use this skill whenever the user wants to test usability, run a moderated test, run an unmoderated test, validate a design, find usability issues, or improve task completion. Triggers on usability test, usability testing, moderated test, unmoderated test, task script, think aloud, prototype testing, user testing, design validation, task completion. Also triggers when the user has built something and wants to know if real users can use it before shipping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Completion Check: Verify Infrastructure Is Wired

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bind loop 'done' to unfakeable gates. Use to harden egregore/herald loops or promote completion_integrity. Not for QA gates; use night-market-validation-and-qa.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。