「concepts」の検索結果

概念や業務の流れ、ソフトウェア構成を図にまとめます。ブラウザで開けるSVG入りHTMLか、編集できるExcalidraw形式で保存するスキルです。

• 教材で概念を図解したいとき
• 業務の流れをフローチャートにしたいとき
• ソフトウェアやクラウドの構成図作成

Create source-grounded paid-ad campaign concepts, messaging, copy, creative briefs, and production plans from a validated brand profile, campaign objective, platform requirements, and optional audit evidence. Triggers on: campaign brief, campaign concepts, create a campaign, ad concepts, ad copy, ad messaging, creative brief, headlines, descriptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explains core Apache Beam programming model concepts including PCollections, PTransforms, Pipelines, and Runners. Use when learning Beam fundamentals or explaining pipeline concepts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create evidence-based Meta ad creative briefs, copy angles, and testable asset concepts for Facebook and Instagram. Use when asked for Meta ad creative, Facebook ads copy, Instagram ad assets, UGC concepts, creative briefs, new ad concepts, or creative refreshes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LP, MILP, QP — concepts, problem-text parsing, and formulation patterns (parameters, constraints, decisions, objective). Concepts only; no API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create source-grounded paid-ad campaign concepts, messaging, copy, creative briefs, and production plans from a validated brand profile, campaign objective, platform requirements, and optional audit evidence. Triggers on: campaign brief, campaign concepts, create a campaign, ad concepts, ad copy, ad messaging, creative brief, headlines, descriptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create source-grounded paid-ad campaign concepts, messaging, copy, creative briefs, and production plans from a validated brand profile, campaign objective, platform requirements, and optional audit evidence. Triggers on: campaign brief, campaign concepts, create a campaign, ad concepts, ad copy, ad messaging, creative brief, headlines, descriptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

技術の仕組みやグラフ、システム構成、製品の流れをManimのアニメーションで説明し、絵コンテとシーン計画、短い動画、サムネイルを作るスキル。

• 技術の仕組みを動画で説明したいとき
• グラフやネットワークの変化を可視化
• 業務フローやシステム構成の説明

製品やブランドの特徴をもとに、32×32でも見分けやすい、丸くシンプルなマスコット画像を設計・生成するスキル。モチーフや配色の異なる候補を並べて比較できます。

• アプリや製品のマスコット作成
• ブランドに合うキャラクター案の検討
• マスコットの配色や輪郭の比較

数学の概念や数式の導出、アルゴリズムの動きをアニメーション動画にします。構成づくりから描画、動画の結合まで、図形で理解を促す解説を制作します。

• 数学の概念を図形で説明したいとき
• 数式の導出を順に見せたいとき
• アルゴリズムの動きを可視化

Smart Money Concepts (ICT) signal engine. Uses the smartmoneyconcepts library to implement institutional-trading-school analysis of BOS, ChoCH, FVG, and order blocks (OB).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a numbered, categorized concept catalogue from the talk summary and timeline, scoring each concept HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW for talk potential with optional repo enrichment. Use when you need a structured inventory of concepts before choosing a talk angle, or when assessing which ideas have the strongest presentation potential.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create grounded paid-media creative concepts, copy angles, refresh hypotheses, and measurable test briefs across advertising platforms. Use for ad copy, creative briefs, UGC concepts, headlines, creative fatigue, asset ideas, or a creative refresh.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build several genuinely different solutions to the same problem at once, spread across what the user does rather than how it looks. Use when one direction is on the table and the team is about to refine it by default. For choosing between the concepts afterwards, use `concept-selection`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a Montessori three-period lesson for introducing concepts through concrete materials and naming. Use when teaching vocabulary, classifications, or concepts through hands-on materials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design game concepts from a novel. From SOURCE_BIBLE and PRODUCT_BRIEF, compare meaningful alternatives on the dimensions still unlocked, then select a playable direction using hard vetoes and explicit trade-offs. Use for what game should this novel become, compare game concepts, choose a game direction for this book, decide whether this novel should become an interactive story. 小说游戏概念设计。根据 SOURCE_BIBLE 与 PRODUCT_BRIEF 比较未锁定维度上的有效替代方案，用硬否决和关键取舍选择可玩方向。用于判断小说适合做成什么游戏、该不该做成互动叙事、比较游戏方案等需求。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarify domain concepts, language, boundaries, and durable architectural decisions. Use when terminology is ambiguous, the user is shaping a domain model, or a design depends on resolving what concepts mean.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI creative director with recursive self-assessment. Generates concepts using world-class methodologies (SIT, TRIZ, Lateral Thinking, bisociation), scores against 6 weighted criteria with Cannes/D&AD/HumanKind calibration, and recursively refines until the 9+ threshold is reached. Accepts briefs in any format — text, voice transcript, PDF, or raw notes. Use when the user asks to generate creative concepts, brainstorm campaign ideas, develop a Big Idea or campaign platform, evaluate or critique existing creative work, find consumer insights, or shares a brief for ideation — including activations, PR-stunts, brand utility, experiential, and non-advertising ideas. Calibrates against a library of 569 legendary campaigns (P01-P18 pattern map) to detect saturation and ensure originality. Do not use for media planning, production budgeting, brand identity/logo design, copywriting final drafts, or market research data collection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a Montessori three-period lesson for introducing concepts through concrete materials and naming. Use when teaching vocabulary, classifications, or concepts through hands-on materials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan but do NOT have a brainstorm-beagle spec to plan against. quick-plan reconstructs intent from the current conversation, fans out domain-expert exploration subagents across the codebase, and synthesizes the same plan format write-plan produces — without requiring `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`. Triggers on: "quick plan", "plan this out", "plan what we just discussed", "turn this into an implementation plan", "plan this without a spec", "I don't have a spec, just plan it", "write-plan but no spec". Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants an implementation or TDD plan and there is no spec to plan against — even if they just say "plan it" after discussing a feature. Writes to `.beagle/plans/<slug>/plan.md`. If a finalized spec already exists at `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`, prefer write-plan. Does NOT brainstorm specs, write code, or execute the plan — produces the plan document (and an optional handoff prompt) only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a finalized brainstorm-beagle spec at `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md` and need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan before any code is written. Triggers on: "write a plan", "plan this spec", "turn the spec into a plan", "now plan the implementation", "write-plan". Reads the spec, designs the file structure, decomposes work into 2-5 minute TDD steps with exact paths and commands, self-reviews against the spec, gets user approval, then writes to `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/plan.md` and offers to generate an execution handoff prompt via the subagent-prompt skill. Does NOT brainstorm specs, write code, or execute the plan — produces the plan document (and an optional handoff prompt) only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create polished, code-driven Remotion motion explainers from scripts, narration, subtitles, product specifications, reference videos, UI recordings, diagrams, or abstract concepts. Use for product launches, AI demonstrations, UI interactions, algorithms, scientific principles, electrical systems, data flows, architecture, charts, equations, and concepts best expressed with React, SVG, Canvas, WebGL, or Three.js. Prioritize continuous spatial logic, visible cause and effect, precise interaction states, editable parameters, deterministic rendering, and evidence-backed visual QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and audits a concept-ontology for a regelrecht corpus to decide and verify reference types — cross-law source-binding vs intra-law source-binding vs open-norm leaf vs external-fact leaf — and to catch concept conflation across laws. Core principle: a value's reference type is fixed by WHO derives it, and a binding is sound only when producer and consumer denote the SAME concept; the lexical surface (the word in the text) is not the concept. Detects false friends (one term, different concepts — e.g. a register-based vs a factual "naar de omstandigheden"-based residence/ingezetene concept), orphan plain-params (a value a regulation actually derives, modeled as a brute input), negation/complement re-entry (¬X modeled as an independent leaf next to X), and duplication (one concept re-entered as several independent leafs, losing the single-source-of-truth invariant). Produces a law-level glossary and a stelsel-level concept map with sound same-concept binding edges and flagged lexical-match-but-concept-mismatch edges. Use when deciding whether a value should be cross-law/intra-law/leaf, when the same term means different things across laws, or when a binding might silently conflate concepts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating scientific magazine cover style images or prompts, research hero visuals, journal-cover-inspired concepts, academic poster covers, PPT covers, and high-impact scientific visual concepts. If the user asks to generate the image, use ChatGPT image generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。