「conform」の検索結果

製造現場の規格不適合について、対象品の隔離から原因分析、処置の検討、是正・予防措置の効果確認までを整理し、管理図の読み取りや仕入先品質の改善も支援します。

• 検査で見つかった不適合を調査したいとき
• 根本原因の分析手法を選びたいとき
• 是正措置の計画作成と効果確認

Generates 3D conformer ensembles using RDKit ETKDGv3 with knowledge-enhanced distance geometry, MMFF94/UFF force-field optimization, CREST + GFN2-xTB semi-empirical refinement, and macrocycle-aware torsion preferences. Provides explicit decision rules for single vs ensemble conformer use, RMSD pruning, energy windows, conformer count, and force-field choice. Use when preparing 3D ligands for docking, generating descriptor input for 3D QSAR, or sampling macrocycle/peptide conformational ensembles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates 3D conformer ensembles using RDKit ETKDGv3 with knowledge-enhanced distance geometry, MMFF94/UFF force-field optimization, CREST + GFN2-xTB semi-empirical refinement, and macrocycle-aware torsion preferences. Provides explicit decision rules for single vs ensemble conformer use, RMSD pruning, energy windows, conformer count, and force-field choice. Use when preparing 3D ligands for docking, generating descriptor input for 3D QSAR, or sampling macrocycle/peptide conformational ensembles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conform is a React form validation library that progressively enhances native HTML forms: it validates FormData against a Zod, Valibot or Yup schema on the server and, optionally, on the client, so a form works before JavaScript loads. Use when a user asks to build a form with Conform, validate a Next.js Server Action or a React Router / Remix action, share one schema between client and server, add or remove rows in a field list, or move to Conform's future API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates 3D conformer ensembles using RDKit ETKDGv3 with knowledge-enhanced distance geometry, MMFF94/UFF force-field optimization, CREST + GFN2-xTB semi-empirical refinement, and macrocycle-aware torsion preferences. Provides explicit decision rules for single vs ensemble conformer use, RMSD pruning, energy windows, conformer count, and force-field choice. Use when preparing 3D ligands for docking, generating descriptor input for 3D QSAR, or sampling macrocycle/peptide conformational ensembles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates 3D conformer ensembles using RDKit ETKDGv3 with knowledge-enhanced distance geometry, MMFF94/UFF force-field optimization, CREST + GFN2-xTB semi-empirical refinement, and macrocycle-aware torsion preferences. Provides explicit decision rules for single vs ensemble conformer use, RMSD pruning, energy windows, conformer count, and force-field choice. Use when preparing 3D ligands for docking, generating descriptor input for 3D QSAR, or sampling macrocycle/peptide conformational ensembles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates 3D conformer ensembles using RDKit ETKDGv3 with knowledge-enhanced distance geometry, MMFF94/UFF force-field optimization, CREST + GFN2-xTB semi-empirical refinement, and macrocycle-aware torsion preferences. Provides explicit decision rules for single vs ensemble conformer use, RMSD pruning, energy windows, conformer count, and force-field choice. Use when preparing 3D ligands for docking, generating descriptor input for 3D QSAR, or sampling macrocycle/peptide conformational ensembles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit de conformité RGPD complet d'un site internet. Réalise une observation systématique du site selon une checklist de 10 sections (mentions légales, hébergeur, formulaires, newsletter, politique de confidentialité, cookies et bandeau, mots de passe, trackers et mesure d'audience, sous-traitants et transferts hors UE, accessibilité du recueil des droits) plus une annexe 22 items reproduisant les exigences des articles 13 et 14 RGPD. Produit un rapport structuré avec niveau de conformité global, points bloquants (risque 3), points de vigilance (risque 2), recommandations prioritaires et notes techniques. Le skill est tool-agnostique : il fonctionne avec un outil de navigation automatique (Claude in Chrome, Cowork ou équivalent) ou en mode dégradé copier-coller. Triggers : "audit RGPD site", "audit site internet", "vérifie ce site", "scanne ce site", "audit conformité site", "audite la conformité de [URL]", "audit cookies site", "audit politique de confidentialité site".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The crouton-conformance gate — the SECOND acceptance axis of graduation (the first is the experience side-by-side, /graduate stage C1). Checks a graduated app is a REAL crouton app — CLI-scaffolded, real collections, consumes the correct packages without reinventing them — by composing the existing probes (frontend-review, a11y, e2e-smoke, typecheck) plus crouton-structural checks, then renders a required, signed-off checklist on the graduation PR. Use at /graduate stage C2, or when asked "is this app crouton-native", "run the conformance gate", "check graduation conformance".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the modern tidyverse + econometrics R ecosystem — dplyr + tidyr + haven + fixest + sandwich + lmtest + clubSandwich + AER + ivreg + did + bacondecomp + HonestDiD + eventstudyr + rdrobust + rddensity + Synth + gsynth + synthdid + MatchIt + WeightIt + cobalt + ebal + grf + DoubleML + mediation + marginaleffects + modelsummary + kableExtra + gt + ggplot2 + ggpubr + cowplot + binsreg. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) — every run produces a publication-ready output set with a multi-column regression table (M1→M6 progressive controls/FE) as the centerpiece, plus Table 1 (descriptives), mechanism / heterogeneity / robustness tables, and event-study + coefficient + trend figures. Covers the full 8-step R pipeline an applied economist runs on every paper — (1) data import & cleaning (read_dta/read_csv, naniar, janitor, validate-merges), (2) variable construction (mutate/across/winsorize/group_by + lag/lead with dplyr), (3) descriptive statistics & Table 1 (gtsummary, modelsummary::datasummary, tableone), (4) classical diagnostic tests (shapiro/jarque.bera.test/bptest/dwtest/bgtest/vif/adf.test/kpss.test/Hausman), (5) baseline modeling (fixest::feols, ivreg, did::att_gt, eventstudyr, sun_ab, did_imputation, synthdid, rdrobust, MatchIt, WeightIt, grf::causal_forest, DoubleML, mediation), (6) robustness battery (modelsummary stack, clubSandwich CRSE, fwildclusterboot, ri2, robomit Oster, bacondecomp, HonestDiD), (7) further analysis (interactions + marginaleffects, mediation::mediate, gsem via lavaan, dose-response splines, grf CATE), (8) publication-ready tables & figures (modelsummary, kableExtra, gt, stargazer, texreg, flextable to LaTeX/Word/HTML; ggplot2 + ggpubr + cowplot + binsreg + iplot for figures). **Also covers two parallel domain modes that share the same 8-step scaffolding** — **Mode A — Epidemiology / public health** (target-trial emulation, IPTW + g-formula + TMLE doubly-robust triplet via `WeightIt` / `gfoRmula` / `tmle` / `ltmle`, Mendelian randomization via `MendelianRandomization` / `TwoSampleMR` / `MRPRESSO`, KM / Cox / AFT / RMST survival via `survival` / `survminer` / `flexsurv`, E-value sensitivity via `EValue`, principal stratification — STROBE / TRIPOD reporting), and **Mode B — ML causal inference** (DML via `DoubleML`, S/T/X/R/DR meta-learners via `causalweight` / `grf`, causal forest via `grf::causal_forest`, BART/BCF via `bartCause` / `bcf`, matrix completion via `MCPanel`, CATE distribution + policy tree via `policytree`, off-policy evaluation, conformal causal via `conformalInference` / `cfcausal`, fairness audit via `fairmodels`, DAG learning via `pcalg` / `bnlearn` / LLM-assisted). Use when the user asks for a complete R empirical analysis, wants a tidyverse-style reproducible R script / Quarto workflow, prefers fixest over reghdfe, needs the R counterpart to StatsPAI / 00.1 / 00.2, or names a specific R step in isolation ("feols with cluster", "MatchIt nearest neighbor", "bacondecomp in R", "gtsummary table 1", "modelsummary to Word"). Mode A triggers on "target trial emulation R", "tmle ltmle", "MendelianRandomization", "TwoSampleMR", "MRPRESSO", "survival cox AFT", "STROBE R", "EValue R", "公共健康 R", "流行病学 R". Mode B triggers on "DoubleML R", "grf causal forest", "policytree", "bartCause bcf", "conformal causal R", "fairmodels", "pcalg NOTEARS", "因果机器学习 R".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides combined DPIA and AI Act conformity assessment template with integrated risk scoring matrix. Covers GDPR Art. 35 DPIA elements, AI Act high-risk system requirements, mitigation measures, and human oversight assessment. Keywords: DPIA template, conformity assessment, risk scoring, AI Act, combined assessment, high-risk AI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

语音转文字 (ASR) (语音转文字 (ASR / 语音识别 / Speech-to-Text) 应用工程 (从业者视角) — 选型、集成、优化语音转文字能力，尤其面向移动端、低成本、快速识别的场景。覆盖: (a) 引擎/API 地图 — 云端 API(OpenAI gpt-4o-transcribe / Whisper API、Deepgram、AssemblyAI、Google / Azure / AWS Transcribe、讯飞、字节火山、阿里、腾讯、百度) vs 开源模型(Whisper / faster-whisper / whisper.cpp / distil-whisper、NVIDIA NeMo Parakeet / Canary、阿里 FunASR / Paraformer / SenseVoice、Moonshine、Vosk、Kaldi / k2 / icefall) vs 端侧·移动 SDK(whisper.cpp + CoreML / Metal、iOS Speech framework、Android SpeechRecognizer、Picovoice、SenseVoice 端侧); (b) 准确率(WER / CER) × 延迟(RTF / 流式) × 成本 三角权衡与选型决策树; (c) 成本优化 playbook — 端侧免费 / 批量折扣 / VAD 裁静音 / 量化(int8 / ggml) / 蒸馏 / 自托管 break-even; (d) 移动端集成 — 端侧 vs 云、流式 vs 批量、断点检测(endpointing)、隐私 / 离线; (e) 后处理 — 标点 / 数字规整(ITN) / 说话人分离(diarization) / 时间戳。学派分歧: 云 API vs 端侧自托管、通用大模型(Whisper) vs 专用流式(RNN-T / Conformer)、闭源 API vs 开源、准确率派 vs 成本派、英文优先 vs 中文 ASR(FunASR / SenseVoice / 讯飞)。不含: 文字转语音(TTS / 语音合成，方向相反)、声纹识别 / 说话人验证为主业、语音 agent / 对话式 AI、ASR 模型训练科研深水区。) Master OS — automated mastery of 语音转文字 (ASR / 语音识别 / Speech-to-Text) 应用工程 (从业者视角) — 选型、集成、优化语音转文字能力，尤其面向移动端、低成本、快速识别的场景。覆盖: (a) 引擎/API 地图 — 云端 API(OpenAI gpt-4o-transcribe / Whisper API、Deepgram、AssemblyAI、Google / Azure / AWS Transcribe、讯飞、字节火山、阿里、腾讯、百度) vs 开源模型(Whisper / faster-whisper / whisper.cpp / distil-whisper、NVIDIA NeMo Parakeet / Canary、阿里 FunASR / Paraformer / SenseVoice、Moonshine、Vosk、Kaldi / k2 / icefall) vs 端侧·移动 SDK(whisper.cpp + CoreML / Metal、iOS Speech framework、Android SpeechRecognizer、Picovoice、SenseVoice 端侧); (b) 准确率(WER / CER) × 延迟(RTF / 流式) × 成本 三角权衡与选型决策树; (c) 成本优化 playbook — 端侧免费 / 批量折扣 / VAD 裁静音 / 量化(int8 / ggml) / 蒸馏 / 自托管 break-even; (d) 移动端集成 — 端侧 vs 云、流式 vs 批量、断点检测(endpointing)、隐私 / 离线; (e) 后处理 — 标点 / 数字规整(ITN) / 说话人分离(diarization) / 时间戳。学派分歧: 云 API vs 端侧自托管、通用大模型(Whisper) vs 专用流式(RNN-T / Conformer)、闭源 API vs 开源、准确率派 vs 成本派、英文优先 vs 中文 ASR(FunASR / SenseVoice / 讯飞)。不含: 文字转语音(TTS / 语音合成，方向相反)、声纹识别 / 说话人验证为主业、语音 agent / 对话式 AI、ASR 模型训练科研深水区。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 语音转文字 (ASR / 语音识别 / Speech-to-Text) 应用工程 (从业者视角) — 选型、集成、优化语音转文字能力，尤其面向移动端、低成本、快速识别的场景。覆盖: (a) 引擎/API 地图 — 云端 API(OpenAI gpt-4o-transcribe / Whisper API、Deepgram、AssemblyAI、Google / Azure / AWS Transcribe、讯飞、字节火山、阿里、腾讯、百度) vs 开源模型(Whisper / faster-whisper / whisper.cpp / distil-whisper、NVIDIA NeMo Parakeet / Canary、阿里 FunASR / Paraformer / SenseVoice、Moonshine、Vosk、Kaldi / k2 / icefall) vs 端侧·移动 SDK(whisper.cpp + CoreML / Metal、iOS Speech framework、Android SpeechRecognizer、Picovoice、SenseVoice 端侧); (b) 准确率(WER / CER) × 延迟(RTF / 流式) × 成本 三角权衡与选型决策树; (c) 成本优化 playbook — 端侧免费 / 批量折扣 / VAD 裁静音 / 量化(int8 / ggml) / 蒸馏 / 自托管 break-even; (d) 移动端集成 — 端侧 vs 云、流式 vs 批量、断点检测(endpointing)、隐私 / 离线; (e) 后处理 — 标点 / 数字规整(ITN) / 说话人分离(diarization) / 时间戳。学派分歧: 云 API vs 端侧自托管、通用大模型(Whisper) vs 专用流式(RNN-T / Conformer)、闭源 API vs 开源、准确率派 vs 成本派、英文优先 vs 中文 ASR(FunASR / SenseVoice / 讯飞)。不含: 文字转语音(TTS / 语音合成，方向相反)、声纹识别 / 说话人验证为主业、语音 agent / 对话式 AI、ASR 模型训练科研深水区。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「语音转文字」「语音识别」「asr」「speech to text」「stt」

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codified expertise for quality control, non-conformance investigation, root cause analysis, corrective action, and supplier quality management in regulated manufacturing. Informed by quality engineers with 15+ years experience across FDA, IATF 16949, and AS9100 environments. Includes NCR lifecycle management, CAPA systems, SPC interpretation, and audit methodology. Use when investigating non-conformances, performing root cause analysis, managing CAPAs, interpreting SPC data, or handling supplier quality issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a nonconformance report from inspection notes, test results and the governing specification or procedure: what was observed, where, the evidence with references, the requirement cited quoted verbatim with the departure from it, and containment proposals for the quality lead to decide. Never classifies severity, dispositions the item, names a root cause or closes the report. Use when the user asks to "write up this nonconformance", "draft an NCR from my inspection notes", "formalise this deviation" or "turn this snag into a defect report". Do not use for tracking the actions an NCR raises, use corrective-action-tracker instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The re-measure and standing report of the canonical data model's live DB conformance. Use when asked 'where are we at' on DB drift or conformance, to update the drift numbers, when a drift-audit brief is re-issued, or on /drift-audit. NOT the per-table fix recipe (use matrx-frontend's db-canonicalize-table).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codified expertise for quality control, non-conformance investigation, root cause analysis, corrective action, and supplier quality management in regulated manufacturing. Informed by quality engineers with 15+ years experience across FDA, IATF 16949, and AS9100 environments. Includes NCR lifecycle management, CAPA systems, SPC interpretation, and audit methodology. Use when investigating non-conformances, performing root cause analysis, managing CAPAs, interpreting SPC data, or handling supplier quality issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a narrow-interval quality signal for a WinDAGs skill that a third party can verify without inspecting model weights or method internals. The mechanism is attribution-kNN over a tamper-evident outcome log (task→skills→accept/reject store), combined with a conformal-prediction calibration certificate that provides a formal coverage guarantee. Thompson/Beta sampling is explicitly rejected as a category error: it produces a selection signal for stationary i.i.d. rewards, not an attestation signal for context-dependent LLM output quality. The resulting bundle — outcome-log Merkle root + conformal threshold + optional TEE guardrail signature — constitutes a "narrow-interval trust" credential: verifiable, bounded, and internals-opaque.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Swift 6.2への移行や並行処理の設計で、MainActorによる状態の保護、重い処理の明示的なバックグラウンド実行、コンパイルエラーの解消を支援するスキル。

• 既存アプリをSwift 6.2へ移行したいとき
• データ競合のコンパイルエラー解消
• 重い計算をバックグラウンドへ移したいとき

Information Security Management System (ISMS) audit expert for ISO 27001 compliance verification, security control assessment, and certification support. Use when the user mentions ISO 27001, ISMS audit, Annex A controls, Statement of Applicability (SOA), gap analysis, nonconformity management, internal audit, surveillance audit, or security certification preparation. Helps review control implementation evidence, document audit findings, classify nonconformities, generate risk-based audit plans, map controls to Annex A requirements, prepare Stage 1 and Stage 2 audit documentation, and support corrective action workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) operational compliance for compliance teams. Three Article-level decisions: (1) What's the risk tier of this AI system — prohibited (Art. 5), high-risk (Art. 6 + Annex III), limited-risk (Art. 50), or minimal-risk? (2) For high-risk systems, what's the Article 43 conformity assessment route (Module A internal control vs Module H full QMS + notified body) and what goes in the Annex IV technical documentation? (3) Per organizational role (provider / deployer / importer / distributor / authorized representative), what are the active obligations and deadlines? Use during AI system intake review, when planning conformity assessment, or when scoping deployer obligations. Cites Articles + Annexes for every output. NOT executive AI strategy (see chief-ai-officer-advisor). NOT a legal substitute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Token integration and implementation analyzer based on Trail of Bits' token integration checklist. Analyzes token implementations for ERC20/ERC721 conformity, checks for 20+ weird token patterns, assesses contract composition and owner privileges, performs on-chain scarcity analysis, and evaluates how protocols handle non-standard tokens. Use when integrating or accepting arbitrary ERC20/ERC721 tokens, auditing a token implementation for standards conformity, or assessing risk from weird tokens such as fee-on-transfer, rebasing, missing return values, or blocklists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。