「consensus」の検索結果

6つの専門レビュアーロールを並列実行し、consensusLevel（複数ロールの合意度）と Tech Lead レポート（top3指摘・blindSpots・consensusSummary）で結果を統合する マルチエージェントレビュー entry skill。 Parallel multi-role review with consensus scoring (consensusLevel) and Tech Lead report. Use when a major release needs exhaustive multi-angle review, or when a single-perspective review is not enough and you want confidence that no reviewer angle was missed（重要リリース前の網羅レビュー・多視点の確証が 欲しいとき）。

Decides how to preprocess plasma cfDNA sequencing data so the recoverable signal survives - library-prep-aware fragment expectations (dsDNA vs ssDNA/adaptase prep), UMI/duplex consensus with fgbio (ExtractUmisFromBam, GroupReadsByUmi --strategy paired for duplex, CallMolecularConsensusReads vs CallDuplexConsensusReads, FilterConsensusReads min-reads "total s1 s2"), the align->group->consensus->RE-align ordering, and the cfDNA dedup trap where naive coordinate dedup collapses nucleosome-coincident independent molecules. Covers when single-strand consensus suffices vs when duplex is mandatory, the singleton/sensitivity tax at low input, and reading the insert-size histogram as a pre-analytical QC instrument. Use when processing plasma cfDNA reads before fragmentomics, ctDNA mutation calling, or tumor-fraction estimation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decides how to preprocess plasma cfDNA sequencing data so the recoverable signal survives - library-prep-aware fragment expectations (dsDNA vs ssDNA/adaptase prep), UMI/duplex consensus with fgbio (ExtractUmisFromBam, GroupReadsByUmi --strategy paired for duplex, CallMolecularConsensusReads vs CallDuplexConsensusReads, FilterConsensusReads min-reads "total s1 s2"), the align->group->consensus->RE-align ordering, and the cfDNA dedup trap where naive coordinate dedup collapses nucleosome-coincident independent molecules. Covers when single-strand consensus suffices vs when duplex is mandatory, the singleton/sensitivity tax at low input, and reading the insert-size histogram as a pre-analytical QC instrument. Use when processing plasma cfDNA reads before fragmentomics, ctDNA mutation calling, or tumor-fraction estimation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate consensus FASTA sequences by applying VCF variants onto a reference with bcftools consensus, or build viral/amplicon consensus with iVar. Use when reconstructing a sample-specific reference or haplotype, deciding -H haplotype vs IUPAC vs all-ALT projection, masking no-coverage sites so a consensus does not manufacture false reference calls, or setting iVar min-depth/min-frequency policy for surveillance genomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Achieve distributed agreement without central authority using bee democracy, threshold voting, and quorum sensing. Covers proposal generation, advocacy dynamics, commitment thresholds, deadlock resolution, and consensus quality assessment. Use when a group must decide between options without a designated leader, when centralized decision-making is a bottleneck, when stakeholders have different perspectives to integrate, or when designing automated systems that must reach consensus such as distributed databases or multi-agent AI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent skill for consensus-coordinator - invoke with $agent-consensus-coordinator

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate consensus FASTA sequences by applying VCF variants to a reference using bcftools consensus. Use when creating sample-specific reference sequences or reconstructing haplotypes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when identifying stable sample subtypes from bulk expression matrices with ConsensusClusterPlus, including PAC-based model selection and consensus matrix/CDF visualization. NOT for: differential expression analysis, single-cell clustering workflows, or non-expression tables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate consensus FASTA sequences by applying VCF variants to a reference using bcftools consensus. Use when creating sample-specific reference sequences or reconstructing haplotypes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides God Committee members through consensus-building for collective decisions. Use for proposals, voting, and disagreement resolution. Triggers on: consensus, voting, proposal, committee decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Distributed consensus algorithms and logical time for cloud and multi-node systems. Covers Lamport clocks, vector clocks, FLP impossibility, Paxos (basic, multi, fast), Raft, Viewstamped Replication, Byzantine fault tolerance basics, quorum reads/writes (N/R/W), leader election, and TLA+ specification style. Use when designing replicated state machines, picking a consensus protocol, reasoning about split-brain and quorum loss, or writing formal specs for distributed coordination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query multiple foreign AIs in parallel and synthesize a consensus ("quorum") answer with a consensus rating. Use when the user wants a quorum, a consensus answer, or the opinions of multiple AIs on a question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Byzantine consensus voting for multi-agent decision making. Implements voting protocols, conflict resolution, and agreement algorithms for reaching consensus among multiple agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent skill for consensus-coordinator - invoke with $agent-consensus-coordinator

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced Hive Mind collective intelligence system for queen-led multi-agent coordination with consensus mechanisms and persistent memory

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced Hive Mind collective intelligence system for queen-led multi-agent coordination with consensus mechanisms and persistent memory

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a pre-earnings briefing for a stock from Yahoo Finance data (yfinance): the upcoming report date and timing, consensus EPS and revenue estimates with their range, the beat/miss track record, analyst ratings and price targets, and what to watch in the print. Use this skill whenever the user is preparing for an upcoming earnings report or asks what the street expects — consensus or whisper numbers, EPS expectations, whether a company will beat, an earnings setup, or an earnings-season preview — and whenever a ticker comes up in the context of upcoming earnings, even without the word "preview". For results that are already out, use earnings-recap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze sell-side analyst estimates and how they are changing, using Yahoo Finance data (yfinance): EPS and revenue consensus by period, estimate ranges and dispersion, revision trends over 7/30/60/90 days and up/down revision breadth, growth estimates vs industry, sector, and the S&P 500, and historical estimate accuracy. Use this skill when the user wants more than a single estimate lookup: estimate revisions or momentum, EPS trend, consensus changes, forward or next-quarter and annual estimates, the bull vs bear estimate spread, or growth projections across periods.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] High-stakes technical proposal needing approval: consensus planning with review gates. Use when the user says: ralplan, consensus plan, reviewed plan, issue to PR, acceptance criteria, verification command, reviewable PR, risky planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Technical proposal facing adversarial scrutiny: independent perspectives attack a proposal, then distill into a bundle a separate planner consumes. Use when the user says: adversarial-consensus, adversarial planning, adversarial plan review, red team this plan, red-team this plan, red team the proposal, multi-perspective review, multiple perspectives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete tumor immune-infiltration-guided bulk-transcriptome diagnostic biomarker and machine-learning research designs from a user-provided cancer type and study direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a tumor bioinformatics study centered on differential expression, immune infiltration estimation, immune-linked module discovery, consensus feature selection, diagnostic modeling, nomogram construction, clinical association, and optional prognostic extension or validation. Covers five study patterns (immune-cell-first diagnostic workflow, immune-module-to-biomarker workflow, consensus-ML biomarker workflow, diagnostic-plus-prognostic hybrid workflow, translational validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, reference literature pack, and self-critical risk review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-protocol consensus for agent swarms supporting Raft leader election, Byzantine fault tolerance, Gossip state propagation, and CRDT conflict-free merging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decides whether and how to polish a draft genome assembly to raise consensus accuracy (QV) with read-type-matched tools - Racon and medaka (ONT consensus), dorado polish, Polypolish and pypolca (Illumina, repeat-aware), Pilon (legacy short-read), NextPolish/NextPolish2, Hapo-G (haplotype-aware), ntEdit, and DeepPolisher/PEPPER-Margin-DeepVariant for human. Covers the do-not-polish-HiFi rule, the medaka basecaller-model footgun, held-out Merqury QV as the only honest stop signal, and the haplotype-collapse trap. Use when correcting homopolymer indels or residual SNPs in a long-read assembly, deciding if a HiFi assembly needs polishing, or choosing an ONT vs hybrid vs short-read polishing chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-method decision tree for calling hits in pooled CRISPR screens. Catalogs statistical models (MAGeCK RRA, MAGeCK MLE, BAGEL2, drugZ, JACKS, Chronos, CERES), experimental designs each is built for, failure modes outside design domain, reconciliation when methods disagree, multiple-testing and effect-size thresholds, the order of operations (count -> QC -> CN-correct -> hit-call -> validate), the second-best-sgRNA conservative rule, and consensus-hit strategy. Use when choosing among MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / drugZ / JACKS / Chronos for a given design, reconciling disagreement across two or three methods on the same screen, deciding whether to require consensus, gating downstream validation by hit-confidence tier, or interpreting unstable hit lists across reruns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。