「contributions」の検索結果

Expert en écosystème d'agents IA (plugins, extensions, thèmes, communauté, contributions, gouvernance)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with persistent history and trend tracking. Team-aware with per-person contributions, praise, and growth areas. Use when asked for weekly retro, what shipped this week, or engineering retrospective.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover the pull requests this Paperclip instance opened (never community contributions), report what each is for and how confident we are that it is merge-ready, and automatically drive the non-ready ones back to green with /prepare-paperclip-pr — without ever merging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft performance reviews, self-assessments, peer reviews, and upward feedback in your own voice. Analyzes your contributions, emails, and meeting history via WorkIQ, then produces honest, impact-focused drafts using the STAR format. USE FOR: write my performance review, draft self-assessment, peer review, 360 feedback, annual review, mid-year review, upward feedback, write review for colleague, performance appraisal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make any repo AI-ready — analyzes your codebase and generates AGENTS.md, copilot-instructions.md, CI workflows, issue templates, and more. Mines your PR review patterns and creates files customized to your stack. USE THIS SKILL when the user asks to "make this repo ai-ready", "set up AI config", or "prepare this repo for AI contributions".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isolated, no cross-pollination), critic analysis, synthesis, founder review, and decision extraction. Use when the user invokes /cs:boardroom, calls a board meeting, or wants structured multi-perspective executive deliberation on a strategic question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage context-mode GitHub issues, PRs, releases, and marketing with parallel subagent army. Orchestrates 10-20 dynamic agents per task. Use when triaging issues, reviewing PRs, releasing versions, writing LinkedIn posts, announcing releases, fixing bugs, merging contributions, validating ENV vars, testing adapters, or syncing branches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer NemoClaw maintainer policy questions about triage, labels, Project fields, releases, or competing contributions. Read-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when modifying an existing PEFT method (its forward method, parameters/buffers, state_dict handling, or config defaults) to ensure that existing checkpoints keep working.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "merge a PR", "review and merge pull requests", "integrate external contributions", "handle PR conflicts", "cherry-pick from a PR", or needs to merge GitHub PRs while maximizing contributor attribution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses a research paper outline (.qmd file) against structured criteria from Kosuke Imai's empirical research guide. Evaluates the abstract and section outline for: research question clarity, stated contributions, hypotheses and testable implications, data description, planned results and inferential approach, and robustness checks. Detects causal papers from the abstract and conditionally assesses identification strategy only when causal framing is present. Produces a structured markdown report with PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL assessments and actionable suggestions. Use when asked to assess, evaluate, review, or check a paper outline, abstract-and-outline, or research plan in a .qmd file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes expert academic paper summaries for social science research, particularly political science and applied statistics. Use when asked to summarize, review, or create a reading summary of an academic paper, PDF, or research article. Accepts a file (PDF or text format) or a directory of papers. Produces a structured markdown summary — approximately 400–600 words — covering primary contributions, major questions and answers with point estimates, methods and data, and limitations and robustness. Includes BibTeX citation retrieved from Google Scholar and keyword metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skeptical review of outside contributions to public repos. Use when reviewing, ranking, or replying to public GitHub pull requests or issues from outside contributors, or when the user says "larp-detector".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to develop, modify, and extend the Claude Code codebase following its established programming style, patterns, and conventions. Use this skill whenever working on the claude-code source — adding tools, commands, utils, components, types, hooks, services, or fixing bugs. Also use when the user asks about claude-code architecture, coding standards, file organization, or wants to understand how the codebase works. This skill ensures all contributions match the existing codebase style exactly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when determining author order on research manuscripts, assigning CRediT contributor roles for transparency, documenting individual contributions to collaborative projects, or resolving authorship disputes in multi-institutional research. Generates fair and transparent auth...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts journal-ready cover letters for manuscript submission. Use when preparing a submission package, communicating the manuscript's contributions and journal fit to editors, or tailoring the novelty framing for a specific journal's scope. Also triggers on "write a cover letter for my paper", "draft a submission cover letter", "help me write to the editor", or "cover letter for [journal name]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft and review contributions to existing MEX project knowledge in the repo wiki. Use when the user wants to capture a team decision, convention, or architecture note, propose an addition or correction for team review, or invokes /mex-inbox or $mex-inbox. Also supports existing Spec proposals. Keywords: mex, project memory, CLAUDE.md, team memory, drift, inbox. Do not activate for brainstorming alone, routine GROW upkeep, email inboxes, session logs, or handoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft and review contributions to existing MEX project knowledge. Use when the user asks to capture a discussion or decision in project knowledge, propose an addition or correction for team review, or explicitly invokes /mex-inbox or $mex-inbox. Also supports existing Spec proposals. Do not activate for brainstorming alone, routine GROW upkeep, email inboxes, session logs, or handoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and deliver a raise request that actually works — the evidence, the number, the timing, and the exact words — instead of hoping it gets noticed. Use when asked how do I ask for a raise, I deserve more money, prepare me to ask for a raise, or negotiate a pay increase at my job. Produces a value case built on your actual contributions and market rate, a specific target number with justification, the right timing and person, a script for the conversation, and responses to the likely pushbacks — turning 'I want more' into a business case your manager can say yes to.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract and score leads from GitHub repositories by analyzing stars, forks, issues, PRs, comments, and contributions. Produces unified multi-repo CSV with deduplicated user profiles. No paid API credits required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help the user turn their Retentioneering ideas, friction reports, bug findings, or feature needs into high-quality upstream contributions: from capturing and validating the idea, through minimal reproductions and issue drafts, to preparing, testing, and submitting a pull request that follows this repository's conventions. Use when the user says they found a bug, wants a feature, wrote a workaround worth upstreaming, or asks how to contribute, open an issue, or make a PR to retentioneering-tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent board meeting protocol running a structured 6-phase deliberation with isolated C-suite contributions to prevent groupthink. Use when making major strategic decisions or resolving cross-functional disagreements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

smina molecular docking CLI. AutoDock Vina fork with customizable scoring functions, native SDF/MOL2/PDB ligand input, autoboxing, local energy minimization, and per-atom score breakdowns. Pipeline: receptor PDBQT prep -> ligand prep (RDKit/OpenBabel) -> dock via autobox or explicit grid -> rescore/minimize with custom scoring -> rank poses by affinity. Choose smina over Vina when you need custom scoring terms (--custom_scoring), local optimization of an existing pose (--local_only), per-atom contributions (--atom_term_data), or SDF/MOL2 ligands without manual PDBQT conversion. For unknown binding sites use diffdock; for the Python-bindings/Vinardo workflow use autodock-vina-docking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read, decompose, and analyze IEEE-style papers using routed technical-reading workflows. Use when extracting problem setting, object-method-condition logic, contributions, method pipeline, equations, datasets, baselines, metrics, ablations, limitations, replication details, citation role, related-work positioning, implementation notes, or reviewer-style assessment from a paper, PDF, abstract, or manuscript excerpt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。