93 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Cleanup and triage of the task ledgers FOUND_DEFECTS.md, CURRENT_ERRORS.md, .matrx/AGENT_TASKS.md, .matrx/ARMAN_TASKS.md. Use when invoked as /task-hygiene <step>, cleaning up tasks, defects, or errors, triaging an error dump, promoting defects, or bootstrapping these files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose and fix concrete MSBuild property defects in projects and existing shared-file hierarchies. USE FOR: conditions, defaults, append versus overwrite, last-write-wins values, OS/TFM checks, portable paths, normalization, and reviews centered on those property defects. Property defects in Directory.Build.* remain in scope, including overwritten values across parent/child imports and conditions that run before TargetFramework is set, even when the fix changes import order or moves a property group to .targets. DO NOT USE FOR: placement-only or import-only requests with no concrete property defect, such as discovering shared files or choosing which file owns a target or customization (use directory-build-organization); item operations; target structure; broad reviews without a concrete property defect; non-MSBuild work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose and fix concrete MSBuild property defects in projects and existing shared-file hierarchies. USE FOR: conditions, defaults, append versus overwrite, last-write-wins values, OS/TFM checks, portable paths, normalization, and reviews centered on those property defects. Property defects in Directory.Build.* remain in scope, including overwritten values across parent/child imports and conditions that run before TargetFramework is set, even when the fix changes import order or moves a property group to .targets. DO NOT USE FOR: placement-only or import-only requests with no concrete property defect, such as discovering shared files or choosing which file owns a target or customization (use directory-build-organization); item operations; target structure; broad reviews without a concrete property defect; non-MSBuild work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Qualify a check before it is allowed to clear anything — prove it can detect the failure it is meant to catch. Seeds known defects into a copy of a real artifact plus a clean control, runs the checker, and reports recall and false-positive rate into a qualification ledger. Use when the user says "does this check work", "qualify the gate", "test my reviewer", "seed defects", "vaccinate", "qualify the checks", "can I trust this review", "does it pass for the right reason", or before relying on any automated check or referee simulation for a decision that matters. NOT a code fixer and NOT a reviewer itself — it grades the grader.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive adversarial audit of a theory, proof, math/econ paper, codebase, or set of claims — decompose into components, fan out independent skeptics that must return CONCRETE defects, adjudicate every finding with a separate judge, fix all confirmed defects, then re-verify. Use when correctness must be bulletproof and single-pass or round-by-round review is too slow and too shallow. Invoke for "audit this rigorously", "find ALL the bugs/gaps", "make this rock solid", "converge faster on correctness".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hunts bugs with evidence trails. Use when investigating unexpected behavior or before merging code with potential hidden defects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reproduce and repair a bounded Proto UI regression whose expected behavior and owning layer are already governed. Use this before domain implementation skills whenever work starts from a reproducible failure, including bug fixes, drift repairs, broken exports, Runtime failures, Adapter parity defects, Prototype defects, or public-projection regressions. Do not use when expected semantics or ownership is unresolved.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage defects with independent severity and priority, reproducible evidence, preserved attempt history, and explicit resolution retesting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenClawの複数のIssueやPRについて、担当を分けて原因調査と修正、検証を進め、許可された範囲でマージや解決済み案件のクローズまで管理するスキル。
OpenClawの課題やプルリクエストを、現在のソースとテスト結果に基づいて調査・レビューし、許可された範囲で修正からマージ完了の確認まで進めるスキル。
Cluster a GitHub issue backlog by root cause into a small set of plan-master issues, redirect children with a standardized comment, and bundle architectural-fix PRs that close clusters atomically. Use when an issue tracker has accumulated dozens of reports that share underlying defects, when asked to triage / consolidate / cluster / dedupe issues, when asked to build a plan series or roadmap from open issues, or when routing a new incoming bug into an existing plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect and prepare the selected PR queue against its exact current base, repair authorized defects with contributor credit, and report full versus partial validation. Use for maintainer pre-greening; merging requires separate owner authorization and the shared merge gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Validate forms accessibly. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction. Distinguish between browser-posted forms and client-handled React forms so you do not over-report missing `method` or `action` as accessibility defects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Contribute a verified bug fix for LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, bundled Codex skills, or upstream Codex CLI bugs. Opens a fork PR only for upstream openai/codex; LazyCodex-owned defects become a verified-fix issue on code-yeongyu/lazycodex (never a PR — that repo is a generated distribution mirror). Use when the user asks to fix a bug, contribute a bug fix, contribute to fix bug, open a PR for a bug, or debug and PR a LazyCodex/Codex defect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug, patch, and verify failed Agent QA runs from MCP evidence, artifacts, logs, and local code without hiding product or infrastructure defects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates structured bug reports for defects found during Oracle-to-PostgreSQL migration. Use when documenting behavioral differences between Oracle and PostgreSQL as actionable bug reports with severity, root cause, and remediation steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Close defects and incidents with a BUG RECEIPT and VERIFIED, PARTIAL, or BLOCKED status after diagnosis, repair, or recovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate finished work for defects, risk, and simplification before it ships
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix defects in the Composio SDK repository with focused reproduction, root-cause analysis, regression tests, and narrow verification. Use when the user reports a bug, failing test, CI regression, runtime defect, or incorrect SDK behavior. Do not use for new feature design or broad refactors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Re-review a pull request after a push — reconcile the previous review against the new commits, look for new defects the push introduced, then a fresh pass over the whole PR, and finish with a verdict on the PR
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every consumer is named before anything is deleted. Not for tidying a diff you just wrote (that is bundled `/simplify`) and not for defects (that is `/review`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for actionable defects. Correctness is the core; performance and security are optional sub-cases of the same engine. Anchors on agreements between participants across a boundary, forces a violating execution, and refutes every candidate before reporting. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, audit a codebase, or check whether a fix is safe.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit OpenClaw frontend code and rendered interfaces for Carapace drift, token misuse, primitive reimplementation, accessibility problems, responsive defects, and off-brand copy. Use for design reviews, compliance checks, or scheduled audit-and-fix workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trigger: RDD, receipt-driven development, review authority, receipt/lineage, correction/recovery, delivery gate/kill switch, bounded review defects. Guide work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。