82 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Comprehensive UI/UX design review with live environment testing, responsive validation, accessibility compliance (WCAG 2.1 AA), and visual consistency analysis using Playwright. Use when user runs /design-review, /review:design-review, requests a "design review", "UI review", "UX audit", or mentions "review the design", "check accessibility", "responsive testing".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Figmaの個別デザインを、既存design repoにあるデザインシステムの正本・仕様・実データの基準に従ってレビューする。明示トリガーは「デザインについてレビューして」「このデザインレビューして」「/design-review URL」。
Use when the user runs /web-design-review with a URL to visually audit and fix a live UI. Not for design direction: use design. Not for variant galleries: use design-variants.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. Iteratively fixes issues in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying with before/after screenshots. For plan-mode design review (before implementation), use /plan-design-review. Use when asked to "audit the design", "visual QA", "check if it looks good", or "design polish".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designer's eye plan review — interactive, like CEO and Eng review. Rates each design dimension 0-10, explains what would make it a 10, then fixes the plan to get there. Works in plan mode. For live site visual audits, use /design-review. Use when asked to "review the design plan" or "design critique".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack design-review method for reviewing rendered UI, landing pages, decks, or visual artifacts for hierarchy, layout, accessibility, and polish.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use after a backend build succeeds or whenever authentication, authorization, actor/identity handling, external service calls (IdP, JWKS, DB, clock), logging, observability, configuration or error contracts are in play — delegates to the backend-design-reviewer agent for a design-quality review of the current branch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Uncorrelated Evaluator — 4軸ルーブリック専門エージェント（functionality-reviewer・code-reviewer・design-reviewer・originality-reviewer）と security-reviewer を5並列実行し、成果物を多面的に独立評価します。PASS / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED 判定を返します。Self-leniency 防止のため、実装エージェントのコンテキストを引き継がない新規エージェントとして起動します。「レビューして」「評価して」「実装を確認して」などのリクエストで起動します。
Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. Iteratively fixes issues in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying with before/after screenshots. For plan-mode design review (before implementation), use /plan-design-review. Use when asked to "audit the design", "visual QA", "check if it looks good", or "design polish". Proactively suggest when the user mentions visual inconsistencies or wants to polish the look of a live site. (gstack)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designer's eye plan review — interactive, like CEO and Eng review. Rates each design dimension 0-10, explains what would make it a 10, then fixes the plan to get there. Works in plan mode. For live site visual audits, use /design-review. Use when asked to "review the design plan" or "design critique". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan with UI/UX components that should be reviewed before implementation. (gstack)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Visual design audit for iOS apps on real hardware. (gstack)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designer's eye plan review — interactive, like CEO and Eng review. (gstack)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. (gstack)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Senior Designer review: rates each design dimension 0-10, explains what a 10 looks like, and flags AI Slop signals. Useful as a gate before merging UI work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designer Who Codes: visual audit then fixes with atomic commits and before/after screenshots. Useful for tightening shipped UI before launch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive Power BI data model design review prompt for evaluating model architecture, relationships, and optimization opportunities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stop coding agents from shipping generic UI. Use UIZZE's 800,000+ real web and iOS screens to build product-specific interfaces, define a design contract, cover required states, and run a hard finish gate. Use when designing, implementing, redesigning, critiquing, or pre-ship reviewing a web or iOS interface in Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, or another coding agent. Trigger with "anti-ui-slop", "stop UI slop", "ground this UI in real screens", or "run the UI finish gate".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive REST API design review with automated linting, breaking-change detection, and design scorecards. Catches inconsistent conventions, missing versioning, and design smells before APIs ship. Use when reviewing a PR that adds or changes API endpoints, auditing an existing API for v2 migration, or establishing API standards for a team.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews one design document for completeness, internal consistency, implementability, and design standards. Before handing to programmers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill enables visual inspection of websites running locally or remotely to identify and fix design issues. Triggers on requests like "review website design", "check the UI", "fix the layout", "find design problems". Detects issues with responsive design, accessibility, visual consistency, and layout breakage, then performs fixes at the source code level.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill enables visual inspection of websites running locally or remotely to identify and fix design issues. Triggers on requests like "review website design", "check the UI", "fix the layout", "find design problems". Detects issues with responsive design, accessibility, visual consistency, and layout breakage, then performs fixes at the source code level.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality and design system compliance. Evaluates using three pillars: frictionless insight-to-action, quality craft, and trustworthy building. USE FOR: PR reviews, design reviews, accessibility audits, design system compliance checks, creative frontend design, UI code review, component reviews, responsive design checks, theme testing, and creating memorable UI. DO NOT USE FOR: Backend API reviews, database schema reviews, infrastructure or DevOps work, pure business logic without UI, or non-frontend code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish review gates — criteria, checkpoints, and approval flow. Use when work ships without consistent review. For running one individual session, use `design-critique`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review designs, products, and features with Steve Jobs' standards: ruthless simplicity, focus, and end-to-end excellence. Use when the user mentions "Steve Jobs review", "design review", "product review", "what would Steve do", "insanely great", "this feels too complicated", "too many features", "product taste", "saying no", or "is this good enough to ship". Also trigger when critiquing a UI, feature, or roadmap for focus and simplicity, cutting scope to the essential, or pressure-testing the whole experience from first run to daily use. Covers the simplicity audit, the no list, design-is-how-it-works, end-to-end ownership, demo culture, and a Jobs-style review protocol with binary verdicts. For visual design fundamentals, see refactoring-ui. For usability audits, see ux-heuristics. For detail polish, see microinteractions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。