「feature discovery」の検索結果

Build a feature store using Feast for centralized feature management, configure offline and online stores for batch and real-time serving, define feature views with transformations, and implement point-in-time correct joins for ML pipelines. Use when managing features for multiple ML models, ensuring training-serving consistency, serving low-latency features for real-time inference, reusing feature definitions across projects, or building a feature catalog for discovery and governance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive a whole tdmcp feature BACKLOG to completion as resumable, wave-by-wave releases — the campaign layer ABOVE tdmcp-pipeline/tdmcp-feature-lead. Use whenever the user wants to implement an ENTIRE backlog or discovery file (e.g. _workspace/discovery*/FEATURE_BACKLOG*.md), 'all the features', many features across multiple releases, or a long autonomous build campaign, AND for every follow-up: continue/resume the campaign, run the next wave, re-run a failed wave, fold in QA results, or check campaign status. Backed by a ledger.json so re-running is idempotent (skips shipped work, resumes interrupted work) and resilient (retry-once then quarantine-and-continue). For a SINGLE feature or one small batch, use tdmcp-pipeline instead; this skill is for the whole ledger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive a whole tdmcp feature BACKLOG to completion as resumable, wave-by-wave releases — the campaign layer ABOVE tdmcp-pipeline/tdmcp-feature-lead. Use whenever the user wants to implement an ENTIRE backlog or discovery file (e.g. _workspace/discovery*/FEATURE_BACKLOG*.md), 'all the features', many features across multiple releases, or a long autonomous build campaign, AND for every follow-up: continue/resume the campaign, run the next wave, re-run a failed wave, fold in QA results, or check campaign status. Backed by a ledger.json so re-running is idempotent (skips shipped work, resumes interrupted work) and resilient (retry-once then quarantine-and-continue). For a SINGLE feature or one small batch, use tdmcp-pipeline instead; this skill is for the whole ledger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build empowered product teams using discovery and delivery dual-track. Use when the user mentions "product discovery", "empowered teams", "feature factory", "opportunity assessment", "product vision", "product strategy", "what should we build", or "our roadmap is just a feature list". Also trigger when restructuring teams away from output-driven models, or deciding what to build next based on outcomes. Covers discovery techniques, team structure, opportunity assessment, vision/strategy, and continuous delivery. For customer interviews, see mom-test. For ongoing discovery systems, see continuous-discovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end Android indie idea workflow — feature-build phase only (no monetization). Phased — discover (if no idea) → generate 2 candidates → refine scope (offline/online, sharing, MVP vs full, core-value features) → risk/reward/tradeoff analysis when scoping down → emit idea brief. Use for greenfield app concepts, new feature ideation, idea discovery, or pre-design discovery before writing a design document. Triggers — new app idea, feature concept, indie dev brainstorm, validate idea, refine idea, what should I build, find an app idea, idea pipeline, I have no idea, help me find an app idea, scope down, MVP scoping, core value features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey the whole tdmcp project and produce a prioritized list of NEW features it could implement — across artist controls, CLI/DX, AI/LLM integration, and TouchDesigner depth. Use whenever the user wants to brainstorm, discover, survey, list, or audit what features/tools/effects/controls/commands/prompts/capabilities tdmcp *could* add, asks 'what could we build / what's missing / what are the opportunities / ideas for the project', or wants a feature backlog or gap analysis. Also for follow-ups: re-run, refresh, update, re-survey, deepen, or re-prioritize the backlog, or survey just one surface (e.g. 'CLI ideas only'). This is the IDEATION harness — it produces a list to decide from; it does NOT build. When the user has already chosen a feature and wants it implemented/shipped/added, use tdmcp-pipeline instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey the whole tdmcp project and produce a prioritized list of NEW features it could implement — across artist controls, CLI/DX, AI/LLM integration, and TouchDesigner depth. Use whenever the user wants to brainstorm, discover, survey, list, or audit what features/tools/effects/controls/commands/prompts/capabilities tdmcp *could* add, asks 'what could we build / what's missing / what are the opportunities / ideas for the project', or wants a feature backlog or gap analysis. Also for follow-ups: re-run, refresh, update, re-survey, deepen, or re-prioritize the backlog, or survey just one surface (e.g. 'CLI ideas only'). This is the IDEATION harness — it produces a list to decide from; it does NOT build. When the user has already chosen a feature and wants it implemented/shipped/added, use tdmcp-pipeline instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structured discovery interview and produce a complete, developer-ready Product Requirements Document. Load when the user asks to write a PRD, create product requirements, document a feature, define user stories with acceptance criteria, or turn a rough idea into a formal product requirements document. Also triggers on "document this feature", "write requirements for", "create a one-pager", "turn this into a PRD", "I need a PRD for", or any request to produce a structured product document for stakeholder alignment or engineering handoff. Supports Full PRD, Lean PRD, and One-Pager formats. Note: for executable feature specifications (FRs, NFRs, ACs as Given/When/Then consumable by AI coding agents), route to `feature-spec` instead — PRDs frame the product, feature-specs encode the implementable contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs an iterative, conversational product-discovery process with a founder/stakeholder: structured interview, live low-fi wireframing, a linked feature/page node-graph built up as you go, a founder-confirmed lock-in checkpoint, then a generated PRD, a Mermaid-rendered sitemap, and a mockup with a full design system (palette, typography, dark mode). Use when building or operating an AI product-discovery chatbot, or when running founder/stakeholder discovery by hand and you need the structure (interview script, node-graph schema, PRD template, design-system handoff order). NOT for implementing the spec'd product once locked — hand off to feature-specific skills (ideal-web-app-builder, tailwind-v4-expert, color-theory-palette-harmony-expert, typography-expert, dark-mode-design-expert) for that. NOT for one-shot PRD generation without an interview loop — if the founder already has a written spec, this process is unnecessary overhead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when coordinating product work across the 12 bundled product sub-skills (RICE, OKRs, UX research, design tokens, competitive teardown, analytics, experiments, discovery, roadmaps, spec-to-repo, landing pages, SaaS scaffolding) or the 4 standalone product-team plugins (user stories, Apple HIG, code-to-PRD, research summarizer). Triggers on 'help me prioritize', 'plan a product experiment', 'we ship features nobody uses', 'run the discovery loop', 'is our OST sound'. Forks context to route to one sub-skill via a deterministic signal router and returns a digest; can also drive a continuous-discovery loop (Torres cadence tracker + OST linter as machine gates) or a full goal→plan→execute→verify→close run through the repo-wide agent-harness. Distinct from project-management (how to deliver vs what to build), marketing/landing (from-scratch pages), and engineering/agent-harness (the generic loop engine this orchestrator plugs into).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete phenotype-scoring bioinformatics research designs for any disease context and any user-defined phenotype, pathway, process, signature, or molecular program. Use when a study centers on gene-set or feature-set definition, intersection with DEGs or candidate features, phenotype scoring, feature selection, diagnostic or stratification assessment, immune or cellular-resolution interpretation, network analysis, and optional orthogonal validation. Covers five study patterns (signature discovery, phenotype scoring, feature selection, immune/cellular interpretation, multi-layer validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

B2B 大客户销售 (B2B 大客户销售 / 企业级复杂销售 (Enterprise B2B Sales / Complex Selling) — 面向企业客户的高价值、长周期、多干系人复杂销售的职业认知操作系统，从业者(AE/客户经理/SE 售前/销售负责人 VP Sales/CRO)、想入行者、以及服务这行(销售咨询/enablement/RevOps)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 三大方法论流派之争: **买方主导的诊断式提问 (consultative/discovery-led: SPIN 提问 → 痛点 → 方案, 「像医生先诊断再开方」) ⇄ 卖方主导的教学式挑战 (Challenger: Teach-Tailor-Take control, 用商业洞见 reframe 客户认知, 「像老师挑战客户的既有想法」) ⇄ 资格审查纪律 (MEDDIC/MEDDPICC: 先严格 qualify/disqualify, 「no deal 好过 bad deal」)**; 三派不是非此即彼, 资深人混用, 但底层世界观分歧真实(问 vs 教 vs 筛); 更深层张力 — 「过程/方法论纪律 (process rigor: 预测准确、deal inspection、qualify) ⇄ 关系/信任 (relationship: champion 培养、高管关系、人情)」, 「卖结果/业务价值 (business outcome/ROI、卖给经济决策人) ⇄ 卖产品/功能 (feature selling)」, 「多线程触达买方委员会 (multithreading buying committee) ⇄ 单一 champion 依赖」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量+CLI 化) — MEDDIC/MEDDPICC (Metrics 量化指标/Economic buyer 经济决策人/Decision Criteria 决策标准/Decision Process 决策流程/Identify Pain 痛点/Champion 内部拥护者 + Paper process 签约流程/Competition 竞争), SPIN (Situation/Problem/Implication/Need-payoff 提问序列), Challenger (商业洞见 commercial insight + reframe + 建设性张力 constructive tension + Mobilizer 调动者), Solution Selling (痛点链 pain chain/愿景创建/buying vision), Sandler (前置合约 up-front contract/痛苦漏斗 pain funnel/潜艇七步), Command of the Message (Force Management: 业务价值框架/before-after/decision criteria), Gap Selling (Keenan: 现状 current state → 期望 future state → 差距 the gap/问题中心), Miller Heiman Strategic Selling (蓝表 blue sheet/buying influences: 经济/用户/技术买家 + coach), Value Selling, BANT (老式资格框架, 多被 MEDDIC 取代); (c) 行业结构与角色 — SDR/BDR (开发/约见) → AE/客户经理 (成交) → SE/售前/Solutions Engineer (技术验证/POC/demo) → CSM (客户成功/续约扩张) → Sales Manager/VP Sales/CRO; RevOps (收入运营), Sales Enablement (赋能); land and expand (先落地再扩张)、量化指标 quota/OTE(目标总收入)/配额达成率/pipeline coverage(管道覆盖率 ~3x 业内经验法则)/win rate(赢率)/sales velocity(销售速度)/ramp time(爬坡期)/ACV·ARR·NRR(年合同额/年经常性收入/净收入留存); (d) 销售周期 (the deal/opportunity lifecycle) — prospecting 开发 → discovery 需求挖掘 → qualification 资格审查(MEDDIC) → demo/technical validation/POC 技术验证 → business case/value 业务价值与 ROI → proposal 提案 → negotiation 谈判(procurement 采购/法务/security review) → close 成交 → onboarding/expansion 交付与扩张; 干系人: champion 拥护者 vs coach 线人 vs economic buyer 经济决策人 vs blocker 阻碍者; mutual action plan/close plan(双向行动计划/成交计划); (e) 产出物与节奏 — discovery call(需求电话)、demo、business case、proposal/SOW、MAP(mutual action plan)、forecast(预测: commit/best case/pipeline 类别)、pipeline review/deal review/QBR(季度业务回顾)/account plan(客户计划); (f) 职业/招聘/薪酬 — quota/OTE/comp plan(底薪+提成)/accelerator(加速器)/SPIFF/clawback、ramp、President's Club(顶尖销售俱乐部)、SDR→AE→管理 晋升路径、rep turnover(销售流失率高); (g) 争议/批判 — Challenger 是否过誉(CEB 原始数据被质疑、insight selling 批评)、MEDDIC 沦为填表剧场(box-checking theater, 填字段不真 qualify)、活动指标 vs 质量(spray-and-pray 群发/冷电话存废之争)、AI SDR/自动化淹没收件箱(2024-2025 AI BDR 泡沫 + 邮件送达率崩溃 backlash)、SDR 军团模式是否将死(Winning by Design/signal-based GTM 取代)、配额虚高与销售 burnout、季末打折促单、销售方法论的「宗教化」与培训-认证产业链、最大竞争对手其实是「no decision/维持现状」而非对手; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 提问诊断派(Rackham SPIN/Bosworth&Eades Solution Selling/Keenan Gap Selling) vs 挑战教学派(Dixon&Adamson Challenger/Force Management Command of the Message) vs 资格纪律派(MEDDIC: Napoli&Dunkel 起源/John McMahon/MEDDICC Andy Whyte) vs 关系战略派(Miller Heiman Strategic/Large Account) vs SaaS 现代收入架构派(Aaron Ross Predictable Revenue/Mark Roberge Sales Acceleration Formula/Jacco van der Kooij Winning by Design bowtie/David Skok 指标) vs 开发-心态派(Jeb Blount Fanatical Prospecting/Sales EQ、Anthony Iannarino、Josh Braun) vs 谈判(Chris Voss Never Split the Difference 战术同理心)。不含: B2C/零售/电商导购销售、纯电话客服/客户支持、纯渠道/分销管理(channel 虽相关但聚焦直销复杂销售)、纯 marketing/需求生成(demand gen 虽上游但本 skill 聚焦销售执行)、纯 CSM 客户成功(虽相关但聚焦 new logo + expansion 的销售动作)。) Master OS — automated mastery of B2B 大客户销售 / 企业级复杂销售 (Enterprise B2B Sales / Complex Selling) — 面向企业客户的高价值、长周期、多干系人复杂销售的职业认知操作系统，从业者(AE/客户经理/SE 售前/销售负责人 VP Sales/CRO)、想入行者、以及服务这行(销售咨询/enablement/RevOps)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 三大方法论流派之争: **买方主导的诊断式提问 (consultative/discovery-led: SPIN 提问 → 痛点 → 方案, 「像医生先诊断再开方」) ⇄ 卖方主导的教学式挑战 (Challenger: Teach-Tailor-Take control, 用商业洞见 reframe 客户认知, 「像老师挑战客户的既有想法」) ⇄

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes a four-phase feature addition workflow (Discovery, Planning, TDD Implementation, Verification) for Python projects. Use when adding a new feature end-to-end — discovering project structure and integration points, drafting a feature spec with MoSCoW-prioritized requirements and BDD acceptance criteria, implementing via test-first TDD cycles, then verifying with ruff lint, ty type checks, and behavior-focused regression and contract coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous feature research and gap analysis. Use when starting /add-new-feature or analyzing existing architecture documents. Explores codebase patterns, identifies ambiguities, and produces feature-context-{slug}.md for orchestrator RT-ICA phase. Does NOT make technical decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or updating the project skill discovery config — generates or regenerates .dh/skill_discovery.yaml by scanning the repo to infer tech stack, inventorying installed skills via npx skills list, loading candidate skill content before suggesting, and writing a config-driven skill injection file. Triggers on /dh:setup-skill-discovery invocations and programmatic --auto calls from add-new-feature Phase 3.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SAM-style feature initiation workflow — discovery through codebase analysis, architecture spec, task decomposition, validation, and context manifest. Use when a user asks to add a feature, plan a feature, or convert an idea into an executable SAM plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting a new feature, gathering requirements for an unfamiliar domain, refining a vague idea into actionable scope, or when a user request is ambiguous or underspecified. Conducts SAM Stage 1 discovery — structured requirements gathering through user discussion, asking WHO/WHAT/WHEN/WHY and never HOW. Produces the ARTIFACT:DISCOVERY document containing feature requirements, NFRs, goals, anti-goals, references, and resolved questions. Supports backlog item self-initialization via a

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic product leadership guidance for SaaS and technology companies. Covers product strategy, roadmap planning, product discovery, user research, growth product management, platform strategy, product analytics, and product launches. Use when defining product vision, prioritizing features, conducting discovery, analyzing metrics, or launching products. Use for "product strategy", "roadmap planning", "feature prioritization", "product discovery", "product metrics", "PRD writing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scout the TouchDesigner community for what's HYPED right now — community showcases, recent tutorials, generative-AI bridges, hardware interaction trends, visual-aesthetic trends of 2025-2026 — then propose tdmcp tools that ride those trends AND are easy to build. Use whenever the user wants to brainstorm new feature ideas based on what's trending in TouchDesigner, asks for 'hype' or 'trending' features, asks 'what are people doing in TD right now / what's hot / what's hype', wants tools inspired by community trends, asks to scout TD trends/aesthetics/integrations, or says things like 'ideias hype', 'novas ideias', 'o que está em alta', 'criar ferramentas para o que está bombando', 'tendências do TouchDesigner'. Also for follow-ups: refresh, rescout one surface, re-rank under another profile, deepen a trend, or filter for buildable-easy items. This is an EXTERNAL trend ideation harness — complementary to tdmcp-feature-discovery (which is INTERNAL gap analysis). It produces `_workspace/hype-scout/HYPE_TOOL_BACKLOG.md` ranked by Hype × Build-Ease; it does NOT build. Once a feature is chosen from the backlog, hand it to tdmcp-pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey one surface of tdmcp (artist controls, library/packaging, CLI/DX, AI/LLM, or TouchDesigner depth) for candidate NEW features — inventory what exists, cross-check the roadmap, apply the gap-finding lenses, vet each idea, and emit a structured, novelty- and confidence-labelled candidate list to _workspace/discovery/. Use when a td-surveyor agent is scouting a surface during the feature-discovery harness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Feature discovery agent — mines project docs, memory, user feedback, and competitor gaps to surface the highest-leverage features to build next. Outputs a prioritized feature backlog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey one surface of tdmcp (artist controls, library/packaging, CLI/DX, AI/LLM, or TouchDesigner depth) for candidate NEW features — inventory what exists, cross-check the roadmap, apply the gap-finding lenses, vet each idea, and emit a structured, novelty- and confidence-labelled candidate list to _workspace/discovery/. Use when a td-surveyor agent is scouting a surface during the feature-discovery harness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides guidance for training and analyzing Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) using SAELens to decompose neural network activations into interpretable features. Use when discovering interpretable features, analyzing superposition, or studying monosemantic representations in language models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brainstorm feature ideas for a new product in initial discovery from PM, Designer, and Engineer perspectives. Use when starting product discovery for a new product, exploring features for a startup idea, or doing initial ideation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。