「founders」の検索結果

A drafting-and-review copilot for a founders' / co-founders' agreement — the terms fixing equity, vesting, IP, roles, control, deadlock, and departure between cofounders. Jurisdiction-agnostic, anchored on the Delaware C-corp default. Two modes: DRAFT (intake → equity & vesting → clauses → blocker triage → pre-signature check) and REVIEW (audit an existing agreement against an 18-clause checklist and red-flag scan). It handles the highest-dispute terms first-class: the equity split as documented reasoning (not a fake calculator), reverse vesting and the 83(b) clock, present-tense IP assignment (the Stanford v. Roche trap), leaver buyback and dead equity, and the deadlock clause most tools omit. It drafts for the venture, never one founder against another. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

複数回のインタビューでブランドの目的、顧客像、個性、語り口を掘り下げ、創業者間の認識の違いも整理して、協力者に共有できるブランドブックにまとめます。

• 新ブランドの方向性を決めたいとき
• ブランドの立ち位置を見直したいとき
• 複数の創業者の認識をそろえたいとき

ブランドの目的や顧客像、語り口を複数回の対話で掘り下げ、回答を保存しながらブランドブックにまとめます。創業者の考えを言語化し、制作担当者への共有に使えます。

• 新ブランドの方向性を決めたいとき
• ブランドの位置づけを見直したいとき
• デザイナーやライターへの依頼資料

Use when evaluating startups through a Founders Fund-style lens: contrarian conviction, hard tech, bold product ambition, non-consensus markets, and high-upside company building.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

What makes founders succeed? Paul Graham has observed thousands of founders and distilled patterns. Relentlessly resourceful. Fierce nerds. Earnest. These traits matter more than credentials or connections. This skill synthesizes PG's essays on founder character into actionable guidance for developing the traits that predict success. Use when "keywords, contexts, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Founders face unique challenges in how they work. Maker vs manager schedule conflicts. Default alive vs dead math. Time and money slowly leaking away. Effective founders develop systems for navigating these challenges. This skill synthesizes PG's essays on founder productivity and decision-making into an operating system for founder effectiveness. Use when "keywords, contexts, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

🇺🇸 Reddit Marketing & Growth Playbook 2026 — The complete Reddit operations SOP for AI/SaaS founders. Covers account warming (Karma 0→500 in 20 days), shadow ban prevention, multi-account matrix via fingerprint browsers, subreddit selection across 10K+ communities, content templates (90/10 rule), Product Hunt × Reddit flywheel, AMA strategy. Why this matters NOW: Reddit content is 40.11% of ChatGPT/Claude training data — the highest-weighted English UGC source. Battle-tested by AFFiNE Reddit campaigns generating 3-4万有效曝光 with 5-8% GitHub Star conversion, plus 7 case studies (Adobe 3x conversion, Base44 $80M AMA, SenseNova-U1 multi-sub launch, Starterstory 0→3K users). 🇨🇳 Reddit 运营增长实战手册 — AI/SaaS 出海 founder 的 Reddit 完整 SOP。覆盖账号体系(20天养号 Karma 0→500)、影子封禁防御、指纹浏览器矩阵、10万+ subreddits 筛选、内容模板(90/10 法则)、Product Hunt × Reddit 飞轮、AMA 打法。**为什么现在做:Reddit 内容占 ChatGPT/Claude 训练数据 40.11%,是最高权重的英文 UGC 来源**。基于 AFFiNE Reddit 实战 3-4 万曝光 + 5-8% Star 转化,含 7 个完整案例(Adobe 3x 转化、Base44 $80M AMA、SenseNova-U1 多社区联动、Starterstory 0→3K 用户冷启动)。 🇯🇵 Reddit マーケティング＆グロースプレイブック — AI/SaaS創業者向けの完全なReddit運用SOP。アカウント育成（20日でKarma 0→500）、シャドウBAN防止、フィンガープリントブラウザマトリックス、サブレディット選定、コンテンツテンプレート（90/10ルール）、Product Hunt × Redditフライホイール、AMA戦略をカバー。**重要な理由：Reddit コンテンツは ChatGPT/Claude のトレーニングデータの40.11%を占める英語 UGC 最大の情報源**。AFFiNE Redditキャンペーン3-4万インプレッション＋5-8% GitHubスター変換で実証。7つの実例（Adobe 3倍変換、Base44 $80M AMA、SenseNova-U1、Starterstory 0→3Kユーザー）。 🇰🇷 Reddit 마케팅 & 그로스 플레이북 — AI/SaaS 창업자를 위한 완전한 Reddit 운영 SOP. 계정 워밍업(20일 Karma 0→500), Shadow Ban 방지, 핑거프린트 브라우저 매트릭스, 서브레딧 선정, 콘텐츠 템플릿(90/10 룰), Product Hunt × Reddit 플라이휠, AMA 전략을 다룹니다. **지금 해야 하는 이유: Reddit 콘텐츠는 ChatGPT/Claude 학습 데이터의 40.11%를 차지하는 최대 영어 UGC 소스**. AFFiNE Reddit 캠페인 3-4만 노출 + 5-8% GitHub Star 전환으로 검증. 7가지 사례 연구(Adobe 3배 전환, Base44 $80M AMA, SenseNova-U1, Starterstory 0→3K 사용자). Triggers: "reddit marketing" | "reddit growth" | "reddit ads" | "reddit advertising" | "reddit strategy" | "reddit promotion" | "subreddit marketing" | "reddit playbook" | "reddit SOP" | "reddit shadow ban" | "shadow ban prevention" | "reddit karma" | "reddit AMA" | "reddit product launch" | "reddit AI training data" | "reddit GEO" | "AFFiNE reddit case" | "Base44 AMA" | "SenseNova Reddit" | "subreddit selection" | "r/SaaS posting" | "r/MachineLearning self-promotion" | "fingerprint browser matrix" | "AdsPower reddit" | "reddit account farming" | "reddit 90/10 rule" | "reddit content strategy" | "reddit indie founder" | "reddit cold start" | "Reddit 运营" | "Reddit 营销" | "Reddit 防封" | "Reddit 矩阵号" | "Reddit 出海" | "Reddit 引流" | "Reddit 冷启动" | "影子封禁" | "Reddit Karma" | "Reddit 养号" | "Reddit AMA" | "Reddit マーケティング" | "Reddit グロース" | "Reddit 마케팅" | "Reddit 그로스"

Rescuing a messy startup deck into a board-grade system — the diagnosis, the page grammar, and the rebuilt proof pages. Built as a decision-grade design craft deck for founders, exec presenter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates scientific claims and evidence quality. Applies to experimental design validity, biases and confounders, statistical interpretation, evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), and teaching critical analysis. Supports evidence appraisal and identifying flaws; formal peer review writing belongs to peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-build product and feature risk review for founders, product managers, and AI-assisted builders. Use this skill when the user is about to build a landing page, MVP, SaaS product, internal tool, agent workflow, or major feature and needs to check demand, positioning, monetization, retention, trust, distribution, and adoption risk before implementation starts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PE deal sourcing workflow — discover target companies, check CRM for existing relationships, and draft personalized founder outreach emails. Use when sourcing new deals, prospecting companies in a sector, or reaching out to founders. Triggers on "find companies", "source deals", "draft founder email", "check if we've seen this company", or "outreach to founder".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, evaluate, or build a free tool for marketing purposes — lead generation, SEO value, or brand awareness. Also use when the user mentions "engineering as marketing," "free tool," "marketing tool," "calculator," "generator," "interactive tool," "lead gen tool," "build a tool for leads," or "free resource." This skill bridges engineering and marketing — useful for founders and technical marketers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial thinking partner for founders and executives. Stress-tests plans, prepares for brutal board meetings, dissects decisions with no good options, and forces honest post-mortems. Use when you need someone to find the holes before the board does, make a decision you've been avoiding, or understand what actually went wrong.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Personal leadership development for founders and first-time CEOs. Covers founder archetype identification, delegation frameworks, energy management, CEO calendar audits, leadership style evolution, blind spot identification, imposter syndrome, founder mental health, and succession planning. Use when a founder feels like the bottleneck, struggles to delegate, is burning out, transitioning from IC to executive, managing a board, or when user mentions founder mode, CEO growth, leadership development, delegation, burnout, or imposter syndrome.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill helps users discover key contacts across industries, roles, and social platforms via the BrowserAct API. Agent should proactively apply this skill when users express needs like finding public profiles for founders or CEOs, discovering key decision-makers in a specific industry, extracting contact details for lead generation, searching for growth leaders on LinkedIn or Facebook, gathering professional networking profiles, retrieving URLs and names of industry leaders, finding marketing managers in a specific field, conducting competitive analysis by identifying key personnel, sourcing talent acquisition targets across platforms, or compiling a list of target roles on specific social sites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Causal inference framework for answering "does X cause Y?" beyond correlation. DoWhy (Microsoft Research) provides the identify-estimate-refute loop: define a causal graph (DAG), identify the causal effect using backdoor/frontdoor/instrumental variable criteria, estimate treatment effects with multiple estimators, and validate results with automated refutation tests. Use when: distinguishing causation from correlation, estimating treatment effects (ATE, ATT, CATE), designing and analyzing A/B tests with confounders, using instrumental variables, performing counterfactual reasoning ("what would have happened if..."), validating causal claims with sensitivity analysis, working with observational data where randomization is impossible, or any analysis where the question is "what is the CAUSAL effect of X on Y" rather than just "how do X and Y relate?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production-grade Bayesian causal inference with PyMC, CausalPy, and DoWhy. Enforces DAG-first thinking, mandatory user checkpoints for assumptions, design-specific refutation, and defensible reporting with causal language guardrails. Trigger on: causal inference, causal effect estimation, treatment effects, counterfactuals, difference-in-differences (DiD), synthetic control, regression discontinuity (RDD), interrupted time series (ITS), instrumental variables (IV), propensity scores, DAGs, causal graphs, confounders, backdoor criterion, do-calculus, interventional distributions, pm.do(), pm.observe(), CausalPy, DoWhy, mediation analysis, refutation, sensitivity analysis, parallel trends, placebo tests, or any question of the form "does X cause Y" or "what is the effect of X on Y."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a new LinkedIn post from scratch using one of 20 2026 hook formulas (anaphora, R.I.P., time-anchor, curiosity-gap, contrarian, controlled A/B, false-binary, and more) plus a founders-edition angle library, picked by engagement goal (comments, reposts, likes, saves). Runs the humanizer pass and schedules via Publora on approval. Use to write a post, find a hook or proven format, or get founder-specific angles. Not for reviewing existing drafts (use linkedin-humanizer --mode audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "make everyone tell the same story", "write our elevator pitch ladder", or "build a spokesperson Q&A and approved boilerplate pack"; derives from the narrative-registry canon, message house, and brand voice a repeatable enablement kit — an elevator ladder (10-second / 30-second / 2-minute), a spokesperson Q&A (tough questions with on-canon answers), an approved boilerplate/bio pack (25 / 50 / 100-word), and a do/don't language sheet — so sales, support, founders, and partners repeat one consistent story. Not for the launch-day runbook — use launch-day-conductor; not for finished per-channel copy — use content-writer or each discipline creative builder; not for launch-window battle cards — use sales-enablement-kit; this kit never adjudicates a claim. 叙事赋能包/电梯梯度/发言人问答/审定样板/该说不该说

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write personalized cold outreach emails to hiring managers and founders — specific, human, not a pitch deck

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。