「game-design」の検索結果

The foundational theory of interactive experience design - loops, motivation, feel, and the art of meaningful playUse when "game design, core loop, game feel, player motivation, game mechanics, meaningful choice, progression system, game economy, game balance, playtesting, GDD, game document, fun factor, engagement, flow state, risk reward, player agency, juice, game polish, 8 kinds of fun, bartle types, MDA framework, game-design, player-experience, core-loop, motivation, game-feel, MDA, playtesting, GDD, systems-thinking, player-psychology, engagement, flow-state" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designing tabletop games - from core mechanics to manufacturing, from prototyping to KickstarterUse when "board game, tabletop, card game, worker placement, deck building, area control, playtesting, rulebook, kickstarter game, game balance, asymmetric factions, euro game, ameritrash, party game, dice game, prototype, game publisher, crowdfunding game, board-games, tabletop, game-design, mechanics, playtesting, kickstarter, manufacturing, rulebook, components, balance, player-interaction" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures a vague engineering request into a well-scoped task brief before any implementation begins. Use when the user has an engineering goal but the ask is missing which repos are in scope, what "done" means, constraints, or open questions. Triggers on "shape this", "scope this out", "frame this work", "write a brief for", "I want to build" (with unclear scope), or the /shape slash command. Produces a filled task template (multi-repo feature, single-repo change, investigation, or bugfix). Not for already-scoped work — go straight to execution. If the domain is unclear, ask one qualifying question before routing — for marketing intake see marketing-shaper, game-design intake see game-design-shaper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use to structure a vague marketing request into a well-scoped brief before any real work begins. Triggers on "shape this campaign", "plan this launch", "scope this content", "marketing plan", "growth plan", "content strategy", "outbound plan", or when invoked as the /mshape slash command. Produces a filled brief (campaign, content, optimization, research, or pipeline) that downstream marketing skills can act on. Do not use for work already well-defined — go straight to execution. For engineering task shaping see prompt-shaper; for game-design intake see game-design-shaper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta-skill for complete Roblox game development with Rojo — the entry point that knows and unifies the three specialist skills `/rojo` (filesystem→Studio sync, project setup), `/rbx-studio` (editor, MCP, assets, malware scan) and `/game-design` (roles, workflows, GDD). Use this skill for ANY Roblox game-dev undertaking: planning/building/setting up a Roblox game, scaffolding a new project, defining code architecture (Main + manager modules, _G.ClientState + HUD, remotes in GameEnums), avoiding Luau/Roblox pitfalls, or when it is unclear which of the Roblox specialist skills fits — routing happens from here. Also trigger on "develop Roblox game", "build Roblox game", "new Roblox project", "Luau project structure", "how do I organize Roblox code", "Roblox dev setup".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How game development works as a process — roles, subtasks, workflows and role descriptions, especially (but not only) for Roblox. Use this skill when it's about the ORGANIZATION of game dev rather than concrete code: Which roles exist (Creative Director, Engineer, Artist, Polish/Audio, Business, QA-Tester, Game Critic)? Who does which subtask? What does a development chain (concept → backend → frontend → polish → test) look like? How do you write a Game Design Document / KONZEPT.md? How do several (AI) agents divide up a game? Also trigger on "plan a new game", "create Game Design Document", "which roles do I need for my game", "development workflow for a game", "who tests the game", "structure a game idea", "Roblox genre/monetization".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the combat team — game-designer, gameplay-programmer, ai-programmer, technical-artist, sound-designer, qa-tester — design through implement and validate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Take a board game idea from 'wouldn't it be cool if' to a playtestable prototype — core loop, tension source, components you can make tonight, balance starting-points, and a real playtest protocol with kill criteria. Use when someone says 'I have a board game idea', 'design a game about X', 'my game drags in the midgame', or 'how do I playtest this'. Produces a design one-pager, a print-and-play prototype spec, and a 3-session playtest plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Game designer for creative vision, GDD creation, and narrative design. Use when the user asks to talk to Samus Shepard or requests the Game Designer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Building interactive experiences that engage, challenge, and delight playersUse when "game, gamedev, game development, phaser, unity, unreal, godot, gameplay, game loop, sprites, collision, physics, player, level, tilemap, games, gamedev, interactive, gameplay, physics, engines, performance, player-experience" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

World-class game UI design expertise combining the clarity of Nintendo's UI philosophy, the immersive diegetic interfaces of Dead Space and Metroid Prime, and the competitive readability principles from esports titles. Game UI is the invisible bridge between player intent and game response. Great game UI serves the player without breaking immersion. It communicates critical information at a glance during intense action, guides new players without patronizing veterans, and adapts gracefully from 4K monitors to handheld screens and from keyboard to touch to controller. The best game UI designers understand that every pixel of screen space is sacred - borrowed from the game world itself. Use when "game ui, game interface, hud design, heads up display, game menu, inventory ui, health bar, stamina bar, game hud, minimap, crosshair, reticle, button prompt, controller ui, gamepad navigation, diegetic interface, in-world ui, quest tracker, damage numbers, cooldown indicator, radial menu, game tooltip, game-ui, hud, game-interface, game-menu, controller-ui, diegetic, game-design, accessibility, console, mobile-games" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

World-class expertise in TCG/CCG design, resource systems, and metagame balanceUse when "card game design, TCG design, CCG design, trading card game, collectible card game, mana curve, deck building, card templating, keyword mechanic, set design, draft format, limited format, card rarity, color pie, faction design, card balance, magic the gathering style, hearthstone style, deckbuilder, card text, rules text, card-game, tcg, ccg, trading-card, collectible-card, deck-building, mana-curve, draft, limited, constructed, set-design, card-templating, mechanics, keywords, rarity, balance" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

游戏设计 (Game Design) — 设计游戏的规则 / 系统 / 机制 / 体验 的从业者认知操作系统 (以电子游戏为主, 含桌游 / 卡牌 / 棋盘游戏): 决定「玩家做什么、为什么有意义、每一刻的体验如何」的学科 —— 区别于游戏程序 (引擎 / 代码)、游戏美术 (视觉 / 音频)、游戏制作 (排期 / 预算 / 团队)。覆盖 (a) 核心设计理论与框架 (MDA 机制-动态-美学 Hunicke/LeBlanc/Zubek + Schell 的「透镜」+ Koster「乐趣即学习」理论 + Sid Meier「一连串有趣的决策」+ Salen & Zimmerman「有意义的游玩」/「二阶设计」/「魔法圈」+ Costikyan 论不确定性 + Suits/Huizinga 游戏哲学), (b) 系统与机制设计 (核心循环 + 游戏经济 sink/source/产出-消耗 + 正负反馈环 + 资源与成长系统 + 涌现 vs 脚本 Will Wright「可能性空间」+ Machinations 经济建模 Dormans + 支配 / 退化策略 + 正交设计 Garfield), (c) 关卡与遭遇设计 (灰盒 blockout + 节奏与张力 + 预告 telegraphing + 主线 vs 探索 + 环境叙事 + 锁钥 gating + 难度曲线), (d) 游戏手感与「juice」(Steve Swink《Game Feel》+ 即时响应 + 屏震 / 反馈 / 打磨 + 输入与镜头 + 「手感」是设计出来的不是附带的), (e) 玩家心理与 UX (Celia Hodent《The Gamer's Brain》+ 心流通道 挑战 vs 技能 Csikszentmihalyi/陈星汉 Jenova Chen + Bartle 玩家类型 + 动机与奖励节奏 + 新手引导 FTUE / 教学化 + 认知负荷 + 无障碍), (f) 平衡与调优 (Ian Schreiber《Game Balance》+ 对称 / 非对称 + 动态难度 DDA + 传递 / 非传递平衡 + nerf/buff + 消除支配策略 + 测试驱动调优), (g) 叙事与任务设计 (ludonarrative 失调 / 和谐 + 环境与系统叙事 + 分支 vs 线性 + Amy Hennig 角色驱动 + 任务结构), (h) 以玩家为中心的迭代流程 (Tracy Fullerton《Game Design Workshop》playcentric + 纸面原型 + 垂直切片 + 测试协议「看而不说 / 你不是你的玩家」+ 快速迭代 + game jam), (i) 类型与形态工艺 (roguelike/roguelite 与程序生成 Derek Yu + 平台跳跃 + RPG 系统 + 策略 4X + 解谜设计 Jonathan Blow + 多人 / PvP 平衡 + 桌游 / 卡牌设计 Reiner Knizia/Richard Garfield/Brenda Romero), (j) F2P / 长线运营 / 商业化设计 (核心 / 元 / 经济循环 + 抽卡 gacha / 开箱 loot box / 战令 battle pass 机制 + 留存 D1/D7/D30 + 转化 + 鲸鱼 + live ops 内容节奏 —— 并诚实处理掠夺式暗黑模式 / 强迫循环 / 剥削式商业化的伦理), (k) 设计师角色与工艺职业 (系统 / 关卡 / 叙事 / UX 设计师之分 + 通才 vs 专才 + 独立作者 vs 3A 团队 + 设计文档 + 传达设计意图 + GDC 工艺社区)。跨 3A / 独立 / 手游 F2P / 桌游。不含 游戏程序 / 引擎 (Unity/Unreal 编码 / 图形 / 网络同步) / 游戏美术 / 动画 / 音频 / 游戏制作 / 项目管理 / 排期 / QA / 游戏作为生意 / 发行 / 市场 / 电竞运营为终点 / 泛泛「我想做游戏」的 game-dev 教程 —— 本 skill 是「设计」学科: 规则 / 系统 / 机制 / 体验。 (Game Design — the cognitive operating system of practitioners who design the rules, systems, mechanics, and experiences of games (video games primarily, plus tabletop/board/card games): the discipline of deciding WHAT the player does, WHY it is meaningful, and HOW the moment-to-moment experience feels — distinct from game programming (builds the engine/code), game art (visuals/audio), and game production (schedule/budget/team). Covers (a) core design theory & frameworks (MDA Mechanics-Dynamics-Aesthetics Hunicke/LeBlanc/Zubek, Schell's Lenses, Koster's theory of fun = learning, Sid Meier 'a series of interesting decisions', Salen & Zimmerman 'meaningful play'/'second-order design'/'magic circle', Costikyan on uncertainty, Suits/Huizinga play philosophy), (b) systems & mechanics design (core loops, game economy sink/source/faucet-drain, feedback loops positive/negative, resource & progression systems, emergence vs scripting Will Wright 'possibility space', Machinations economy modeling Dormans, dominant/degenerate strategy, orthogonal design Garfield), (c) level & encounter design (blockout/greybox, pacing & tension, telegraphing, critical path vs exploration, environmental storytelling, gating & lock-and-key, difficulty curve), (d) game feel & juice (Steve Swink 'Game Feel', moment-to-moment responsiveness, screenshake/feedback/polish, input & camera, the 'feel' is designed not incidental), (e) player psychology & UX (Celia Hodent 'The Gamer's Brain', flow channel challenge-vs-skill Csikszentmihalyi/Jenova Chen, Bartle player types, motivation & reward schedules, onboarding/FTUE/tutorialization, cognitive load, accessibility), (f) balancing & tuning (Ian Schreiber 'Game Balance', symmetry/asymmetry, dynamic difficulty adjustment DDA, transitive/intransitive balance, nerf/buff, dominant strategy elimination, playtesting-driven tuning), (g) narrative & quest design (ludonarrative dissonance/harmony, environmental & systemic storytelling, branching vs linear, Amy Hennig character-driven, quest structure), (h) player-centric iterative process (Tracy Fullerton 'Game Design Workshop' playcentric design, paper prototyping, vertical slice, playtesting protocol 'watch don't talk / you are not your play

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the combat team: coordinates game-designer, gameplay-programmer, ai-programmer, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to design, implement, and validate a combat feature end-to-end.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Game design principles. GDD structure, balancing, player psychology, progression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the combat team: coordinates game-designer, gameplay-programmer, ai-programmer, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to design, implement, and validate a combat feature end-to-end.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep game design health assessment across five dimensions: review core loop and progression systems, analyze in-game economy for inflation and sink/source balance, mathematically simulate combat balance and drop rates, audit analytics event coverage, and evaluate monetization ethics..

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze game design documents and implementations for core gameplay loop clarity and depth, XP leveling curves and unlock pacing, difficulty curve spikes and plateaus, skill tree viability, player motivation via Self-Determination Theory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Game design principles. GDD structure, balancing, player psychology, progression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualitative quality review of game design documents — answers "is this design good, and does it follow best practices?" — across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Fans out adversarial lenses (completeness, clarity, pillar alignment, systems-math, fantasy-delivery, feasibility, scope) plus domain lenses that check it against the game-design rules, each prompted to find problems rather than validate; produces a severity-graded verdict and a two-bucket report (apply-ready fixes vs research), handed to /unikit-gd-apply or /unikit-gd-explore in one move. Scope is inferred: a named system, flow, or content type reviews that document; "all" runs a cross-document review. Use when the user wants a critique, quality judgment, or rules check of the design, e.g. "review the combat GDD", "review the onboarding flow". This is the subjective quality pass — for a mechanical consistency check (numbers, terms, IDs, references matching the registry) use /unikit-gd-verify.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render the GAME-DESIGN document (the GDD) into a human-readable form — read-only Markdown chapters under docs/design/ (index, systems, flows, content, economy, glossary), with facts resolved inline from GD-IDS.yaml and drafts flagged 🚧. Optional --web also renders an HTML site from the unikit-docs template (falls back to Markdown-only if the template is absent). Use to export or publish the design for people to read, e.g. "render the GDD", "export the game design to docs", "generate readable design docs", "publish the GDD", "make a design doc site". Read-only — it never edits the GDD or registry, only renders it. This renders the game DESIGN — for the project's CODE documentation (README, docs/*, modules, architecture) use /unikit-docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Navigator and help guide for the UniKit framework — use when the user is unsure what to do next, where to start, or which unikit skill fits their situation. It diagnoses intent and points to the right skill or pipeline: starting a project, writing code, testing, planning, the spec-driven code workflow, authoring or detailing game design, finding a new mechanic, or deciding what game to build. Trigger on questions like "what do I do next", "where do I start", "how do I start coding", "how do I test my code", "how do I create the game design", "how do I detail a system", "how do I find a new mechanic", "which unikit skill should I use", "how does the code pipeline relate to game design", "I'm lost in unikit", "help me with unikit". Read-only — it explains and points to the right command, it never edits project files. For technical code research use /unikit-explore; for game-design research use /unikit-gd-explore; to initialize the framework use /unikit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research and ideation partner for GAME DESIGN — think through design ideas before writing them into the GDD; produces a brief, never edits the GDD itself. Use to assess a genre or market for viability, dissect a reference game (mechanics → dynamics → aesthetics), explore how to improve or extend an existing system, flow, or content type, research new mechanics the design lacks, investigate a part of the GDD in code, or develop the research bucket of a /unikit-gd-review report into decided edits. Trigger on "explore how to improve the flow", "ways to improve the combat system", "is this genre saturated", "break down the combat of Hades", "work out the review's open questions". GAME-DESIGN research only — for CODE or technical research use /unikit-explore; to reconstruct a design from code use /unikit-gd-recon; to write a change into the GDD use /unikit-gd-system or /unikit-gd-spec; to apply edits you know use /unikit-gd-apply; to invent a new game use /unikit-gd-brainstorm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter explore mode for technical work — a thinking partner for {{engine_name}} code, architecture, and implementation decisions before you write any code. Use it to investigate a technical solution, design the architecture of a feature, choose between frameworks or libraries, compare implementation approaches, analyze how existing code or a system works, or deeply root-cause a complex bug without fixing it yet. The ultra mode adds adaptive artifacts (a C4 view, ADRs, a dependency graph) to the research folder — run it on "ultra research", "ultra explore" or "ultraresearch"; otherwise run the default. Trigger on "let's explore this technical solution", "how should we architect this feature", "which framework should we use", "run an ultra research on the save system", "investigate this error deeply". Research and analysis only — it never writes code. This is the CODE / engineering explorer — for GAME-DESIGN, GDD, mechanics, or balance research (no code) use /unikit-gd-explore.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。