「gold」の検索結果

Flutterプロジェクトに Golden Test 環境をセットアップし、コンポーネントや画面のGolden Testを対話形式で作成するスキル。「Golden Testを導入したい」「ゴールデンテストをセットアップ」「スクリーンショットテストを作りたい」などのリクエストで起動。

Alluvial gold recovery using panning, sluicing, and classification. Covers site reading (geological indicators, stream dynamics, pay streak location), panning technique, sluice box operation, and responsible extraction practices. Use when prospecting in an area with known or suspected alluvial gold deposits, sampling a stream to test for gold presence, maximizing recovery during recreational panning, or assessing a site's gold potential before investing more effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

供应链与生产运营 (供应链与生产运营 (Supply Chain & Production Operations) — 面向制造业与消费品实体供应链的『计划-制造-交付』运营判断,不是采购谈价技巧,也不是跨境电商发货物流。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 这行的核心世界观分歧: **流动 > 局部效率(用有效产出/流动时间看系统,而不是用设备利用率/人均产出看工位;非瓶颈上的效率是幻觉) ⇄ 精益拉动 vs 推式预测(TPS/JIT 按下游消耗拉动、小批量平准化 vs MRP 按预测展开净需求推动;DDMRP 解耦缓冲是第三条路) ⇄ 精益/丰田 TPS 派 vs 约束理论 TOC 派(消除七大浪费、全局改善 vs 五步聚焦瓶颈、鼓-缓冲-绳 DBR 排产;两派互相指责对方浪费时间/只治标) ⇄ 变异是敌人(Deming/六西格玛/Factory Physics 的 VUT 排队论: 利用率越靠近满载排队时间越爆炸,交期长不是产能不够而是变异+高负荷) ⇄ 库存是负债 vs 库存是缓冲(会计把库存记成资产、精益视其为掩盖问题的水位、TOC 与韧性派视其为吸收变异的必要缓冲;真问题是缓冲放在哪一层而不是有没有) ⇄ 精益 JIT vs 韧性冗余(2020-2023 断链后 just-in-case、多源、近岸/友岸的回摆;精益派反驳崩的是『假精益』——单一来源+砍库存不砍变异) ⇄ 服务水平 vs 库存成本(安全库存/报童模型/ABC-XYZ 的经典取舍,牛鞭效应放大上游波动) ⇄ 成本导向压价 vs 供应商共生开发(Kraljic 分级、丰田供应商协会式长期共生 vs 年降指标与竞价) ⇄ 一个数 vs 各部门各算各的(S&OP/IBP 的本质是跨职能对齐到一套数字与一份产销计划))**; (b) 工具栈(此行的工具是『系统+方法』的混合) — ERP/MRP(SAP S/4HANA PP·MM、Oracle、用友·金蝶、Odoo、NetSuite)、APS 高级计划排程(Kinaxis RapidResponse、o9、Blue Yonder、SAP IBP、OMP、Siemens Opcenter APS)、MES/车间执行(Siemens Opcenter、Rockwell FactoryTalk、黑湖智造)、WMS/TMS、需求预测(统计模型 + Nixtla StatsForecast/Prophet、FVA 预测增值分析)、运筹优化与仿真(OR-Tools、Gurobi、Pyomo、AnyLogic、FlexSim、SimPy)、供应链风险与多级可视(Resilinc、Everstream、Interos)、分析层(SQL/Python pandas/Power BI)、以及纸笔工具(价值流图 VSM、A3、看板、标准作业票)—— 选型决策树的关键分岔是 MTS/MTO/ATO/ETO 履行模式与需求变异度,而非厂商功能清单; (c) 心智模型层 — 利特尔法则(在制品 = 产出率 × 流动时间)、瓶颈与非瓶颈、缓冲三态(库存/时间/产能缓冲)、解耦点(客户订单渗透点 CODP)、牛鞭效应、takt time 节拍与产线平衡、OEE 与六大损失、muda·mura·muri 三种浪费、自働化 jidoka 与安灯、防错 poka-yoke、SMED 快速换模换出小批量、平准化 heijunka、PDCA 与丰田改善型 Toyota Kata、DMAIC 与 Cpk 过程能力、报童模型与安全库存公式、ABC-XYZ 分级; (d) 工作流/SOP — 跑一轮月度 S&OP(需求评审→供应评审→预 S&OP→执行 S&OP)、做需求预测与预测误差复盘(MAPE/WMAPE/bias/FVA)、设定库存分级与安全库存、MRP 跑批与例外消息处理(缺料齐套与 MRP 神经质)、瓶颈识别与 DBR 排产、价值流图现状图→未来图→改善计划、新品导入 NPI 与多级 BOM/ECN 工程变更、供应商选择与开发(RFQ→审厂→APQP/PPAP→量产→年度绩效)、断料应急与交期承诺(ATP/CTP)、循环盘点与库存准确率; (e) 知识正典(en/ja 一手极厚,中译齐全) — 《目标 The Goal》Goldratt(TOC 小说体奠基)、《丰田生产方式》大野耐一、《改变世界的机器》Womack·Jones·Roos(MIT IMVP 研究)、《精益思想 Lean Thinking》Womack & Jones、《丰田模式 The Toyota Way》Liker、《工厂物理学 Factory Physics》Hopp & Spearman(排队论视角的运营科学)、《学习观察 Learning to See》Rother & Shook(VSM)、《丰田套路 Toyota Kata》Rother、Spear & Bowen 的 HBR 1999《Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System》、Lee/Padmanabhan/Whang 1997《The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains》、Ptak & Smith 的 DDMRP、Orlicky 的 MRP、Chopra & Meindl 的供应链管理教材、Deming《转危为安 Out of the Crisis》、Sheffi《The Resilient Enterprise》、ASCM/APICS 的 SCOR 参考模型与 CPIM/CSCP 知识体系; (f) 行业大佬/figures — 大野耐一(TPS 立法者)、新乡重夫(SMED/防错)、Eliyahu Goldratt(TOC 创立者)、W. Edwards Deming(变异与系统观)、James Womack & Daniel Jones(把 TPS 译成西方可学的『精益』)、Jeffrey Liker(丰田模式学术化)、Mike Rother(VSM 与改善型)、Wallace Hopp & Mark Spearman(工厂物理学)、Hau Lee(斯坦福,牛鞭效应与 Triple-A 供应链)、Yossi Sheffi(MIT,韧性)、Carol Ptak & Chad Smith(DDMRP)、David Simchi-Levi(MIT,风险敞口指数)、Steven Spear(TPS 的 DNA)、以及中文圈的供应链实务作者(刘宝红等); (g) 争议/批判(必须保留不洗白) — JIT 是不是 2021 全球断链的元凶(精益派反驳:崩的是单一来源+砍库存不砍变异的『假精益』);西方学精益的高失败率(只搬工具不搬思维,精益在很多工厂沦为裁员的代号);六西格玛黑带官僚化与扼杀创新之争;TOC 派与精益派互相攻击(Goldratt 讽刺精益是等浪费自己浮现);预测无用论(需求驱动派说预测必然错、要靠缓冲吸收)vs 统计预测派;控制塔/数字孪生/AI 预测的过度承诺与高项目失败率;中国制造的年降与内卷式压价 vs 供应商共生;近岸·友岸外包是真实产能转移还是政治叙事; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — **精益/TPS 派(丰田血统:大野-新乡→Womack/Jones/Liker/Rother,信全局消除浪费与人的改善能力)** vs **约束理论 TOC 派(Goldratt:系统产出只由瓶颈决定,聚焦五步、DBR、缓冲管理)** vs **统计质量/六西格玛派(Deming-Juran-Shewhart→GE/Motorola,信减少变异与过程能力)** vs **运营科学/工厂物理学派(Hopp & Spearman:用排队论与数学定律解释,认为精益与 TOC 都是特例)** vs **需求驱动/DDMRP 派(Ptak & Smith:预测不可靠,靠战略解耦缓冲)** vs **韧性/风险派(Sheffi、Simchi-Levi:效率之外必须为断链设计)**。不含: 跨境电商卖家的发货与头程物流(已由 cross-border-ecommerce 覆盖)、纯采购的商务谈判技巧、企业级 ERP 的代码实施与二次开发、通用项目管理。) Master OS — automated mastery of 供应链与生产运营 (Supply Chain & Production Operations) — 面向制造业与消费品实体供应链的『计划-制造-交付』运营判断,不是采购谈价技巧,也不是跨境电商发货物流。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 这行的核心世界观分歧: **流动 > 局部效率(用有效产出/流动时间看系统,而不是用设备利用率/人均产出看工位;非瓶颈上的效率是幻觉) ⇄ 精益拉动 vs 推式预测(TPS/JIT 按下游消耗拉动、小批量平准化 vs MRP 按预测展开净需求推动;DDMRP 解耦缓冲是第三条路) ⇄ 精益/丰田 TPS 派 vs 约束理论 TOC 派(消除七大浪费、全局改善 vs 五步聚焦瓶颈、鼓-缓冲-绳 DBR 排产;两派互相指责对方浪费时间/只治标) ⇄ 变异是敌人(Deming/六西格玛/Factory Physics 的 VUT 排队论: 利用率越靠近满载排队时间越爆炸,交期长不是产能不够而是变异+高负荷) ⇄ 库存是负债 vs 库存是缓冲(会计把库存记成资产、精益视其为掩盖问题的水位、TOC 与韧性派视其为吸收变异的必要缓冲;真问题是缓冲放在哪一层而不是有没有) ⇄ 精益 JIT vs 韧性冗余(2020-2023 断链后

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Golden-fixture contract discipline: locations, bless workflow, env vars, volatile-field scrubbing, failure-artifact triage. Use when a golden/snapshot test fails or a new golden fixture is added.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose whether an LLM classifier's validation-gate failure is GOLD-BOUND before spending on prompt revision or model changes. Use when: (1) a scoring pipeline over-predicts a label (precision low, recall high) and a prompt clarification is proposed to tighten it, (2) a pilot/validation gate fails and the fix candidates are prompt edits, (3) inter-rater agreement on the weak label was already low (κ < ~0.6). Core check: if gold POSITIVES share the exact feature the revision would exclude, no prompt can pass a gold-scored gate — recall craters while precision barely moves. Also documents the verified surgical-pilot design (single-section diff, tune/holdout split, pre-registered gate, perturbation check on untouched sections).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect Kerberos Golden Ticket forgery (e.g. Mimikatz-forged tickets) by analyzing Windows Event ID 4769 for RC4 encryption downgrades (0x17), abnormal ticket lifetimes, and krbtgt account anomalies using Splunk and Elastic SIEM queries. Use when investigating suspected forged Kerberos tickets or krbtgt credential theft in Active Directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect Golden Ticket attacks in Active Directory using Splunk and KQL queries against domain controller event logs, looking for Kerberos TGT anomalies such as mismatched encryption types, impossible ticket lifetimes, non-existent accounts, and forged PAC signatures. Use when hunting for Kerberos ticket forgery or krbtgt-based persistence (MITRE T1558.001) in AD environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovers golden base images for creating GKE custom node images based on technical specifications or context clues. Use when finding the golden base image for custom GKE node creation, mapping cluster configuration parameters (GKE version, OS, architecture, accelerators, gVisor, cgroups) to image names, or querying GKE base image maps. Don't use for general GKE cluster creation (use gke-cluster-creation) or standard node pool management (use gke-basics).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunts for Active Directory credential and replication attacks — DCSync, Golden/Silver Ticket, and DCShadow — by analyzing directory-service-access (4662), Kerberos TGS (4769), and logon (4624) events for replication abuse and forged-ticket anomalies. Activates for requests to hunt DCSync, detect golden/silver tickets, or find Active Directory replication abuse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovers golden base images for creating GKE custom node images based on technical specifications or context clues. Use when finding the golden base image for custom GKE node creation, mapping cluster configuration parameters (GKE version, OS, architecture, accelerators, gVisor, cgroups) to image names, or querying GKE base image maps. Don't use for general GKE cluster creation (use gke-cluster-creation) or standard node pool management (use gke-basics).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect Kerberos Golden Ticket forgery by analyzing Windows Event ID 4769 for RC4 encryption downgrades (0x17), abnormal ticket lifetimes, and krbtgt account anomalies in Splunk and Elastic SIEM

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect Golden Ticket attacks in Active Directory by analyzing Kerberos TGT anomalies including mismatched encryption types, impossible ticket lifetimes, non-existent accounts, and forged PAC signatures in domain controller event logs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Covers Flutter testing across all three layers: unit tests (business logic, ViewModels, repositories), widget tests (UI rendering, interactions, golden regression), and integration/E2E tests (full app flows, native OS interactions). Use this skill when writing any Flutter test, setting up mocking with mocktail or mockito, implementing golden file tests, debugging async failures (pumpAndSettle timeouts, Timer leaks, FakeAsync deadlocks), fixing cross-platform golden pixel diffs in CI/CD, testing state management (Riverpod/BLoC/Provider), handling permission dialogs or native system UI with Patrol, or troubleshooting MediaQuery/Theme missing errors in widget tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect Kerberos Golden Ticket forgery by analyzing Windows Event ID 4769 for RC4 encryption downgrades (0x17), abnormal ticket lifetimes, and krbtgt account anomalies in Splunk and Elastic SIEM

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect Golden Ticket attacks in Active Directory by analyzing Kerberos TGT anomalies including mismatched encryption types, impossible ticket lifetimes, non-existent accounts, and forged PAC signatures in domain controller event logs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect Kerberos Golden Ticket forgery by analyzing Windows Event ID 4769 for RC4 encryption downgrades (0x17), abnormal ticket lifetimes, and krbtgt account anomalies in Splunk and Elastic SIEM

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect Golden Ticket attacks in Active Directory by analyzing Kerberos TGT anomalies including mismatched encryption types, impossible ticket lifetimes, non-existent accounts, and forged PAC signatures in domain controller event logs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, implement, review, or refactor native macOS 27 Golden Gate interfaces in SwiftUI or AppKit. Use when a Mac app must match Apple's current macOS 27 UI kit and restrained Liquid Glass language: integrated windows, full-height sidebars, native toolbars, flat lists, tables, and forms, clear pane boundaries, accessible materials, and removal of unnecessary nested cards, framed panels, or glassmorphism. Also use for Figma macOS 27 design-to-code work and audits of interfaces that feel too boxed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform DCSync attacks by abusing MS-DRSR replication rights (DS-Replication-Get-Changes/-All) to impersonate a Domain Controller and extract KRBTGT, Domain Admin, and service account hashes for Golden Ticket forging, typically with Mimikatz. Use in authorized engagements after finding principals with replication rights, to establish long-term domain persistence, or to validate detections for replication abuse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive the AADInternals PowerShell toolkit to perform Microsoft Entra ID tenant reconnaissance, access-token acquisition across Microsoft APIs, and federation/AD FS backdoor testing (Golden SAML, T1606.002) for defensive validation. Use during an authorized Entra ID/Microsoft 365 red-team assessment to map external attack surface or verify AD FS signing certs resist Golden SAML.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides GKE golden path configuration defaults, production readiness checklists, and cluster default patterns. Use when designing GKE clusters, verifying GKE production readiness, or checking configurations against GKE defaults. Don't use for setting up workload autoscaling specifically (use gke-workload-scaling instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain model-routing audit golden fixtures and expected outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Luxury-minimal whitespace hero — single word reveals letter by letter, warm-gold hairline, breathing indicators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans and builds end-to-end Fabric data platforms on the Bronze, Silver, and Gold medallion pattern: ingestion to analytics, PySpark and Delta layers, pipeline orchestration, per-layer Spark tuning, Materialized Lake View versus notebook choices for Silver and Gold, and Direct Lake handoff. Use for layered architecture design, planning and recommendations. For questions over an existing Power BI report use fabriciq.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。