619 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Validate improvements from .turbo/improvements.md, recommend a working set tailored to what's in the backlog, and run one lane: direct fixes, investigation, or planned work. One lane per session. Use when the user asks to "implement improvements", "work on improvements", "address improvements", "process improvement backlog", "tackle improvements", or "implement noted improvements".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage the improvements backlog at .turbo/improvements.md: merge duplicate entries, state the user story or simplification behind each one, and decide with the user which to keep and which to drop. Use when the user asks to "triage improvements", "triage the backlog", "clean up the backlog", "clean up improvements", "groom the backlog", "prune the improvements backlog", or "go through the backlog with me".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture an out-of-scope improvement opportunity so it doesn't get lost. Use when the user asks to "note improvement", "save improvement", "track this for later", "remember this improvement", "note this idea", "log improvement", "backlog this", or "park this idea". Also invoke proactively when noticing something improvable during work that falls outside the current task's scope, or after deliberately shipping a simpler approach that accepts a known ceiling — briefly mention it to the user and offer to note it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "apply skill improvements", "update skill from plan", "execute improvement plan", "fix skill issues", "implement skill recommendations", or mentions applying improvements from quality review reports. Reads improvement-plan-{name}.md files generated by skill-quality-reviewer and intelligently merges and executes the suggested changes to improve Claude Skills quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "apply skill improvements", "update skill from plan", "execute improvement plan", "fix skill issues", "implement skill recommendations", or mentions applying improvements from quality review reports. Reads improvement-plan-{name}.md files generated by skill-quality-reviewer and intelligently merges and executes the suggested changes to improve Claude Skills quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform transcript analysis findings into actionable improvements. Triggers on "generate hooks from findings", "improve agent", "fix anti-pattern", "kaizen improvement", "generate hook proposals", or "create improvement plan". Provides templates for hook generation, agent prompt refinement, skill patches, CLAUDE.md updates, and script automation from analysis data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Marp形式プレゼンテーションの専門レビュー・評価・改善スキル。 10軸スコアリング（100点満点）で品質を定量評価し、具体的な改善コード付きで提案する。 Use when the user asks to: - Review, evaluate, or critique a Marp presentation / プレゼンをレビュー / 評価 / 添削 - Improve, polish, or upgrade existing slides / スライドを改善 / ブラッシュアップ - Check slide quality, score slides, or audit a deck / スライドの品質チェック / 採点 - "このプレゼンどう？" "スライドを見てほしい" "プレゼン資料のフィードバック" Reads .md files with Marp frontmatter, scores across 10 dimensions, and outputs a detailed review report with concrete before/after code improvements. Works as a companion to the marp-slides skill (generation → review → improvement cycle).
AIエージェントの成果物を、正確さ・網羅性・明瞭さ・実行しやすさ・簡潔さの5軸で自己評価し、根拠付きの点数と優先順位を付けた改善案をまとめます。
Run the Part 12 continuous improvement loop into a quarterly brief for leadership. "produce the quarterly improvement brief"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold and run Karpathy-style autoresearch loops in any git repo. This skill should be used when setting up autonomous code improvement, generating adversarial eval harnesses, running hypothesis-implement-eval-keep/discard loops, or checking autoresearch progress. Triggers on "autoresearch", "autonomous improvement", "eval loop", "hypothesis loop", "self-improvement loop".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a project or sprint retrospective by gathering data from status reports and velocity metrics, structuring what went well and what needs improvement, and generating actionable improvement items with owners and due dates. Use at the end of a sprint, after a project phase or milestone, following a significant incident or success, at a quarterly review of ongoing processes, or before starting a similar project to capture lessons learned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define a Lean Six Sigma improvement project using DMAIC, problem framing, baseline measures, root-cause hypotheses, CTQs, and control planning. Use when an existing process is underperforming and the team needs a charter, SIPOC, baseline, and improvement path. Do not use for brand-new process design or vague complaints with no process boundary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesizes actionable feedback from validation results, confidence scores, and iteration triggers. Creates structured improvement guidance for re-execution. Activate on 'synthesize feedback', 'improvement suggestions', 'actionable feedback', 'iteration guidance', 'feedback generation'. NOT for iteration detection (use dag-iteration-detector) or convergence tracking (use dag-convergence-monitor).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides continuous improvement and change management for SMEs adopting AI. Applies Marginal Gains philosophy, Kaizen principles, and structured sprint methodologies to organizational transformation. Use when user asks about change management, continuous improvement, AI adoption strategy, team resistance, transformation roadmaps, or improvement sprints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture and develop a reusable skill, tool repair, or behavior improvement noticed while completing a task. Use when instructions are stale, a recurring workflow deserves a skill, or a tool contract fails in practice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
River Review のメインエントリポイント。 レビュー依頼の intent classification → 専門 skill 選択 → 実行 → finding verification → feedback classification → fixture / reference / suppression への還元までを束ねる improvement-loop orchestrator。
Apply continuous improvement principles to iteratively enhance processes, code quality, team practices, and system performance through small, incremental changes. Use when improving development processes, optimizing workflows, reducing waste, enhancing code quality over time, implementing retrospective learnings, or fostering a culture of continuous improvement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a self-improvement loop for a shipped product's AI agents — production traces feed evals, evals feed improvement proposals (prompts, playbooks, retrieval configs), and a human approval gate promotes changes with rollback. Technique-agnostic: chooses per project between ACE-style evolving playbooks, GEPA/MIPROv2 offline optimization, or simple eval-driven iteration via references/techniques.md. Load when the user asks to make my product's agents self-improving, learn from production traces, add a learning loop, evolve prompts or playbooks safely, promote agent improvements, or GEPA-style optimization. NOT harness-evolution (that improves the coding agent), NOT experimentation (product A/B tests), NOT agent-run-retro (dev-phase manual retros — this skill is the production-scale continuation).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenClawを動かす端末やサーバーの安全性を点検し、SSH、ファイアウォール、更新、暗号化、バックアップの状態から、段階的な改善策を提案します。
Comprehensive AI prompt engineering safety review and improvement prompt. Analyzes prompts for safety, bias, security vulnerabilities, and effectiveness while providing detailed improvement recommendations with extensive frameworks, testing methodologies, and educational content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds SOC performance metrics and KPI tracking dashboards measuring Mean Time to Detect (MTTD), Mean Time to Respond (MTTR), alert quality ratios, analyst productivity, and detection coverage using SIEM data. Use when SOC leadership needs operational visibility, continuous improvement tracking, or executive-level reporting on security operations effectiveness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the harness, scaffold, workflow, or optimizer itself is the optimization target: recursive self-improvement (RSI) loops, meta-harnesses, self-improving harnesses that mine their own failures and propose bounded edits, evolutionary or population-based search over agent scaffolds, acceptance gates for self-modifying systems, and agentic context evolution where the mechanism that produces context is versioned and evolved. Route governance of a single autonomous loop (locked surfaces, durable logs, rollback, novelty gates, approval boundaries) to harness-engineering, measurement and quality-gate design to evaluation, judge design to advanced-evaluation, and remote sandbox infrastructure to hosted-agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over any code target — a skill, plugin, module, or directory — using a reviewer the user names: any installed skill or agent. Keeps a cross-round findings ledger, escalates when fixes stop converging, and guards scope mechanically. Use when asked to 'improve this code until review passes', 'run an improvement loop with <reviewer>', or to iterate review-and-fix with a specific reviewer. For skills prefer the skill-improver entry; for a branch prefer pr-improver.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over a Claude Code skill until a review comes back clean, with a cross-round findings ledger, escalation when fixes stop converging, and a mechanical scope guard. Reviews are performed by the plugin-dev skill-reviewer agent. Use to fix skill quality issues, iteratively refine a skill, or resume a loop after an escalation ('fix my skill', 'improve this skill until it passes review', 'skill improvement loop'). NOT for a one-time review — use the plugin-dev skill-reviewer agent directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。