「no retraining」の検索結果

Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan 8-type / 3-category leakage taxonomy; the illegitimate-proxy / sampling-bias / pretraining-contamination subtypes hand off as needs_external_check, naming but NEVER running Oren-2023 exchangeability / Shi-2023 Min-K% / Golchin-2023 Time-Travel / BIG-bench canary); a load-bearing LLM judge is conflicted (same model/family as a compared system) or unvalidated (no human-agreement, no bias control) (HP-JUDGE-VALIDITY); a declared condition/metric is dropped or switched to favor the method, or 'best' is chosen with no held-out set (HP-SELECTIVE-REPORTING). Verdict-bearing at L0/L1 from the DESCRIBED protocol — NOT repo-gated like experiment-forensics; L2 only CONFIRMS against split/preprocessing/result files. A fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per pass) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Leakage and under-reporting are usually HONEST methodological errors — every finding describes a discrepancy to CHECK, never an accusation. An LLM generating GROUND-TRUTH labels is HP-FAKE-GT (experiment-forensics) — routed there, not here. Emits eval-design-forensics.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "eval design audit", "evaluation validity", "train/test leakage", "data leakage", "is the score measuring generalization", "LLM judge bias", "is the judge validated", "selective reporting", "cherry-picked results", "评估设计审计", "评测有效性", "数据泄漏", "训练测试集泄漏", "裁判模型有没有验证", "选择性报告".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Supports work with Outpost Bio's open microbiome foundation models - the Waypoint checkpoints (Waypoint-6m, Waypoint-45m, Waypoint-170m), the Atlas pretraining corpus, the Compass eight-task benchmark, or the `waypoint` CLI from the `waypoint-bio` package. Covers embedding microbiome samples, fine-tuning on taxonomic abundance data, benchmarking a checkpoint on Compass, pretraining a GPT-2 model on taxonomic abundance profiles, and converting MetaPhlAn, Kraken2, QIIME 2, or MGnify abundance tables into waypoint format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

重みが公開されたLLMの回答拒否に関わる仕組みを分析し、再学習なしで重みを変更する実験を支援。計算環境に合うモデルや手法の選択、変更前後の品質評価まで扱います。

• LLMの回答拒否の仕組みを調べたいとき
• 再学習せず重み変更を実験したいとき
• 計算環境に合うモデルと手法を選びたいとき

Merge multiple fine-tuned models using mergekit to combine capabilities without retraining. Use when creating specialized models by blending domain-specific expertise (math + coding + chat), improving performance beyond single models, or experimenting rapidly with model variants. Covers SLERP, TIES-Merging, DARE, Task Arithmetic, linear merging, and production deployment strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Merge multiple fine-tuned models using mergekit to combine capabilities without retraining. Use when creating specialized models by blending domain-specific expertise (math + coding + chat), improving performance beyond single models, or experimenting rapidly with model variants. Covers SLERP, TIES-Merging, DARE, Task Arithmetic, linear merging, and production deployment strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, configure, and chain repo-native Nemotron customization steps into single-step or multi-step pipelines: curation, translation, SFT/PEFT (AutoModel or Megatron-Bridge), pretraining/CPT, RL alignment (DPO/RLVR/GRPO/RLHF), BYOB/MCQ benchmarks, checkpoint conversion, ModelOpt optimization, env profiles, and evaluation of trained checkpoints or existing/hosted endpoints. Use when a request names a Nemotron step or workflow, or asks to clean, translate, train, fine-tune, align, convert, optimize, evaluate, or compose these into a pipeline. Do NOT use for frontend/dashboard/visualization work, generic ML advice, billing/access, or non-Nemotron coding tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use ML.NET to train, evaluate, or integrate machine-learning models into .NET applications with realistic data preparation, inference, and deployment expectations. USE FOR: ML.NET integration; local model training or retraining; inference pipelines, model loading, evaluation, and deployment review. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Computer Vision Scientist. Use when a task calls for Computer Vision Scientist judgment. Reasons from image formation, projective geometry (pinhole intrinsics and extrinsics, epipolar/PnP/bundle adjustment, similarity-scale ambiguity), and COCO/LVIS AP mechanics through DINOv3/SigLIP 2 foundation baselines, RF-DETR/YOLO26/SAM 3 models, COLMAP 4/GLOMAP and VGGT geometry, pycocotools/TrackEval/BOP evaluation, and CVPR reporting and EU AI Act limits while treating train–test and pretraining leakage, AP evaluation-setting gaming, preprocessing mismatches (EXIF, BGR, aliased resizing), label noise, and camera-convention and scale errors as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a Meta-Harness-style optimization loop NATIVELY — automatically search over the scaffolding around a FIXED base model (memory, retrieval, context construction, prompt templates, summarization, tool-selection logic) by proposing candidate variants, scoring each on a cheap deterministic eval, and keeping a Pareto frontier of quality vs cost — using native Agent / Workflow / loop tools instead of a standalone Python harness. Use this whenever the user wants to optimize, evolve, tune, distill, or search over a harness, scaffold, prompt system, memory or retrieval policy, context-assembly code, or summarizer while keeping the model fixed; whenever they mention Meta-Harness, harness optimization, scaffold evolution, automatic prompt/memory optimization, an evolutionary or Pareto search over candidate implementations, or "make the harness/agent better without retraining"; and whenever the gain must come from the code AROUND the model rather than the model weights. Reproduces the Meta-Harness paper's method natively, with no claude_wrapper.py and no metered solver API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a Meta-Harness-style optimization loop NATIVELY — automatically search over the scaffolding around a FIXED base model (memory, retrieval, context construction, prompt templates, summarization, tool-selection logic) by proposing candidate variants, scoring each on a cheap deterministic eval, and keeping a Pareto frontier of quality vs cost — using native Agent / Workflow / loop tools instead of a standalone Python harness. Use this whenever the user wants to optimize, evolve, tune, distill, or search over a harness, scaffold, prompt system, memory or retrieval policy, context-assembly code, or summarizer while keeping the model fixed; whenever they mention Meta-Harness, harness optimization, scaffold evolution, automatic prompt/memory optimization, an evolutionary or Pareto search over candidate implementations, or "make the harness/agent better without retraining"; and whenever the gain must come from the code AROUND the model rather than the model weights. Reproduces the Meta-Harness paper's method natively, with no claude_wrapper.py and no metered solver API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Merge multiple fine-tuned models using mergekit to combine capabilities without retraining. Use when creating specialized models by blending domain-specific expertise (math + coding + chat), improving performance beyond single models, or experimenting rapidly with model variants. Covers SLERP, TIES-Merging, DARE, Task Arithmetic, linear merging, and production deployment strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and troubleshoots TorchDrug 0.2.1 workflows for molecular graphs, property prediction, self-supervised pretraining, molecule generation, retrosynthesis, protein representation learning, and knowledge graph reasoning. Use when code imports torchdrug or needs its datasets, models, tasks, or Engine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when polishing, diagnosing, tailoring, or exporting resumes for LLM, RAG, Agent, Agentic RL, post-training, pretraining, AIGC, search/ranking, multimodal, AI backend, or LLM algorithm internships from raw resume text, a materials folder, and/or a target job description. Audits evidence, maps JD fit, enforces truth boundaries, writes polished and targeted resumes, generates interviewer-style grilling questions, answer cards, evidence-upgrade plans, and optional open-source project recommendations without fabricating experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps query single-cell data to reference atlases using scArches transfer learning with scVI and scANVI models. Transfers cell type labels without retraining on combined data. Use when annotating new single-cell datasets using pre-trained reference models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a GPT and BPE tokenizer from scratch. Use when implementing autograd, attention, a nanoGPT loop, muP hyperparameter transfer, WSD annealing, loss spikes, or mid-training.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Somatic movement and whole-body retraining as Joseph Pilates designed it in the Contrology method and as Moshé Feldenkrais designed it in Awareness Through Movement and Functional Integration, with enough cross-reference to the broader somatics landscape (Alexander Technique, Hanna Somatics, Body-Mind Centering) that an agent can place a user into the right method. Covers the Pilates reformer and mat system, the six Pilates principles, the Feldenkrais ATM lesson structure, the nervous-system learning frame that distinguishes somatics from exercise, and the safety posture that matters for rehab populations. Use for queries about core training, rehab-adjacent movement, chronic pain patterns, and learning-based movement re-education.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mescle múltiplos modelos ajustados usando mergekit para combinar capacidades sem retreinar. Use ao criar modelos especializados misturando expertise específica de domínio (math + coding + chat), melhorando performance além de modelos únicos, ou experimentando rapidamente variantes de modelos. Cobre SLERP, TIES-Merging, DARE, Task Arithmetic, mesclagem linear e estratégias de deploy em produção.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。