「output」の検索結果

Complete guide for xUnit test output and logging. Use when you need to implement test output, diagnostic logging, or ILogger alternatives in xUnit tests. Covers ITestOutputHelper injection, AbstractLogger pattern, structured output design. Includes XUnitLogger, CompositeLogger, performance test diagnostic tool implementations. Keywords: ITestOutputHelper, ILogger testing, test output xunit, test output, test logging, AbstractLogger, XUnitLogger, CompositeLogger, testOutputHelper.WriteLine, test diagnostics, logger mock, test log, structured output, Received().Log

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates agent outputs against expected schemas and quality criteria. Ensures outputs meet structural requirements and content standards. Activate on 'validate output', 'output validation', 'schema validation', 'check output', 'output quality'. NOT for confidence scoring (use dag-confidence-scorer) or hallucination detection (use dag-hallucination-detector).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator for the eval-output skill suite — evaluate LLM and agent outputs for quality, accuracy, helpfulness, and safety using structured rubrics and LLM-as-judge techniques. Load when the user says "evaluate this output", "score this response", "run an eval", "LLM as judge", "evaluate agent output", "how good is this response", "rate this answer", "eval this", or provides an LLM output that should be assessed for quality. Single entry point for all output evaluation workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure output requests - field outputs, history outputs. Use when user asks what results to save, output variables, reduce output file size, or history output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates agent outputs against expected schemas and quality criteria. Reports structural and content checks within the declared evidence scope. Activate on 'validate output', 'output validation', 'schema validation', 'check output', 'output quality'. NOT for confidence scoring (use dag-confidence-scorer) or hallucination detection (use dag-hallucination-detector).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use context-mode tools (ctx_execute, ctx_execute_file) instead of Bash/cat when processing large outputs. Triggers: "analyze logs", "summarize output", "process data", "parse JSON", "filter results", "extract errors", "check build output", "analyze dependencies", "process API response", "large file analysis", "page snapshot", "browser snapshot", "DOM structure", "inspect page", "accessibility tree", "Playwright snapshot", "run tests", "test output", "coverage report", "git log", "recent commits", "diff between branches", "list containers", "pod status", "disk usage", "fetch docs", "API reference", "index documentation", "call API", "check response", "query results", "find TODOs", "count lines", "codebase statistics", "security audit", "outdated packages", "dependency tree", "cloud resources", "CI/CD output". Also triggers on ANY MCP tool output that may exceed 20 lines. Subagent routing is handled automatically via PreToolUse hook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sysinternals DebugView CLI (DbgViewCli) for capturing and analyzing usermode and kernel-mode Windows debug output from the command line. USE FOR: capturing OutputDebugString output, kernel DbgPrint/KdPrint capture, boot-time debug logging, remote debug monitoring, filtering debug output by PID or process name, crash dump analysis, automated debug capture with bounded execution. DO NOT USE FOR: non-Windows platforms, application-level logging frameworks (log4j, serilog), Azure Monitor or cloud telemetry, ETW tracing (use WPR/xperf instead), user-mode crash dumps (use WinDbg). Triggers: "debug output", "DbgView", "DebugView", "kernel debug", "capture debug logs", "boot logging", "OutputDebugString", "DbgPrint", "KdPrint", "remote debug monitor", "debug capture CLI".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage for output using Grove's "High Output Management": a manager's output is their organization's output, raised by high-leverage activities. Use when the user mentions "high output management", "managerial leverage", "one-on-ones", "1:1 agenda", "OKRs", "performance review", "task-relevant maturity", "delegation", "meeting overload", "new manager", "how do I run a 1:1", or "just got promoted to manager". Also trigger when structuring a manager's calendar and meeting cadence, designing team metrics, running planning, coaching delegation, or preparing performance reviews. Covers leverage, production principles, meetings as the medium of management, decisions, OKRs, and task-relevant maturity. For intrinsic motivation, see drive-motivation. For a company operating system, see traction-eos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tested output format specifications for Claude prompts. Use when the user wants a specific deliverable structure — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or building output formatting. Trigger on: "give me the Executive Brief format," "show me the output template for," "I need the Decision Matrix structure," "show me available output formats," "build a custom output format for." Provides 10 ready-to-use structures (executive briefs, technical designs, research summaries, implementation plans, decision matrices, competitive analyses, post-mortems, stakeholder updates, strategic memos, process documentation) plus a custom template, with per-section length guidance and format constraints tested against Claude formatting defaults. If unsure which format fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or choosing reasoning/identity approaches (use rootnode-block-selection if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score LLM and agent outputs using LLM-as-judge techniques — direct scoring against rubrics or pairwise comparison between two outputs. Includes built-in bias mitigation for position bias, length bias, and self-enhancement bias. Load when the user asks to score an output, judge a response, evaluate against a rubric, compare two outputs, do direct scoring, run pairwise comparison, or says "rate this", "which response is better", "score this against the rubric", "judge this output", "LLM as judge this". Sub-skill of eval-output orchestrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects MSBuild projects with conflicting OutputPath or IntermediateOutputPath. USE FOR: builds failing with 'Cannot create a file when that file already exists', 'The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process', intermittent build failures that succeed on retry, or missing/overwritten outputs in multi-project or multi-targeting builds where bin/obj (or project.assets.json) collide. Common causes: shared OutputPath, missing AppendTargetFrameworkToOutputPath, extra global properties (e.g. PublishReadyToRun), or SetTargetFramework on a ProjectReference to a single-targeting project. DO NOT USE FOR: file access errors unrelated to MSBuild (OS-level locking), single-project single-TFM builds, non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects MSBuild projects with conflicting OutputPath or IntermediateOutputPath. USE FOR: builds failing with 'Cannot create a file when that file already exists', 'The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process', intermittent build failures that succeed on retry, or missing/overwritten outputs in multi-project or multi-targeting builds where bin/obj (or project.assets.json) collide. Common causes: shared OutputPath, missing AppendTargetFrameworkToOutputPath, extra global properties (e.g. PublishReadyToRun), or SetTargetFramework on a ProjectReference to a single-targeting project. DO NOT USE FOR: file access errors unrelated to MSBuild (OS-level locking), single-project single-TFM builds, non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick an LM output format per (task x consumer x model) rather than by reflex: different formats carry different cognitive load (e.g. code-in-JSON makes the same model write worse code than plain-text+diff, while asking for prose when you need a typed object fails the other way). Use when designing or debugging an LM's output schema, choosing between plain text / diff / JSON / tool-call / grammar-constrained output, or when a model's quality drops after wrapping its output in a structured format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assessing privacy risks in large language model outputs including training data memorisation, PII leakage in generated text, prompt injection leading to data extraction, and hallucinated personal data. Covers output filtering, guardrails, and monitoring. Keywords: LLM privacy, output risk, memorisation, PII leakage, prompt injection, hallucinated PII.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure render settings, compositing nodes, output formats, and execute renders via Cycles or EEVEE engines using Python API or command-line interface. Use when automating render execution for batch processing, configuring quality and performance trade-offs, setting up compositing pipelines for post-processing, generating multiple output formats from a single render, or producing final output for publication or presentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design terminal output for a CLI tool with chalk colors, Unicode glyphs, multiple verbosity levels (human, verbose, quiet, JSON), and consistent voice rules. Covers color palette selection, status indicator design, reporter function architecture, ceremony/narrative output variants, and cross-terminal compatibility. Use when building a new CLI reporter module, adding warm narrative output to an existing tool, standardizing output across multiple commands, or designing machine-readable JSON alongside human-readable text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a roadmap or backlog to distinguish outcomes from outputs. Use when the user says "outcome vs output", "escaping the build trap", "are we building the right things", "roadmap review", "feature factory", "output-driven team", "we keep shipping but nothing changes", or wants to shift focus from shipping features to delivering value - even if they don't explicitly say "outcome vs output".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects MSBuild projects with conflicting OutputPath or IntermediateOutputPath. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: builds failing with 'Cannot create a file when that file already exists', 'The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process', intermittent build failures that succeed on retry, missing outputs in multi-project builds, multi-targeting builds where project.assets.json conflicts. Diagnoses when multiple projects or TFMs write to the same bin/obj directories due to shared OutputPath, missing AppendTargetFrameworkToOutputPath, or extra global properties like PublishReadyToRun creating redundant evaluations. DO NOT USE FOR: file access errors unrelated to MSBuild (OS-level locking), single-project single-TFM builds, non-MSBuild build systems. INVOKES: binlog MCP server tools (overview, projects, evaluations, properties, double_writes); falls back to dotnet msbuild binlog replay + grep when the MCP is unavailable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate output schemas (dataset_schema.json, output_schema.json, key_value_store_schema.json) for an Apify Actor by analyzing its source code. Use when creating or updating Actor output schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design n8n AI agents the right way. Use when building or editing any @n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.* AI node — an AI Agent, LLM chain, Text Classifier, or Information Extractor — and whenever the user mentions AI agents, LLM with tools, tool calling, $fromAI, system prompts, agent memory, sessionId, structured/JSON output, output parser, RAG, vector store, a chat assistant/bot, or human-in-the-loop review. Covers Agent-vs-chain-vs-classifier choice, the model/memory/tools/outputParser slots, tool names/descriptions as prompt, structured output with autoFix, memory, RAG, human review, and chat topologies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design n8n AI agents the right way. Use when building or editing any @n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.* AI node — an AI Agent, LLM chain, Text Classifier, or Information Extractor — and whenever the user mentions AI agents, LLM with tools, tool calling, $fromAI, system prompts, agent memory, sessionId, structured/JSON output, output parser, RAG, vector store, a chat assistant/bot, or human-in-the-loop review. Covers Agent-vs-chain-vs-classifier choice, the model/memory/tools/outputParser slots, tool names/descriptions as prompt, structured output with autoFix, memory, RAG, human review, and chat topologies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screenplay format, page craft, the writing process and adaptation (剧本格式/写作流程/改编) — merged from Wendy Henson (spec format rules), Richard Walter (page craft, revision), Neill Hicks (selling vs shooting script, draft chain), Syd Field (master shot, card method, adaptation as original work), Robert McKee (step outline → treatment → screenplay), Julian Hoxter (format elements, adaptation four questions), Diamond & Weissman (one-page nine-step) and Eric Bork — plus an exact typographic grid, element conventions (V.O./O.S., MORE/CONT'D, dual dialogue), a machine-writable output contract (Fountain, with forced markers for Chinese), and Asian industry formats (Chinese 场号制 影视剧本格式, Japanese 柱・ト書き・セリフ / 決定稿). Use when formatting a spec script, choosing the output file format, deciding what goes in action lines, planning drafts and outlines, cutting pages, adapting a novel, play or true story, writing a Chinese TV/film or Japanese-style script page, or preparing a submission-ready draft.

Check AI output before you trust or use it — where it's likely wrong, what to verify, and how to catch confident-sounding errors. Use when asked can I trust this AI answer, how do I verify what AI told me, fact-check this AI output, or is this AI response reliable. Produces a risk read on the specific output (the claims most likely to be wrong or made up), the parts that need independent verification vs the parts that are low-risk, how to actually verify each, the tells of AI hallucination and overconfidence, and a habit for building verification into your AI use — because AI is confidently wrong often enough that unchecked trust is a real risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks for "ADHD output", "fewer output tokens", "short numbered steps", "limited working memory formatting", or explicitly invokes "adhd-output-style".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。