「ownership」の検索結果

Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization. Trigger only when the user explicitly wants a security-oriented ownership or bus-factor analysis grounded in git history (for example: orphaned sensitive code, security maintainers, CODEOWNERS reality checks for risk, sensitive hotspots, or ownership clusters). Do not trigger for general maintainer lists or non-security ownership questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization. Trigger only when the user explicitly wants a security-oriented ownership or bus-factor analysis grounded in git history (for example: orphaned sensitive code, security maintainers, CODEOWNERS reality checks for risk, sensitive hotspots, or ownership clusters). Do not trigger for general maintainer lists or non-security ownership questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization. Trigger only when the user explicitly wants a security-oriented ownership or bus-factor analysis grounded in git history (for example: orphaned sensitive code, security maintainers, CODEOWNERS reality checks for risk, sensitive hotspots, or ownership clusters). Do not trigger for general maintainer lists or non-security ownership questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization. Use when the user explicitly wants a security-oriented ownership or bus-factor analysis grounded in git history (for example: orphaned sensitive code, security maintainers, CODEOWNERS reality checks for risk, sensitive hotspots, or ownership clusters). Do NOT use for general maintainer lists, non-security ownership questions, or threat modeling (use security-threat-model).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization. Trigger only when the user explicitly wants a security-oriented ownership or bus-factor analysis grounded in git history (for example: orphaned sensitive code, security maintainers, CODEOWNERS reality checks for risk, sensitive hotspots, or ownership clusters). Do not trigger for general maintainer lists or non-security ownership questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rustのコード作成・レビュー・改修で、所有権やエラー処理、型設計、並行処理を見直し、安全性・性能・保守性を意識した実装へ整えるスキル。

• Rustの所有権と借用のレビュー
• 異常時に停止するエラー処理の改修
• Rustアプリの型とモジュール設計

Task claiming and ownership tracking for parallel agent execution. Agents claim tasks from a shared queue with file ownership enforcement. Use during parallel execution phases when multiple agents work simultaneously.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenClawの画面をSolid 2で実装・移行・レビューするスキル。状態管理やLitとの共存、ダイアログなどの表示、テストと性能確認を扱います。

• Litの画面をSolid 2へ移行したいとき
• 状態管理と画面更新をレビューしたいとき
• プラグイン画面やダイアログの実装

Writes, reviews, and debugs idiomatic Rust code with memory safety and zero-cost abstractions. Implements ownership patterns, manages lifetimes, designs trait hierarchies, builds async applications with tokio, and structures error handling with Result/Option. Use when building Rust applications, solving ownership or borrowing issues, designing trait-based APIs, implementing async/await concurrency, creating FFI bindings, or optimizing for performance and memory safety. Invoke for Rust, Cargo, ownership, borrowing, lifetimes, async Rust, tokio, zero-cost abstractions, memory safety, systems programming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Rust ownership, lifetime, or unsafe trouble: prepare Rust changes with ownership, error, and API discipline, and escalate any unsafe, FFI, or lock-free change to the UB checklist. Use when the user says: rust, rust code, rust skill, rustlang, borrow checker, lifetime error, ownership error, trait bound.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use a repo-root `.editorconfig` to configure free .NET analyzer and style rules. Use when a .NET repo needs rule severity, code-style options, section layout, or analyzer ownership made explicit. USE FOR: the repo needs a root .editorconfig; analyzer severity and style ownership are unclear; the team wants one source of truth for rule configuration. DO NOT USE FOR: choosing analyzers with no config change; formatting-only execution with no config ownership question. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes, reviews, and debugs idiomatic Rust code with memory safety and zero-cost abstractions. Implements ownership patterns, manages lifetimes, designs trait hierarchies, builds async applications with tokio, and structures error handling with Result/Option. Use when building Rust applications, solving ownership or borrowing issues, designing trait-based APIs, implementing async/await concurrency, creating FFI bindings, or optimizing for performance and memory safety. Invoke for Rust, Cargo, ownership, borrowing, lifetimes, async Rust, tokio, zero-cost abstractions, memory safety, systems programming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and mitigate Salesforce data skew — ownership skew (single user owns >10,000 records) and parent-child skew (>10,000 children under one parent) — that cause sharing recalculation slowness, group membership lock errors, and record-level locking failures. Covers lookup skew and UNABLE_TO_LOCK_ROW, Defer Sharing Calculation (deferGroupMembership / deferSharingRules in Sharing.settings), ownership bucket groups, Controlled by Parent OWD, Bulk API serial vs parallel concurrency for skewed loads, and the documented load ordering for roles, groups and sharing rules. NOT for planning and batching a recalculation job — use data/sharing-recalculation-performance. NOT for designing the sharing model itself — use admin/sharing-and-visibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous build-ship-verify loop that ends with code committed, deployed, and confirmed live. Triggers on: "$ownership", "execute X with ownership", "build this overnight", or any request for an autonomous product loop with no human checkpoints until production is verified. NOT for: one-off tasks, quick fixes, or supervised dev work (use devprocess for those).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure designs define data flow, state ownership, consistency boundaries, and cross-boundary writes to prevent drift and incidents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides ownership, borrowing, and lifetime decisions in Rust. Use when encountering E0382, E0597, E0506, E0507, move errors, or when designing data ownership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ECCを通じてNasiko CLIの導入状況を確認し、固定バージョンのインストールと管理対象の削除を、事前プレビューや利用者の同意を踏まえて進めるスキル。

• Nasiko CLIの導入状況を調べたいとき
• 検証済みバージョンの導入前確認
• ECC管理下のCLIを削除したいとき

Webの電子署名画面で署名・日付・入力欄を数値座標で配置する手順をまとめたスキル。署名者ごとの欄の割り当てを確認し、送信前の下書き確認まで整理します。

• 生成した契約書に署名欄を準備したいとき
• 署名欄の担当者を確認したいとき
• 確認用の下書きと画像を残したいとき

AIエージェントが実装の多くを担う開発チーム向けに、計画、責任分担、レビュー基準、テスト要件を整理し、生成コードを扱う開発プロセスを設計するスキル。

• AI生成コードを扱う開発ルールの整備
• コードレビュー基準と承認条件の設定
• エージェントが作業しやすい設計の検討

Coordinate parallel feature development with file ownership strategies, conflict avoidance rules, and integration patterns for multi-agent implementation. Use this skill when decomposing a large feature into independent work streams, when two or more agents need to implement different layers of the same system simultaneously, when establishing file ownership to prevent merge conflicts in a shared codebase, when designing interface contracts so parallel implementers can build against each other's APIs before they are ready, or when deciding whether to use vertical slices versus horizontal layers for a full-stack feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Employee offboarding runbook for {{projectName}}. Detects newly marked departures via the {{hris_group}} group in Okta, then works one independent case per departure across Okta, Google Workspace, Google Drive, and GitHub — revoking access, transferring ownership, and reclaiming licenses — holding the ownership transfer for a human approval gate (never deleting an account) and posting the completed checklist to {{notify_channel}}.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户问「怎么赚钱/如何致富/该不该要期权/如何判断一个生意的结构」时调用。 核心理念: 财富=睡觉时仍在赚钱的资产; 靠「责任(押上声誉)→产权(股权/知识产权)→杠杆(无需许可的代码媒体)→避免出局」构建, 无法靠出租时间致富。 不适用于: 具体投资标的分析、理财产品的选股建议。 Triggers: 致富/赚钱/股权/期权/杠杆/被动收入/ownership/leverage/equity

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Entire product design problem to delegate: prepare a bounded design direction, existing-lane composition, and executor-neutral handoff. Use when the user says: design-orchestration, design orchestration, design ownership, handle this product design, take on the design, デザインを任せる, デザイン全体を任せ, プロダクトデザインを任せ.

Runs SQL analytics on SageMaker Catalog asset metadata tables exported as Apache Iceberg in S3 Tables. Covers governance queries, asset growth tracking, ownership audits, time-travel over catalog state, and metadata quality analysis. Applies when querying catalog inventory, finding assets without descriptions, comparing catalog snapshots, or auditing data ownership. Trigger phrases: catalog inventory SQL, how many assets, assets without descriptions, asset growth over time, who owns this data, catalog governance, data quality audit, catalog analytics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。