14 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Creates structured multi-file implementation plans before build. Scope-aware: trivial tasks exit early, simple tasks get fast plans, complex tasks get full research + phase files + validation. Enforces Gate 1. Activated by /mk:plan or /mk:cook. NOT for ticket complexity analysis against an existing codebase (see mk:planning-engine); NOT for CEO-level scope review of existing plans (see mk:plan-ceo-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
新しいプロジェクトまたは既存リポジトリに Claude 用の kickoff 文脈を導入するスキル。 テンプレートとリポジトリ証跡、ユーザー入力をもとに `CLAUDE.md`、`docs/PROJECT_BRIEF.md`、 `docs/SKILL_ROUTING.md`、`docs/QUALITY_GATES.md`、`docs/TEST_STRATEGY.md`、 `docs/DECISION_LOG.md`、`docs/HIDDEN_CONTRACT_REGISTER.md`、 `docs/CROSS_MODULE_CONSISTENCY_MATRIX.md`、`.claude/rules/*`、 `.claude/commands/project-kickoff.md` を必要に応じて作成・更新する。 Use when starting a new project, retrofitting AI project context into an existing repository, bootstrapping Claude memory, or standardizing kickoff documents, rules, and slash-command scaffolding. Distinct from project-manager / project-plan-creator (which plan work), and from completion-quality-gate-designer / hidden-contract-investigator / safe-by-default-architect / cross-module-consistency-auditor / production-parity-test-designer (which deeply refine individual artifacts after bootstrap).
Design sport-specific practice sessions. Drills by skill level and time, warm-up, skill work, scrimmage, cool-down.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create structured employee onboarding plans using the 30-60-90 day framework aligned with SHRM best practices. Cover pre-boarding, Day 1, Week 1, and monthly milestones with task owners, success criteria, and buddy assignments. Use when hiring new employees or revamping the onboarding process.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes ticket complexity and dependencies against the codebase before sprint planning. NOT for writing plans (mk:plan-creator); NOT for scope review (mk:plan-ceo-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured multi-file implementation plans before build; scope-aware, enforces Gate 1. NOT for ticket sizing (mk:planning-engine) or plan CEO-review (mk:plan-ceo-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured second-pass reasoning after a review or plan verdict: pre-mortem, inversion, red team, Socratic lens, etc. NOT for initial review (mk:review) or new plans (mk:plan-creator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer factual project questions (codebase, architecture) with cited evidence. NOT for brainstorming, trade-offs (mk:party), debugging (mk:investigate), review (mk:review), or plans (mk:plan-creator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when refining a draft user prompt before sending it to a coding agent. Decomposes goal/context/constraints/acceptance/output-format, detects ambiguity and model-coupled framing, then emits a model-agnostic rewrite. Supports --analyze, --score, and --deep. NOT for prompts from scratch (mk:brainstorming), plans/reviews (mk:elicit), implementation plans (mk:plan-creator), or general codebase scouting (mk:scout).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes ticket complexity and maps dependencies against an existing codebase before sprint planning. Triggers on 'how complex is this ticket', 'what should we work on first', 'can we fit this in the sprint', 'tech review before planning', 'plan the sprint'. NOT for writing implementation plans (see mk:plan-creator); NOT for scope/ambition review (see mk:plan-ceo-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when answering factual or explanatory questions about the current project — codebase, architecture, conventions, workflows, constraints — with minimal cited evidence. Triggers on "how does X work here", "what does X mean", "why is X structured this way", "is this claim true in the repo", "explain X with sources". NOT for brainstorming or comparing approaches (mk:brainstorming), trade-off decisions (mk:party), debugging/root cause (mk:investigate), code review (mk:review), plans (mk:plan-creator), security audits (mk:cso), visual explanations/diagrams (mk:preview --explain), test-coverage gaps (mk:nyquist), library docs (mk:docs-finder), or workflow navigation (mk:help).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured second-pass reasoning after code review or plan evaluation. Offers named reasoning methods (pre-mortem, inversion, red team, Socratic, etc.) to re-examine findings through a specific lens. Use after /mk:review verdict or any time deeper analysis is needed on an existing output. NOT for initial review (see mk:review); NOT for creating implementation plans (see mk:plan-creator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when creating comprehensive project plans for system development or implementation projects. Use this skill when you need to create Project Charters, Project Plans, WBS, Gantt Charts, RACI matrices, Risk analysis, or other PMBOK-aligned project management artifacts. Outputs are in Markdown format with Mermaid diagrams for visualizations. Leverages comprehensive PM knowledge base in references/ directory (544KB, 11 files) including PMBOK standards, Software/SaaS best practices, IT industry guidance, and specialized PM methodologies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
事業計画書を体系的に作成するスキル。新規事業、既存事業の拡大、スタートアップのピッチ資料、 社内新規プロジェクト提案など、あらゆる事業計画のドキュメントを構造化して作成する。 「事業計画」「ビジネスプラン」「business plan」「新規事業提案」「事業企画」「収支計画」 「プロジェクト提案書」「投資計画」「起業」「創業計画」などのキーワードが出たら必ずこのスキルを使用する。 事業のアイデア段階から、市場分析、競合分析、収支シミュレーション、リスク評価まで 包括的にカバーする。日本語・英語の両方に対応。