「pwn」の検索結果

从逆向走到可用利用 (Working Exploit) 的全链路工程化方法。 适用场景：拿到了二进制 + 漏洞点 + 目标环境，需要写出一个能稳定打通的 exploit（不是只能本地复现一下、远程一打就崩的脚本）。 覆盖三大方向：栈溢出 / 堆利用 / 内核 pwn。强调"CTF 本地通 → 真实远程稳定打通"的工程差距：libc 版本错配、堆喷射时序、SMEP/SMAP/KASLR、栈对齐、远程缓冲。 核心工具链：pwntools + GEF/pwndbg + ROPgadget/Ropper + one_gadget + libc-database + qemu-system 内核调试。 触发关键词：pwn、栈溢出、堆溢出、ROP、ret2libc、ret2csu、one_gadget、libc-database、堆利用、tcache、fastbin、unsorted bin、kernel pwn、kROP、SMEP、SMAP、KASLR、modprobe_path、pwntools、GEF、pwndbg。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remote binary exploitation — pwntools remote(), socket yönetimi, interactive shell

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pwn/Binary kategorisi SKILL.md — BOF, ROP, kernel exploit araçları kurma rehberi

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when hunting Pwn Request vulnerabilities where pull_request_target workflows checkout attacker-controlled PR code and execute it in a privileged context with access to repository secrets. Trigger on: "pwn request", "pull_request_target", "checkout PR head", "npm install in CI", "lifecycle scripts in CI", "preinstall script", "postinstall script", "package.json scripts CI", "npm ci ignore-scripts false", "actions/checkout ref pull request head sha", privileged workflow running PR code, "Gato-X", supply chain via PR lifecycle scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Linux kernel pwn temelleri — char device exploitation, ret2usr, KPTI/SMEP/SMAP bypass, modprobe_path overwrite, privesc primitives

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for reverse engineering, malware, DFIR, firmware, pwnable, and native exploit challenges. Use when the user asks to reverse a binary, unpack a sample, inspect a memory dump or PCAP, recover malware behavior, debug a crash, or build or verify an exploit chain under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

用于缓冲区溢出、格式化字符串、堆利用、ROP、ret2libc、shellcode、内核利用、seccomp 绕过与沙箱逃逸等 pwn 类 CTF 题;触发名:ctf-pwn

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for reverse engineering, malware, DFIR, firmware, pwnable, and native exploit challenges. Use when the user asks to reverse a binary, unpack a sample, inspect a memory dump or PCAP, recover malware behavior, debug a crash, or build or verify an exploit chain under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Check and interpret data-breach exposure for an email, username, phone or name using Have I Been Pwned, the Pwned Passwords k-anonymity range API, DeHashed, IntelX and Snusbase. Use when checking breach or leak exposure, finding which services an account was registered with, interpreting a combolist or credential dump, assessing credential compromise, or auditing your own leaked personal data

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides binary exploitation techniques for CTF challenges. Use when you already have a vulnerable native target or service and need to turn memory corruption or low-level primitives into code execution or privilege escalation, such as buffer overflows, format strings, heap bugs,

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stack buffer overflow + ROP chain ile kontrol akışı ele geçirme — NX etkin, canary yok senaryoları için eksiksiz tarif

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sigreturn Oriented Programming (SROP) — sigreturn syscall ile tüm registerları tek payload'da kontrol etme; gadget kıtlığında ROP alternatifi

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploit development operational guide: environment setup, debugging workflow, PoC development lifecycle, writing reliable exploits, using pwntools/pwndbg, heap exploitation techniques, and weaponization considerations. Use when actively developing exploits or setting up an exploit dev environment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Default entrypoint and master ctf-sandbox-orchestrator workflow for CTF, exploit, reverse engineering, DFIR, pwnable, crypto, stego, mobile, AI-agent, cloud, container, Active Directory, Windows-host, and identity challenges. Use first when the user presents challenge infrastructure, binaries, prompts, hosts, or identities that should be treated as sandbox-internal by default and Codex needs to choose, route, and load the right downstream analysis path with concise evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Thin PRIMARY for CTF / AWD / 靶场 multi-type orchestration. Hands off to the sidecar CTF-Sandbox-Orchestrator. Use when the user says CTF, AWD, 靶场, or 比赛题 and no more specific pwn/APK/IDA route already won.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides reverse engineering techniques. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic. Do not use it when the vulnerability is already understood and the remaining task is exploitation; use pwn instead. Do not use it for pure web workflows, log or disk forensics, or standalone crypto problems unless reversing the implementation is the real blocker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive Linux privilege escalation methodology for offensive security engagements. Covers the full attack surface from a low-privilege shell to root: SUID/SGID binary abuse via GTFOBins, Linux capabilities exploitation (cap_setuid, cap_dac_override, cap_dac_read_search), sudo misconfigurations including NOPASSWD rules and Baron Samedit (CVE-2021-3156), cron job abuse through writable scripts, PATH hijacking, and wildcard injection with tar/rsync/chown. Includes writable /etc/passwd attacks, NFS no_root_squash exploitation, kernel exploits (DirtyPipe CVE-2022-0847, DirtyCow CVE-2016-5195, PwnKit CVE-2021-4034), Docker group container escapes, LD_PRELOAD and LD_LIBRARY_PATH hijacking for shared library injection, systemd service misconfigurations, and sensitive file enumeration for credential harvesting. Integrates automated enumeration with LinPEAS, linux-exploit-suggester, pspy for process monitoring, and GTFOBins for binary exploitation. Each technique includes detection signatures and defender-side visibility to support purple team operations. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1548 (Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism) and related sub-techniques. Designed for authorized penetration testing, red team engagements, and CTF competitions where you hold a low-privilege shell and need to escalate to root.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt CI/CD pipeline vulnerabilities — GitHub Actions workflow injection (pull_request_target Pwnrequest + ${{ }}-into-shell), self-hosted runner poisoning, OIDC trust-policy abuse, Jenkins script-console RCE and CVE-2024-23897 file read, GitLab CI runner-token registration, Terraform state file leakage, artifact/log secret leakage, pipeline env-var disclosure. Use when target has a public GitHub/GitLab org, exposed CI dashboards (Jenkins/TeamCity/Drone/Argo), or build artifacts/images are reachable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides reverse engineering techniques for CTF challenges. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, game clients, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic. Do not use it when the vulnerability is already understood and the remaining task is exploitation; use pwn instead. Do not use it for pure web workflows, log or disk forensics, or standalone crypto problems unless reversing the implementation is the real blocker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides binary exploitation techniques for CTF challenges. Use when you already have a vulnerable native target or service and need to turn memory corruption or low-level primitives into code execution or privilege escalation, such as buffer overflows, format strings, heap bugs, ROP, ret2libc, shellcode, kernel exploitation, seccomp bypass, sandbox escape, or Windows/Linux exploit chains. Do not use it when the main blocker is understanding what the binary does; use reverse engineering first. Do not use it for pure web bugs, disk or packet forensics, or standalone crypto/math challenges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides miscellaneous CTF challenge techniques for problems that do not cleanly fit the main categories. Use for encoding puzzles, pyjails, bash jails, RF/SDR, DNS oddities, unicode tricks, esoteric languages, QR or audio puzzles, constraint solving, game theory, unusual sandbox escapes, and hybrid logic puzzles. Prefer a more specific skill first when the challenge is mainly web, pwn, reverse, forensics, malware, OSINT, or crypto. Treat this as the fallback skill for genuine cross-category or edge-case challenges, not the default starting point.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub Actions security review for workflow exploitation vulnerabilities. Use when asked to "review GitHub Actions", "audit workflows", "check CI security", "GHA security", "workflow security review", or review .github/workflows/ for pwn requests, expression injection, credential theft, and supply chain attacks. Exploitation-focused with concrete PoC scenarios.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Static analysis of UEFI/BIOS firmware dumps using Intel's chipsec framework. Decode firmware structure, detect known malware and rootkits (LoJax, ThinkPwn, HackingTeam, MosaicRegressor), generate EFI executable inventories with hashes, extract NVRAM variables, and parse SPI flash descriptors. Use when analyzing firmware .bin/.rom/.fd/.cap files offline without requiring hardware access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides reverse engineering techniques. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic. Do not use it when the vulnerability is already understood and the remaining task is exploitation; use pwn instead. Do not use it for pure web workflows, log or disk forensics, or standalone crypto problems unless reversing the implementation is the real blocker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。