「qa」の検索結果

Sequenced launcher that bootstraps QA on a project with no QA in place. Chains qa-project-context → test-strategy → test-planning in one guided run, then points you at automation. Use when: "set up QA on a new project," "QA from scratch," "no QA exists yet," "/qa-start." Not for: onboarding a QA engineer to an existing team with existing tests — use qa-project-bootstrap. Not for: "which skill do I use" with no clear match — use qa-do. Related: qa-project-context, test-strategy, test-planning, qa-project-bootstrap, qa-do.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Telegramの下書きと最終メッセージが届く順序を、OpenClawのQA Labで検証するスキル。QA Channelと実際のTelegramプラグインで同じシナリオを実行します。

• Telegramの下書きと最終配信を確認
• QA Channelで配信フローを検証
• 実際のTelegramプラグインで検証

Run one unattended IDEATION iteration of the quality-assurance loop — find the highest-value untested behavior in the codebase, judge it against the QA value bar, and file ONE locked `qa` issue specifying the test to write. Never writes code or tests; the next-qa skill builds from the queue this skill fills. Use when the user says "QAアイデア", "next qa idea", or wants the QA backlog refilled without implementation.

OpenClawのQAシナリオを模擬環境や実サービスで実行し、失敗原因の修正、結果レポートの確認、複数モデルの応答スタイル比較まで支援するスキル。

• 模擬環境や実サービスでQAを実行
• 失敗シナリオの原因調査と再検証
• 複数モデルのキャラクター比較

Run one unattended iteration of the QUALITY-ASSURANCE loop — steward any in-flight QA PR, then build ONE queued `qa` issue (test infrastructure, unit tests, regression tests for known bugs) on a branch off auto-qa and open a PR that squash-merges on green CI. Adds tests and tooling only; never edits product source. Use when the user says "QAタスク", "next qa", "テストを進めて", or wants autonomous progress on the quality track.

Onboard a new QA engineer to an existing codebase, or audit an existing test architecture. Produces a 30-day ramp plan: codebase orientation, framework walkthrough, test architecture audit, mentorship pairing, and first-test guidance. Use when: "QA onboarding," "new tester," "ramp up," "test architecture audit," "first 30 days," "QA mentorship," "joining QA team." Not for: setting up QA on a brand-new project from scratch — use `qa-start`. Related: qa-start, qa-project-context, shift-left-testing, ai-qa-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-publish QA framework for content. Brief adherence, voice consistency, fact accuracy, structure and clarity, AI-content audit, SEO and AEO compliance, internal linking and schema validation, QA at scale via sampling, the QA workflow, and the discipline that distinguishes catch-problems QA from checkbox QA. Triggers on editorial QA, content review, pre-publish review, content audit, content QA process, AI-content audit, hallucination check, content sampling, programmatic QA, voice consistency check, brief adherence check. Also triggers when a content team is shipping sloppy work, when AI-co-authored content is reaching publish unaudited, when a QA process burns reviewers out, or when a programmatic SEO set needs sampling discipline. On a voice consistency check, this skill owns checking a draft against an existing voice system at the publish gate; use `brand-voice` when the voice system itself needs defining or documenting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routing skill of last resort. Takes a plain-language QA situation and names the right 1-2 skills to use and in what order. Use ONLY when the request does not match any other skill's trigger phrases. Use when: "which skill should I use," "where do I start," "I'm not sure what to test," "/qa-do," or any vague QA situation that doesn't map to one skill. Not for: bootstrapping a brand-new project with no QA — use qa-start. Not for: capturing project setup/context — use qa-project-context. If the request clearly matches another skill, invoke that skill directly instead of routing through here. Related: qa-start, qa-project-context, test-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and fill .agents/qa-project-context.md with the project's tech stack, test frameworks, CI/CD pipeline, environments, quality goals, risk areas, team structure, and conventions. This is the one file every other QA skill reads first, so they skip redundant discovery and give context-aware advice. Use when: "set up QA context," "configure testing," "initialize project," first use of any QA skill. Not for: bootstrapping a brand-new project's QA end-to-end — use qa-start (which calls this skill as its first step). Related: qa-start, risk-based-testing, test-strategy, qa-metrics, playwright-automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenClawの機能分類とQAの証拠を照合し、品質・機能の充足度・長期サポートの評価を見直して、成熟度のスコアカード文書を更新するスキルです。

• 機能領域ごとの成熟度を見直したいとき
• 想定した利用手順の充足度を確認したいとき
• QAの証拠から評価文書を更新したいとき

QA the omo Senpi adapter (packages/omo-senpi, packages/senpi-task) against the REAL senpi binary in strict isolation, and write every artifact to the one canonical evidence path .omo/evidence/omo-senpi-adapter/<slug>/. The live drivers under packages/omo-senpi/scripts/qa/ create their own isolated SENPI_CODING_AGENT_DIR and ignore the caller's, so the real ~/.senpi/agent is never written. Ships scripts/resolve-evidence-dir.mjs, which is the ONLY sanctioned way to pick an evidence directory: it rejects traversal, separators, absolute paths, and stray roots such as local-ignore/qa-evidence. Use whenever someone changes anything under packages/omo-senpi or packages/senpi-task, or wants to QA, smoke-test, verify, or debug the Senpi adapter, the task/team engine, the DAG, task RPC, or skill delivery. Triggers: senpi qa, qa senpi, senpi-qa, test senpi adapter, verify senpi task, senpi task e2e, senpi team e2e, task dag qa, live senpi driver, senpi evidence path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Hostile scenario testing: adversarial QA and fix loops. Use when the user says: ultraqa, adversarial qa, hostile scenarios, e2e qa, real-world qa, qa scenario, release qa, 敵対的QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Rendered UI needing a visual verdict: prepare observed-only rendered QA gates for web, frontend, image, document, and TUI surfaces. Use when the user says: visual-qa, visual qa, visual QA, visual quality assurance, visual check, web qa, web visual qa, screenshot qa.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manual QA harness for the senpi coding agent itself. MUST USE after changing packages/ai, packages/agent, packages/coding-agent, or packages/tui — a green typecheck and `npm test` are NOT QA. Drives the real CLI from source in an isolated sandbox (never touches ~/.senpi or real credentials) across four channels: remote RPC (--mode rpc JSONL stdio), TUI smoke (node-pty on Windows, tmux on POSIX), mock loop (a local fake model server for deterministic, zero-token agent-loop runs), and CLI smoke (--help/--print/--list-models). Every helper ships a --self-test. Use whenever someone says qa senpi, test the agent, verify my change, rpc qa, tui qa, mock-loop qa, smoke the cli, or needs evidence that an agent-loop, tool, keybinding, or provider change works end to end. Capture evidence to local-ignore/qa-evidence/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

QA the omo Codex Light edition (lazycodex / packages/omo-codex) itself, in strict isolation so ONLY our plugin is exercised, never the user's real ~/.codex. The first-party method drives the real `codex app-server` against an isolated CODEX_HOME plus a LOCAL mock model (no real API call), and proves a plugin hook fired by asserting hook/started + hook/completed notifications. Also: isolated install verification, per-component hook probes, a tmux TUI smoke, and runtime log observation (RUST_LOG / logs SQLite / /debug-config). Ships tested helper scripts each with a --self-test. Use whenever someone changes anything under packages/omo-codex or wants to QA, smoke-test, verify, or debug the Codex plugin, its hooks/components, the installer/config.toml, the app-server flow, or the Codex TUI. Triggers: codex qa, qa codex, codex-qa, test codex plugin, verify codex hook, codex app-server, lazycodex qa, isolated CODEX_HOME, prove codex hook fired, codex tui test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove AI-generated patterns from QA reports, bug reports, test summaries, status updates, and quality communications. Detects and rewrites robotic test-result language, template-sounding status updates, inflated severity descriptions, and generic stakeholder reports — without inventing facts. Makes QA writing sound like a real engineer wrote it. Use when: "humanize report," "rewrite QA summary," "fix test report," "make this sound human," "clean up status update." Not for: general prose, blog, or marketing-copy cleanup — use the global humanizer skill. Not for: classifying or routing CI failures — use ai-bug-triage. Related: ai-bug-triage, qa-metrics, qa-dashboard, quality-postmortem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Move quality earlier in the development lifecycle. Covers dev/QA pairing patterns, Three Amigos sessions, TDD facilitation (Red-Green-Refactor), PR review checklists for testability, and Definition of Done with quality gates. Includes shift-left maturity model for team assessment. Use when: "shift left," "TDD," "dev-QA pairing," "definition of done," "testability," "quality culture," "QA in sprint planning." Not for: writing the unit tests themselves — use unit-testing; automated PR test-quality review at scale — use ai-qa-review; multi-quarter QA direction or roadmap — use test-strategy. Related: unit-testing, ai-qa-review, test-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The systematic discipline of reviewing AI-generated and human-written marketing content for quality, accuracy, consistency, and effectiveness. This isn't proofreading—it's strategic quality control that catches issues before they damage brand, waste spend, or miss opportunities. In an era where AI can generate content at scale, QA becomes the bottleneck— and the moat. Speed without quality is just fast failure. Every piece of content is a brand promise, and QA ensures that promise is kept. Content QA operates at multiple levels: tactical (spelling, grammar), strategic (message alignment), technical (platform compliance), and brand (voice, tone). The best QA catches what the creator couldn't see because they were too close. Use when "review content, QA, quality check, proofread, check copy, content review, brand compliance, verify content, fact check, review before publish, content approval, final review, qa, content-review, quality-assurance, brand-compliance, proofreading, content-quality, review" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-implementation QA planning — independent of /review (the developer chooses whether to run them sequentially or in parallel), only when the change has a running surface worth driving. Interviews the developer to turn the specs and the diff into an executable QA specification (specs/qa/QA-<N>-<slug>.md) that /execute-qa runs. The agent drives browser and shell; the human steps in only at named handoff points. Use only when the user asks to plan manual QA — never trigger automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes a QA specification (specs/qa/QA-<N>-<slug>.md) written by /plan-qa: drives every step with the plan's drivers, verifies each Expected line mechanically ([assert]) or by evidence-backed judgment against the plan's written criterion ([judge]), pauses at named operator handoffs, and writes the results artifact QA-RESULTS-<N>-<slug>.md. Use only when the user asks to run or execute a QA plan — never trigger automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user says "找 bug" / "看一下有没有 bug" / "smart-qa" / "/smart-qa" / "帮我测一下这个项目" / "智能 QA" / "推断业务流程测一下"，or asks for an autonomous bug-hunt where they DON'T already know what to test. Distinct from `qa` (blind exploration) and `devtest` (verifies a specific change). smart-qa READS the project source — prefers PRD/requirements docs, falls back to code (activities, routes, click handlers, API calls) — then proposes a focused test plan for confirmation before driving the app. v1 stops after the user confirms the plan and hands off to the existing `qa` skill for execution. v2 (planned) adds per-step assertions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI QA Agent のメインオーケストレーター。テストスイートまたは個別テストケースの QA を段階的に実行する。フェーズスキルに委譲して段階的開示を行い、サブエージェントでコンテキスト隔離を実現する。「QA」「動作確認」「テストケース実行」「smoke test」「E2E」「手動テスト」「結合テスト」などのキーワードで自動適用。

QA テストスイートの解析・前提条件解決・実行計画策定を行うフェーズスキル。ios-qa-workflow から参照される。「テスト計画」「QA 準備」「テストスイート解析」などのキーワードで自動適用。

テストケースの実行制御を行うフェーズスキル。各テストケースを qa-runner → qa-judge のパイプラインで実行し、アプリ状態管理と結果収集を担当する。ios-qa-workflow から参照される。