30 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Run one unattended iteration of the QUALITY-ASSURANCE loop — steward any in-flight QA PR, then build ONE queued `qa` issue (test infrastructure, unit tests, regression tests for known bugs) on a branch off auto-qa and open a PR that squash-merges on green CI. Adds tests and tooling only; never edits product source. Use when the user says "QAタスク", "next qa", "テストを進めて", or wants autonomous progress on the quality track.
Run one unattended IDEATION iteration of the quality-assurance loop — find the highest-value untested behavior in the codebase, judge it against the QA value bar, and file ONE locked `qa` issue specifying the test to write. Never writes code or tests; the next-qa skill builds from the queue this skill fills. Use when the user says "QAアイデア", "next qa idea", or wants the QA backlog refilled without implementation.
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow, 연구부터 논문까지, 연구 주제 설정부터 논문 완성까지, 논문 전체 워크플로, flujo de trabajo académico, investigación a artículo, flujo completo de artículo, pipeline de investigación completa, publicación de investigación, flujo de trabajo completo del artículo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform the final submission-level audit of mathematical-modeling workflow integrity, evidence quality, anti-fabrication, paper coherence, figures, references, and contest readiness after consistency and completeness audits pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Seven-role depersonalised panel review of framework artefacts (KUD, criterion bank, LT definition, crosswalk, scope-and-sequence) in sequential-isolation mode. Gate rule mean>=88 AND no role<70.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a proposed assessment for construct validity, reliability, and alignment to learning objectives. Use when reviewing or quality-assuring assessments before deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write or review manual Zephyr test cases with 1-condition-per-TC granularity, Module_Action on Screen when Condition naming, platform prefix rules, and High/Normal/Low priority classification. Use for test-case authoring and review; defer Jira traceability, linking, and pushing cases to Zephyr.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
强制审计论文生成质量，防止模型偷换、逻辑断链、内容空洞。Invoke when 用户提出检查/审计/验收/确保/verify/QA，或合并前需要把关。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Updates, generates, and validates tests using git-workspace context and TDD/BDD methodology. Use when code changes require new or updated test coverage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Python testing patterns with pytest, fixtures, TDD, mocking, async and integration tests. Use when writing or auditing a Python test suite.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate Claude Code rules in .claude/rules/. Use for frontmatter, globs, and quality audits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate Claude skill quality through auditing. Use when reviewing or auditing skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The systematic discipline of reviewing AI-generated and human-written marketing content for quality, accuracy, consistency, and effectiveness. This isn't proofreading—it's strategic quality control that catches issues before they damage brand, waste spend, or miss opportunities. In an era where AI can generate content at scale, QA becomes the bottleneck— and the moat. Speed without quality is just fast failure. Every piece of content is a brand promise, and QA ensures that promise is kept. Content QA operates at multiple levels: tactical (spelling, grammar), strategic (message alignment), technical (platform compliance), and brand (voice, tone). The best QA catches what the creator couldn't see because they were too close. Use when "review content, QA, quality check, proofread, check copy, content review, brand compliance, verify content, fact check, review before publish, content approval, final review, qa, content-review, quality-assurance, brand-compliance, proofreading, content-quality, review" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Seven-role depersonalised panel review of framework artefacts (KUD, criterion bank, LT definition, crosswalk, scope-and-sequence) in sequential-isolation mode. Gate rule mean>=88 AND no role<70.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a proposed assessment for construct validity, reliability, and alignment to learning objectives. Use when reviewing or quality-assuring assessments before deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QA validation and fix loop workflow — validates implementation completeness then iterates fix cycles until all acceptance criteria pass and quality gates clear
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Independent LLM judge evaluates task completion separately from the executing agent, catching false success claims by reviewing task goal, actions taken, final state, and evidence. Produces PASS/FAIL with confidence score and reasoning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a GxP audit of computerized systems and processes. Covers audit planning, opening meetings, evidence collection, finding classification (critical/major/minor), CAPA generation, closing meetings, report writing, and follow-up verification. Use for scheduled internal audits, supplier qualification audits, pre-inspection readiness assessments, for-cause audits triggered by deviations or data integrity concerns, or periodic compliance posture reviews of validated systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Proactively suggest when the user says a feature is ready for testing or asks "does this work?". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Análisis de requisitos de documentos: Analiza los documentos de concepto y requisitos en la carpeta docs/, verifica los requisitos con el código actual y crea un informe de diferencias consolidado.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
文档需求分析：分析 docs/ 文件夹中的概念与需求文档，针对当前代码检查需求，并生成整合的差异报告。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ドキュメント要件分析: docs/ フォルダ内のコンセプトおよび要件ドキュメントを分析し、現在のコードと照らし合わせて要件を検証し、統合差異レポートを作成します。
Анализ требований к документации: Анализирует документы концепций и требований в папке docs/, проверяет требования на соответствие текущему коду и создает консолидированный отчет об отклонениях.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
系统化 Bug 扫荡工作流，包含基于代码库规模的目标值计算、翻倍升级机制、区域追踪及最终验证。适用于执行 /bugsweep 或用户要求进行系统化 Bug 排查时。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。